Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 678 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
19 Free Tissue Transfer forHead andNeck Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
261
should consider the tissue components, amount of tissue bulk and length of the vascular pedicle unique to different ap types. The characteristics of different aps will be described later in this chapter.
Some aps allow for simultaneous ap har­vest and tumour resection, thus shortening the overall operative times. Prolonged operative times, specically longer than 18 h, have been signicantly associated with increased rates of free ap failure [5]. Therefore, the logistical organisation between the ablative and reconstruc­tive team is critical when deciding the free ap of choice.
Knowledge of the vascular supply to the neck is fundamental to avoiding ap ischemia or loss. Knowing the dose and elds of any prior radia­tion therapy will facilitate a prudent choice of skin incision and recipient vessel selection.
19.3.6 Tracheostomy
The indication for tracheotomy is dependent on the presence of cardio-respiratory comorbidities, tumour stage, location and planned resection, the planned extent of neck dissection and previous
head and neck radiation. Elective tracheostomy is a relatively safe procedure for adults; however, can be associated with risks, more extended hos­pital stays and increased costs of care [3]. Many institutions have a policy and procedure regard­ing the management of tracheostomy patients. Ward staff and junior team members should be equipped and trained to manage such patients in an emergency. Many studies report that patients can often be successfully decannulated within 2 weeks after surgery, but reports vary on the appropriate pathway to decannulation. Nearly all studies agree that a patient should pass a capping trial before decannulation [3].
19.4 Subsite Use ofFree Flaps
Each ablative subsite poses unique anatomical and functional challenges in free ap reconstruc­tion. The table below shows the suggested ap choice for different subsites. This is not prescrip­tive by any means and each defect should be examined to identify the ideal ap that can address its decits (Table 19.1). Common soft tissue and composite aps are described later in this chapter.
Table 19.1 Suggested free aps for each ablative subsite
Ablative subsites Oral cavity/
oropharynx
Free ap
Abbreviations: RF radial forearm, ALT anterolateral thigh, LD latissimus dorsi, MSAP medial sural artery perforator, RA rectus abdominus, DCIA deep circumex iliac artery
RF
ALT
LD
MSAP
RA
Fibula
DCIA
Scapula
✓ ✓
✓ ✓
Pharyngolarynx Maxillomandibular Craniofacial Cutaneous soft
tissue
✓ ✓ ✓
262
https://t.me/medicina_free
T. E. Yabe and R. Jayaram
19.5 Common Soft Tissue Free
Flaps
19.5.1 Radial Forearm
The radial forearm fasciocutaneous ap (RFFF) was originally developed in 1978 and reported in
1981. The ap with a rich axial pedicle consisting of the radial artery, venae comitantes and cephalic vein made reconstructive surgery breakthroughs. It can be harvested as a composite ap incorpo­rating muscle, tendon, nerve or bone. Once the radial artery is harvested, the perfusion to the hand depends on the continuity of the palmar arch. It is therefore important to perform an Allen’s test to assess an adequate inow from the ulnar artery. It is a workhorse ap for head and neck reconstruction and is commonly used for the reconstruction of oral tongue, cheek, oor of mouth, laryngopharyngeal, oesophageal and sur­face defects (Fig.19.1).
19.5.2 Anterolateral Thigh
The anterolateral thigh (ALT) ap was described by Song etal. The application to the maxillofa­cial region was described in the 1990s. It is gen­erally raised as a fasciocutaneous ap based on the septocutaneous perforators of the descending branch of the lateral circumex femoral artery and venae comitantes. The other variations of this ap include adipofascial, myocutaneous, muscle only (Vastus lateralis Flap), or a combination as chimeric option with the anteromedial thigh ap. The body habitus of the patient should be consid­ered when choosing this ap. An increased adi­posity will make the ap unexpectedly bulky
which can impair function and cosmesis. This is another workhorse ap for the head and neck reconstruction and has particular advantages of large surface area, a discrete scar and minimal donor site morbidity. The neurotised version can be used for dynamic reanimation of the face [6] (Fig.19.2).
19.5.3 Latissimus Dorsi
Latissimus dorsi (LD) was rst reported as a free ap in 1979 for breast reconstruction. Reports of its use in the head and neck soon followed, with Fujino etal. reporting a case of successful recon­struction of a total cheek defect in 1981. It is par­ticularly useful for defects of the entire scalp where a defect requires broad soft-tissue cover­age. The pedicle comprises the thoracodorsal artery, a terminal branch of the subscapular artery, and its accompanying venae comitantes. The muscle ap is typically covered with a split­thickness skin graft which will give an excellent cosmetic result. Most commonly used for large surface defects coverage as a free ap, it can also be used as a pedicle ap in a recipient vessel depleted neck or salvage scenarios. Despite the size, donor functional decit is minimal. The rotation axis and the pedicle length limit the reach of the pedicled ap but allow for recon­struction of defects on the neck or parotid region (Figs.19.3, 19.4, 19.5, and 19.6).
Fig. 19.1 Radial forearm free ap with associated vascu­lar pedicles
Fig. 19.2 ALT free ap demonstrating fasciocutaneous ap with two perforators
19 Free Tissue Transfer forHead andNeck Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 19.3 Scalp defect
263
Fig. 19.5 Two weeks post latissimus dorsi free ap and split skin graft
Fig. 19.4 Latissimus dorsi free ap with associated pedicle
19.5.4 Medial Sural Artery
PerforatorFlap
Medial sural artery perforator ap (MSAP) was rst described by Cavadas etal. in 2001. It was rst used for lower limb reconstruction, and then the clinical application was increased to include head and neck. MSAP ap has low donor site
Fig. 19.6 One year following latissimus dorsi free ap and split skin graft in the same patient
morbidity, adequate vascular pedicle length and a thin fasciocutaneous component even in obese patients. The pedicle consists of a medial sural artery and two venae comitantes. The greater saphenous vein can also be used as drainage. The versatility of MSAP comes from its ability to be elevated as a thin fasiocutaneous ap or elevated with the underling gastrocnemius muscle to ll
264
https://t.me/medicina_free
T. E. Yabe and R. Jayaram
mandibular reconstruction with this ap was rst reported in 1989 by Hidalgo. The vascular pedi­cle consists of a peroneal artery and its accompa­nying two venae comitantes. Care must be taken to protect peroneal nerve and ankle joint stability by leaving at least 5cm of proximal and distal bula bone intact (Fig.19.8).
19.6.2 Deep Circumex Iliac Artery
Fig. 19.7 Medial sural artery perforator ap with associ-
ated vascular pedicles
the deep defect, or it can also be elevated as a chimeric ap. The sural nerve, the lesser saphe­nous vein or the plantaris tendon can also be har­vested within the ap (Fig.19.7).
19.5.5 Rectus Abdominus
The rst free rectus abdominis ap was per­formed by Holmstrom in 1979. Hasegawa etal.in 1994 reported a rst clinical report describing its use in the head and neck. The vascular pedicle consists of the deep inferior epigastric artery and venae originating from the external iliac artery and vein. The main advantage of this ap is bulk and hence is used for reconstruction of total glos­sectomy and skull base defects. This ap has gen­erally been superseded in head and neck reconstruction by the ALT.
Deep circumex iliac artery (DCIA) ap was rst reported, as a bony ap, in 1979 by Taylor etal. then as an oromandibular reconstruction in 1989 by Urken etal. The vascular pedicle consists of a deep circumex iliac artery from the external iliac system, accompanying venae comitantes. It provides an alternative to the bula and scapula free aps with thicker bone more suited to implant placement. At least six vascular systems contribute to the iliac crest, and free aps have been reported based on all 6 (Fig.19.9).
Fig. 19.8 Fibular free ap with associated vascular pedicles
19.6 Common Composite Flaps
The composite free ap contains more than one tissue unit such as skin, muscle and bone.
19.6.1 Fibula
The bula free ap was rst described indepen­dently in Japan and Australia in 1973. The work of Wei etal. in 1986 employing this ap as a chi­meric ap expanded its utility in complex com­posite head and neck reconstruction. The
Fig. 19.9 Deep circumex iliac artery free ap with associated vascular pedicles
19 Free Tissue Transfer forHead andNeck Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
19.6.3 Scapula
The scapular fasciocutaneous free ap, based on the circumex scapular artery, is a part of the subscapular system. It was initially described in an anatomic study by Saijo in 1978. Batchelor and Sully used a scapular and latissimus dorsi free ap to reconstruct a scalp defect in 1984 (Figs.19.10, 19.11, and 19.12).
265
Fig. 19.12 Reconstructed post-operative CT image
Fig. 19.10 Segmental mandibulectomy defect with
reconstruction plate in situ
Fig. 19.11 Chimeric scapula free ap
19.7 Post-operative Management
19.7.1 Intensive Care
Most head and neck free ap patients are admit­ted to the intensive care unit (ICU) post- operatively, to monitor the patient’s early recovery, undertake high frequency ap observa­tions, and to manage the airway as required.
Vasopressor use is often frowned upon due to concern that vasoconstriction caused by such agents could compromise the ap blood supply. There is conicting evidence regarding the use of vasoactive agents in free ap surgery. Vasoactive agents can cause vasoconstriction and decrease ap perfusion, while others suggest no adverse outcomes. The judicious use of such vasopres­sors should be employed with input from inten­sivists, as uid overload can compromise the ap’s viability. Fluid overload is thought to cause pedicle thrombosis from endothelial damage, extravasation, oedema and venous stasis. Furthermore, free aps are more sensitive to oedema from loss of lymphatic drainage and autonomic innervation. It is imperative there is clear communication between the surgical,
266
https://t.me/medicina_free
T. E. Yabe and R. Jayaram
anaesthetic and ICU team so that everyone is aware of when the medication is started and when it is stopped. Notwithstanding technical surgical issues, if the patient is well, the ap will not be harmed.
19.7.2 Flap Monitoring
The purpose of ap monitoring is the early detec­tion of vascular compromise (venous or arterial) and to prevent ap loss. The highest risk for vas­cular compromise is during the rst 24h, when the intimal injury is the highest, and the risk sig­nicantly drops after the rst 3 days following surgery [7]. The free ap monitoring should be performed hourly for the rst 24h with tapering of intensity after the initial 24h [3]. The assess­ment should include a physical exam of ap warmth, turgor, capillary rell, colour, and Doppler assessment of the vascular pedicle. Handheld or implantable doppler devices are rou­tinely used.
19.7.3 Anticoagulation
Immediate to early thrombosis is mainly attrib­uted to technical failure. There are no pharmaco­logic measures that have been proven to reduce free ap anastomotic thrombosis or ap necrosis [3].
After surgery, maintaining a neutral head position can prevent kinking or pressure on the pedicle with the subsequent ow compromise. Ties around the neck (i.e., tracheostomy ties, oxygen mask) can have a tourniquet effect and should be avoided. Advanced atherosclerotic dis­ease, diabetes mellitus, prior radiotherapy, and prior neck dissection can also contribute to poor vessel quality [8], compromising the integrity of the anastomosis. In our practice, head and neck free ap patients receive either subcutaneous injection of unfractionated heparin or low­molecular weight heparin depending on their body weight and renal function.
19.7.4 Antibiotics
Oropharyngeal surgery is classied as a Class II Clean/Contaminated procedure. Infection risks inherent in head and neck free ap surgeries are long duration, malnutrition, use of a bone ap, prior radiotherapy and tracheostomy. Pre­operative antibiotics at induction and 24 h of post-operative antibiotics (usually cephazolin 1g three times a day with or without metronidazole 500 mg twice a day) have consistently demon­strated a signicant reduction in surgical site infections [9].
19.7.5 Nutrition
Following an initial nasogastric or gastrostomy feeding, there should be a multidisciplinary approach to the commencement of oral feeding. There is a theoretical risk of wound breakdown and stula formation when the reconstruction involves the oral cavity and pharynx. A return to oral feeding as early as the sixth post operatively day is observed to be safe without increasing the risk of orocutaneous stula or ap related com­plications [10, 11].
19.8 Problems andPotential Complications
19.8.1 Wound Infection andDehiscence
Head and neck operations often breach the upper aerodigestive tract, and hence are considered clean-contaminated procedures. This means a 20–30% risk of developing a wound infection justifying the use of antibiotics during the early post-operative period.
When wound dehiscence occurs, the princi­ples of care involve managing drainable collec­tions by aspiration or exploration, regular sterile dressings, wound culture, appropriate antibiotic therapy and attention to nutritional support.
19 Free Tissue Transfer forHead andNeck Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
267
Extensive tissue loss may require a skin graft, myocutaneous or a further free ap for cover (Figs.19.13 and 19.14).
19.8.2 Flap Ischaemia
Regular and frequent monitoring of ap health is to recognise the vascular insufciency early and to prevent a ap loss. Prompt re-exploration and
revision are crucial as most aps fail to recover after 10–12h of ischaemia. Venous insufciency is more common than arterial and tends to develop later. Venous congestion gives the ap a bluish appearance with swelling, oedema, and on the needle prick test, a brisk dark venous ooze. In contrast, the ap with arterial ischaemia is pale, cool to touch and does not blanch. The throm­bosed vessel should be resected to a healthy ves­sel wall before re-anastomosis. If that is not possible, an alternative recipient vessel should be sought. Authors often use external carotid artery (for more proximal and better calibre) or trans­verse cervical artery (for non-radiated eld) in the vessel depleted neck when more distal branches of vessels are of inadequate calibre. Other causes of early ap failure are haematoma and recipient vessel problems. Late ap compro­mise (>48 h) is usually due to infection or mechanical stresses on the pedicle leading to compromise. Prior radiotherapy to the recipient neck, signicant medical co-morbidities such as diabetes, hypercoagulable states and alcohol withdrawal may also contribute to ap failure [12] (Fig.19.15).
Fig. 19.13 Wound dehiscence during adjuvant radiother­apy following extended orbital exenteration and ALT free ap
Fig. 19.14 Bolstered ap as a temporary measure to complete adjuvant radiotherapy
Fig. 19.15 Venous ischaemia of RFFF for right hemi­glossectomy on day 1 post-op
268
https://t.me/medicina_free
T. E. Yabe and R. Jayaram
19.8.3 Fistula
Orocutaneous stula is a complications of major head and neck surgery that may delay much needed adjuvant treatment and place a patient’s life at risk with neck sepsis. The reported inci­dence is up to 20%, and a large percentage of stulas received a major second operation to achieve wound healing. The vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device is useful when the ap is viable, not infected or is a low-output stula. The authors advise against using VAC when the major vessels are exposed or within the wound bed.
When the defect is too large to be closed by secondary intension, a second free ap or regional ap depending on prognosis, tissue quality, and stula size should be planned within a week after the rst debridement.
When patients present with the stulae while on radiotherapy, radiotherapy should not be inter­rupted, and the stula managed conservatively by less aggressive but effective wound care until radiotherapy is completed and a denite recon­struction planned. However, this is only true if there is no risk of carotid blowout. Many of these patients present not only with stula but also with other coexisting unfavourable conditions such as tissue atrophy, plate exposure, trismus, or even occult recurrence, which ideally can be addressed at the same time.
Hypothyroidism can complicate head and neck cancer treatment and is an under-recognised cause of failure to heal following surgery. Thyroid function should be tested for and corrected in all head and neck cancer patients, especially those with free ap reconstruction.
19.8.4 Carotid Blowout
Carotid blowout is a rare but signicant compli­cation following major neck surgery. In a series of 280 patients who underwent major head and neck surgery, 3% suffered carotid artery rupture. Of the 3%, most died, and 11% survived but with adverse neurological outcomes [13]. Neck sepsis
and previous radiation are the most signicant risk factors. The management depends on its acu­ity of presentation.
In the event of life-threatening massive bleed­ing on the ward, the focus should be on arresting life-threatening haemorrhage with direct pres­sure and securing the airway. Denitive explora­tion and repair will follow in the operating theatre. Angiography with embolization can offer a safe and rapid alternative method of achieving vascular control in patients with spontaneous rupture of the common carotid, carotid bulb or external carotid system once the patient has been stabilised.
19.9 Tips andTricks
19.9.1 Vessel Selection
andOrientation
The availability of recipient vessels can be pre­dicted pre-operatively based on presenting pathology and the planned extent of neck dissec­tion. There are common vessels that are used based on location in the head and neck region. The supercial temporal artery and vein are used in the upper third of the head, the facial and supe­rior thyroid artery and vein for the lower third of the face, and the external carotid artery branches and jugular veins in the neck. In the vessel depleted neck, nding a vessel in the contralat­eral neck, outside the previous radiation or sur­gery elds (e.g., transverse cervical) or more proximally (e.g., external carotid) can help pre­vent arterial problems (Table19.2).
The free ap pedicle often has more than one vein as a draining vessel. If the separate veins can be traced to a conuence, a single venous anasto­moses can be achieved. If no conuence and both veins have good ow and calibre, both these ves­sels should be anastomosed to suitable recipient veins. If the pedicle geometry permits, they should be anastomosed to separate systems (i.e., internal and external jugular). In this arrange­ment, one will act as a backup drainage system if the other one fails.
19 Free Tissue Transfer forHead andNeck Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 19.2 Extent of neck dissection, associated com­mon pathology and typical recipient vessels
Neck dissection levels
1–3/1–4 Tongue,
1–4/1–5 Metastatic
1–4/2–4 Parotid Artery: Supercial
Primary pathology Typical recipient vessels
Artery: Facial, superior oor of mouth
SCC of neck
thyroid, lingual
Veins: Common facial
vein/internal jugular vein
Artery: Facial, superior
thyroid, occipital artery,
transverse cervical artery
Vein: Internal jugular,
external jugular
temporal, facial, superior
thyroid, transverse
cervical artery
Vein: Supercial
temporal, internal/
external jugular vein
19.9.2 Perforator Based Chimeric Flaps
The chimeric concept for free tissue transfers in the head and neck setting was initially proposed by Koshima etal. Chimeric aps consist of mul­tiple spatially independent units with their own vascular supply, joined to a common vessel. Such vascular arrangement is particularly useful for complex defects needing tissue of varying struc­tural and or functional components simultane­ously. These are also useful when surgeons are presented with vascularly depleted necks due to previous surgery or radiotherapy. Compared to employing multiple free aps, chimeric aps offer good versatility while maintaining a similar complication rate (Fig.19.16).
19.9.3 Reanimation
Functional and psychological morbidity caused by facial paralysis should not be underesti­mated. Facial reanimation can be categorised into primary versus secondary procedure and dynamic versus static reconstruction. The aeti­ology and duration of facial paralysis are the
269
Fig. 19.16 Chimeric ALT free ap with vastus lateralis muscle and fasciocutaneous paddle
most important considerations when determin­ing what kind of reanimation surgery would most benet the patient. In general, younger patients with viable facial musculature and an intact neuromuscular junction who had an inten­tional sacrice of facial nerve would benet more from nerve transfer to achieve dynamic reanimation. In the setting of radical parotid surgery with a need for free tissue transfer, donor nerves are often available in reconstruc­tive aps. For older patients with multiple comorbidities, static facial suspension with ten­sor fascia lata (TFL) graft, tarsal strip and eyelid gold weight are often used to achieve oral com­petence and corneal protection.
Key Take Aways
1. Free tissue transfer is a key component of head and neck reconstruction.
2. This is a common procedure with very low failure rates in high volume centres.
3. A very thorough history and examination of both the neck and proposed donor site enhances free ap success.
4. No ap survives without adequate arterial inow.
5. Venous anastomotic thrombus is more com­mon than arterial.
6. Early free ap compromise or failure is usu­ally technical, and regular post operative observation of a free ap provides early opportunity to address insufciency of perfusion.
270
https://t.me/medicina_free
T. E. Yabe and R. Jayaram
19.10 Conclusion
In this chapter, we have outlined the variety of free aps commonly used in head and neck reconstruction and salient points in managing patients who need free tissue transfer to achieve biologically robust, functional and cosmetic reconstruction. Familiarity with these reconstruc­tive options will give ablative surgeons the skills to balance the extent of resection versus potential outcome. The mutual understanding and collabo­ration between ablative and reconstructive sur­geons will produce the best possible outcomes in head and neck surgery.
References
1. Steel BJ, Cope MR. A brief history of vascularized free aps in the oral and maxillofacial region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(4):786.e1–11.
2. Leung JS, Seto A, Li GK.Association between pre­operative nutritional status and postoperative out­come in head and neck cancer patients. Nutr Cancer. 2017;69(3):464–9.
3. Dort JC, Farwell DG, Findlay M, Huber GF, Kerr P, Shea-Budgell MA, et al. Optimal perioperative care in major head and neck cancer surgery with free ap reconstruction: a consensus review and recom­mendations from the enhanced recovery after sur­gery society. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(3):292–303.
4. Motakef S, Mountziaris PM, Ismail IK, Agag RL, Patel A.Perioperative management for microsurgical free tissue transfer: survey of current practices with a comparison to the literature. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015;31(05):355–63.
5. Ishimaru M, Ono S, Suzuki S, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Risk factors for free ap failure in 2,846 patients with head and neck cancer: a national database study in Japan. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(6):1265–70.
6. Hasmat S, Low TH, Krishnan A, Coulson S, Ch’ng S, Ashford BG, etal. Chimeric vastus Lateralis and anterolateral thigh ap for restoring facial defects and dynamic function following radical parotidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(5):853e–63e.
7. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL, etal. Timing of pedicle throm­bosis and ap loss after free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(7):1230–3.
8. Vincent A, Sawhney R, Ducic Y.Perioperative care of free ap patients. Semin Plast Surg. 2019;33(1):5–12.
9. Rodrigo JP, Alvarez JC, Gómez JR, Suárez C, Fernández JA, Martínez JA. Comparison of three prophylactic antibiotic regimens in clean­contaminated head and neck surgery. Head Neck. 1997;19(3):188–93.
10. Aires FT, Dedivitis RA, Petrarolha SM, Bernardo WM, Cernea CR, Brandão LG. Early oral feeding after total laryngectomy: a systematic review. Head Neck. 2015;37(10):1532–5.
11. Kinzinger MR, Bewley AF.Perioperative care of head and neck free ap patients. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;25(5):405–10.
12. Novakovic D, Patel RS, Goldstein DP, Gullane PJ.Salvage of failed free aps used in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck Oncol. 2009;1(1):33.
13. Stell PM.Catastrophic haemorrhage after major neck
surgery. Br J Surg. 1969;56(7):525–7.