Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 535 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
24 Advanced Techniques forButtock Restructuring, Reshaping, andLifting
337
c
Fig. 24.12 (continued)
24.7 Postsurgical Management
d
The patient must remain at the surgical facility for a minimum period of 24h for surveillance, antimicrobial coverage, analgesia, anti-inammation, antiemetics, and measures for prevention of DVT such as the use of pneumatic intermittent compres­sion stockings and enoxaparin, the latter begins 8h after surgery. In the immediate postsurgical period a postsurgical garment is not used, only a noncompressive ban­dage so as not to compromise the viability of the aps and it is important to use a cushion to reduce the pressure in the gluteal region. The wounds are inspected the next day and assisted ambulation begins. The patient is instructed to perform proper wound care and is scheduled for revision every 5days.
The drains are removed once the expense has decreased to 25cc in 24h for 3 consecutive days. Once the drains have been removed, the postsurgical garments are placed and rehabilitation therapy with ultrasound, lymphatic drainage, radiothera­pies, etc., is started according to the needs and evolution of each patient. One week after drain removal the stitches are removed. The patient is instructed to avoid pres­sure in the area, avoid sitting for long periods of time, and continue using a special cushion or donut to avoid pressure in the buttock area. In case of performing lipec­tomy the donut use begins 10days later to avoid pressure in the wound region and its use continues for at least 2months.
338
ab
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
E. U. Góngora Alejandre and C. C. Solis López
In case of making an incision above the intergluteal crease for implant place­ment, it is important to instruct the patient to maintain a meticulous cleaning of the area and to take a shower after each bowel movement.
24.8 Complications andIts Management
This section will discuss the complications of the buttock reshaping and lifting with lipectomy since the complications of buttock augmentation with lipoinjection or implants have been widely discussed by several authors and are widely known. Therefore, we will only discuss the complications of lipectomy in “seagull wings” with gluteal augmentation in its different modalities.
24.8.1 Transitory Ischemia ofFlaps
This complication occurs mainly in patients in whom aggressive liposuction of the back is performed, patients whose large dermal-fat aps are resected and in which the wound may present a certain degree of tension, or in patients in which secondary to wide tissue resection is necessary to perform a cephalic dissection of the lumbar ap to achieve adequate advancement and closure of the wound. Although this com­plication is not frequent, it is important to keep a close postsurgical surveillance in order to establish the management as soon as possible and avoid any transient isch­emia that can progress toward a partial necrosis of the ap (Fig.24.13a).
Among the general measures for the management of this complication are to avoid any type of pressure that can be exerted in the area, remove compressive ban­dages, application of local heat in the area, supplement with oxygen in nasal tips, and local application of 2% nitroglycerin ointment in the affected area with a plastic cover over the region. This is repeated every 12h according to the evolution of the
Fig. 24.13 (a) Transient ischemia of the ap in a patient. (b) Supercial eschar formation after 7days of evolution
24 Advanced Techniques forButtock Restructuring, Reshaping, andLifting
patient. It is important to warn the patient about possible adverse effects of the nitroglycerin ointment (dizziness, nausea, headache, redness of skin, fainting, sweating, etc.). We have also found helpful the use of oral pentoxifylline 400 mg every 12 h.
Usually, after starting this treatment, transient ischemia remits after approxi­mately 5–7days and there is a favorable evolution in most cases. However, in some cases, there is blister formation and partial necrosis of the dermis, which is pre­sented clinically as a supercial eschar and which usually evolves favorably with epithelialization (Fig.24.13b).
339
24.8.2 Non-Aesthetic Scars
Since this procedure involves large incisions it also involves large scars. In some cases, they can be irregular, asymmetric, hyper pigmented, or, in the worst case, hypertrophic or keloid. In case of requiring scar revision this is done 6months after surgery.
24.8.3 Skin Necrosis
It is a rare complication, if it occurs, conservative management and surveillance begins until the damage is delimited, which occurs in a period of 1 or 2weeks. Once the area of necrosis is delimited excision of the area of necrosis is made and direct closure is performed.
24.8.4 Wound Dehiscence
When dehiscence cases occur these are generally limited to small areas of a few centimeters in the areas of greatest tension such as the central regions of the aps. If the tissues are in suitable conditions, conservative debridement and direct closure are performed.
24.8.5 Asymmetry ofButtocks
It is a very rare complication. It refers to the difference in the height and/or position of the buttocks when augmentation is performed with implants and is attributed to malposition due to rupture of the intramuscular pocket and displacement of the
340
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
E. U. Góngora Alejandre and C. C. Solis López
implant. If presented, surgery renement is performed to reposition the implant 6months after surgery.
24.8.6 Neuropathic Pain
This complication is very rare, and occurs in cases of buttock augmentation with implants of signicant volume and occurs by compression of the sciatic nerve. This complication is extremely rare and has occurred in only two patients in my 25-year career. The patient presents pain and paresthesia in the pelvic limb, as well as weak­ness of the musculature. Initial management has been carried out in both cases with analgesics, anti-inammatories, steroids, physiotherapy, etc., with torpid evolution. The denitive management was the withdrawal of the gluteus implant.
24.8.7 Insatisfaction withtheResult
It is important to note that patients never complain about the length of the “seagull wings lipectomy” scar in the postoperative period. The patient should be thoroughly explained in the presurgical consultation that the only way to obtain an adequate buttock lift and reshaping in order to obtain an aesthetic result is through this big incision and that an exchange will be carried out. That is, we will obtain the silhou­ette that the patient has always dreamed of in exchange for making a very large incision. The scar generally has an adequate evolution and is easily hidden under clothes and even under a bathing suit (Fig.24.14). A patient satised with the shape
abc
Fig. 24.14 (ac) The scar can be easily hidden even under a tiny bathing suit
24 Advanced Techniques forButtock Restructuring, Reshaping, andLifting
341
and volume of her buttocks will never complain about the scar. When there is some kind of dissatisfaction in the result it is usually because they want a greater volume. In 25years I have only presented one case in which the patient reported dissatisfac­tion with a volume that seemed excessive for her and requested that the implants be removed.
References
1. Mendieta CG, Sood A.Classication system for gluteal evaluation: revisited. Clin Plast Surg.
2018;45(2):159–77.
2. Centeno RF.Gluteal aesthetic unit classication: a tool to improve outcomes in body contour-
ing. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26(2):200–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2006.01.001.
3. Mod MM, Teitelbaum S, Suissa D, etal. Report on mortality from gluteal fat grafting: recom-
mendations from the ASERF task force. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:796–806.
4. Del Vecchio DA, Villanueva NL, Mohan R, Johnson B, Wan D, Venkataram A, Rohrich
RJ. Clinical implications of gluteal fat graft migration: a dynamic anatomical study. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(5):1180–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.000000000000502.
5. Aslani A, Del Vecchio D. Composite buttock augmentation: the next frontier in gluteal
aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(6):1312–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/
PRS.0000000000006244.
6. Vergara R, Marcos M.Intramuscular gluteal implants. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1996;20:259. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s0026699000306.
Chapter 25
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
The Post-Bariatric Buttock
MartínMorales-Olivera
25.1 Introduction
The lower body contour is the region of greatest clinical stigma after massive weight loss. This contour includes the abdomen, thighs, and gluteal region, and are also the topography of greatest concern and most popular for reconstruction.
We should keep in mind that patients who lose weight after bariatric surgery (postbariatric patient), present a series of nutritional, histological, and clinical changes, placing them in a very particular study group as compared to a conven­tional cosmetic patient.
The severity of these changes (also called sequelae) depends on the bariatric surgery performed, as there are very signicant differences between restrictive (gas­tric sleeve, adjustable gastric band, intragastric balloon), and malabsorptive proce­dures (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, biliopancreatic diversion, duodenal switch). The most common and performed worldwide are the bypass and gastric sleeve (Table25.1).
As such, in addition to these factors, the resulting body deformities will also depend on the weight loss (the greater the degree of obesity, the greater the loss and sequelae), but will generally occur in all segments and body areas, including the gluteal region.
Therefore, in order to better understand the gluteal region changes in a postbar­iatric patient and conduct their correct evaluation, we should remember that there are specic anatomical changes in the four anatomical structures involved in “ideal buttocks”: the skin, fat, muscle, and bone components.
M. Morales-Olivera (*) Hospital General Tláhuac, Mexico City, Mexico
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 D. Del Vecchio, H. Durán (eds.), Aesthetic Surgery of the Buttock,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13802-7_25
343
344
Table 25.1 Severity of sequelae
Severity of sequelae
Nutritional changes
Histological changes
Clinical changes Great loss of subcutaneous fatty tissue (almost
Iron deciency Uncommon Common Zinc deciency Uncommon Common Vitamin B1 deciency Rare Common Vitamin B12 deciency Very rare Common Vitamin C deciency Very rare Common Density changes of elastic bers Uncommon Very
Morphology changes of elastic bers Uncommon Very
Collagen density changes Uncommon Very
Collagen morphology changes Uncommon Common
exclusively skin aps) Increased cervicofacial contour deformity Uncommon Very
Increased upper body contour deformity Uncommon Very
Increased lower body contour deformity (including the gluteal region)
M. Morales-Olivera
Gastric sleeve
Uncommon Very
Uncommon Very
Gastric bypass
common
common
common
common
common
common
common
25.2 Post-Bariatric Anatomic Changes oftheGluteal Region
25.2.1 The Skin Component
As indicated above, post-bariatric patients present skin histological alterations depending on the procedure performed, and this will have a direct impact on the clinical presentation of the skin surface (larger aps, higher degree of rhytidosis, and greater number of irregularities).
Changes in density and morphology of elastic and collagen bers, as well as thickening of the epidermis, hyperplasia, and parakeratosis, are very common histo­logical changes in patients who underwent gastric bypass (especially in those who had class II or greater obesity), and therefore lose viscoelasticity, which is reected as greater laxity.
Similarly, these histological alterations pose a greater risk of presenting altera­tions in the surgical site, such as epidermolysis, necrosis, and dehiscence. These pose a relative risk 14 times greater than for a conventional patient.
As such, the gluteal skin component of a post-bariatric patient must be handled in a very specic way with surgical accessories that allow us to close with less reac­tive and stiffer suture material (such as tissue adhesives), while achieving complete healing of the wound.
25 The Post-Bariatric Buttock
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
345
25.2.2 The Fat Component
Buttocks are closely related to all the structures adjacent to the posterior contour to have a certain shape or projection, where fat plays an essential role, both externally and internally.
Externally, factors such as the lack of waistline have an inuence, given large fatty deposits in the sacral or suprasacral region, and internally, providing adequate tissue rmness by lling the connective-brotic tissue network of the gluteal region.
That is why fat is a fundamental factor for gluteal aesthetics, as much of the volume, especially in female patients, consists of fat located in the subcutaneous region. This fat is usually rm because the subcutaneous tissue of this region is mostly rich in dense connective tissue, resulting in rmness of the local tissue.
Therefore, in thin patients with a lack of fat that lls said connective-brotic tis­sue, it converts the loose subcutaneous plane and causes gluteal ptosis, which can in turn come with cutaneous accidity.
In post-bariatric patients, weight loss certainly involves structural alteration of the adipocytes, presenting interstitial brosis, hypertrophy of the vessel wall, and fat necrosis.
Therefore, the loss and structural and density modication of collagen bers and elastin, as well as modications of the adipose tissue in all planes (including the subcutaneous region), result in severe clinical alterations (ptosis in any degree, aps, and depressions), regardless of the patient bone and muscle characteristics.
This is why most post-bariatric patients present sequelae at the buttock contour region, despite having a gradual and controlled weight loss and an adequate muscle strengthening routine, because the physiological-nutritional-histopathological dis­order in the skin and fat components cannot be corrected with exercise.
25.2.3 The Muscle Component
Muscles giving volume to the gluteal region (both supercial and deep) are thinner and with greater accidity in post-bariatric patients, unlike a conventional patient.
This is because the vast majority are used to a sedentary lifestyle (both before and after the bariatric procedure), mainly affecting the gluteus maximus muscle, since daily activities do not require the use of said muscle that much.
The supercial muscle plane is made up of the gluteus maximus and gluteus medius muscles. The former is the largest and thickest in the region, usually reach­ing a measure of up to 6–7cm thick at its origin next to the sacrum, becoming thin­ner toward its lateral limit (2–3cm thick). However, in post-bariatric patients, these dimensions are considerably reduced, a signicant factor to consider in the place­ment of buttock implants.
In addition, the supercial gluteal fascia, which is usually quite thick, and which provides complete coverage to the gluteal muscle region (from the iliac crest and
346
M. Morales-Olivera
tensor fascia lata, covering the gluteus medius and gluteus maximus), also loses volume and especially rmness (because it is connective tissue, collagen, and elas­tin bers).
Ultimately, said fascia presents septa-shaped expansions that divide the gluteus maximus into multiple fascicles, which can be highly resistant (and even inelastic), causing gluteal retractions, a clinical phenomenon present in most post-bariatric patients, addressed in the following chapters.
For all these reasons, post-bariatric buttock contouring poses a real surgical challenge.
In deep muscles (gluteus minimus, pyramidal, upper and lower calves, internal and external obturator), no important changes have been identied that may have an impact on the clinical sequelae of these patients.
25.2.4 The Bone Component
The overall image of the gluteal region depends on its shape, volume, and projec­tion. As previously mentioned, these result from the conformation and characteris­tics of the skin, fat, and muscle components. However, a noteworthy factor (that we often forget to indicate to the patient during the initial examination), is the bone structure per se of each individual, as it will give the general proportion of the lower body contour in relation to the upper body contour.
As such, we should remember that the shape of the gluteal region is dened mostly by bony structures: the iliac crest in its upper part, and laterally by a line that goes from the anterior superior iliac spine to the greater trochanter, and then through an imaginary line from the greater trochanter to the gluteal sulcus.
In post-bariatric patients, we can identify important modications in the bone structure, but especially in the upper body, given that for people who have been obese since childhood or are still in development; the ventilation mechanism is generally dysfunctional (obesity hypoventilation syndrome or obstructive sleep apnea) that is clinically presented with a large diameter rib cage and a forced inspi­ration or emphysema.
Such modications cause a disproportionate image of the upper shape in relation to the lower one, both in an anteroposterior and lateral view (Images 25.1 and 25.2).
For this reason, when a patient presents such bone alterations, it becomes the most difcult factor to improve, since this component cannot be directly modied, thus resorting to the other three (skin, fat, and muscle) to offset the disproportion.
For this purpose, we must turn to surgical techniques that generate an actual increase in the gluteal region, the pelvis, and the lower contour in general.
25 The Post-Bariatric Buttock
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Images 25.1–25.2 Disproportion between the upper and lower body contours
25.3 Post-Bariatric Gluteal Ptosis
347
Gluteal ptosis is skin redundancy and caudal adipose tissue beyond the gluteal sul­cus in the midpoint of posterior thigh. Taking Raúl González’s gluteal ptosis clas­sication as reference, post-bariatric patients present Grade IV Ptosis (true Ptosis) and Grade IV Ptosis (dysfunctional ptosis) (Images 25.3 and 25.4).
It is common that patients who presented a loss greater than 50kg also present a grade IV ptosis, where the infra-gluteal sulcus exceeds the M line (sagittal line that crosses the midpoint of posterior thigh), with ptotic tissue beyond that.
In patients with more severe weight loss, grade V ptosis is identied, where there is complete dysfunction of the gluteal support system.