Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 391 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
45 Мб
Скачать
308
https://t.me/medicina_free
F. M. Senes et al.
tude without surgery because of a spontaneous recovery thatmight happen within a few months, whereas open lesions are in need of immediate treatment as in adults.
Even though the outcome is generally good, a small percentage of failure has to be taken into consideration, particularlythose related to open or closed ulnar nerve injuries.
References
1. Missios S, Bekelis K, Spinner RJ.Traumatic periph­eral nerve injuries in children: epidemiology and socioeconomics. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;10:1–7.
2. Birch R, Achan P.Peripheral nerve repairs and their results in children. Hand Clin. 2000;16(4):579–95.
3. Waters PM, Bae DS. Distal humerus fracture. In: Pediatric hand and upper limb surgery. A practical guide. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins;
2012. p.287–315.
4. McGraw JJ, Akbarnia BA, Hanel DP. Neurological complications resulting from supracondylar frac­tures of the humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;6:647–50.
5. Iqbal M, Habib R. Nerve injuries associated with supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children. J Pak Med Assoc. 1994;44:148–9.
6. Babal JC, Mehlman CT, Klein G.Nerve injuries asso­ciated with pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(3):253–63.
7. Vincelet Y, Journeau P, Popkov D, Haumont T, Lascombes P. The anatomical basis for anterior interosseous nerve palsy secondary to supracondy­lar fractures in children. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:543–7.
8. Holstein A, Lewis GM.Fractures of the humerus with radial nerve palsy. J Bone Joint Surg. 1963;45:1382–8.
9. Rocchi M, Tarallo L, Mugnai R, Adani R.Humeral shaft fractures complicated by radial nerve palsy: is surgical exploration necessary? Musculoskelet Surg. 2016;100(Suppl 1):S53–60.
10. Waters PM, Bae DS. Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries. In: Pediatric hand and upper limb surgery. A practical guide. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2012. p.462–77.
11. Lyons JP, Ashley E, Hoffer MM.Ulnar nerve palsies after percutaneous cross pinning of supracondylar fractures in children’s elbow. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:43–5.
12. Tindall A, Dawood R, Povlsen B.Case of the month: the skin wrinkle test a simple nerve injury test for pediatric and uncooperative patients. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(11):883–6.
13. Barisic N, Perovic D, Mitrovic Z, Jurenic D, Zagar M.Assessment of war and accidental nerve injuries in children. Pediatr Neurol. 1999;21(1):450–5.
14. Carter GT, Robinson LR, Chang VH, Kraft GH.Electrodiagnostic evaluation of traumatic nerve injuries. Hand Clin. 2000;16:1–12.
15. Lee J, Bidwell T, Metcalfe R.Ultrasound in pediatric peripheral nerve injuries: can this affect our surgi­cal decision making? A preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(2):152–8.
16. Yang M, Rawson JL, Zhang EW, Arnold PB, Lineaweaver W, Zhang F. Comparison of outcomes from repair of median and ulnar nerve defect with nerve graft and tubulization: a meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011;27:451–60.
17. Senes FM, Catena N, Senes J. Use of tubulization (nerve conduits) in repairing nerve defects in children. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(5):554–60.
18. Senes FM, Campus R, Becchetti F, Catena N. Upper limb nerve injuries in developmental age. Microsurgery. 2009;29(7):529–35.
19. Shore BJ, Gillespie BT, Miller PE, Bae DS, Waters PM. Recovery of motor nerve injuries associated with dis­placed, extension-type pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017;39(9):e652–6.
Flexor Tendon Lesions inChildren:
https://t.me/medicina_free
Diagnosis, Treatment, andEarly Active Motion Rehabilitation
ChiaraParolo, GretaCulicchia, RossellaPagliaro, andGiorgioPajardi
26
Abstract
Flexor tendon injuries in children represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for sur­geons. These injuries can go unnoticed and rehabilitation is difcult, but good results are achieved after treatment. In the recent years, with the evolution of repair techniques of exor tendons, in adult patients, an early active motion regime was introduced. In pedi­atric age, there is not still common consensus for surgical technique and for postoperative rehabilitation. In children aged between 3 and 7 years, we prefer the pullout technique while in children aged between 8 and 12 years the four-strand suture associated with the periph­eral epitendinous suture. Partial early active motion protocol is started no later than 7 days after the repair. Between April and December 2018, four children were treated. There were no complications such as rupture, inamma­tion, infection, or contractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint at the nal follow-up. No patient needs tenolysis. Good and excellent
C. Parolo (*) · G. Culicchia · R. Pagliaro Milan, Italy e-mail: chiara.parolo@multimedica.it;
grata.culicchia@multimedica.it; rossella.pagliaro@multimedica.it
G. Pajardi Department of Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation, S.Giuseppe Hospital IRCCS MultiMedica, Milan University, Milan, Italy e-mail: gpajardi@centrostudimano.it
results were registered in all four digits, respectively, with the TAM score and the Strickland method. We do believe that early active motion by promoting tendon gliding immediately avoids the exclusion of the hand and the loss of the motor pattern and favors the return to play activities.
Keywords
Flexor tendons · Rehabilitation · Mobilization Injuries
Flexor tendon injuries in children represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for sur­geons. These injuries can go unnoticed and reha­bilitation is difcult, but good results are achieved after treatment.
The incidence of these lesions in children has been estimated at 3.6/100,000 children per year [1]. Flexor zones II and V are the most commonly affected, and it is very strange to see these lesions in children younger than 2 years old, although they have been described in newborns occurring during emergency cesarean deliveries [2]. “Buds” or higher incidence peaks have also been observed in holiday times, in which children tend to manipulate sharp instruments [2].
The most common trauma mechanism is caused by cutting glass, followed by sharp object injuries (knives). Associated neurological injuries are commonly found in exor zones III and V, and
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 G. Pajardi (ed.), Pediatric Hand Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30984-7_26
309
310
https://t.me/medicina_free
they are not frequently associated with nger frac­tures or extensor tendon injuries [1]. These injuries are more common in men than in women and most commonly affect the right hand [1, 3].
In the recent years, with the evolution of repair techniques of exor tendons, in adult patients, an early active motion regime was introduced. There are several articles that support this concept seeing as it improves the gliding of tendons and the strength of tensile and reduces the adhesion for­mation and complications. In pediatric age, there is not still common consensus for surgical tech­nique and for postoperative rehabilitation. In fact, rehabilitation program after exor tendon repair is highly controversial. Some authors prefer immo­bilization while others support different rehabilita­tion protocols. Postoperative rehabilitation programs are strictly inuenced by the patient’s age. In literature, preschoolers (less than 5 years old) are immobilized while for children between 5 and 10 years old recommend an early motion pro­gram under the supervision of the hand therapist. In this study, we reported the cases of children between 3 and 12 years old with exor tendon injury in zones I, II, and III repaired with four­strand suture associated with epitendinous suture and with pullout technique. After surgery, they performed the early active motion protocol.
In children aged between 3 and 7 years, we pre­fer the pullout technique while in children aged between 8 and 12 years the four-strand suture asso­ciated with the peripheral epitendinous suture. The pullout technique, described for the rst time by Bunnel in 1940, is used for the repair of the profun­dus exor tendon in zone I with the aim of transfer­ring the tendon suture to the button placed on the digital apex (Fig.26.1). This technique allows the two tendon stumps to be brought together, eliminat­ing tension during muscle contraction. In recent decades, a four-strand repair associated with a peripheral epitendinous suture has been the main repair technique for exor tendons. This promotes greater resistance and sealing force and less gap­ping at the repair site and allows for inherent heal­ing by limiting adhesion formation. The associated peripheral epitendinous suture has the purpose of leveling and reducing the repair thickness ensuring greater sliding. When the tendon is too small, we use a smaller suture than adults in order to permit a four-strand technique.
C. Parolo et al.
Fig. 26.1 Pull-out technique
Fig. 26.2 Double 4 strand in exor tendon repair
After surgery, a dorsal thermoplastic splint was applied at the end of surgery to protect the tendon suture, and this is usually worn for 6 weeks. The splint keeps the wrist at 0–30° of extension, the metacarpophalangeal joints at 30° of exion, and the interphalangeal joints fully extended. Prior to initiating an active motion regime, maximal passive digital exion should be restored (Fig.26.2). This will assist in reducing the work of exion on the repaired tendon and preventing joint stiffness. Edema also plays a sig-
26 Flexor Tendon Lesions inChildren: Diagnosis, Treatment, andEarly Active Motion Rehabilitation
https://t.me/medicina_free
311
nicant role in the limitation of motion, espe­cially in the early phase following surgery. For this reason, active mobilization regime begins on the third to fth days in line with current thinking on the subsidence of postoperative edema. Active exion exercises were initiated from the distal interphalangeal (dip) joint, and motion should be conned to the outer range or rst third of ex­ion. In fact, resistance to digital exion increases over the rst two-thirds of exion increasing ve­to tenfold in the nal third. The degrees of digital active exion will be increased after 1 week until reaching the complete active exion in the fourth week. Active IP (interphalangeal) joint extension exercises are very important and should be per­formed regularly to prevent the loss of extension at the IP joints, which is a common complication in this type of injury. Patients did not move the wrist until the third week and performed passive and active digital exercises with the wrist immo­bilized inside the splint. From the third to the sixth weeks, the patient removed the splint only to perform the exercise (Table 26.1). With the pullout technique, the risk of tendon rupture is lower. For this reason, the active mobilization regime of the ngers and wrist begins immedi­ately without any limit in the degrees of move­ment. The splint was worn only at night and in dangerous activities. The pullout is removed at 6 weeks after a surgical check (Table26.2).
The study was conducted from 2017 to 2018in
the Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation department
Table 26.1 Rehabilitation regime for exor tendon repair with a four-strand suture
• Begin the motion at 3–5 days postoperative
• Protective dorsal splint applied to be worn for 6 weeks
• Prioritize restoration of full passive digital exion
• Start early active motion from the DIP joint
• Encourage active digital extension exercise
• Move the wrist at 3 weeks
• Begin the complete active exion of ngers at 4 weeks
• At 6 weeks, remove splint during the day but worn it for the night
• At 6 weeks, commence stretching and splinting of residual exion deformity
• Return to normal activity between 10 and 12 weeks
Table 26.2 Rehabilitation regime for exor tendon repair with pullout technique
• Begin the motion at 3–5 days postoperative
• Protective dorsal splint worn at night and in dangerous activities for 6 weeks
• Prioritize restoration of full passive digital exion
• Start active movement of the ngers in all degrees of exion
• Encourage active digital extension exercise
• Stimulate to use the ngers in activity of the day
• At 6 weeks, remove the pullout
• At 6 weeks, commence stretching and splinting of residual exion deformity
• Return to normal activity between 10 and 12 weeks
at the IRCCS (Scientic Institute of Recovery and Care) Multimedica group of Lombardy. Small patients aged 3–12 years with lesions of the exor tendons in areas 1, 2, and 3 operated from 2017 to 2018 were included. The inclusion criteria were lesion of the exor digitorum pro­fundus tendon, of the exor digitorum supercia­lis, a combination of the FDP (exor digitorum profundus) and FDS (exor digitorum supercia­lis) tendon, and of the exor pollicis longus; injury zones I, II, and III; concomitant neurovas­cular injury; surgical repair with a four-strand suture associated with epitendinous suture or with pullout technique; and start of the partial early active motion protocol no later than 7 days after repair. The exclusion criteria were associ­ated injuries such as fractures, volar plate, and pulley injury. In children aged 8–12 years, the exor tendons were repaired with a four-strand associated with epitendinous suture using the Prolene 3.0 for the central suture and Prolene 5.0 for the peripheral suture. The pullout technique was used for children aged 3–7 years. After the surgical repair, a dorsal thermoplastic splint (photo) was applied and the patients were started the rehabilitation regimen based on the partial early active motion protocol. The exercises were performed several times a day at home under parental supervision and with the hand therapist three times a week. The evaluation scales used were AROM (active range of motion), TAM (total active motion), % TAM, Strickland, Buck­Gramcko, and Scala Vas.
312
https://t.me/medicina_free
C. Parolo et al.
Active exion and extension at the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints of the injured ngers were measured by a hand therapist using a goniometer. Postoperative outcome for joint function was assessed using the total active of motion (TAM) scoring system suggested by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. The results were also established using Buck­Gramcko score and the Strickland and Glogovac Grading System with excellent (85–100%), good (70–84%), fair (50–69%), and poor (<50%) post­operative function.
Between April and December 2018, four chil­dren were treated. Of them, two were males and two were females. The mean age was 6 years (range 3–9 years). In total, four digits were affected: thumb n= 1, middle nger n = 2, and small nger n=1. The exor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon was affected in two ngers, the exor pollicis longus (FLP) tendon in one nger and the combination of the exor digitorum pro­fundus (FDP) and the exor digitorum supercia­lis (FDS) tendons in one nger. The number of tendon laceration in zone I was two and in zone II was two. Concomitant neurovascular transection was diagnosed in two patients. The patients were subdivided by age into two groups: 3–7 years (two digits) whose tendons were repaired with pullout technique and 8–12 years (two digits) whose ten­dons were repaired with a four-strand suture asso­ciated with the epitendinous suture. There were no complications such as rupture, inammation, infection, and contractures of the proximal inter­phalangeal joint at the nal follow- up. No patient needs tenolysis. Good and excellent results were registered in all four digits, respectively, with the TAM score and the Strickland Method. According to the Buck- Gramcko evaluation system, all digits showed excellent functional results. Mean Vas score was 1 only given to the 8–12 years’ group and the nal mean was 1. All parents were happy with the nal results.
In adults, early active motion is the principle of exor tendon rehabilitation. The need for a stronger central suture to resist the early active movement regimen has been underlined for sev­eral years in adults. Several studies have shown excellent results with the four-strand technique
associated with the epitendinous suture. The suture technique is a critical factor in children compared to adults. Although it is possible to place more than one core suture in an adult-size tendon, this might not always be possible in the smaller pediatric-size tendon. In this study, we have not wanted to compare different suturing techniques, but the suture technique and the post­operative rehabilitation program are greatly inuenced by the age group and by the coopera­tion of child. In literature, many different forms of early mobilization programs have been used. Preschoolers are frequently immobilized in a cast for 3–4 weeks, while for children between 5 and 10 years of age, most of the recent articles recom­mends a modied early mobilization program under the supervision of a hand therapist but the ngers are immobilized between physiotherapy sessions [4]. In our experience, the children aged 0–2 years are frequently immobilized with splint for 3–4 weeks [5] in children between 3 and 7 years of age with exor tendon injury in zone I, we use the pullout repair technique and the active motion regime start immediately without any limitation of the movements at the level of the ngers and wrist. This is because the pullout technique is safer and the possibility of tendon rupture is lower. So it is used in younger children where the use of splint is difcult to manage and rehabilitation does not require complex exer­cises. For patients between 8 and 12 years, we use an early active motion regimen after the ten­don reparation with a four- strand suture associ­ated with the epitendinous suture, as for adult injuries. In this case, our postoperative rehabilita­tion protocol involves an early but partial active movement of the ngers for the rst 3 postopera­tive weeks because resistance to digital exion increases over the rst two-thirds of exion increasing ve- to tenfold in the nal third week. The wrist is immobilized inside the splint until 3 weeks, and only after this period it is possible to move it. There was not any difference in the post­operative outcomes between groups of age in this study. In fact, using the Strickland criteria and Buck-Gramcko evaluation, all children qualied for an excellent outcome in all four ngers. Comparing our data with the Nietosvaara and
26 Flexor Tendon Lesions inChildren: Diagnosis, Treatment, andEarly Active Motion Rehabilitation
https://t.me/medicina_free
313
Al-Qattan’s studies who promote immediate active mobilization, we obtained 50% of the excellent results before a year according to the Strickland criteria. Moreover, in our study, there were not cases of tendon rupture and of contrac­tures of the proximal interphalangeal joint and tenolysis. The VAS scale was administered only to the 8–12 years’ group by reason of poor com­pliance and understanding of children under 7 years old, and we had a very low score at the end of the treatment.
We did not evaluate the grip strength and the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) questionnaire because it was developed and validated for adults. However, the results obtained with early active motion after exor ten­don repair are encouraging considering the ten­dency to reduce complication rates and early recovery of nger movement and functionality. In addition, we believe that early active motion by promoting tendon gliding immediately avoids
the exclusion of the hand and the loss of the motor pattern and favors the return to play activi­ties. We have shown that it can easily be applied to children and is well tolerated by them and their families.
References
1. Nietosvaara Y, Lindfors NC, Palmu S, Rautakorpi S, Ristaniemi N. Flexor tendon injuries in pediatric patients. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(10):1549–57.
2. Al-Qattan MM.Flexor tendon injuries in the child. J Hand Surg Eur. 2013;39(1):46–53.
3. Sikora S, Lai M, Arneja JS.Flexor tendon injuries pediatric: a 10-year outcome analysis. Can J Plast Surg. 2013;21(3):181–5.
4. Moehrlen U, Mazzone L, Bieli C, Weber DM. Early mobilization after exor tendon repair in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2009;19(2):83–6.
5. Kato H, Minami A, Suenaga N, Iwasaki N, Kimura T.Long term results after primary repairs of zone 2 exor tendon lacerations in children younger than age 6 years. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22(6):732–5.
Pediatric Hand Fractures
https://t.me/medicina_free
FilippoM.Senes, LuigiA.Nasto, NunzioCatena, andChiaraArrigoni
27
Abstract
Pediatric hand fractures can be anatomically classied as fractures or dislocations of the wrist, carpus, metacarpals, and phalanxes. Wrist fractures (i.e., distal metaphyseal radius and/or ulna fractures) represent 20% of all frac­tures in growing children. These injuries can be classed as simple fractures with no displace­ment, greenstick fractures, and complete frac­tures with dislocation and overlapping of the fracture fragments. However, in almost 90% of cases they require conservative treatment. Pediatric carpal fractures are rare, com­monly observed in adolescents rather than in children because of the cartilaginous matrix of carpal bones. Metacarpal and phalanxes show
F. M. Senes (*) Department of Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation, S. Giuseppe MultiMedica Hospital, Milan University, Milano, Italy e-mail: lipposenes@fastwebnet.it
L. A. Nasto UOC Ortopedia e Traumatologia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
N. Catena UOSD Microchirurgia Ricostruttiva e Chirurgia della Mano, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
C. Arrigoni Scuola di Specializzazione in Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy
typical fracture patterns: metacarpal fractures are most commonly metaphyseal compression fractures or Salter-Harris (SH) type II physeal fractures and are frequently observed in the I and V rays; phalangeal fractures are the most common hand fractures in children and the dis­tal phalanx is the most injured. Dislocation of metacarpophalangeal (MP) and interphalan­geal (IP) joints is not frequently reported in children. Minor ngertip injuries are very com­mon instead. Sometimes simple wound care will be enough in achieving complete healing, but in cases of larger skin loss with exposed fractures, advancement ap or, more rarely, regional aps or skin grafts could be required.
Keywords
Pediatric · Children · Hand · Fractures · Dislocations · Wound
27.1 Introduction
Pediatric hand fractures can be classied anatom­ically as fractures and dislocations of the wrist region, carpus, metacarpals, and phalanxes [1].
27.1.1 Wrist Region Fractures
Wrist fractures (i.e., distal metaphyseal radius and/or ulna fractures) represent 20% of all frac-
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 G. Pajardi (ed.), Pediatric Hand Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30984-7_27
315
316
https://t.me/medicina_free
F. M. Senes et al.
tures in growing children. These injuries can be classied as simple fractures with no displace­ment, greenstick fractures (i.e., monocortical fractures), and complete fractures with disloca­tion and overlapping of the fracture fragments [2]. Finally, epiphyseal fractures of the distal radius are also very common and can be associ­ated with a fracture of the distal ulna.
Pain, tenderness, and local swelling are the three most common ndings in wrist fractures. In displaced fractures, there is an obvious clinical deformity of the wrist, typicallya bayonet defor­mity with dorsal displacement of the distal frag­ment. X-ray imaging helps in establishing a correct diagnosis, although it can be negative in cases of SH type I of the distal radius.
Not displaced fractures, greenstick fractures, and complete fractures can be treated with cast immobilization. If some signicant displacement or angulation is present, this can be usually reduced in the casting roomafter a brief proce­dural analgesia. This allows conservative treat­ment for almost 90% of fractures in the distal radius and ulna region. However, displaced frac­tures with signicant overlapping of the fracture fragments will require reduction under anesthe­sia. If the reduction is unstable, temporary pin­ning of the fracture is advised. The upper limb is immobilized in a well-molded cast after the pro­cedure, with exion of the wrist if needed. X-ray imaging is obtained 1 week after reduction to exclude any loss of correction, and the cast is removed at 5 weeks.
Displaced SH type I or II distal radius frac­tures are very easy to diagnose, and an X-ray shows the direction of the displacement. The complete reduction can be achieved at this level by closed means and short procedural anesthesia. The wrist is immobilized in a closed well-molded cast for 4 weeks. X-ray imaging is always obtained 1 week after reduction torule out any loss of correction.
Fractures and epiphyseal injuries of the wrist show very good healing with almost complete restoration of the anatomy even in cases of mod­erate displacement. This is due to the great growth and repair potential of this anatomical region in growing children and pediatric patients.
27.1.2 Carpal Bone Fractures
Pediatric carpal bone fractures are rare and usu­ally observed in adolescents [3]. Carpal bones are largely cartilaginous in children, thus less prone to fractures. Higher-energy trauma normally causes multiple fractures of the carpal bones with associated metacarpal fractures [4].
The scaphoid is the most commonly injured carpal bone. The scaphoid fracture can be observed either in isolation or with a distal radius fracture. This fracture is exceedingly rare before the age of seven [4, 5]. In more than 50% of cases, a distal pole fracture is observed, while fractures of the body or proximal pole are less common [6, 7].
Clinically, focal tenderness is observed at the anatomical snuffbox and along the axis of the rst ray. A scaphoid fracture can be easily missed on X-rays, especially if only a small angulation is present or a limited interruption of the cortex. However, if focal tenderness can be elicited at the anatomical snuffbox in presence of negative X-ray, a short period of immobilization (2 weeks) with a cast is advised. X-ray is then repeated at the end of the immobilization period to conrm the presence of a fracture. In children, treatment is nonoperative. Cast immobilization is main­tained for 4 weeks in incomplete fractures, while complete fractures are splintedfor 4–8 weeks. In cases of belated diagnosis or delayed healing, cast immobilization can be extended up to 8–16 weeks until complete healing is achieved.
Ossication of the scaphoid bone proceeds in a distal to proximal direction. This is followed by rapid vascularization, which explains why com­plications typical of adult patients (i.e., nonunion, bone necrosis) are usually absent in children. At the end of the ossication period, vascularization of the bone decreases and becomes more similar to the adult pattern. Avascular necrosis is very rare in children [68]. Similarly, nonunion is very rare in pediatric patients [912] (Fig.27.1).
Interestingly, the lack of ossication or com­plete bone bridging on the X-ray is not necessar­ily a demonstration of nonunion in pediatric patients. Often, a brous tissue bridge develops between the fracture fragments. Nevertheless,
27 Pediatric Hand Fractures
https://t.me/medicina_free
317
Fig. 27.1 Shaft scaphoid fracture hesitated in nonunion
prolonged immobilization allows complete heal­ing of the fracture. The rare cases of pediatric scaphoid bone nonunion have been successfully treated with bone grafting through a volar approach to the fracture site [13, 14] (Fig.27.2).
Very rare fractures of other carpal bones
(Fig.27.3).
27.1.3 Metacarpal Fractures andDislocations
Metacarpals and phalanxes show typical fracture patterns. The presence of a single growth plate explains the typical fracture patterns seen in these bones.
Metacarpal fractures are most commonly observed in I and V rays. These injuriesare gen­erally metaphyseal compression or SH type II physealfractures. The epiphysis of the I metacar-
pal is located at the base of the bone, while in the remaining metacarpals, the epiphysis is located distally, at the head of the bone.
Diaphyseal fractures of metacarpals are unusual. Oblique or spiral fracture pattern and modest displacement occur, as adult fractures. These are most commonly observed in the II and III metacarpal. Isolated or multiple diaphy­seal fractures can be immobilized in a cast with MCP joints exed and PIP and DIP joints extended. If bone fragments are severely dis­placed, closed reduction should be attempted and followed by 4 weeks cast splinting. Sometimes, Kirshner wire pinning is needed to maintain reduction; rarely, plate and screw xa­tionare required (Fig.27.4).
Fractures of the distal third of II, III, and IV metacarpals are rare in children and adoles­cents [15, 16]. In distal metaphyseal fractures, the metacarpal heads are always tilted on the
318
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 27.2 Scaphoid nonunion treated with allograft from the distal radius
F. M. Senes et al.
Fig. 27.3 Triquetral fracture
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025