Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 678 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
16 Maxillofacial Trauma fortheGeneral Surgeon
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 16.11 A patient with soft tissue trauma sustained during an industrial accident. The injury would be expected to damage the parotid duct and facial nerve branches
229
skin. Wounds contaminated with gravel or other foreign matter should be thoroughly debrided. Tooth fragments are some­timesseen in adjacent soft tissues and need to be removed. Plain radiographs and CT scans can often show retained soft tissue for­eign bodies, however they cannot be relied upon completely.
(c) Tongue
The tongue is very vascular and muscular. Lacerations may bleed signicantly. Repair under local anaesthetic is possible; however, it requires patient co-operation in order to reduce movement of the tongue. Deep tissue bites with 3/0 suture material are required.
Top Five Takeaways
1. Maxillofacial trauma is common.
2. Oral and maxillofacial trauma is often associ-
ated withhead and spinal injury.
3. Beware of the potential for acute or
delayed airway embarrassment in patients with maxillofacial injuries.
4. Retrobulbar haemorrhage due to an orbital
injury is a surgical emergency.
5. Dental Practitioners are a good source of
advice and help with dental trauma.
Fig. 16.12 The intraoperative view of the patient in Fig.16.11 showing lacrimal probes in the ends of the sev­ered parotid duct prior to microsurgical anastomosis
non- specialist repair and referral should be made to an oculoplastic or maxillofacial surgeon.
(b) Lips
Care should be exercised in repairing lip lac­erations, especially if the injury involves the vermillion border. Accurate apposition of the vermillion border is required, and this is facilitated by the use of magnication. Careful coaptation of the transected orbicu­laris muscles if involved is also required. A full thickness laceration of the lip will necis­sitate closure of the mucosa, muscle and
References
1. Perry M. Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS): can one size t all? Part 1: Dilemmas in the manag­ment of the mulitply injured patient with coexisting facial injuries. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37(3): 209–14.
2. Perry M, Morris C. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS) and facail trauma: cna one size t all? Part 2: ATLS, maxillofacial injuries and airway dilemmas. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37(4):309–20.
3. Tuckett J, Lynham A, Lee G, Perry M, Harrington U. Maxillofacial trauma in the emergency depart­ment: A review. Surgeon. 2014;12(2):106–14.
4. Elledge RO, Elledge R, Aquilina P, Hodson J, Dover S. The role of alcohol in maxillofacial trauma - a comparative retrospective audit between two centres. Alcohol. 2011;45(3):239–43.
5. Bahr W, Stoll P.Nasal intubation in the presence of frontobasal fractures: A retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50(5):445–7.
6. McLeod A, Calder I.Spinal cord injury and laryn­goscopy - the legend lives on. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(6):705–9.
230
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Aquilina
7. Arrowsmith J, Robertshaw H, Boyd J.Nasotracheal intubation in the presence of frontobasal skull frac­ture. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45(1):71–5.
8. Salvino C, Dries D, Gamelli R, Murphy-Macabobby M, Marshall W. Emergency cricothyroidotomy in trauma victims. J Trauma. 1993;34(4):503–5.
9. Ceallaigh P, Ekanaykaee K, Beirne C, Patton D.Diagnosis and managment of common maxillofa­cial injuries in the emergency department.Part 5: den­toalveolar injuries. Emerg Med J. 2006;24(6):429–30.
10. Therapuetic Guidelines (digital). (2021, 11 23). Tooth avulsion (knocked-out tooth). www.tg.org.au
Odontogenic Infections andDeep
https://t.me/medicina_free
Neck Collections
GaryR.Homan, AshimN.Adhikari, andOliviaG.I.Homan
17
17.1 Introduction
The neurocranium, sub-cranial viscero-cranium and cervical spine collectively provide a frame­work of structural support and protection for a variety of complex anatomical structures that are condensed into a small space.
A number of surgical and medical specialties lay claim to the diagnosis and management of a wide range of diseases, deformities, defects and disorders that afict the musculoskeletal and soft tissue components of the head and neck.
While such subspecialties idiosyncratically manage their respective pathologies, it is incum­bent for all surgeons who operate in the head and neck to have both a working knowledge of, as well as a capacity to manage, both supercial and deep neck space infections.
G. R. Hoffman (*) Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Head and Neck Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
School of Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
A. N. Adhikari Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
O. G. I. Hoffman School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
17.2 Infection
In its broadest sense, infection is arguably the most common pathological denominator that can affect any of the resident tissues and organs of the head and neck. Infection can be dened as the damage that results from the invasion by and growth of pathogenic microorganisms within host tissues. In doing so, they also have the capac­ity to both activate and overwhelm the host’s innate and acquired immune defences.
The microorganisms that are responsible for the damage can be classied as either bacterial, viral, fungal or parasitic. For the purposes of this dissertation, the infections that are discussed are bacterial in origin.
Although a wide variety of pathogenic bacte­ria exist, they enlist remarkably common strate­gies to cause their local, regional and systemic effects. These comprise an array of virulence factors, which uphold their intrinsic ability to adhere to (adhesins), invade into (invasins), counter innate host immune defences (elabora­tion of coat proteins and superoxide dismutases), multiply within and spread throughout, causing primary cytotoxic damage (production of destructive proteolytic enzymes) to host tissues and organs.
These processes are modied by host anatom­ical factors and resistance capacity. The latter is impaired by poorly or uncontrolled intercurrent systemic disease.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 B. Ashford (ed.), Head and Neck Surgery for General Surgeons,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7900-2_17
231
232
https://t.me/medicina_free
G. R. Homan et al.
17.3 Sepsis andSeptic Shock
The body’s ultimate response to the progression of uncontrolled infection is sepsis. Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that arises when the physical, biochemical and pathological contribu­tions to the host response become dysregulated and result in injury to its own tissues and organs (e.g., pulmonary injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome, hypoperfusion and acute tubular necrosis/acute renal failure, ischemia and gastro­intestinal ulceration and disseminated intravascu­lar coagulation).
Physiologist, Carl Wiggers, stated that “Shock not only stops the machine, but it wrecks the machinery.” For clinical operationalisation, the organ dysfunction due to infection is qualied by an increase in the sequential (sepsis related) organ failure assessment (SOFA) score of two points or more. At the bedside, a quick SOFA (qSOFA) score can be used, where any two of respiratory rate 22 breaths/minute, altered men­tal status or systolic blood pressure 100mm Hg are suggestive of sepsis.
Septic shock is a subset of sepsis in which pro­found circulatory, cellular and metabolic abnor­malities conspire to increase the risk of mortality over sepsis alone. This is characterised by serum lactate 2mmol/L and the requirement for vaso­pressor support in order to maintain a mean arte­rial pressure 65mmHg, despite adequate uid resuscitation.
17.4 Aetiology andMicrobiology
Many contemporary authors have reiterated the concepts espoused by renaissance philosopher­diplomat, Niccolò Machiavelli in his sixteenth century treatise entitled Il Principe, where he prophetically identied two fundamental tenets of sepsis in annotating that, “Hectic fever, at its inception, is difcult to recognise but easy to treat; left unattended, it becomes easy to recog­nise and difcult to treat.” It is that philosophy that underpins the subsequent discussion in this chapter.
Severe infections, as a cause of serious illness or death, have been recorded in the spoken and written word since antiquity.
As a subset, deep neck space infections are usually polymicrobial and generally caused by the resident bacteria that populate the oral cavity and upper aerodigestive tract. These bacteria are a mixture of aerobic, facultative or strict anaero­bic organisms, with deeper infections more likely to involve anaerobes.
Implicated bacteria from the oral cavity include Streptococcus viridans and subsequent colonisation with anaerobes such as
Septostreptococci, Fusobacteria, Prevotella, Porphyromonas and Actinomyces species. Aerodigestive bacteria include Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus inuenza, with Klebsiella and Pseudomonas playing a role in immunocompro-
mised hosts. Many of these organisms are able to produce beta-lactamase and, in turn, inhibit the action of a broad range of conventional antibiotics.
Although there are many causes of head and neck infection, those of odontogenic origin con­tinue to remain some of the most common, fol­lowed by those of the pharyngotonsillar origin [1,
2], and contribute to a signicant proportion of
those that present as deep neck space infections encountered in clinical practice.
Odontogenic infections arise as a result of epi­sodes of either dental pulp necrosis (and a resul­tant periapical abscess secondary and most commonly to dental decay– but also any process that exposes the dental pulp: attrition, erosion, abrasion and trauma), periodontal disease (chronic gingivo-periodontal pathos) or pericoro­nitis. A rising cause of related infections also include osteonecrosis of the jaws resulting from either therapeutic radiotherapy or pharmacother­apy (anti-resorptive or immune-modulation/ suppression).
Non-odontogenic causes include a variety of acute conditions de novo or arising as exacerba­tions of chronic pathology such as otitis media, mastoiditis, sinusitis, pharyngitis, tonsillitis, sial­adenitis, thyroiditis, infected brachial cleft and
17 Odontogenic Infections andDeep Neck Collections
https://t.me/medicina_free
233
thyroglossal duct anomalies, suppurative cervical lymphadenitis, post-surgical or traumatic head and neck wounds.
They are typically diagnosed by thorough
history- taking and clinical examination.
17.5 Anatomy
Once odontogenic infection has spread beyond the connes of the jaws, it is essentially anatomi­cal factors that play a key role in the clinical pre­sentation of disease.
In its simplistic presentation, if the suppura­tive exudate discharges above muscular attach­ments in the lower jaw or below muscular attachments in the upper jaw, the resultant pre­sentation is that of an acute alveolar or vestibular abscess (parulis/gum boil). This may devolve into a chronic state and present as an intra-oral sinus tract, and for that matter, if the path of least resistance is relatively short, it may present as an extra-oral submental, submandibular or facial sinus tract.
Infections can spread more broadly via lympho- haematogenous dissemination and/or direct extension via fascial layers, into the deep recesses of the head and neck, with direct exten­sion being the most common route of spread.
Retrograde ow through the veins that drain the mid-face in association with the abundance of anastomoses that exist between intra- and extra­cranial structures, may predispose to haematoge­nous spread, leading to serious complications such as cavernous sinus thrombophlebitis and cerebral abscess [3]. Haematogenous spread can also cause bacterial endocarditis and infection of distant sites, including prosthetic implants.
Lymphadenitis in the regional draining basin often resolves with treatment of the primary infection. Occasionally, this results in brosis or suppuration and lymphadenopathy may be per-
sistent. Other causes of lymphadenopathy, including neoplasia, need to be ruled out.
Landmark papers by Grodinsky and Holyoke [4], who used dyed gelatin injections to deter­mine the path of least resistance between fascial planes, Williams and Guralnick [5], who described the anatomical basis of managing Ludwig’s angina (a life-threatening cellulitis of the submental and bilateral sublingual and sub­mandibular spaces), and Granite [6], who sum­marised the literature on the potential interfascial spaces of the head and neck, with periodic sup­plementation by a variety of sporadic anatomi­cal studies [7] and case reports are fundamental to an understanding of both the spread into and occupancy of deep neck spaces. This work is further supplemented by Flynn [8], who has published extensively on odontogenic infec­tions, and described the likely routes of spread, based on causative teeth, and the approach for draining their associated collections. This infor­mation is summarised in Table 17.1 [3, 8] and depicted in anatomical drawings and imaging in Fig.17.1.
These anatomical spaces are potential in nature, until they are occupied by an inamma­tory exudate, and, in addition, are able to freely communicate. The severity of an infection can be linked to the anatomical location of the affected spaces due to their effect on local structures, including the airways and vital structures such as the orbital contents, intracranial contents, carotid sheath and mediastinum as well as their ability to spread into these spaces.
As such, submandibular and masticator space infections would be considered moderate risk, for their ability to induce trismus and spread to high­risk spaces such as parapharyngeal, retropharyn­geal and pretracheal. Infection spreading within the so-called “danger space” (prevertebral space), mediastinum or intracranially would be consid­ered very high risk.
234
https://t.me/medicina_free
Surgical approaches
for incision and
drainage
Intraoral
Transcutaneous
Upper premolars and
molars, lower premolars
Intraoral
Transcervical
Intraoral
Transcervical
Lower third molars,
mandibular angle fracture
Lower third molars,
mandibular angle fracture
Intraoral
Lower molars Transcervical
Lower premolars and
Transcervical
molars, trauma
Transcervical
symphyseal fracture
Intraoral
Transcervical
Upper and lower molars,
tonsils, infection in
adjacent spaces
Transcervical
Intraoral
parapharyngeal
(especially lateral incisor)
G. R. Homan et al.
Transcervical
Transtemporal
Pterygomandibular, submas-
seteric, supercial temporal
pterygomandibular, buccal
Deep temporal, sublingual,
parapharyngeal, peritonsillar,
submandibular, submasseteric,
buccal
Buccal fat pad, parotid
duct, facial vessels
geal fascia and skin
Mandibular nerve and
vessels
pterygoid
Sublingual, submental, buccal,
parapharyngeal
Contralateral sublingual,
submental, submandibular,
parapharyngeal
Submandibular gland,
facial vessels
Submandibular gland and
duct, sublingual gland,
lingual and hypoglossal
nerves, lingual vessels
Anterior jugular veins Sublingual, submandibular Lower anterior teeth,
supercial layer of deep cervical
fascia posteriorly
and mylohyoid
supercial layer of deep cervical
fascia anteriorly
Retropharyngeal,
submandibular, sublingual,
pterygomandibular,
peritonsillar, along carotid
sheath
Divided by styloid process
Anterior: Styloid muscles
Posterior: Carotid sheath,
IX, XI, XII
and buccopharyngeal fascia
anteriorly and medial pterygoid
and parotid posteriorly
Buccal Upper anterior teeth
Loose connective tissue Parapharyngeal, mediastinum Spread from
Infraorbital nerves and
and prevertebral fascia
Pterygomandibular Upper molars Intraoral
vessels
Maxillary vessels,
mandibular nerve,
muscles of facial expression
temporalis
Submasseteric Upper and lower molars Intraoral
pterygoid plexus
Temporal fat pad, facial
nerve
Between temporalis and
temporoparietal fascia
Space Location Contents Communicating spaces Likely aetiology
Buccal Between buccinator/buccopharyn-
Table 17.1 Spaces involved in deep neck space infections, their contents, communications, likely causes and surgical approaches to draining them
Submasseteric Between mandible and masseter Masseteric vessels Supercial temporal,
Pterygomandibular Between mandible and medial
Submandibular Between mylohyoid and
Sublingual Between oor of mouth mucosa
Submental Between mylohyoid and
Parapharyngeal Between pharyngeal constrictors
Retropharyngeal Between pharyngeal constrictors
Infraorbital Between canine fossa and
Deep temporal Between temporal bone and
Supercial
temporal
Adapted from Bridgeman [3] and Flynn [8]
17 Odontogenic Infections andDeep Neck Collections
https://t.me/medicina_free
235
Fig. 17.1 Anatomy and computed tomography of deep neck space infections. Anatomical drawings adapted from Feigl [7], Granite [6], and Grodinsky and Holyoke [4]. Computed tomography scans of deep neck space infec-
tions: (a and b) show a submandibular abscess from the same patient, (c) buccal space abscess, (d) pterygoman­dibular abscess causing inammation of the medial ptery­goid muscle and resulting in trismus
236
https://t.me/medicina_free
G. R. Homan et al.
17.6 Diagnosis—Management
17.6.1 Clinical Assessment andWork-Up
Patients with deep neck space infections most commonly present with odynophagia, dysphagia, fever, neck pain, neck swelling, trismus and dys­phonia. Additional symptomology may result from their direct effect on adjacent structures and is discussed later in this chapter. The signs and symptoms of deep neck space infection are sum­marised in Table17.2.
The most sensitive clinical features to detect moderate to high-risk infections are swelling, lymphadenopathy and trismus [9] (Fig. 17.2). The most specic features to differentiate between moderate to high-risk and low-risk infections are: dysphonia, oor of mouth eleva­tion, dyspnoea, dysphagia or odynophagia, tris­mus, fever and tachypnoea [9].
The teeth most likely to cause moderate- to high-risk infections are the mandibular second and third molars as they drain directly to the sub­mandibular and masticator spaces and can read­ily spread to the parapharyngeal space.
Miller etal. [10] showed that clinical assess­ment alone was only 63% accurate (55% sensi­tive and 73% specic) in identifying a drainable collection of 2mL or more in deep neck space infections. Contrast-enhanced computed tomog­raphy (CT) alone was only 77% accurate (95% sensitive, 53% specic). Combining both of these modalities lead to 89% accuracy with 95% sensi­tivity and 80% specicity. This highlights the importance of CT as an adjunct to clinical assess-
Table 17.2 Signs and symptoms of deep neck space infection
Signs Symptoms Neck swelling
Fever Trismus Pharyngeal wall medialisation Dysphonia facial swelling Oral swelling Tongue elevation Floor of mouth swelling Pharyngeal wall medialisation
Neck pain Odynophagia Dysphagia Dyspnoea Otalgia Sialorrhea/drooling
ment as 40% of the purulent collections on CT were not identied on clinical examination.
Ban etal. [11] developed a prediction tool for the likelihood of nding purulent discharge at incision and drainage and stated that any three of the following was 81.4% accurate in predicting pus (79.5% sensitive, 82.8% specic):
1. Peripheral rim enhancement on CT. (a) Also a>2.45mL hypodense area on CT.
2. CRP>41.25mg/L.
3. ESR>56.5mm/h.
4. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio>8.02.
17.6.2 Treatment
In their work on Ludwig’s Angina, Williams and Guralnick [5] stated that the fundamental tenets of the management of deep neck space infections are: “to establish an adequate airway, to relieve tension, to secure drainage and to combat the infection by supplementary measures.” Adoption of these principles, lead to a drop in mortality of 54–10% in 3years. Notably, such improvement occurred prior to the use of penicillin, the rst true antibiotic, and highlights the role of securing the airway and surgical egress in managing these infections. Modern medical care has further reduced the mortality from Ludwig’s Angina to 4%.
We expand on these tenets by outlining the following additional steps:
1. Identify the presenting problem (i.e., infection
and spaces involved).
2. Attempt to identify the cause (e.g., odonto-
genic or pharyngotonsillar).
3. Determine the severity. (a) Airway. (b) Spaces involved. (c) Duration and progression. (d) Host factors. (e) Determine setting of care (inpatient,
intensive care or outpatient).
4. Supportive medical care (including antibiot-
ics, uid resuscitation and nutrition).
5. Treat surgically.
17 Odontogenic Infections andDeep Neck Collections
https://t.me/medicina_free
237
a
b
c d
Fig. 17.2 Clinical photographs of deep neck space infec­tions. Clinical photographs of deep neck space infections: (a) temporal space infection, (b) buccal space infection, (c)
submandibular space infection, (d) Ludwig’s Angina affect­ing the bilateral submandibular, sublingual and submental spaces with elevation of the oor of mouth and tongue
238
https://t.me/medicina_free
G. R. Homan et al.
(a) Removal of the cause (tooth, tonsil or
other). (b) Drain any suppurative exudate. (c) Debride necrotic tissue.
6. Evaluate and re-evaluate. (a) Identify causes of treatment failure and
adjust (i.e., changing antibiotics).
As is customary in all aspects of medical and surgical care, the identication of the presenting problem (and the spaces involved) can be achieved by the undertaking of a thorough clini­cal history, selection of appropriate diagnostic imaging (CT scan) and the requesting of relevant blood tests. Orthopantomogram X-rays are also helpful in the assessment of odontogenic infec­tions as they are less susceptible to metal artefact and show the teeth and potential causes of pulp necrosis more clearly. Identication of the cause follows from this but is not always obvious and, in some instances, cannot be found.
Determining the severity of the infection allows for appropriate determination of patient disposition (outpatient, inpatient or intensive care) and ideal delivery of care. The most impor­tant of these steps is to determine whether or not the airway is at risk and this is a clinical decision. Inability to lay at, tripoding and stridor are late signs of impending airway obstruction. Patients with impending airways should not be put in the CT scanner until their airway has been secured. Similarly, they should not be transferred to another health facility for denitive management until their airway has been secured. Thorough clinical assessment includes exible nasopharyn­golaryngoscopy to assess oedema and pharyn­geal wall medialisation.
In the stable patient, the spaces involved on CT and their proximity to the airway and muscles of mastication can help predict potential airway challenges. Often trismus will necessitate awake bre-optic intubation with consideration given to the establishment of a surgical airway being required in more difcult cases. Although aspira­tion of purulent exudate is a potential consider­ation, safely securing the airway is paramount.
The anatomical spaces closest to the teeth are considered low-risk spaces (i.e., vestibular, pala-
tal, buccal, infraorbital) as well as the subcutane­ous space. These low-risk spaces can often be treated in the outpatient setting under local anaes­thetic, but host factors and the need for any sup­portive medical care should also be considered. Moderate- and higher-risk infections should be treated in an inpatient setting. The sublingual, submental and masticator spaces are considered moderate risk for their ability to spread to adja­cent spaces and induce trismus. High-risk spaces include those that affect the airway or other vital structures including the parapharyngeal, retro­pharyngeal and pretracheal spaces. Once infec­tion involves the prevertebral space, mediastinum, or has gone intra-orbital or intra-cranial, the risk of morbidity and mortality increases signicantly.
Host factors such as diabetes mellitus, malnu­trition, alcoholism, active malignancy and immune compromise in its broadest sense (including organ transplant, chemotherapy and rheumatological patients) as well as the duration and rate of progression of the infection can fur­ther affect the severity with more aggressive treatment being required in immune­compromised patients and those with rapidly progressing signs and symptoms.
Supportive medical therapy starts at assess­ment and includes uid resuscitation, nutritional support and appropriate antibiotics. Most deep neck space infections are sensitive to penicil­lins, but there is a growing trend to microbial production of beta-lactamase. It is also impor­tant to note that whilst ampicillin and metroni­dazole cross the blood-brain barrier, clindamycin does not. The use of steroids in pharyngotonsil­lar infections has been shown to help reduce length of hospital stay, pain and trismus, but their use in odontogenic infections is controversial.
Fu etal. [12] showed that the most signicant factors for requiring an admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) from odontogenic infections were lower third molar involvement, dysphagia and a CRP >150mg/L.All patients admitted to ICU in their study were identied as having man­dibular infections, submandibular swelling and trismus.