Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 391 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
45 Мб
Скачать
22 Vascular Malformations
https://t.me/medicina_free
265
22.11 Syndromic Forms
In syndromic forms, vascular malformations are associated with general disorders. The forms that involve the hand and upper limb are Maffucci syndrome, Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome, Park­Weber syndrome, Proteus syndrome and Cloves syndrome.
22.11.1 Maucci Syndrome (MS)
Maffucci syndrome is a rare congenital disorder characterized by multiple central cartilaginous tumours (enchondromas) in association with cutaneous spindle cell haemangiomas. Patients with MS have a high incidence of malignant transformation [37]. MS was rst described in 1881 as differential diagnosis with Ollier’s syn­drome, which is a simple multiple enchondroma­tosis. Treatment of MS is surgical excision of enchondromas and vascular malformations.
22.11.2 Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome (KTS)
22.11.3 Park-Weber Syndrome (PKWS)
PKWS is often confused with KTS.Clinical fea­tures are capillary venous malformations that involve upper or lower limb, arteriovenous shunts and anomalies and hypertrophy of bones and tissues.
22.11.4 Proteus Syndrome (PS)
Proteus syndrome is a mosaic, progressive over­growth disorder involving vessels, skin and skel­eton and caused by a somatic activating mutation in AKT1 [38, 39].
Proteus syndrome appears with localized macrosomia, congenital lipomatosis and slow ow vascular malformations, connective tissue nevus and epidermal nevus. There are usually some manifestations at birth. The vascular abnor­malities that have been reported in Proteus syn­drome are capillary and slow-ow venous malformation [3840].
Patients with Proteus syndrome have a high mortality incidence at 22 years of age [41].
Clinical features are (1) port-wine stains that may be localized to a relatively small area or involve the lateral aspect of one or more extremities; (2) limb hypertrophy or gigantism, presenting with an extremity that is longer and larger in circum­ference than the unaffected limb; (3) large clus­ters of varicose veins extending throughout the entire extremity; and (4) large lateral venous col­lector called the vena marginalis lateralis [15]. Most of these patients can be treated by compres­sion and sclerotherapy and by sleeping in Trendelenburg position. However, some patients have pain, venous ulceration, venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism that do not respond to conservative measures and need to be treated aggressively. It is important to stop bleeding that may sometimes be copious [27].
22.11.5 CLOVES Syndrome
The acronym CLOVES stands for congenital lipomatous overgrowth (CLO), vascular malfor­mation (V), epidermal nevi (E) and scoliosis and spinal deformities (S) [42].
22.11.6 Characteristics ofCLOVES
(Fig.22.8)
1. Various size lipomatous mass of the torso
2. Vascular malformations
3. Musculoskeletal deformities especially of
hands and feet
4. Scoliosis and anomalies of the spine and chest
5. Neurologic involvement
266
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 22.8 CLOVES syndrome in a 9-year-old male
Unlike Proteus syndrome, CLOVES does not present with connective tissue nevi and consists of a lipomatous mass with an aggressive over­growth and high rate of recurrence [42, 43].
This overgrowth leads to exhaustion due to the heavy weight of the overgrowing limb. When symptomatic treatment fails, surgical excision of the mass or amputation should be considered.
References
1. Lee BB, etal. Phlebology. 2007;22(6):283–6.
2. Marzella L. Indicazioni diagnostico terapeu­tiche per le Malformazioni vascolari dell’Arto superiore:valutazione dell’appropriatezza tra un gruppo di esperti e adozione di linee guida multidisci­plinari. Chirurgia della Mano. 2016;53(3):77–87.
3. Belov S, Loose DA, Weber J.Vascular malformations. Reinbek: Einhorn Presse; 1989. p.29.
4. Szilagyi DE, Smith RF, Elliott JP, et al. Congenital arteriovenous anomalies of the limbs. Arch Surg. 1976;111:423–9.
5. Gomes AS, Busuttil RW, etal. Congenital arteriove­nous malformations. The role of transcatheter arterial embolization. Arch Surg. 1983;118:817–25.
6. Gomes MMR, Bernatz PE.Arteriovenous stulas: a review and ten-year experience at the Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clin Proc. 1970;45:81–102.
7. Malan E, Pugliorisi A. Congenital angio-dysplasias of the extremities. I. Generalities and classica­tion; venous dysplasias. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1964;5:87–130.
8. Malan E, Pugliorisi A. Congenital angiodysplasias of the extremities. II. Arterial, arterial and venous, and haemolymphatic dysplasias. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1965;6:255–345.
L. Marzella and P. di Giuseppe
9. Wolfe SW, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Cohen MS. Green’s operative hand surgery, 2-volume. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011. p.2236–9.
10. Angiome VR.Die Krankhaften Gerschwulste. Berlin: Hirschwald; 1863.
11. Mulliken J, Glowacky J.Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: a classication based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69:412–22.
12. Mattassi R. Hemangiomas and vascular malforma­tion. Milan: Springer; 2009.
13. Konez O.Imaging in vascular anomalies. Medscape, October 2015
14. Cabbade EB.Xerography as an aid in planning resec­tion of vascular malformation of the upper extremi­ties. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10:670–4.
15. Lee BB, Villavicencio L. Congenital vascular mal­formations: general considerations. In: Rutherford vascular surgery, vol. 68. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014.
16. Kennedy WP.Epidemiologic aspects of the problem of congenital malformations. In: Persaud TNV, editor. Problems of birth defects. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press; 1977. p.35–52.
17. Stevenson AC, Johnston HA, Stewart MIP, Golding DR.Congenital malformations. A report of a study of series of consecutive births in 24 centres. Bull WHO. 1966;34(Suppl):9 and 100–102 (Extracts).
18. Myrianthopoulos NC, Chung CS. Congenital mal­formations in singletons. Epidemiologic survey. In: Bergsma D, editor. Birth defects original article series, vol. X, no II (Miami Symposia Specialists for the National Foundation-March of Dimes); 1974.
19. Kulungowski AM, Mulliken JB.Expression of andro­gen, estrogen, progesterone and growth hormone receptors in vascular malformations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(6):919–24.
20. Luks VL, Kamitaki N, et al. Lymphatic and other vascular malformative/overgrowth disorders are caused by somatic mutations in PIK3CA. J Pediatr. 2015;166(4):1048–54.e1–5.
21. Ayturk UM, Couto JA.Somatic activating mutations in GNAQ and GNA11 are associated with congenital hemangioma. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(4):789–95.
22. Couto JA, Huang L.Endothelial cells from capillary malformations are enriched for somatic GNAQ muta­tions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(1):77e–82e.
23. Couto JA, Huang L.Somatic MAP2K1 mutations are associated with extracranial arteriovenous malforma­tion. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100(3):546–54.
24. Belov S. Surgical treatment of congenital vascular defects. In: Chang JB, editor. Modern vascular sur­gery. NewYork: Springer; 1994. p.383–97.
25. Hassanein HC, Mulliken JB.Evaluation of terminol­ogy for vascular anomalies in current literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(1):347–51.
26. Blei F.Basic science and clinical aspects of vascular anomalies. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005;17(4):501–9.
27. Ek ET, Suh N.Vascular anomalies of hand and wrist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:352–60.
22 Vascular Malformations
https://t.me/medicina_free
267
28. Jacobs BJ, Anzarut A, Guerra S, Gordillo G, Imbriglia JE.Vascular anomalies of the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(10):1703–9.
29. Pearce WH, Rutherford RB, Whitehill TA, Davis K. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in patients with congenital vascular malformations of the limbs. J Vasc Surg. 1988;8:64–70.
30. Lee BB, Choe YH, Ahn JM, etal. The new role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) in the contem­porary diagnosis of venous malformation: can it replace angiography? J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198: 549–58.
31. Coursley G, Ivins JC, Barker NW. Congenital arteriovenous stulas in extremities. Angiology. 1956;7:201–17.
32. Park UJ, Do YS, Park KB, Park HS, Kim YW, Lee BB, Kim DL.Ann Vasc Surg. 2012;26(5):643–8.
33. Ahmad Khan RD.Glomus tumours: outcome based on tumour location in the hand. J Pak Med Assoc Nov. 2015;65(11 Suppl 3):S3–7.
34. Hill RA, Pho RW, Kumar VP. Resection of vascular malformations. J Hand Surg Br. 1993;18(1):17–21.
35. Upton J, Coombs CJ, Mulliken JB, Burrows PE, Pap S.Vascular malformations of the upper limb: a review of 270 patients. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24(5):1019–35.
36. Di Giuseppe P.Surgical treatment of vascular malfor­mation in the hand. In: Hemangiomas and vascular malformation. Milan: Springer; 2009. p.287–92.
37. Amyere M, Dompmartin A.Common somatic altera­tions identied in Maffucci syndrome by molecular karyotyping. Mol Syndromol. 2014;5(6):259–67.
38. Kepler-Noreuil KM, et al. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173(9):2359–65.
39. Ou M etal. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017;6(3):381–3.
40. Asillian A, etal. Adv Biomed Res. 2017;7:6–27.
41. Sapp JC, et al. Genet Med. 2017. https://doi.
org/10.1038/gim.2017.65.
42. Bloom J, Upton J III.Cloves syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(12):2508–12.
43. Alomari AI.Characterization of a distinct syndrome that associates complex truncal overgrowth, vascu­lar, and acral anomalies: a descriptive study of 18 cases of CLOVES syndrome. Clin Dysmorphol. 2009;18(1):1–7.
Macrodactilies
https://t.me/medicina_free
ScottN.Oishi, MarybethEzaki, TerriBeckwith, andArenaSayavong
23
Abstract
Macrodactyly is the descriptive name for n­gers or toes that are enlarged most often due to pathway mutations regulating growth, protein synthesis, and cellular proliferation. The enlargement in these patients is extremely variable and can affect the nger(s) only or the entire limb. These patients typically present for evaluation early in life as the enlarged dig­its/extremities are usually recognized at birth. It is critical to identify those children in which macrodactyly is extensive or progressive, as surgical and/or pharmacologic intervention may be warranted. Parental education and counseling about realistic expectations are imperative too.
Keywords
Macrodactyly · Overgrowth · PI3K-AKT · Fibroadipose hand · PROS
23.1 Introduction
As the name suggests, macrodactyly means abnormal enlargement of one or more digits of the hand or foot. Although associated with neuro­bromatosis and Klippel-Trenaunay and Ollier syndromes, the most common etiology of this condition was only recently discovered using newly developed advanced sequencing tech­niques. A mutation in the PIK3CA (phosphati­dylinositol-4,5-biphosphate 3-kinase) pathway was identied in affected tissues [1, 2]. This somatic mosaic gain-of-function mutation leads to dysregulation of growth through the mTOR pathway (Fig.23.1) [2].
This pathway is involved with the regulation of growth, protein synthesis, and cellular prolif­eration and is also implicated in various adult malignancies. Other overgrowth conditions have been shown to be caused by mutations in this mTOR pathway, the so-called PIK3CA- related overgrowth spectrum (PROS) (Fig.23.2).
The mutation occurs in the postzygotic embry­onic period, thereby occurring in some cells and not in others. As a result, DNA sequencing of unaffected tissue will fail to show this upregula­tion in PIK3CA.Sanger sequencing is much less
S. N. Oishi (*) · M. Ezaki · T. Beckwith · A. Sayavong Charles E.Seay, Jr. Hand Center, Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, Center for Excellence in Hand, Upper Extremity and Microvascular Surgery, Dallas, TX, USA e-mail: Scott.Oishi@tsrh.org;
Terri.Beckwith@tsrh.org; Arena.Sayavong@tsrh.org
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 G. Pajardi (ed.), Pediatric Hand Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30984-7_23
269
270
PI3K-AKT Signaling Pathway
• Macrodactyly
• Hemih Multiple Lipomatosis (HHML)
• Fibroadipose
• Muscle Hemih
• F
• CLO
• Megalencephaly Capillar
• Skin disorders: Epider Seborrheic Benign lichenoid
Cell cycle/apoptosis regulation, metabolism, angiogenesis
)
Phenotypic Spectrum of PROS
Tissue-Specific
Phenotypic Severity
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. N. Oishi et al.
RTK
P
PIK3CA-Related Overgrowth Spectrum (PROS)
yperplasia
overgrowth (FAO)
ypertrophy
acial Infilitrating Lipomatosis
VES
-
y Malformation (MCAP)
mal nevi,
keratoses,
keratoses
P
PI3K
PIP3
P
Bannayan - Riley - Ruvalcaba and Cowden and Type II Segmental Cowden syndrome Lhermitte–Duclos disease
PIP3
P P
PTEN
P
Fig. 23.1 Signaling pathway of PI3CA expression [2]
Fig. 23.2 Phenotypic
variating related to the spectrum of PROS [2]
Distribution
Pleiotropic
PDK1
P
P
• Proteus Syndrome (AKT1)
P
Thr308
AKT
Ser473
mTOR2 mTOR1
P
mTOR
• Lipodystrophy syndrome - Hypoglycemia (AKT2)
• Hemimegalencephaly and Megalencephaly-polymicrosyria polydactyly-hydrocephalus (MPPH) (AKT3
• Hemimegalencephaly
Muscular
HH
Macrodactyly
SK,
BLK
ILM
EN
FAO/HHML
CLOVES
TSC2TSC1
Facial
Infiltrating
Lipomatosis
DMEG/
HMEG
MCAP
expensive than high-throughput but is slower and less sensitive and can have some false negatives because it has difculty in distinguishing low­level mutations in the tissue. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) uses a technique of massively parallel sequencing and can pick up relatively low levels of mutation in the tissue. The burden of mutation in a cell population or the tissue is thought to be related to phenotype.
23.2 Clinical Presentation
The digits usually affected are in the median dis­tribution of the hand, with the index nger being the most common (Fig.23.3).
Occasionally, however, it can be isolated to the ulnar distribution of the hand (Fig.23.4).
Macrodactyly was thought to be inuenced by the associated nerve, which is grossly enlarged as
ab
23 Macrodactilies
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 23.3 (a, b) Macrodactyly involving the thumb and index ngers. Note the thumb hyperextension which is due to disproportionate palmar overgrowth
271
well. All soft and bony tissues of the digit are involved. The osseous structures enlarge and joints become stiff and hyperostotic. This enlargement needs not be limited to the digit, as proximal involvement of the hand and median nerve in the carpal tunnel is often seen. Nerve histology has been termed a lipobromatous hamartoma, descriptive of fatty and brous enlargement, surrounding dispersed but other­wise functioning nerve fascicles. Enlargement of the nerve in the carpal canal may cause a com­pressive neuropathy (Fig.23.5).
Fig. 23.4 Minimal enlargement of the ring nger with a normal thumb and index nger, defying the “nerve territory” concept
272
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. N. Oishi et al.
Fig. 23.5 Nerve histology in hematoxylin and eosin stain. (a) Normal nerve. (b) Macrodactyly nerve
23.3 Evaluation
Because of the disparity in digit/limb size, these patients are often seen at an early age [3, 4]. A thorough examination is mandatory to assess overall limb size as well as other ndings possi­bly associated with PROS. It is especially impor­tant to identify those patients who have the
macrodactyly associated with overall limb enlargement (macrodystrophic lipomatosis) (Fig.23.6) as rapid growth may occur in the dig­its/limb and earlier surgical and/or medical inter­vention may be required. Macrodactyly can also be part of lymphatic overgrowth, so evaluation for vascular anomalies is also warranted. The macrodactylus digits are usually, and will be, stiff
23 Macrodactilies
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 23.6 Macrodystrophic lipomatosis. Note the entire limb enlargement with normal appearing ring and little ngers
and lacking full exion. All physical ndings should be pointed out to the parents to help inform their long-term expectations for the limb.
In patients who have growth proportionate to overall growth of the child, observation is war­ranted until the digits become the size of the par­ent of the same sex. Some digits may never need surgical intervention to slow growth (Fig.23.7).
273
Fig. 23.7 Macrodactyly of the little nger that likely will never need surgical intervention to slow growth
Rapidly enlarging digits may develop angulation due to asymmetric growth plate involvement. In these instances, epiphysiodesis, corrective oste­otomy, and debulking procedures are warranted (Fig.23.8). A good algorithm for this strategy is outlined in a paper by Gluck and Ezaki (Fig.23.9).
274
ab
cd
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. N. Oishi et al.
Fig. 23.8 Middle nger with angular deformity. (a, b) Before and after epiphysiodeses and shaft osteotomy. K-wires are used to maintain alignment until healing is
complete. (c, d) The illustration portrays the cuts made at each level. “x” marks sites of planned epiphysiodeses [5]
23 Macrodactilies
https://t.me/medicina_free
275
23.4 Treatment
Treatment must be individualized to each patient. In patients who have rapidly enlarging digits or the macrodystrophic lipomatosis variety, referral to a hematologist may be warranted for possible institution of an mTOR blocker such as rapamy­cin [6]. Because of possible associated side effects and unknown long-term sequelae, routine use of rapamycin in all macrodactyly patients is not recommended.
Wound healing and scar formation are also affected by the mutated genetic pathway, and par­ents should be informed of possible problems
before surgery. Meticulous wound care is espe­cially important in these patients.
In most cases, surgery is undertaken when the child’s digit reaches the size of the same sex par­ents. Surgery usually entails soft tissue debulk­ing, physeal arrest, and osteotomy if signicant angulation is present (Figs. 23.10 and 23.11). Digital vessels are typically thin, atretic, and often not well seen. Only one side of the nger should be debulked in this manner because of the risk of devascularizing the digit. A technical tip demonstrated in Fig. 23.10 is the placement of marker “darts” at the interphalangeal joint levels. This detail will help in aligning aps during
Fig. 23.9 Algorithm for intervention of macrodactyly [5]
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025