Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 535 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
222
H. Durán
Images 15.1–15.2 Case Lipocontour HD
15 The Lipocontour Technique
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
223
15.2.3 Fat Inltration intheButtock
Once fat is obtained, it is collected in closed canisters where it is decanted: if the calcu­lated volume for inltration is less than 500cc per buttock and hip, then, we generally use 60-mL Toomey syringes in a single-ported Tulip® cannula. However, if the calcu­lated volume is greater than 500cc per buttock, then we use the Del Vecchio EVL tech­nique [7]. With Lipocontour, gluteal inltration is performed subcutaneously and never in the muscle [8]. We start the fat inltration in the deep subcutaneous space (between fascia supercialis and the major gluteus muscle) from the center of the projection to the periphery. Once it is full, we direct the inltration to the supercial subcutaneous space (between the skin and the fascia supercialis) in only a small amount in the center to generate projection. But be aware: if the amount of fat is higher than indicated it will be lled in such a way that it forms a hardened plate that is not very malleable and will detract the roundness of the gluteal contour, being counterproductive for aesthetics. To improve it, one can use the Microaire with a basket cannula, to equalize and distribute this fat, but this increases the risk of a blowout lesion (Images 15.3 and 15.4).
Images 15.3–15.4 Case Lipocontour HD
224
H. Durán
Images 15.3–15.4 (continued)
We must consider that the buttock has the shape of a “p” or a “q” more than an “o” due to insertion into the iliotibial tract of the gluteus maximus (Fig. 15.2). Therefore, if there’s a lack of volume in the inferolateral area of the buttock, to achieve more anatomical inltration and provide more support, we place the fat as inltration pillars, which also yields a better relationship between the buttock and the thigh [9]. The hip is inltrated in the lateral position to identify the effect gener­ated by the fat in the contour and to provide the greatest expansion at the transverse line extending from trochanter to trochanter. The buttock can be inltrated through the superior gluteal mid-incision, although inltration can also be performed through the infragluteal fold. An angulated cannula can be used to easily enter the supercial space. Once the fat has inltrated, any PAL device can be used to equal­ize (distribute) the inltrated fat (Images 15.5 and 15.6).
At the end of the procedure, we insert closed drains to monitor bleeding. We cover the patient with forced-air blankets and only applied cotton bandages. In the immediate postoperative period, we administer analgesics such as parecoxib or
15 The Lipocontour Technique
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 15.2 The gluteus maximus shape is a p (left buttock) or a q (right buttock) because a extension reaching for the iliotibial tract and trochanter
225
Images 15.5–15.6 Case Lipocontour SD
226
H. Durán
Images 15.5–15.6 (continued)
tramadol. Sometimes tranexamic acid [10] is prescribed orally for 3days if heavy bleeding occurs during the rst 8h. Most patients can leave the hospital 4–6h after the procedure with oral analgesics and antibiotics. In the rst week, we never use pressure garments (only cotton bandages) because they can exert pressure and cause fat necrosis, and placing a compressive girdle is uncomfortable and painful in the rst days after surgery.
15.3 Results
From 2014 to 2019, we completed a total of 210 liposuction procedures in women. All patients underwent Lipocontour marking preoperatively and were surgically treated by the author. The marking protocol has changed according to the learning
15 The Lipocontour Technique
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
227
curve and successful or unsuccessful experiences, but since 2018, the marking pro­tocol has been minimally modied. The average age of the patients was 33.9years, the average weight was 63.77 kilos, the average height was 1.58 m, and the average body mass index was 25.3kg/m2. A total of 71 patients received regional anesthesia, and 139 patients received general anesthesia. The average operative time when Lipocontour did not require additional procedures was 2h and 11min. The average volume of fat extracted with liposuction was 3L and 113mL.The average volume of inltrated fat was 590cc per side for a total of 1180mL of fat inltrated in the buttock and the hip of each patient. A total of 138 (66%) smooth-denition Lipocontour surgeries and 72 (34%) high-denition Lipocontour surgeries were performed. No patient was lost to follow-up, and the maximum follow-up was 6years.
These were the complications of the procedure: three patients (1.6%) required readmission due to bleeding; one patient did not receive a blood transfusion while two patients required blood transfusions from a single globular bundle (Clavien Dindo Grade II) [11]. Five seromas (2.6%) (Clavien Dido GI) were managed con­servatively and did not require drainage, and no fat necrosis, infection, MIFE/ MAFE [11] or a single death was recorded. Overall, 97% of the patients were man­aged as outpatients. Only ve patients were hospitalized, including one patient who was hospitalized for pain management, two patients who were hospitalized for bleeding monitoring, and two patients who were hospitalized at their request for more comfort (Images 15.7 and 15.8).
On a scale of patient satisfaction, (result on a questionnaire 3months after sur­gery) 85.6% of patients mentioned being satised or completely satised with the result, and 5.7% reported dissatisfaction with no answer in 8.5%. Two of these
Image 15.7 Lipocontour front
228
Image 15.8 Lipocontour back
H. Durán
patients required repeat treatment after 6 months due to dissatisfaction with the result, which was mainly related to bulging remnants in the hypogastric area (this was in the rst 50 cases), indicating to be more aggressive in this area and remove the largest volume at this site. After this change, none of the patient experimented insatisfaction. Among these patients, none required reoperation. The maximum follow-up of the patients was 6years, and the minimum follow-up was 6months.
15.4 Discussion
This is a marking technique for liposuction and safe buttock inltration called Lipocontour, to guide the surgery. This technique involves standardized marking, which guides the surgeon, achieving satisfactory results in 85.6% of patients. Its needs a short learning curve, but it can be easily adopted.
The main advantage of Lipocontour is that the markings serve as a guide for the surgeon to perform the procedure and maintain the planned objectives during sur­gery. We believe that this option is necessary because no standardized marking pro­tocol has been established for liposuction. The only publication on marking found in the literature is a 2002 article by Chang [12] that describes grid marking. However, we did not nd any other article referring to standardization of body marking as a guide for liposuction. We have generally observed that most surgeons mark the midline where an excessive fat volume is typically observed using concentric circles for identication. However, this strategy is disadvantageous because it is based more on excess fat volume rather than on the areas that should not be treated and does not consider the underlying anatomical structures.
The Lipocontour technique was developed based on anatomical landmarks cor­responding to the surface anatomy to produce a common marking map of contours and appropriate silhouettes. The markings mainly indicate to the surgeon where fat aspiration or inltration should be performed in relation to the underlying anatomy
15 The Lipocontour Technique
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
229
to achieve a more natural result with satisfactory body ratios. Moreover, the tech­nique provides the surgeon with the freedom to adjust the dimensions of his patient according to expectations.
The lines marked on the anterior abdomen correspond to the midline, the linea alba, and the ratio between the abdomen and the upper (rib cage) and lower (ingui­nal region) limits, which are framed by the lateral oblique muscles. In the lateral region [13], the markings facilitate continuity between anterior and posterior lipo­suction, emphasizing the region at the 12th rib where an adherence zone is located, which is where the main reduction of the entire torso is performed. The markings also identify the trochanters or the Cuenca-Guerra point [14], which denote where the widest area should be to maintain a 0.6–0.7 waist–hip ratio [3], providing visual feedback at all times. The technique strategically locates the incision sites to control the dimensions of the body, identies the framework according to the types described by Mendieta [15], and provides a simpler view by delineating the areas to be treated while also identifying the quadrants and areas that should be expanded the most in the anteroposterior plane in the buttock and laterally. On the back, the midline is traced to identify asymmetries from side to side. The division of the buttock into two vertical quadrants establishes an anatomical limit of the infragluteal fold. If the fold extends beyond this line laterally, then the fold is not considered aesthetic and should be improved. The best technique for such improvement usually involves fat inltration vertically or in pillars. This inltration method achieves three effects: (1) shortening of the infragluteal fold, (2) buttock support, and (3) volume addition to the thigh to minimize any disparity in the ratio [9].
The next challenges related to this technique are teaching it to other surgeons, detailing the technical differences between the smooth-denition and high- denition methods.
15.5 Conclusions
This preliminary report shows that Lipocontour, a liposculpture technique involving a standardized marking protocol, is perfectly adapted to the aesthetic standards pre­viously established in other references, although the technique is not intended to replace any former techniques. Thus, surgeons who wish to use Lipocontour can easily adapt to it because the technique is based on anatomical landmarks related to the surface anatomy, which also provides exibility by ensuring that the technique can be used in any patient regardless of their features. The markings cover the entire trunk and buttock on the front, back, and sides of the body. In buttock, Lipocontour helps the surgeon to perform gluteal inltration in an organized and consistent man­ner. The main advantage of Lipocontour is the markings indicate the areas with excess fat volumes and fat-decient areas in a simple manner to guide plastic sur­geons to a straightforward intraoperative decision-making.
Disclosure/Conict of Interest Statement The author has no conict of interest or disclosures.
230
H. Durán
References
1. Castro CC, Cupello AMB.Liposuction—personal approach around 120 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85(2):325.
2. Mendieta CG.Classication system for gluteal evaluation. Clin Plast Surg. 2006;33(3):333–46.
3. Singh D.Adaptive signicance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;65(2):293–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.65.2.293.
4. Dixit VV, Wagh MS.Unfavourable outcomes of liposuction and their management. Indian J Plast Surg. 2013;46(2):377–92. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970- 0358.118617.
5. https://www.equator- network.org/reporting- guidelines/preferred- reporting- of- case- series- in-
surgery- the- process- guidelines/. Accessed 20 Aug 2019.
6. Wall SHJ, Lee MR.Separation, aspiration, and fat equalization: SAFE liposuction concepts for comprehensive body contouring. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(6):1192–201.
7. Del Vecchio D, Wall S.Expansion vibration lipolling: a new technique in large-volume fat transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(5):639e–49e.
8. Del Vecchio DA, Villanueva NL, Mohan R, Johnson B, Wan D, Venkataram A, Rohrich RJ. Clinical implications of gluteal fat graft migration: a dynamic anatomical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(5):1180–92.
9. Vartanian E, Gould DJ, Hammoudeh ZS, Azadgoli B, Stevens WG, Macias LH.The ideal thigh: a crowdsourcing-based assessment of ideal thigh aesthetic and implications for gluteal fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(8):861–9.
10. Cansancao AL, Condé-Green A, David JA, Cansancao B, Vidigal RA.Use of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss in liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(5):1132–5.
11. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classication of surgical complications: 5-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.
12. Chang KN.The use of intraoperative grid pattern markings in lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(5):1292–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000135908.46918.36.
13. Hoyos AE, Perez ME, Castillo L. Dynamic denition mini-lipoabdominoplasty com­bining multilayer liposculpture, fat grafting, and muscular plication. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(4):545–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13484493.
14. Cuenca-Guerra R, Quezada J.What makes buttocks beautiful? A review and classication of the determinants of gluteal beauty and the surgical techniques to achieve them. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2004;28(5):340–7.
15. Mendieta CG.The art of gluteal sculpting. St Louis: Quality Medical Publisher; 2011.
Chapter 16
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Buttocks Dynamic Denition (HD2) Liposuction: for Adipose Harvesting and Grafting
AlfredoHoyos andMauricioPerez
16.1 Background
The gluteal region has been historically associated with healthiness and couple mat­ing while considered one of the most appealing features of the human body for both men and women.
Its shape and best projection can be perceived in the standing position and during bipedal locomotion. The glutes are dynamic and change their shape depending on age, gender, weight, and lifestyle. They are not only responsible for the leg move­ment, but also play an important erotic issue as a secondary sexual erogenous area, the concept of its ideal contour changes among different ethnicities and time.
As new lipoplasty techniques evolved in body contouring surgery, the gluteal region was rapidly included, and fat modeling enhanced its overall shape. However, the lack of projection was a concern that only got overpassed with the introduction of implants and/or fat grafting. Since then, multiple approaches for female buttock contour enhancement were described, though the male gluteal aesthetics were left somehow behind. In fact, the male patient was subject to liposculpture procedures based on female premises, which in turn derived in suboptimal results. So recently, we reported our experience on the male aesthetics for the gluteal region, by describ­ing some different anatomic perspectives: the contour is squared rather than round; fat deposits are not predominant; and the musculature projects two different bulges that in the antero-posterior view results in a buttery shape (Fig.16.1).
Current gluteal contouring treatments include the use of implants, autologous fat transfer, excisional procedures, autologous gluteal augmentation with tissue aps and liposuction. Implants have a considerable higher rate of complications
A. Hoyos (*) Bogotá, Colombia
M. Perez Rochester, MN, USA
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 D. Del Vecchio, H. Durán (eds.), Aesthetic Surgery of the Buttock,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13802-7_16
231