Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 391 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
45 Мб
Скачать
30 Rehabilitation in Pediatric Hand Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 30.7 The silicone elastomer used in the night time to treat the scar
When all the wounds will be completely
Fig. 30.8 A kind of exercise to stimulate hand using in manual play and daily living activity
371
healed, the hand therapist will make a removable splint in order to protect the stump, the parents will learn how to massage the scars, and the use of silicon sheets will be suggested for the night. Also in this case, sensibility has to be stimulated through different tissues. It is very important that the little patient at the end of the therapy is able to use the ngers involved in the trauma for all the activities of daily living (Fig.30.8).
30.2 Tendon Lesions inPediatrics
Tendon lesions in children have a high incidence because they explore the world outside with their little hands often without paying attention. If these lesions are not treated properly, they can cause important functional decits and decits of growth; the child in fact can learn daily activities with the complete exclusion of the segment or of the whole hand.
However, it is very difcult to treat children with this kind of lesions because sometimes they have a very low compliance and little hands and little ngers which are very difcult to treat and to splint.
The major difference between the treatment of an adult and a child in this eld is that treating a child means a bigger immobilization and bigger splints that can include also digit and joint that are not directly involved in the trauma, with the aim of giving more stability and to be safer (Fig.30.9a–c).
The time of immobilization is on average longer than in adults, for example, in the lesion of exor tendons, we begin to physiotherapy at the end of the fourth week keeping the splint that will be made removable, with the wrist extended 0–20°, metacar­pal-phalangeal joint at about 30°, and interphalan­geal joint extended (Fig. 30.10a). Disposition is chosen in order to avoid intrinsic muscle retraction.
Sometimes the surgeon chooses the pullout technique (Fig.30.11); this can allow the imme­diate mobilization. The little patient will have of course a limit in the maximum open extension. The splint is going to be removable from the very beginning and will be made in the same position
372
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Pagliaro et al.
a
b
c
Fig. 30.9 Immobilization splint in pediatric hand tendon lesion
ab
30 Rehabilitation in Pediatric Hand Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
373
Fig. 30.10 Flexor tendons removable splint to start physiotherapy
that we explain before in order to protect the suture of the tendon.
The wearing of the splint will take a little bit longer for your patients, especially during the night and in risky situation.
The recovery will be placed basically on play­ing; the therapist will choose with the little patient games and toys that can be appropriate for the situation and the age (Fig.30.12a).
Fortunately in children, the elasticity of the tissues helps to reduce the post-immobilization stiffness (Fig.30.13).
The massage of the scar will be extremely important and has to be done more than four times a day, not very long but very often during the day. The technique of the massage is to do it slowly with pressure in order to avoid a thicken­ing of the scar and to limit the establishment of adherence in the deep tissues.
Another tool that needs to be associated with the massage is the use of silicon sheets, to wear during the night, which means for at least 8 hours
Fig. 30.11 Start rehabilitation with exor tendon pull out technique repair
per night. It is very important to spend some time
374
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Pagliaro et al.
Fig. 30.12 Example of exercise in rehabilitation in exor tendon lesion
during the rehabilitation, putting attention on the recovery of sensibility on the scar and nearby; this can be done with the stimulation of the part with different tissues from the softer to the rougher.
In case of stiffness after eight weeks, it will be possible to make dynamic splint to increase the mobility of the single nger or of more of them.
During the tenth week. The therapist can try to use electrostimulation in order to promote the sliding of the tendons and reduce the possibility of adherence and bio-feedback.
At about 12 weeks, if there are no decits, the patient can go back to the normal activities and use the whole limb like the other.
Also in extensor tendon lesion, the therapeutic approach is cautious. Normally, the time of immobilization is of six weeks with a splint in extension of the ngers and wrist in a neutral position (Fig.30.14).
At the end of the sixth week, we start to move the little hand of the child, making a removable
Fig. 30.13 Result of exor tendon lesion
splint. The therapist will teach the little patient
30 Rehabilitation in Pediatric Hand Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 30.14 Example of cast immobilization for extensor tendon lesion
and parents some exercises for the ngers like the “hook” and the “roof,” so gradually as the exion improves, the patient will be able to do a com-
375
plete st. To help the patient to understand how to close the hand, the therapist will provide some targets, like cylinders from bigger ones to smaller ones. During the rehabilitative session, different kinds of grips will be offered to the child in order to recorticalize the correct gesture of the single hand and of both in bimanual grips.
For sure also in this case, the treatment of this scar when healed will be very important and will follow the rules that we have explained before such as multiple massages during the day and the use of silicon sheets during the night. The extensor tendons slide immediately under the skin; this means that normally a scar has more possibility to do adherence with the next tissues and this can limit the range of motion. For this reason the parents need to learn from the thera­pist how to do dynamic sliding in schools; this means that they x the skin in one way and they asked the child to extend or ex which has a dou­ble effect on the scar, and this can be very useful. Also in this case during the week, if there is stiff­ness, the therapist can make dynamic splint in exion to increase the range of motion.
At about 12 weeks like for exor tendons, the rehabilitative protocol ends if the patients do not present any decit, and normal activity is permitted.
Toe-to-Hand Transfers for
https://t.me/medicina_free
Posttraumatic and Congenital Reconstruction in Children: Indications and Surgical Technique
NeilJones andChiaraParolo
31
Abstract
Miraculous improvement in hand function can be achieved by microsurgical toe-to-hand trans­fers, either for children who have sustained severe trauma resulting in amputations of their thumb or ngers or for children with congenital absent digits, due to symbrachydactyly, con­genital constriction ring syndrome, or trans­verse and longitudinal deciencies. From the rst experimental microsurgical toe-to-hand transfer performed by Buncke etal. (Br J Plast Surg 19:332–337, 1966), the procedure has subsequently evolved to minimize the harvest of tissues from the foot and to customize the appearance of the great toe similar to that of the thumb. Great toe and second toe transfers for posttraumatic reconstruction of amputations of the thumb, and single second toe, simultaneous double second toe transfers (O’Brien, Hand 10:232–240, 1978; Coskunrat et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1064–1069, 2005), and combined second and third toe transfers (Wei etal., Plast Reconstr Surg 84:651–661, 1989) for posttraumatic reconstruction of multiple digital amputations have subsequently evolved
N. Jonesn e-mail: nfjones@uci.edu
C. Parolo (*) Department of Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation, San Giuseppe Hospital IRCCS MultiMedica, Milan University, Milan, Italy e-mail: chiara.parolo@multimedica.it
for specic indications. Indications for post-
traumatic microsurgical reconstruction of the
thumb and ngers in children may be classied
exactly similar to the classication of congeni-
tal absent digits (Jones and Kaplan, Hand
7:391–399, 2012; Jones and Clune, Hand
11:77, 2016). The optimal age for performing a
toe transfer to reconstruct a congenital hand
difference has not been dened. Generally, the
earlier that a toe transfer is performed, the bet-
ter the chance of cortical integration.
Preoperative counseling of the parents with the
opportunity to meet and speak with other fami-
lies and children who have undergone a toe
transfer is absolutely vital.
Keywords
Toe-to-hand transfer · Microsurgical toe
transfer · Congenital absent digit · Finger
amputation · Hand trauma · Hand
reconstruction
31.1 Introduction
Miraculous improvement in hand function can be achieved by microsurgical toe-to-hand transfers, either for children who have sustained severe trauma resulting in amputations of their thumb or ngers or for children with congenital absent dig­its, due to symbrachydactyly, congenital con­striction ring syndrome, or transverse and longitudinal deciencies.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 G. Pajardi (ed.), Pediatric Hand Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30984-7_31
377
378
https://t.me/medicina_free
N. Jones and C. Parolo
Buncke [1] performed the rst experimental microsurgical toe-to-hand transfer in a monkey in 1964, and this was followed by the rst microsur­gical second toe-to-thumb transfer in a human by Yang in 1966 [2]. Cobbett [3] performed the rst great toe-to-thumb transfer based on the plantar arterial system, and Buncke et al. [4] performed the rst great toe-to-thumb transfer based on the rst dorsal metatarsal artery system. Great toe transfers have subsequently evolved to minimize the harvest of tissues from the foot and to custom­ize the appearance of the great toe similar to that of the thumb, using the Morrison “wrap- around” ap [5] and the “trimmed toe” transfer [6, 7]. Great toe and second toe transfers for posttraumatic recon­struction of amputations of the thumb and single second toe, simultaneous double second toe trans­fers [8, 9], and combined second and third toe transfers [10] for posttraumatic reconstruction of multiple digital amputations have subsequently evolved for specic indications.
31.2 Conventional Reconstruction
ofAmputations inChildren
Fortunately, severe amputations of the thumb and ngers are relatively rare in children. For sharp amputations, replantation should be attempted if at all possible, if necessary using vein grafts (per­formed on a back table) from the dorsal radial artery or even from the brachial artery at the elbow. Ectopic replantation in the groin or axilla may be considered in very unusual circumstances such as gross contamination. Conventional reconstruction of amputations or failed replanta­tions includes pollicization of a normal or injured nger for thumb reconstruction [11, 12] and dis­traction lengthening for thumb and nger recon­struction [1317].
31.3 Toe-to-Hand Transfers After
Trauma inChildren
Microsurgical toe-to-hand transfers have revolu­tionized posttraumatic reconstruction in adults after amputation of the thumb and/or ngers. Toe
transfers should now be considered as the opti­mal technique for reconstruction of amputated ngers and thumbs in children, just as in adults. It is a single stage procedure that provides greater length and maintains the potential for growth [18,
19], compared with distraction lengthening. For
thumb reconstruction, it preserves all four ngers or the remaining ngers compared with pollicization.
The second toe is always used for nger reconstruction and is preferred for thumb recon­struction in younger children. The second toe also provides the most inconspicuous donor site in the foot and is preferred by cultures requiring the use of sandal footwear. The great toe and its variations are preferred for thumb reconstruc­tion in older children, when the appearance of the new “thumb” becomes more important and also when multiple ngers are also amputated since the great toe has a greater area of sensate pulp. The Morrison wraparound [5] and “trimmed great toe” [6, 7] variations of a great toe transfer minimize the harvest of tissues from the foot and provide the most normal appear­ance of the reconstructed thumb. The “trimmed toe” technique allows the potential for growth in children, but the Morrison wrap-around does not.
Amputation stumps previously covered with skin grafts may need to be replaced using a groin ap or a reverse radial forearm ap, prior to toe transfers. Similarly, severe thumb-index nger web space contractures may need to be released before performing a toe-to-thumb transfer, utilizing a groin ap, reverse radial forearm ap, or reverse posterior interosseous artery ap. Alternatively, the toe-to-thumb transfer and thumb-index nger web-space release can be performed simultaneously, using a small dorsalis pedis artery skin ap based on the same arterial pedicle or by using a reverse radial forearm ap to cover the web space and the proximal radial artery to provide arterial inow to the toe transfer [20].
Several small series of toe-to-thumb and toe­to- nger transfers have been reported for post­traumatic reconstruction of children’s hands with success rates comparable to adults [2132].
31 Toe-to-Hand Transfers for Posttraumatic and Congenital Reconstruction in Children: Indications…
https://t.me/medicina_free
379
31.4 Indications forToe-to-Hand Transfers After Trauma inChildren
Indications for posttraumatic microsurgical reconstruction of the thumb and ngers in chil­dren may be classied exactly similar to the clas­sication of congenital absent digits [22, 33]. Of the 15 different phenotypes of digital amputa­tions, only 6 are potential candidates for micro­surgical reconstruction with toe-to-hand transfers—R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and U4R1—with a further three potential relative indications: U3R2, C2R2U1, and C3R1U1.
The indications for toe-to-thumb transfers
after trauma in children include the following:
1. Isolated amputations of the thumb, from
distal to the CMC joint out to the accepted critical functional level at the midpoint of the proximal phalanx (R1 classication).
Very rarely, an emergency toe transfer may be indicated for reconstruction of a degloved thumb with an intact bony skeleton and tendons.
2. Amputations of the thumb and several other
ngers (R2, R3, and R4 classication).
3. Amputation of all ve digits—the “metacar-
pal hand” [27, 34] or R5 hand [22].
Indications for toe-to-hand transfers for nger reconstruction after trauma in children include the following:
1. Complete or partial amputation of multi-
ple or all four ngers, but with an intact thumb (U4R1 classication)
2. Amputation of all ve digits: the “metacar-
pal hand” [27, 34] or R5 hand [22]
31.5 Conventional Reconstruction
ofCongenital Hand Dierences
Conventional non-microsurgical reconstruction of congenital absent digits usually involves pol­licization of the index nger for children born
with a hypoplastic or absent thumb [35, 36] and nonvascularized toe phalangeal bone grafting [3745] and distraction lengthening of hypoplas­tic digits due to symbrachydactyly, cleft hand, or congenital constriction ring syndrome [1317,
4650].
31.6 Toe-to-Hand Transfers forCongenital Hand Dierences
The rst microsurgical toe transfer to recon­struct a congenital hand difference was per­formed by O’Brien et al. [51] in 1977 who successfully transferred a great toe to recon­struct a hypoplastic thumb in two children. Yoshimura [30, 31] performed second toe trans­fers in two children with congenital differences. May [52] reported bilateral great toe-to-thumb transfers to reconstruct a nine-year-old boy with bilateral aplasia of his thumb, index, and middle ngers. After other case reports [53, 54], several surgeons have reported larger series of micro­surgical toe-to- hand transfers to reconstruct various congenital differences of the hand [23,
24, 5565].
31.7 Indications forToe-to-Hand Transfers forCongenital Hand Dierences
Microsurgical toe-to-hand transfers for recon­struction of congenital hand differences have not evolved to a similar extent as toe transfers for reconstruction after trauma and still remain con­troversial. Firstly, surgeons may be reluctant to risk the small but potential loss of a toe transfer in children who are already missing one or more digits in their hands. Secondly, some pediatric hand surgeons still maintain that children with unilateral absence of one or more digits adapt to their impairment as they grow or can be helped with a static or functional prosthesis. Finally, par­ents may be reluctant to accept a very compli­cated reconstructive procedure that carries a small risk of ending up with a missing great or
380
https://t.me/medicina_free
N. Jones and C. Parolo
second toe as well as more scars on the hand to show for the failed endeavor.
Very little has been published on the specic indications for microsurgical reconstruction of congenital absent digits. Most pediatricians and even some hand surgeons do not understand which children should be considered for micro­surgical reconstruction. Previous reports of toe transfers for congenital hand differences have all been based primarily on the specic embryo­logical diagnoses, according to the classication of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand [66]. However, it is the authors’ contention that specic indications for toe transfers are more logically dened by the anatomy of the hand difference itself, a concept that is also much more easily understood by referring pediatricians and surgeons [33]. From an analysis of 235 hands in 204 children born with congenital absent digits over a 15-year period, Jones and Kaplan [33] developed a sim­ple documentation system, which allows hand surgeons to describe the morphological or radio­graphic appearance or the functional status of a child’s hand with congenital absent digits, based on which digits are missing and their level of absence. Each hand can be described by three letters R (radial), C (central), and U (ulnar) as well as ve numbers. The rst letter and number designate which rays are missing and the second and third letters and numbers designate which rays are present. Consequently, an absent thumb would be designated as R1U4, a hand with a thumb but absent ngers would be designated as U4R1, and complete absence of all ve digits would be designated as R5. The spectrum of radial deciencies includes R1U4, R2U3, R3U2, and R4U1. There are 15 morphological phenotypes of congenital absent digits—the three most common phenotypes being U4R1 (thumb but absence of all four ngers corre­sponding to the monodactylous type III sym­brachydactyly), R1U4 (absent thumb), and R5 (aplastic hand). Unlike most other classica­tions, this documentation system not only facili­tates communication between hand surgeons but also incorporates all the previous subclassi-
cation systems that have attempted to describe congenital absent digits in radial, central, and ulnar deciencies, symbrachydactyly, and con­genital constriction ring syndrome. However, most importantly, it has allowed the develop­ment of an algorithm which predicts whether conventional or microsurgical reconstruction is indicated for each specic phenotype. Of the 15 phenotypes, only 7 phenotypes are potential indications for microsurgical reconstruction with toe-to-hand transfers: R1U4, R2U3, R3U2, R4U1, R5, U4R1, and occasionally C3R1U1. For a child missing a thumb but with four rela­tively normal ngers (R1U4), it is intuitive to reconstruct a thumb to oppose to these ngers, either by pollicization of the index nger or by a toe-to-thumb transfer. Similarly for a child missing all four ngers (U4R1), it is logical to reconstruct one or two ngers to allow pinch and grasp to the normal thumb, either by dis­traction lengthening or by toe-to-hand transfers.
The following are four indications for consid­ering microsurgical reconstruction of an absent thumb [60]:
1. Isolated absence of the thumb with four
normal or relatively normal ngers, in which the carpometacarpal joint and base of the thumb metacarpal and thenar mus­cles are preserved (R1U4). This is usually
seen in congenital constriction ring syndrome or occasionally transverse failure. Reconstruction of these thumbs with a toe transfer is superior to index nger polliciza­tion, distraction lengthening, or nonvascular­ized toe phalangeal bone grafting, because it provides greater length and the potential for growth and preserves the full complement of ngers. A second toe transfer in a 2–3-year­old child will provide almost 5cm length of the bone and soft tissue compared with only 13–17 mm length of a nonvascularized toe phalangeal bone graft or 3 cm that can be achieved by distraction lengthening, albeit with a secondary bone graft procedure. If the thenar muscles are poorly developed, an
31 Toe-to-Hand Transfers for Posttraumatic and Congenital Reconstruction in Children: Indications…
https://t.me/medicina_free
381
opposition tendon transfer using the exor digitorum sublimis from the ring nger can be performed at a secondary procedure.
However, if there is an isolated absence of the thumb and four relatively normal ngers, but the carpometacarpal joint is absent, polli­cization of the index nger remains the gold standard of reconstruction [36], although there are two reports of toe transfers for recon­struction of Blauth type IV and V hypoplastic thumbs [67, 68].
2. Absence of the thumb as well as the index,
middle, and ring ngers, but with one or two ngers remaining on the ulnar side of the hand (R2U3, R3U2, and R4U1). This is
usually seen with severe radial longitudinal deciencies or the monodactylous type III atypical cleft hand variant of symbrachydac­tyly [69]. A second toe can be transferred to reconstruct the absent thumb with minimal donor site morbidity, but the modied “wrap­around” [5] or trimmed great toe [6, 7] tech­niques can occasionally be considered in older children to provide both an excellent functional result and a “thumb” very similar in appearance to the contralateral normal thumb. If the carpometacarpal joint is absent in these severe radial deciency phenotypes, the second toe metatarsal can be xed to the scaphoid or spliced into the radial styloid as described by Vilkki [25] and by Yu [32]. Very rarely, a similar morphological deformity also occurs in one or both feet (cleft hand and cleft feet), and the abnormal great toe is sometimes amputated to facilitate the tting of shoes. In these situations, the abnormal great toe is a “free spare part” that can be transferred to reconstruct the absent thumb [18, 19].
3. Unilateral (or extremely rarely bilateral)
absence of the thumb and all four ngers (R5). This is usually seen with the adactylic
type IV symbrachydactyly [69] or with trans­verse failure of formation.
4. Finally, there are very rare cases in which the thumb or radial side of the hand becomes totally enveloped by a rapidly growing vascu-
lar malformation which is unresponsive to embolization or sclerotherapy or by progres­sive macrodactyly. This situation can poten­tially be salvaged by radical resection of the thumb but preserving the carpometacarpal joint and base of the thumb metacarpal and thenar muscles, followed immediately by a second toe transfer [56, 70].
The following are two indications for consid­ering toe transfers to reconstruct absent ngers [60]:
1. Absence of all four ngers (from the car-
pus out to the base of the middle phalan­ges), but with a normal thumb (U4R1).
This is usually seen with the monodactylous type III symbrachydactyly, transverse fail­ure of formation, congenital constriction ring syndrome, or severe ulnar longitudinal deciency. The location into which the toe transfer is positioned depends on the anat­omy. Microsurgical reconstruction of a n­ger can be accomplished by a single second toe transfer into the middle, ring, or small nger position (Figs. 31.1 and  31.2). Placement of the toe transfer on the ulnar side of the hand allows both grasp of large objects and tip-to-tip pinch. An alternative option, if the parents are agreeable, is to transfer two second toes, either simultane­ously or sequentially, into the middle and
Fig. 31.1 Toe transfer in U4R1 hand Post op
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025