Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 535 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
32
C. Khorsandi
things they are not interested in. Thus we can deduce that in these geographically isolated communities, some underlying drive collectively brought artists to sculpt what they believed to be important.
Further evidence in the archaeological record exists for the fascination of the female buttocks. Nefertiti, the Egyptian Queen of fourteenth century BC was con­sidered to be one of the most beautiful woman of her time. Her name literally trans­lates to: “a beautiful woman has come.” The notion of this idea has resonated throughout history to the present so much so that the famous bust of her face was adopted by the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery to be the symbol of their group. While many may associate the image of Nefertiti with her face alone, a statue unearthed, which now stands in the Louvre, shows that Nefertiti possessed a round, projected buttocks. A tribute yet again to that which is considered desirable.
If we were to travel back in time to visit our hominid ancestors prior to bipedal ambulation, we would see that in the process of walking on all four limbs results in the buttocks and the genitalia being prominently displayed from behind. In order for a species to survive, procreation is an imperative drive, and this instinct needs no instruction, as we see throughout all of nature. From a complex interplay of olfac­tory, visual, tactile, and other sensory cues, males will invariably seek a place to give action to their procreative drive, whether real or in some cases an imitation of such.
Take for instance the spider orchid, this remarkable ower has evolved to not only look like a female wasp, but to also secrete a pheromone that mimics a solitary female wasp. The effect it has is to lure naive males to the ower in an attempt to mate with it. The result is a fooled wasp but a potentially pollinated ower. This remarkable example of natural mimicry can be seen in many parts of nature, but to narrow our focus a bit, let us refer to the idea of the female human breast.
I have been asked to present this concept at several meetings around the world and during this lecture I play a game with my audience. To illustrate that we as humans are susceptible to biologic mimicry, I show a series of photos with the majority of the image obscured, except for two areas of esh pressed up against each other. I poll the audience as to whether they believe this is a picture of a but­tocks or a pair of breasts. As they respond to the revealed images alternating from a buttocks to breast, the certainty of the audience begins to diminish as to what’s behind the rest of the picture. In my last slide I show an obscured close-up image of my index nger closed in a tight st, and showing the middle and proximal phalan­ges pressed up against each other. When I reveal to the audience that this is neither a buttocks nor a breast, but my own hand, made to look like a buttocks, the room generally erupts into laughter, a sure sign a new information is being assimilated.
So what, you may ask, does breast aesthetics and mimicry have to do with gluteal aesthetics? Evidence suggests that a relative enlargement of the female breast size compared to other primates occurred around the time when our ancestors began walking upright. During this period, the female genitalia became hidden between the legs and oriented downward as bipedal ambulation led to far more face-to-face interactions. While the lactiferous tissue of the breast serves a logical function for rearing young, the fatty tissue of the breast can range in proportion from a small
2 The Buttocks: Anthropologic andCultural Evolution
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
33
percentage to greater than half the volume of the breast and this serves no functional purpose. When viewed from the front, however, a remarkable natural mimicry of the gluteal area can be evident, especially when presented as cleavage with the rest of the breast obscured in clothing.
In one of our close primate relatives, the bonobo, female breasts sometimes approximate the shape and appearance of human female breasts. Bonobos can walk upright for short distances, and are considered to be extremely social creatures. Bonobos live in highly sexualized communities, where not only is face-to-face cop­ulation common, but the act of copulation is also frequently used to solve disputes, form bonds, and socialize. Perhaps the bonobo is subjected to the dual stimulations of seeing the genitalia, when walking on all fours, and also being subjected to see­ing the breasts when face to face. One can only speculate.
For humans, the female breast has been deemed a sexualized organ and its dis­play in public considered to be taboo in most societies throughout history. Even to this day the breast is considered to be provocative, and best left covered in most common activities. But why? The female breast is not a true sexual organ, you can­not procreate with a breast, and surprisingly there are very few instances in which a bare male chest is considered to be taboo. Yet the female breast is undeniably trig­gering for most individuals, and this is may be due to its form and natural mimicry of the buttocks, the area between which procreation is done.
It serves a female wishing to attract the attention of males, much like the spider orchid, to make a display of exaggerating things, and one way in which modern humans have accomplished this is through their clothing. Today as it was for much of modern human history, clothing is much more than a protection from the ele­ments, as it often serves as decoration. Since we reasonably can attribute the physi­cal enhancement of the body through plastic surgery to the last 100years, we must wonder how our ancestors made a show of things, so to speak. I propose that If you want to know about a society, study the way in which it dresses.
Around the turn of the nineteenth century a phenomenon began, in which wom­en’s dresses were made to enhance the appearance of the female form, by the use of various materials and styles. It started out rather tamely in 1811 with the regency dress. This garment used tufted material on the back of the dress to create a wider backside than the relatively at embroidered front. As we progress through the 1800s we see a continued exaggeration of this theme. In the 1830s dresses used gored panels to narrow the waist and pleated rows of fabric to widen the hips. In the early Victorian era of the 1840s dresses began to compound the fabric with paddings on the hips and back side with more pleated fabric. The exaggeration continued into the 1850s with ever more fabric, creating dresses with the lower half three to four times the diameter of the waist. The limits of fabric only techniques were reached in the 1860s when metal ttings such as the elliptical loop were added to support even more fabric. The 1870s and 1880s saw the advent of the bustle, a remarkable dress in which the width was tamed and the posterior projection was made round and highly exaggerated.
In the famous painting “A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte” by George Seurat, a scene depicting the bourgeoise of Paris enjoying a sunny day is
34
C. Khorsandi
highlighted by a female in the foreground wearing a typical bustle. She is accompa­nied by a well-dressed man holding a cigar and with a cane tucked upright under his arm. Art historians have suggested that this woman is a courtesan, a prostitute asso­ciated with the upper class, and the image of the young girl in the center of the painting, dressed in a simple white dress, staring out at the viewer, is the criticism of this society and its sexualized dress. Some may beg to differ, but it is likely Seurat was drawing attention to the concepts that higher society seemed to overlook in the name of fashion.
But what sparked this trend in clothing styles and textile enhancements of the female form? Around the time of the regency dress in 1815, Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo, and the control of Africa goes to England, and the Dutch. With this, the colonization of Africa begins. Through the exploration of Africa, Europeans came into contact with societies that had been isolated from them for many thousands of years. One particular group of individuals in the southern part of Africa displayed a phenotypic variance that sparked the interest of these colonial Europeans.
The Khoi-san, Bantu, and Hottentot peoples of southern Africa have an inherited characteristic called Steatopygia. Considered a sign of beauty in these cultures, the typical features are a relatively large collection of adipose in the buttocks and hips, extending sometimes to the knees. For early explorers these people’s appearance differed from what they had been accustomed to. As many atrocities occurred dur­ing the colonial period in Africa, several of the women were forcibly taken from these tribes to Europe, to be part of traveling shows as entertainment. One woman in particular, Sarah Baartman, became a sensation, engendering many writings and recreations of her image in throughout Europe. It is precisely this exposure, at this time in history, which likely led to the change in woman’s fashion across the conti­nent. European woman and men fascinated with the sexualized nature of the Steatopygic body sought to recreate the look with needle, thread, and, later, the metal frame.
Just as exposure to the Steatopygic people led to a change in the concepts of fashion in the 1800s, a corollary to this has occurred in more modern times. Over the past decade we have seen a surge in procedures aimed at enhancing, augment­ing, and restoring the youthfulness to the aged buttocks. But why did this trend take so long to form, and where did the impetus for such a change come from? We once again must look at the cross-cultural pollination of ideas to grasp its roots.
In South America and particularly in Brazil where the festival of Carnivale is celebrated with bombastic air, we see that the notion of a large rounded buttocks is not only cherished but in some ways held to be central to the desirable traits of the female form. Woman of all ages, are seen dressed in attire that leaves the buttocks exposed and there are even beauty contests for the most beautiful buttocks. We see this notion predate the rise in gluteal enhancement procedures and it may have something to do with the ethnic makeup of the Brazil.
Looking to the makeup of which peoples settled in South America, we see that it is comprised of a very ethnically diverse population of Native American, Caucasian, African, and Asian. Nearly one half of the population is of mixed or African ances­try, but not just any African ancestry. From 1518 to 1850 nearly 11 million African
2 The Buttocks: Anthropologic andCultural Evolution
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
35
people were stolen from their homes and brought to the new world. An analysis of the slave trading routes shows that the majority of those who were brought to South America originated from the southern part of Africa, from the areas in which Steatopygia was endemic. In contrast the slaves brought to North America generally were taken from the northern and western parts of Africa. A difference that led to the traits of Steatopygia becoming part of the genetic tapestry of South American life.
As these peoples ourished and thrived in relative isolation, a new wave of immi­gration from South America to the United States in the early 1990s, particularly to South Florida, led to Americans coming into contact with South Americans and their aesthetic values. The introduction of the thong bikini and the generously sized buttocks no doubt left an impression of tourists to the beaches of Miami, in much the same way that the Europeans of the 1800s were fascinated with the peoples of Africa. This in turn spurred demand for procedures that would allow those who were less endowed to seek a physical change.
In South America many surgeons were already performing buttocks augmenta­tion with silicone implants and to a lesser degree, fat transfer. However, it wasn’t until more recently that the term Brazilian Butt Lift was coined by an American surgeon looking to capitalize on the trend. From there we see a complex interplay of many factors leading to the rise of demand.
For one, pop cultural milestones opened the door to openly and publicly consid­ering the buttocks as an object of desire. In 1992, the Hip Hop Artist known as Sir Mix A Lot released a song extolling his love of woman’s butts. The chorus of “I like big butts, and I cannot Lie,” led the song to receive the Grammy Award for Best Solo Performance, and 2.9 million copies being sold, the second best-selling song of the year. This tongue-in-cheek song begins with two Caucasian women disparaging a woman who has a curvy body with a large buttocks. It drew a stark contrast between cultural lines in America, and seeded the idea that there was something wrong with those who did not appreciate the beauty of the buttocks.
At around the same time we see the inuence of the Hip Hop industry and the Black community as a whole softening the cultural divisions present for much of American history. Public opinion of interracial marriage crosses a milestone in 1994 with more Americans approving of interracial marriage than disapproving of it. Interracial marriage itself increases on larger scale in the ensuing years and with it diversity of aesthetic concepts.
Humans like our bonobo cousins are extraordinarily social creatures and as such we often take our cues from others in how to act, dress, and look. In the 2000s we begin to see the wholesale change in attitudes toward a more Steatopygic form. Celebrities such as Jennifer Lopez and Kim Kardashian become as much known for their buttocks as anything else. Reality TV catapults us toward the idea of watching other people in their daily life, followed by the advent of social media and mobile technology delivering these cues directly into our daily life and at the press of a but­ton. The rapidity of this change cannot be understated. Today my ofce is awash with individuals who have made an entire career of using the appearance of the but­tocks to make money. I no longer have patients bringing in pictures of celebrities to emulate. Instead they tap on their phones and pull up a collection of images of
36
C. Khorsandi
seemingly unknown woman from social media whose buttocks they wish to have. It is easy to understand why.
Social media has provided social pressure. On a typical platform, individuals who post alluring images of themselves are instantly rewarded with positive feed­back in the form of “likes.” Comments take the form of patronage to these image and, occasionally, a negative comment is placed by a disagreeable person, which is often rapidly deleted. By contrast, posts from a provocateur that talk about ideas and speak of the mundane often get little response. Thus a cycle of behavior and drive has become xed. While mainstream social media platforms do not allow for nudity or sexual content, a rise of private web services linked to social media have provided a means for individuals to monetize their appearance from the comfort of their own home. These services charge a fee to view content and they have seen a tenfold rise in creators over the Covid-19 pandemic, hoping to cash in on their looks. One site, in particular, at the time of this writing called OnlyFans.com has over one million content creators, and over 50 million subscribers. This social pressure along with nancial incentive is driving more and more patients to their plastic surgeon, hoping to stand out from the crowd.
The question that is often asked regarding gluteal augmentation is: “How long this trend will last.” However the question is awed in assuming that the desire to augment the buttocks is merely a trend, one that will see beauty ideals swing in the opposite direction, to smaller, less rotund, less buoyant buttocks. It is unlikely that we will ever see the demand for gluteal augmentation change. As we have seen throughout history, the biological drives and underlying functional imperative will keep us grounded in the notion that a shapely buttocks is a desirable trait. The degree of augmentation and restoration will invariably differ between individuals and cultures, but the fundamental principle will always remain the same.
Chapter 3
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Artistic Anatomy oftheGluteal andLumbosacral Area
StefanDanilla
The female gluteal area has been a cardinal beauty zone of attraction since the beginning of civilization and artists have focused on gluteal anatomy for more than 2000years (Fig.3.1).
Usually, anatomy is taught in medical school and surgery residency by layers of tissue, blood supply, and innervation but without emphasizing the tridimensionality of the structures (Fig.3.2).
The gluteal area does not correspond to a single structure but several structures that involve bones, muscle, subcutaneous fat, and skin.
Cuenca-Guerra, Mendieta, and De la Peña have contributed to the understanding of the esthetic traits in a beautiful buttocks, that summarized are:
• Four main determinants of the gluteal esthetics are:
– Bony structure: the pelvis shape greatly inuences the perception of beauty.
There are four shapes A, V, circular, and square pelvis. “A” shape and circular shape are the most esthetic ones.
– Gluteus maximus muscle: the greater the development of the mass of the glu-
teus maximus and – Subcutaneous fat compartment – Skin.
The anatomical structures surrounding the gluteal region also are important for the correct esthetic proportions of the buttocks: the waist, lower back, sacral area, and thighs must be treated in order to achieve a natural harmonic result. For exam­ple, a big buttocks with thin thighs created by fat graft buttocks alone are called ant deformity, because of the unnatural appearance that it gives to the patient.
S. Danilla (*) Plastic Surgery Unit, Surgery Department, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 D. Del Vecchio, H. Durán (eds.), Aesthetic Surgery of the Buttock,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13802-7_3
37
38
Fig. 3.1 Aphrodite Kallipygos or Callipygian Venus
S. Danilla
In Fig.3.3 a picture of a model with esthetical ideal buttocks without cosmetic surgery can be seen. Clearly an A shape pelvic framework with adequate propor­tional and symmetric development of all muscles in the back, gluteal region, and thigs, thin and even fat pad distribution, and turgid elastic skin.
3 Artistic Anatomy oftheGluteal andLumbosacral Area
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 3.2 Traditional anatomical drawing
Fig. 3.3 Fitness woman without surgeries
39
In order to clearly understand the supercial tridimensionality of the posterior female body, it is useful to study from an artistic approach, from lines of rst dimen­sion, to shapes in second dimension to the volume of the tridimensional approach that plastic surgery requires.
In the sketch, the silhouette of a woman with a beautiful body is drawn, with adequate proportions of waist and hip, buttocks and thighs is evident (Fig.3.4a).
40
ab
cd
S. Danilla
Fig. 3.4 (a) Silhouette of tness woman. (b) Sketch marks of muscular groups. (c) Muscular volume of tness woman. (d) Actual picture of tness woman
3 Artistic Anatomy oftheGluteal andLumbosacral Area
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
41
Adding some lines between major muscle groups add denition and sensation of depth in the gure: posterior belly of the deltoid, midline from interscapular line to L4–5 is drawn, the lateral border of the paravertebral muscles, the posterior superior iliac spine (dimples of Venus), and insertion of the gluteus major in the inferolateral border of the sacrum and iliac crests (Fig.3.4b).
An adequate blending of the major lines, valleys and the muscle group between them, hills, creates tridimensionality, the surgeon can create or accentuate the anat­omy by carving the subcutaneous fat or adding volume by fat grafting or implants (Fig.3.4c).
Applying those concepts to a real patient can improve the results of the surgery (Fig.3.4d).
Liposuction of the supercial fat in posterior belly of the deltoid, midline, inser­tion of the gluteus major muscle in the sacrum, posterior iliac spine, and iliac crest is marked in green (Fig.3.5a).
Deep fat of the posterior arm and anks must be removed to reveal anatomy of the underlying muscles (Fig.3.5b).
Preserving the fat over the paravertebral muscles can contribute to enhance the muscular appearance of the lower and middle back. The buttock area can be improved by adding volume through implants or fat grafting according to the sur­geon’s preferences and patient result desire (Fig.3.5c).
The lateral aspect of the buttock can vary depending on the muscularity of the patient and ethnic differences. In a woman with hip muscle hypertrophy and lean subcutaneous fat in the hips, a lateral depression can be noticed (Fig.3.6).
The lateral depression is created by the bulkiness of the gluteus major muscle, gluteus medius, tensor of fascia lata, and the depression of the iliotibial tract (Fig.3.7).
abc
Fig. 3.5 (a) Negative zones (supercial liposuction). (b) Debulking areas (deep liposuction). (c) Positive areas of fat grafting or implants