Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 756 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
14 Мб
Скачать
194
https://t.me/med1917
26. Brooks SE, Peetz AB. Evidence-based care of geriatric trauma patients. Surg Clin N Am. 2017;97(5):1157–74.
27. Hruska K, Ruge T. The tragically hip: trauma in elderly patients. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2018;36(1):219–35.
28. Huls CK, Detlefs C.Trauma in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2018;42(1):13–20.
29. Krywko DM, Toy FK, Mahan ME, Kiel J.Pregnancy trauma. StatPearls; 2022. ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/books/NBK430926/.
30. Einav S, Kaufman N, Sela HY.Maternal cardiac arrest and perimortem caesarean delivery: evidence or expert-based? Resuscitation. 2012;83(10):1191–200.
31. Katz VL, Dotters DJ, Droegemueller W. Perimortem cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68(4):571–6.
32. Onzuka J, Worster A, McCreadie B.Is computerized tomography of trauma patients associated with a transfer delay to a regional trauma centre? CJEM. 2008;10(3):205–8.
33. Quick JA, Bartels AN, Coughenour JP, Barnes SL.Trauma transfers and denitive imaging: patient benet but at what cost? Am Surg. 2013;79(3):301–4.
34. Jones AC, Woldemikael D, Fisher T, Hobbs GR, Prud’homme BJ, Bal GK.Repeated com­puted tomographic scans in transferred trauma patients: indications, costs, and radiation expo­sure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6):1564–9.
C. R. Parrino et al.
Chapter 12
https://t.me/med1917
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: AReview fortheGeneral andTrauma Surgeon
CorradoP.Marini, JohnMcNelis, andPatrizioPetrone
Introduction
According to the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), mild, moderate, and severe trau­matic brain injury (TBI) correspond to decreasing GCS scores in the corresponding ranges of 15–13, 12–9, and 8–3 [1, 2]. Another assessment method is shown in Table 12.1. A more comprehensive denition of severe TBI (sTBI) includes a depressed GCS (<8), loss of consciousness >24h, and/or amnesia >7days [3]. The 30-day mortality of patients with sTBI ranges from 35 to 45%. Those who survive incur neurological sequelae for 6–12months or even longer, as revealed by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) or extended GOS (GOSE) [4]. Scores <4 are consistent with poor functional results for both of them.
It is recommended that the initial GCS should be re-evaluated after completion of the resuscitation and stabilization phases, in order to predict more accurately the 14-day and 6-months outcomes (CrasH or IMPACT [5, 6]).
C. P. Marini New York Medical College, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA e-mail: corradom@nychhc.org
J. McNelis Department of Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA e-mail: John.McNelis@nychhc.org
P. Petrone ( Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, NYU Langone Hospital—Long Island, Mineola, NY, USA e-mail: patrizio.petrone@nyulangone.org
Switzerland AG 2024 J. Faintuch, S. Faintuch (eds.), Recent Strategies in High Risk Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56270-9_12
*)
195© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
196
https://t.me/med1917
C. P. Marini et al.
Table 12.1
Severity GCS Loss of consciousness Structural imaging
Mild 13–15 <20min to 1h Normal Moderate 9–12 1–24h Normal/abnormal Severe 3–8 >24h Abnormal
GCS Glasgow Coma Scale
Alternate classication
Available andInnovative Variables
Intracranial pressure (ICP), bi-frontal near infrared spectroscopy regional oxygen saturation (rSO2), brain tissue oxygen (PbtO2), external ventricular drainage (EVD), cerebral blood ow (CBF), and cerebral microdialysis (CMD) are among the most mentioned multimodality measures within this context. Other predictive tools such as Marshall, Rotterdam, CrasH, and IMPACT, along with existing clinical and patho-anatomic classications targeting injury subtypes, should not be overlooked either [68].
Their utilization should obviously be examined in the light of invasiveness, safety, convenience, and cost but also of potential advantages concerning both mor­tality and long-term recovery. In other words, the most favorable effectivity, risk/ benet, and cost/benet ratios should be sought.
Primary Lesions
Most centers classify sTBI in accordance with computerized tomography ndings (CT scan) as follows: (1) epidural hematoma; (2) hemorrhagic contusion/hema­toma; (3) diffuse axonal injury; (4) subdural hematoma; (5) subarachnoid/intraven­tricular hemorrhage; and (6) diffuse swelling, as a result of the trauma itself. Secondary injury is frequent as a result of uncorrected hypoxemia, hypotension, and intracranial uid dynamics. Instead of occurring in the initial seconds, it tends to appear within hours or even many days, depending on restoration of brain perfusion and physiology. Diffuse axonal injury or swelling, hemorrhagic contusions, and intraventricular or parenchymal traumatic hemorrhage represent the most unpre­dictable lesions, as corrective interventions are often unavailable or ineffective, allowing for ongoing neuronal damage.
Intracranial Pressure Dynamics
The Monro–Kellie hypothesis (1783) states that the sum of the three components contained within the rigid skull, namely blood (arterial and venous blood, 10%), cerebrospinal uid (CSF, 10%), and brain parenchyma (80%), is constant. An
Intracranial
marking closure of the aortic valve
e
P
P
P
12 Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: AReview fortheGeneral andTrauma Surgeon
https://t.me/med1917
197
increase in one requires a reciprocal decrease in one or the other two. The intracra­nial pressure (ICP) represents the pressure within the brain parenchyma and CSF.ICP increases with corresponding reductions in cerebral blood ow (CBF) can be caused by elevated cerebral blood volume (arterial or venous), increased CSF volume or enlarged brain parenchyma (edema), and also abnormal brain expansion (mass lesion).
While most surgeons are familiar with the numeric value of ICP and of its impli­cation on brain integrity, few can interpret the waveform of the ICP tracing and understand the associated information that can be gathered from it. The three char­acteristic peaks, namely, P1, P2, and P3, have different physiologic meanings and should be individually analyzed (Figs.12.1 and 12.2).
P1
P2
P3
ICP
Amplitude
Time
Fig. 12.1 ICP intracranial pressure, P1 P1 wave, P2 P2 wave, P3 P3 wave
3
2
1
Pressure Waveform
Arterial Pulse Waveform
Dicrotic notch
Fig. 12.2 P1 P1 wave, P2 P2 wave, P3 P3 wave
Intracranial (mean) Pressur
Systolic Blood Pressure
Diastolic Blood Pressure
198
P1/P2 Ratio
https://t.me/med1917
C. P. Marini et al.
Intracranial Hypertension (IH)
IH affects the characteristics of the waveform. An increase in amplitude of the three peaks indicates a mean increase in ICP.A reduced amplitude of P1 suggests decreased cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and an increase in the P2 peak above P1 is indicative of decreased cerebral compliance (CC). A P2/P1 ratio>1 correlates with increased ICP and a loss of CC, with an r of 0.94 [9] (Fig.12.3). The mean P2/P1 ratio has a sensitivity of 100%, specicity of 45.4%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 36.8%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% to predict IH with a cutoff value of 1.06. Of note, P2/ P1>1 precedes the increase in the absolute mean value of the ICP.This supports the hypothesis that morphological changes of the brain volume-pressure curve precede IH.
Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF)
Normal range of CBF is 50–65mL/100g/min, accompanied by low venous pressure (2–5 mmHg) [10]. Brain vessels increase or reduce perfusion depending on oxygen requirements, as a phenomenon of cerebral autoregulation (CA) [11]. CBF <10–15 mL/100 g/min (tissue oxygen tension/PbtO2 <15 mmHg) is usually incompatible with neuronal survival. Reversible damages are triggered by CBF 15–20mL/100g/min and electroencephalographic aberrations around 25mL/100g/min.
Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP)=mean arterial pressure (MAP) − ICP (Fig.12.4) [12]. Constant CBF is linked to cerebral vessel resistance in the settings of increased or decreased CPP, respectively. Above and below the lower and upper limits of 50 and 160mmHg, CA is lost and CBF becomes dependent on mean CPP in a linear fashion.
Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation
Some degree of loss is observed in 49–87% of affected cases soon after sTBI [13
15], and it contributes markedly to secondary brain injury. Continuous transcranial
Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) of the middle cerebral artery ow and calculation
Fig. 12.3 P1/P2 ratio. P1 P1 wave, P2 P2 wave, P3 P3 wave
P1
P2
P3
Normal Compliance
P2
P1
P3
Decreased Compliance
CBF ml/100 g
CPP mm Hg
Cerebral autoregulation
12 Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: AReview fortheGeneral andTrauma Surgeon
https://t.me/med1917
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
010203040506080 100 120 140 160 180 185
Fig. 12.4 Cerebral autoregulation. CBF cerebral blood ow, CPP cerebral perfusion pressure
199
of the pressure reactivity index (PRx), related to the slow waves in ICP and MAP, are well known tools to follow CA.
MAP Norepinephrine Challenge
This is another option to test CA integrity, even though less reliable than PRx calcu­lation. MAP is raised during 10–20min by norepinephrine infusion, and MAP, CPP, ICP, and PbtO2 are repeatedly documented. ICP will diminish (2–5mmHg within 3–5min) if CA is present, whereas no change or elevation will be observed if CA was lost [16].
Open Versus Closed TBI
In both circumstances, GCS is widely used, more recently complemented by the Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NOS-TBI) [17]. Both modalities of trauma are similarly followed by various degrees of vasospasm, which may not alleviate before 5–7days, thus aggravating low tissue perfusion (Table12.2) [18, 19].
Subsequent Brain Damage
After sTBI, several cellular and metabolic shifts can be detected, encompassing cal­cium inux into neuronal cells and increased tissue levels of glutamate, aspartate, and free radicals. All of these contribute toward cerebral edema, intracranial hypertension, impaired CA, and decreased CBF, further damaging the affected brain [2022]. Systemic hypotension should be prevented, including after hospital admission, when
200
https://t.me/med1917
C. P. Marini et al.
Table 12.2
Behavior Response Score
Eye opening response Spontaneously 4
Best verbal response Oriented to time, space, and person 5
Best motor response Obeys commands 6
Total score Best response 15
Available at glasgowcomascale.org/
Glasgow Coma Scale
To speech 3 To pain 2 No response 1
Confused 4 Inappropriate words 3 Incomprehensible sounds 2 No response 1
Moves to localized pain 5 Flexion withdrawal from pain 4 Abnormal exion (decorticate) 3 Abnormal extension (decerebrate) 2 No response 1
Comatose 8 Unresponsive 3
the patient is transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU), as it is a strong driver of mortality (55–150% elevation) [23, 24]. Marked brain edema is another well-described ominous development, as brain herniation could precipitate abrupt demise.
CT Predictive Models
The Marshall model is more than 30years old; however, it is still useful, notably for early outcome, in the rst 4 weeks. The Rotterdam guideline is deemed more trust­worthy for long-term course, being recommended for 6-month prediction (Tables
12.3 and 12.4) [7, 2527]. The International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of
Clinical Trials (IMPACT) is also a recommended score and has the advantage of online calculation (Table12.5) (tbi- impact.org/?p=impact/calc) [28].
Immediate Management
Upon arrival at the emergency unit, all patients with sTBI should be intubated and ventilated to a PCO2 range of 35–45. In case of IH, the level is set at 32–35mmHg, and an intermittent bolus of mannitol 0.25–1.0g/kg is prescribed. Normal saline <2000 mL is preferred over Lactated Ringers based on the results of the
12 Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: AReview fortheGeneral andTrauma Surgeon
https://t.me/med1917
201
Table 12.3
Category Denition
Diffuse injury I No intracranial pathology Diffuse injury II Cisterns present with midline shift <5mm and/or lesion densities present.
Diffuse injury III Cisterns compressed or absent with midline shift 0–5mm Diffuse injury IV Midline shift >5mm, no high or mixed density>25cm Evacuated mass
lesion Non-evacuated
mass lesion
Available at
Table 12.4 Rotterdam CT classication
Marshall CT classication
No high or mixed density lesion >25cm
Any lesion evacuated surgically
High or mixed density lesion >25cm
radiopaedia.org/articles/marshall- classication- of- traumatic- brain- injury
CT nding Score
Basal cisterns 0 Normal 1 Compressed absent 2 Midline shift 5mm 0 >5mm 1 Epidural mass lesion Present 0 Absent 1 Intraventricular or subarachnoid hemorrhage Absent 0 Present 1 Sum score +1
Available at
score- of- traumatic- brain- injury
1 point is added as a sum score to make the grade numerically total 6 points consistent with the motor score of the GHCS and the Marshall Classication. (Maas AI, etal. Neurosurgery 2005;57(6):1173–82)
3
3
3
, not evacuated surgically
radiopaedia.org/articles/rotterdam- ct-
PROMMTT study that showed the superiority of saline for prehospital uid replenishment [29, 30]. Lactated Ringer’s solution seems superior when the patient is hypothermic.
CT scan of the head is required in all patients suspected of having suffered for sTBI. A group of patients with sTBI requires immediate craniotomy or primary decompressive craniectomy. Those who do not require an immediate procedure should undergo multimodality monitoring and goal-directed therapy, as soon as they are resuscitated and transported to the ICU. The exceptions are those with unsurvivable brain injuries, who could become organ donors depending on systemic conditions and family ethical consent. These are basically cases with GCS 3 along with xed or unreactive pupils, severe damage to the brain or brainstem, or absence of cerebral blood ow with imaging methods.
202
https://t.me/med1917
C. P. Marini et al.
Table 12.5
(International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI)
IMPACT
Advanced Monitoring—ICP
Admission characteristics Value
Core Age (14–99) Motor score 1–6 Pupils Both reactive, one, none Core+CT Hypoxia Yes or no Hypotension Yes or no CT classication Marshall I–IV, evacuated mass
tSAH on CT Yes or no Epidural mass on CTYes or no
Core+CT+lab Glucose (3–20mmol/L) Hb (6–17g/dL)
Available at Prediction models for 6-month outcome after TBI ISAH intraventricular or subarachnoid hemorrhage, Hb hemoglobin concentration
tbi- impact.org/?p=impact/calc
lesion, non-evacuated mass lesion
Parenchymal or intraventricular ICP monitoring is a widely recognized tech­nique to prevent secondary brain injury from IH (ICP >20mmHg). In the USA, 90% of level I and II trauma centers adopt it; however, not more than 37% in Europe [31]. Indeed, there is some controversy in the literature about its useful­ness [32, 33]. Nevertheless most specialists admit that in conjunction with a three-tier algorithm, it can improve clinical results [34, 35]. An external ven­tricular drain (EVD) encompassing a pressure transducer provides reliable ICP monitoring and CSF drainage, in circumstances of marked pressure elevations. ICP-guided therapy requires data on cerebral tissue oxygenation (PbtO
) for
2
optimal benets.
Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS)–Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation (rSO2)
Oxygen demand-supply aberrations in the territory of the anterior and middle cere­bral arteries (rSO2<55%) can be followed with this technique. Usually, a low rSO2 is compatible with elevated oxygen extraction due to decreased CBF.
12 Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: AReview fortheGeneral andTrauma Surgeon
https://t.me/med1917
203
Brain Tissue Oxygen Tension (PbtO2)
Current Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, fourth ed., do not advise PbtO2 monitors for direct brain tissue oxygenation measurement; however, a consensus of experts supports the use treatment protocols based on both PbtO2 and ICP [36, 37]. The results of the BOOST II trial and of other studies pro­vide further evidence of the usefulness of such an apporach [38, 39].
Raising Brain Tissue Oxygen Tension
When PbtO2 is <20mmHg, if ICP is >20mmHg, an oxygen challenge (5min 100% FiO2) could be attempted. If positive, the percentage is reduced to <60% as persis­tent normobaric hyperoxia is dangerous. If ICP is <20mmHg, the norepinephrine challenge (with intact CA) will benet CPP and PbtO2, however, not ICP.Brain oxygen consumption can also be diminished, if CA is lost or does not respond to elevation of CPP, with an infusion of fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol (burst sup­pression), as detected on continuous EEG.
Normothermia Versus Hypothermia
Fever above 38.3°C is frequent in the rst week after sTBI [40] and is deleterious regarding brain edema [4143]. Normothermic control seems safer, as therapeutic hypothermia could increase mortality and long-term functional impairment [44]. Prophylactic hypothermia is not endowed with clear benets either [36, 45, 46]. Several temperature control devices are available in the market (Artic Sun, Medivance, Inc.; Louisville, CO, USA, and others), and for patient comfort, anti­shivering therapy should be added [4749].
Enteral Feeding
Basal calorie expenditure replenishment should be achieved in 5–7days [36]. Given the impact of multiple prescribed drugs and possible associated injuries and compli­cations, the calculation of calories requirements using conventional predictive equa­tions such as the Harris-Benedict, Penn State University, or Mifin St Jeor or ASPEN equations can lead to signicant variability; therefore, indirect calorimetry is recommended [50, 51]. Selected patients may suffer from severe hypermetabo­lism (up to 160% elevation) and massive nitrogen loss (up to 16g/day) [52]. We