Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 465 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
378
M. A. Garcia
sac which is vulnerable to trauma as there is no muscular wall that protects the abdominal contents [1114]. In large hernias, the amount of viscera which progres­sively stretch and hold the hernia sac is such that it can form a “second abdomen” (Fig.27.4).
Mesentery andIntestinal Loops
The herniated viscera adapt to local and extra-abdominal factors. The mesentery extends and becomes thickened by the difculty of venous and lymphatic return, and there is chronic bowel dilatation due to loss of balance between the visceral and parietal tonus [9, 12]. A chronic inammation of the mesentery and intestine devel­ops, caused by direct mechanical irritation by the continuous friction with the rim of the ring. This inammation conditions the formation of bowel adhesions, between mesentery and omentum, to the ring and hernia sac. In addition, there is a decrease in the venous return of the portal ow and the cava to the thorax due to the decrease of the intra-abdominal pressure and compression of the hernia ring, which causes congestion of all the abdominal viscera [1114] (Fig.27.4).
Skin andSubcutaneous Tissue, Fistulas
The skin and subcutaneous cellular tissue suffer alterations by a mechanical effect of compression by the large sac, resulting in atrophy. Abreast of a peritoneal sac, the skin is reduced to a poorly vascularized dermis, devoid of its supporting subcutane­ous tissue [7, 12, 14]. The eventual result of this cutaneous hypoxia is the appear­ance of trophic ulcers which are observed, on occasions, in giant incisional hernias. A trophic ulcer has precise and corresponding manifestations: always situated at the midline, symmetrical, and sits at the vertex of the protrusion where the skin is thin­nest. In chronic cases, atrophic ulcers may appear that are bacterial or fungal in origin that can contaminate the operative eld. There will also be a tendency for infections in the skin folds around the sack [15].
Flament etal. described two types of ulcers in patients with hernias with loss of domain:
(a) Uncomplicated ulceration: these ulcers are most often infected, despite the
absence of intestinal stula formation.
(b) Complicated ulcers: the trophic ulcer is a prelude to more serious complications
such as stulas and eviscerations.
The rupture of a herniation (“burst abdomen”) is a rather rare complication which converts a herniation into an evisceration through a breakdown of the perito­neal and cutaneous supportive layers. These events are end results of neglected trophic ulcers [15] (Fig.27.4).
27 Loss ofAbdominal Domain
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
379
Systemic Alterations
Musculoskeletal Dysfunction
As the hernia sac grows excessively, a “second abdomen” is formed, which now weighs more than the abdomen itself and tends to cause the patient to bend forward following the weight of the sac. To compensate, it will force the patient to perform a hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine with its consequent painful lumbar syndrome or low back pain [13, 14]. When the linea alba is disrupted, the rectus abdominis mus­cles become dysfunctional, and the columns are mechanically uncoupled. This results in greater pressure on the posterior column, leading to chronic back pain and spine curvature disorders.
Ventilatory Dysfunction
As the intestinal loops migrate into the sac, the intra-abdominal pressure decreases in direct relation to the herniated volume. This alters the balance between intratho­racic and intra-abdominal pressures by modifying the normal diaphragm shape, which is attened, resulting in inspiratory and expiratory restriction. Ventilation in these patients depends to a large extent on the capacity of the thoracic muscles [14]. The low intra-abdominal pressure changes the function of the diaphragm pro­moting its lowering and progressive lethargy. As a result, patients may have respi­ratory problems due to the synergistic changes in the abdominal wall, the discoordination between the chest wall, diaphragm, and abdominal muscles. This results in a decrease in total respiratory compliance almost entirely due to a decrease in chest wall compliance—whereas the lung remains substantially unchanged—which induces an increase in mechanical work of breathing and O2 consumption by accessory respiratory muscles [10]. Patients develop chronic respiratory failure, often latent, with functional tests and minimal change in blood gases in the absence of preexisting restrictive or obstructive pulmonary disease [16]. However, in patients with low respiratory reserve, all preoperative care must be taken and surgical maneuvers aiming to minimize the increased work of breath­ing [
16].
Chronic Gastrointestinal Dysfunction
Patients with large hernia sacs develop altered intestinal transit through two mecha­nisms; the rst is because of the difculty of increasing the intra-abdominal pres­sure due to abdominal muscles displaced from the midline and with difculty contracting, and the second as obstructive effect when the intestinal loops are included in the contents of the hernia sac, which produces obstruction of the pas­sage of intestinal material by a hernia ring that obstructs the ow, in addition to the compression of the viscera among themselves inside the sac [14].
380
M. A. Garcia
Dysfunction forUrination
Rarely, the bladder is inside a hernia sac and causes obstructive dysfunction. Most of the time, it is simply due to dysfunction of the bladder detrusor muscle due to the inability to raise the intra-abdominal pressure and favor the action of the blad­der [14].
Psychosocial Issues
The deterioration of the quality of life due to the alterations that the giant hernia causes in the patient, such as the low self-esteem due to the aesthetic alteration and the poor access to a hernia specialist in some places, makes the patients and their family environment have a signicant emotional commitment with psychological alterations that also require professional support.
Management oftheHernia withLoss Domain
The objectives of surgical management in an incisional hernia are the recovery of the anatomy and functionality of the abdominal wall, prevention of recurrence, and adequate tissue cover. For this the closure of the midline is of vital importance, since the restructured wall functions as the primary support and the abdominal continent and prevents excessive stress on the mesh. Achieving these three goals in a parietal reconstruction (in the case of a giant hernia) is a major surgical challenge, so all available resources must be used.
Different methods for the closure of the midline in giant hernias have been described in order to reduce the operative morbidity, especially the possibility of the development of the intra-abdominal compartment syndrome due to the clo­sure of a giant defect and the concomitant increase of the intra-abdominal pressure.
The most used surgical techniques, in order to achieve an increase of the perim­eter of the abdominal cavity based on relaxation incisions in the lateral muscles of the abdominal wall, are the anterior separation of components [17] and the trans­versus abdominis release techniques [18]. Another option is the Albanese tech­nique, with good results [19]. There are modications of the anterior separation of components technique widely used as Carbonell-Bonafe modication [20], endo­scopic assisted minimally invasive release of the external oblique [21], and subcu­taneous endoscopic approach described by Daes etal. [22]. In the same way, the transverse abdominal release technique can be done by minimally invasive and robotic approach.
The common objectives of these techniques are (1) to avoid the tension on the midline closure and (2) to increase the abdominal capacity permitting an easy return of the viscera to the abdominal cavity, thus achieving domain recovery.
27 Loss ofAbdominal Domain
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
381
Anterior Separation ofComponents
The technique of anterior component separation was rst described by Ramirez etal., whereby the muscular layers of the anterior abdominal wall could be separated and medially mobilized in order to close the midline in large ventral defects, restoring the anatomy. Ramirez et al. described development of the avascular plane between the external and internal oblique muscular layers through relaxing incisions lateral to the rectus sheath, combined with mobilizing the posterior rectus sheath to the midline. Combined with freeing the rectus from its attachments to the posterior sheet [17]. The technique is extensively described in previous chapters.
Carbonell etal. describe a variation of the Ramirez technique with the installation of a 30×50cm mesh between the plane of the external and internal oblique muscles, reinserting the medial border of the external oblique muscle toward the mesh and internal oblique muscle (Level 1) and if needed releasing the rectus from its aponeu­rosis through its posterior face using another retromuscular mesh (Level 2) [20].
Endoscopic assisted minimally invasive [21] release of the external oblique has also been described as a technique that reduces complications of soft tissues of open technique, and Daes etal. [22] described a subcutaneous endoscopic approach, in his series of hernias between 6 and 10cm only required the release of unilateral external oblique muscle, through a supraaponeurotic subcutaneous dissection with balloon and only one working port apart from the optical port. The closure of the defect and reinforcement with mesh was performed by IPOM technique.
Transverse Abdominal Release Technique TAR
Novitsky etal. described the transverse abdominal release technique. The TAR pro­cedure is a continuation and modication of the traditional retrorectus Rives—Stoppa repair. It is a myofascial release of the transversus abdominis muscle. This technique involves a wide area from the diaphragm to the pelvis and from paraspinal muscles of both sides. A major benet of the TAR approach is that no skin aps are raised for the reduction of the hernia, which may yield lower postoperative wound complica­tions. The technique is extensively described in previous chapters [18].
Albanese Technique
Albanese designed his “triple incision” on the oblique major muscles (OM), the minor oblique, and the posterior leaf of the rectus sheath, respectively. This can be associated with the use of a mesh [19].
Adjuvant Techniques
There are other nonsurgical techniques whose purpose is to increase the perimeter and capacity of the abdominal cavity based on the elongation of the muscles of the abdominal wall; these techniques called “adjuvants” are progressive preoperative
382
ab
M. A. Garcia
pneumoperitoneum (PPP) [23], tissue expanders [24], and botulinum toxin [25, 26]. Other more radical techniques have been described for the treatment of giant inguinoscrotal hernias with loss of domain, like debulking of abdominal contents with extensive bowel resections in the form of total or hemicolectomy, omentec­tomy, splenectomy, and even small bowel resections [27].
Progressive Preoperative Pneumoperitoneum (PPP)
Progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum gradually elevates intra-abdominal pressure, achieving the following systemic and local changes in the cavity and abdominal wall [13, 23, 2831] (Fig.27.5):
• Stabilizes diaphragmatic function and improves ventilatory mechanics
• Distends the muscles of the abdominal wall, which increases the capacity of the
abdominal cavity
• Allows pneumatic lysis of adhesions facilitating dissection of the hernia sac and
its contents
• Improves portal, mesenteric, and intestinal circulation
• Produces peritoneal irritation through the ambient air, optimizing the inamma-
tory response, and improves healing
• Allows to identify other areas of weakness in the abdominal wall not evident
• Decreases midline tension
• Decreases the visceral volume up to 40% [13]
• Improves tolerance to herniary content reduction, reducing immediate hemody-
namic, ventilatory, and postoperative complications related to intra-abdominal
compartment syndrome
PPP requires frequent insufation of air into the abdominal cavity. Goñi Moreno used oxygen in his rst case and later changed to ambient air. You can use oxygen, CO2, nitrous oxide, and ambient air, which has less absorption than oxygen and CO2 [31].
Fig. 27.5 (a) Ventral Hernia, prior to initiation of PPP, (b) after 15days of PPP (Video 27.3)
27 Loss ofAbdominal Domain
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
383
The procedure can be performed in the operating room or in the patient’s bed under aseptic conditions, local anesthesia, and sedation, by a detachable Veres nee­dle or by Seldinger technique; you can use a double lumen catheter or a pigtail catheter placed percutaneously at Palmer’s Point or other remote site from the her­nia. Once the catheter is in the abdominal cavity, ambient air is passed through it. The catheter can be inserted under ultrasonographical or CT-guided control by the interventional radiologist. The subsequent insufation of the abdominal cavity can be performed as an inpatient or ambulatory procedure. Air is insufated daily in an amount of 500–1500cm3 [1214, 31].
Intra-abdominal pressure should not exceed 15 mmHg. The duration of PPP depends on hernia type and size; approximately 1–2weeks in giant inguinoscrotal hernia, 2–3weeks in giant ventral hernia, and the total volume will range from 5000 to 10,000cm3. If the patient manifests a feeling of fullness, pain, nausea, shortness of breath, tachycardia, hypertension, hypotension, or decreased blood O2 satura­tion, the PPP must be suspended.
PPP has a low rate of complications (7%): hematoma, seroma, abdominal wall emphysema, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumopericardium, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary thromboembolism, intestinal obstruction, hemoperi­toneum, peritonitis, catheter dysfunction (local emphysema, infection, displacement to preperitoneum), pneumonia, and metabolic acidosis.
Botulinum Toxin
Botulinum toxin (BTX) is a neurotoxin that is isolated and puried from Clostridium bacteria which produce eight different serotypes. Only A and B serotypes are commer­cially available for clinical use, with type A being the most commonly utilized. BTX blocks the release of acetylcholine in addition to pain and inammatory mediators at the presynaptic cholinergic nerve terminal. The injected skeletal muscle with BTX becomes accidly paralyzed with diminished pain sensations resulting in 4–6months of reversible paralysis or chemical muscle denervation. In the abdominal lateral wall, BTX should result in improved abdominal wall compliance, decreased lateral abdomi­nal wall retraction with less midline tension, and pain modulating benets, with poten­tial applications in abdominal wall reconstruction settings in patients with loss of domain. Ibarra-Hurtado etal. demonstrated in patients with ventral hernia with loss domain a 50% reduction in transverse hernia diameter at week 3 [25]. Another study in inguinoscrotal giant hernias resulted in a 26% gain of intra-abdominal volume [26].
Tissue Expanders
Expansion of musculofascial tissue using temporarily implanted expanders as a pre­cursor to reconstructing the abdominal wall was rst described by Hobar, Byrd, and colleagues for congenital defects and later by the same group for posttraumatic defects. Gradual expansion should allow for reapproximation of autogenous,
384
M. A. Garcia
innervated, healthy tissue. Possible locations for the expanders are subcutaneous, intermuscular sites between the external and internal oblique muscles, intramuscu­lar sites between the internal oblique and transverse abdominis muscles, and intraab­dominally. Placing expanders in the plane between the transverse and internal oblique muscles appears ill-advised because this area contains the nervous and arte­rial supplies for these two muscles and the rectus [32].
Measurement ofAbdominal Cavity Volumes andHernia Sac
The treatment of giant ventral hernia with loss of domain is considered to be dan­gerous because fascia closure under tension is life-threatening due to the risk of intra-abdominal hypertension (also known as abdominal compartment syndrome). To mitigate this postoperative risk, the adjuvant preoperative techniques have been used in the work-up of large incisional hernias. Predictive preoperative factors for these complications (including compartment syndrome) have been poorly described. It is essential that these patients have imaging, such as CT scan without contrast that evaluates the anatomy of the wall and abdominal cavity, in addition to measuring the volumes of the abdominal cavity and hernia sac.
The volumes to be measured are the incisional hernia volume (IHV), the abdomi­nal cavity volume (ACV) excluding the IHV, the total peritoneal volume (PV, i.e. IHV˖ ACV), and the IHV/PV.The height and width of the hernia should also be calculated.
Dumont etal. [23] described in 2009 the increase of the length of the muscles of the abdominal wall and hernia ring after PPP and coined the concept of passive extension in the muscles. Sabbagh etal. [33] in their study in 2011 described that an IHV/PV ratio 20% was predictive of tension-free fascia closure of ventral hernias with loss domain. He showed that 89% of the patients meeting this criterion had tension-free fascia closure and no need for resection to decrease the intra-abdominal pressure. When the ratio was 20%, only 12.5% of the patients had tension-free fascia closure without resection. Meir etal. [34] considered a high IHV/PV ratio to be an indication for PPP but did not quantify the parameter. Kingsnorth etal. [7] suggested that physiological respiratory adaptation is necessary if the volume is above 15–20%. Sabbagh adopted the threshold of 20% suggested by Kingsnorth etal. This value may have been chosen as a result of the systematic use of PPP.In 2009, Tanaka etal. [8] reported on their use of peritoneal volume expansion prior to the surgical treatment of ventral hernias with loss domain. They used the IHV/ACV ratio to determine the extent of PPP. Tanaka etal. [8] applied a threshold of 25% for the IHV/ACV ratio but did not specify how they had decided on this value. Rappoport etal. [13] in 2014 demonstrated similar results in their study. They measured the elongation of the rectus muscles and lateral muscles of the abdominal wall after PPP and also demonstrated a decrease in visceral volume of approximately 47% after PPP, a signicant change, attributable to a clear diminution of the caliber of the intestinal loops and the thickness of intestinal wall (Fig.27.6).
The determination of abdominal cavity and hernia sac volumes and measure­ment of the length of the abdominal wall muscles, before and after the application
ab
27 Loss ofAbdominal Domain
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 27.6 (a) CT scan previous PPP, with the abdominal cavity and the hernia sac totally occupied by bowels. MR anterior rectus abdominis muscle and MO oblique muscles, with their length mea­sures in centimeters. (b) CT scan after 2weeks of PPP, with change of length of the rectus and oblique muscles and reduction of the visceral volume in 46.9%
385
of adjuvant techniques, allows for correct surgical planning, selection of technique for each case, and prediction of feasibility of the closure of the midline without tension.
The Sum oftheForces
During the perioperative period of the approach of a giant hernia with loss of domain, a symbiosis between the different adjuvant and surgical techniques is required. The decrease in the diameter of the hernia ring and the elongation of the muscles of the abdominal wall reached after the application of Botox, plus the elongation of the muscles and decrease of the visceral volume that is achieved with the PPP, allows the patient to reach his surgery with a accid and elongated abdominal wall that facilitates the closure of the midline. If we add the advance­ment of the myofascial aps of both sides with the techniques of anterior or posterior separation of components applied in a more manageable abdominal wall, the union of the rectus muscles in the midline is feasible in large defects of the abdominal wall.
This symbiosis is called “the sum of the forces” in our unit of hernias (Fig.27.7).
This allows patients to have less chance of complications secondary to a tension repair, such as intra-abdominal compartmental syndrome and recurrences. The effect of Botox also decreases postoperative pain with less analgesia requirements and better and faster ambulation and return to activities. During PPP, there is an adaptation to high intra-abdominal pressures of up to 15mmHg, which allows a better tolerance after surgery, without respiratory or hemodynamic compromise.
The sum of the forces offers signicant advantages compared to the individual advantages of each surgical technique and adjuvant.
386
ad
b
c
M. A. Garcia
e
Fig. 27.7 Giant ventral hernia. (a) BTX inltration in lateral abdominal wall. (b) After 5days of PPP. (c) Dissection of the hernia sac with the abdominal cavity with pneumoperitoneum. (d) Anterior component separation. (e) Abdominoplasty (Video 27.4)
According to our experience and as demonstrated in our study of 14 patients with giant hernia with loss of mastery with a mean age of 69years and a BMI of 31.5, the “sum of the forces” have achieved safe results with 6% of relapse with a follow-up at 24months, without major morbidity, without mortality, and improving the quality of life of our patients.
Optimization ofSurgery by aMultidisciplinary Team
The management of a giant hernia with loss of domain requires preparation of the patient and the multidisciplinary team that is treating the patient.
Rarely does a hernia with loss of domain present as an emergency case—the giant hernia diameter decreases the possibility of an intestinal obstruction. Therefore,
27 Loss ofAbdominal Domain
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
387
the vast majority are elective cases, allowing sufcient time for optimal preparation of the patient and their comorbidities.
The patient must stop smoking at least 1 month before and 2–3 months after surgery, reducing respiratory and wound complications. They must have optimal nutrition, with albumin greater than 3.5g/dL; otherwise there must be nutritional optimization. Diabetics with HgA1c greater than 7 have a greater possibility of wound infection and poor wound healing. In these cases, the intervention of the endocrinologist is indispensable.
For patients with poor baseline functional status, a preoperative rehabilitation plan is established.
Decreased weight is critical. Obese patients are more likely to have surgical wound complications and a chronically high intra-abdominal pressure that favors tension in the midline closure, increasing the possibility of recurrence. Preoperative weight loss reduces the volume of the liver, omentum, and retroperitoneal fat. Patients with obe­sity should be previously managed by the nutritionist of the obesity/bariatric team. Therefore, the patient should be treated by a team of multidisciplinary professionals.
The patient’s work-up should include a complete collection of information from their clinical history, surgical history, postsurgical complications, any open abdo­men, and/or recurrences. Operative records should be accessed to obtain informa­tion of the types of sutures and meshes used.
The evaluation with CT scan in Valsalva should include the measurement of vol­umes of the abdominal cavity and hernia sac to determine the percentage of loss of domain, in addition to 3D images of the abdominal wall. For this reason, it is essen­tial to have a radiologist with interest in abdominal wall imaging.
Likewise, the interventional radiology team must have experience in the installa­tion of PPP catheters and evaluate the patient during the period of insufation of the PPP, due to possible dysfunction of the catheter by displacements or other causes.
The use of botulinum toxin should be by surgeons with experience in this man­agement for its correct dosage and inltration in the abdominal wall. Subsequent radiological tests to determine changes in the abdominal wall and hernia and to plan the surgery are also advised. Approximately 1month after inltration, surgery can be performed and the patient hospitalized according to each case in a period of 5–10days. During the PPP period, patients should have antithromboembolic mea­sures such as compression stockings and low-molecular-weight heparin, as well as respiratory and motor kinesiotherapy. The nursing team must have enough experi­ence to recognize signs of intra-abdominal hypertension and to know the initial actions to avoid complications.
The surgical team may, if necessary, include plastic surgeons for an abdomino­plasty in case of large dermal aps that require resection and better aesthetic results (Fig.
27.7).
In the immediate postoperative period, patients should be closely monitored due to the possibility of intra-abdominal compartment syndrome, especially in those cases in which no adjuvant measures were used. Due to the possibility of operative wound complications, the team must have specialized nurses in the advanced man­agement of wound complications. For this reason, these patients must be referred to hospitals that have professionals with experience in giant hernias.
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025