Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 196 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
94 Мб
Скачать
418
https://t.me/med1917
P. Surda et al.
• Sinonasal melanoma is rare but melanotic forms may demonstrate high signal on T1-weighted images.
• T cell lymphomas characteristically affect the nasal sep­tum, whilst B cell lymphomas arise more laterally and may demonstrate tumour on either side of the maxillary sinus wall.
• Olfactory neuroblastoma which tend to arise in the supe­rior nasal fossa and may be associated with peritumoural cysts when extending into the anterior cranial fossa.
Staging
• MRI is particularly useful to delineate the intrasinus extent of tumour relative to (increased T2 signal) inam-
matory change and obstructed secretions. Extrasinus extension to the intracranial compartment, orbit and infra­temporal fossa is dened.
• In particular, pial enhancement, nodular dural enhance­ment and dural thickening of more than 5mm have been found to be predictive of dural invasion, whilst brain parenchymal signal abnormality suggests brain invasion.
• Post-contrast MRI sequences are particularly helpful to evaluate for perineural spread.
• High-resolution T2w signal coronal images are useful to dene invasion since they delineate the periosteum and periorbita (Fig.41.4).
Fig. 41.4 Depicting pathology: sinonasal tumours and mimics. (a) Coronal T2w image demonstrating low T2w signal expansion of the right ethmoid air cells, which is related to dense fungal concretions and metallic contents (star). (b) Axial CT image in the same patient demonstrating the utility of CT to depict the high-density fungal material within the ethmoid labyrinth (arrow). (c) Axial CT in a patient with granulomatous polyangiitis (GPA) with extensive bony destruction presenting as an ‘autorhinectomy’ and a single central cavity, together with marked osseo­neogenesis. (d) Axial CT demonstrating a dentigerous cyst, expanding into the left maxillary antrum. Note the ‘double line’ (arrows), which indicate an alveolar/dental origin to the expansile mass. (e) Axial CT revealing calcied matrix within a chondrosarcoma of the nasal septum (arrow). (f) Axial T2w image revealing the ‘cerebriform’ pattern of a right antronasal inverted papilloma (arrow). (g) Coronal T1w+ contrast sequence demonstrating an enhancing mass within the nasopharynx and extending to the right pterygoid base (arrow) compatible with a juvenile angiobroma. (h) Axial T1w+ contrast sequence demonstrating perineural spread of a right maxillary antral squamous cell carcinoma (star) along the vidian canal posteriorly (arrow). (i) Coronal T1w+ contrast fat-saturated sequence demonstrating dural enhancement and thickening (black arrow) corresponding to dural invasion at the anterior skull base. There is also invasion of the right orbit (white arrow). (j) Coronal T1w+ contrast fat-saturated sequence demonstrating extensive intracranial extension of an olfactory neuroblastoma with its characteristic peritumoural cysts (arrow). (k) Coronal FLAIR sequence demonstrating a hyperintense expansile left ethmoid mucocele (star). (l) Coronal CT demonstrating a cal­cic abnormality within the right nasal cavity consistent with a rhinolith (arrow). (m) Coronal T2w sequence demonstrates gliotic brain tissue (arrow) extending through a left sphenoid defect with an extensive sphenoid sinus and subcranial meningocele
41 Endoscopic Resection ofNasal andParanasal Sinus Neoplasms
https://t.me/med1917
419
a
d
g
bc
e
h
f
i
j
kl
m
420
https://t.me/med1917
P. Surda et al.
41.5 Principles ofTreatment
Sinonasal malignancies are infrequent entities, therefore their treatment, especially for the advanced cases is usually best coordinated by high volume centres with well-estab­lished head and neck and skull base multidisciplinary teams. After staging and discussion, probably the most important factor is to decide whether the treatment will be administered with a curative or palliative intent. In the latter, the choice of the therapeutic approach and the vigour with which they are pursued will be driven by the desire to improve the patient’s quality of life, rather than by its oncological outcomes.
When it comes to curative approaches for sinonasal can­cers, these can vary greatly according to the histology of the tumour and to its extent at presentation. Surgery is still the treatment of choice; adjuvant treatment is recommended based on a risk stratication algorithm, and neoadjuvant reg­imens have been shown to improve outcomes in certain aggressive tumours presenting at an advanced stage. Table 41.5 is a summary of the treatment for specic histologies:
Depending on degree of invasion, the relative contraindi­cations for endoscopic approach include involvement of (Fig.41.5):
• Brain parenchyma
• Palate
• Anterior face and lateral portion of frontal sinus
• Nasal bones
• Soft tissues
Conversely, there is almost a consensus on the inoperabil-
ity (with curative intent) of a patient who presents with:
• Extensive involvement of the orbital apex
• Inltration of the cavernous sinus
• Encasement of the internal carotid artery
41.5.1 Management ofOrbital Invasion
Recent advances in management of sinonasal neoplasms led to orbital preservation surgery, which should be indicated if the resection is considered achievable from oncological per­spective. Data suggest that orbital preservation does not reduce survival or local control. In extensive cases, surgical management is combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with aim to downstage the extent of the mass and allow resection with preserving eye function. In general, malignan­cies with bone wall erosion and periorbita and/or focal extra­conal fat invasion are considered suitable for eye preservation surgery. Invasion of orbital contents such as medial rectus muscle, optic nerve, ocular bulb and palpebral skin is an indication for orbital exenteration. Orbital apex invasion was reported to have dismal outcome and is considered uncurable (Fig.41.5) [26].
Table 41.5 Histology-driven strategy
Treatment
Squamous Cell Ca [14]
Adenoid Cystic Ca [13] AdenoCa • Endoscopic approach (if no contraindication) is the gold standard [16]
ONB • Open, endoscopic or combined craniofacial resection encompassing at least dura of anterior skull base and
SNUC Tailored approach with induction chemotherapy [23] Mucosal Melanoma • The treatment of choice is surgery, with curative or palliative intent
Used with permission of authors: Castelnuovo P, Turri-Zanoni M, Battaglia P, Antognoni P, Bossi P, Locatelli D.Sinonasal Malignancies of Anterior Skull Base: Histology-driven Treatment Strategies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2016 Feb;49(1):183–200. doi: 10.1016/j. otc.2015.09.012. PMID: 26614837 [25]
• Similar oncological outcomes for open (maxillectomy, craniofacial resection) vs endoscopic approach [12, 15]
• Adjuvant IMRT always considered [17, 18] Consider induction chemotherapy for poorly differentiated T3–T4 lesions [19]
• Standard treatment is surgical resection with clear margins followed by adjuvant radiotherapy Palliative resection of the primary is considered also in metastatic disease considering the often-long-term survival
• Open or combined approach only when endoscopic contraindicated (mainly in the form of craniofacial resection)
• Intestinal-type: because of widespread eld change, even in the presence of unilateral disease, exenteration of the whole ethmoid complex is indicated [7, 17]
• RT can be avoided in T1–T2, low-grade ITAC [18]
• Adjuvant radiotherapy: consider it in high-grade, high-stage malignancies (IMRT preferred) [18]
• Elective neck treatment not necessary as low risk of nodal spread (7%) [1]
ipsilateral olfactory bulb [19]
• Better survival with Endoscopic vs open approach [20]
• Post-operative RT always considered (improved OS irrespective of stage) [21, 22]
Neck metastasis 20–25% at presentation, therefore some evidence to elective treatment of the neck, but consider neck irradiation in patients with intracranial extension of the primary tumour [21]
• Evidence of improved survival using endoscopic, minimally invasive approach [24]
41 Endoscopic Resection ofNasal andParanasal Sinus Neoplasms
https://t.me/med1917
421
Fig. 41.5 (a, b) Relative contraindications of endoscopic resection. FS frontal sinus; P palate; O orbita; BP brain parenchyma; NB nasal bones. (c) Approaches to anterior skull base. A transfrontal; B transcribriform; C transplanar; D transsellar; E transclival; F craniocervical
a
b
c
41.6 Endoscopic Resection ofSinonasal Neoplasms
41.6.1 Surgical Considerations Based onTumour Location
Malignant tumours, by their nature, do not respect anatomi­cal boundaries and will evade and escape the normal con­tours of the sinonasal cavity. Therefore, once the MDT has approved the plan to operate with curative intent, a surgeon must be prepared to be exible in their operative approach and be prepared to adapt to the individual tumour and the structures involved.
We would therefore advocate a modular or ‘building block’ strategy to oncologic endoscopic surgery. Individual modules of dissection are outlined below, describing approaches to anatomical subunits such as the maxillary sinus, orbit and skull base. Each of the modules of dissection can then be combined as tailored to the individual character­istics of a tumour and patient. For example, one patient may need medial maxillectomy alone; another patient may need medial maxillectomy plus ethmoidectomy plus clearance of the orbital oor and lamina papyracea ,and a further patient may need medial maxillectomy plus access to the infratem­poral fossa via the pterygopalatine fossa. Rather than seeing these as three completely different procedures, each opera-
422
https://t.me/med1917
P. Surda et al.
tion can be built up using the required modules of dissection. This building block approach allows a surgeon to be exible and yet methodical—whilst each tumour has its own charac­teristics and may be extensive or involve extra-sinus struc­tures, a surgeon can plan each required step of dissection by choosing the appropriate modules.
41.6.1.1 Case Example ofaModular Approach toDissection
This example demonstrates a complete surgical approach that successfully resected an extensive tumour using the fol­lowing modules:
• Medial maxillectomy
• Removal of lamina papyracea
• Wide sphenoidotomy
• Modied Lothrop
41.6.2 Preoperative Considerations
Strategies of surgical eld optimisation:
• 15–20° reverse Trendelenburg position that increases
venous drainage without compromising cerebral perfusion.
• Hypotensive anaesthesia for optimal surgical eld; sys-
tolic mean arterial blood pressure of circa 90mmHg and a pulse rate below 70bpm have been shown to decrease surgical bleeding without affecting cerebral blood ow, provided a patient does not have underlying cardiovascu­lar disease.
• Total intravenous anaesthesia/Desurane (at low concen-
tration only) and remifentanil combined (avoids the need BIS monitoring) provide good a surgical eld.
• Topical decongestion using Moffat’s solution (cocaine
and adrenaline +/ sodium bicarbonate).
– Co-phenylcaine and lignocaine (Co-phenylcaine) or
Oxymetazoline can be also used.
• Intraoperatively, neuropatties soaked with vasoconstrict-
ing agents, haemostatic agents such as Gelfoam® and Floseal®, warm saline irrigations and cautery are used.
Image guidance technology is used in complex cases where it provides enhanced anatomical localisation. CT/ MRI is valuable addition visualising soft tissue structures surrounding the tumour. In cases requiring preoperative embolisation, we recommend using CT after intervention as the presence of coils may improve the understanding of the tumour position in relation to surrounding vascular structures.
41.6.3 Lesions Limited toMaxillary Sinus andExtending toMiddle Meatus (T1/ T2) (Fig.41.6)
Approaches to maxillary sinus include the following:
• Large antrostomy
• Pre-lacrimal approach to maxillary sinus
• OR endoscopic medial maxillectomy and inferior
turbinectomy
When managing benign neoplasms, inferior turbinectomy and medial maxillectomy can be avoided using pre-lacrimal approach, which preserves the structure and function of the lateral nasal wall. In malignant tumours, medial maxillec­tomy and turbinectomy is almost always necessary to obtain clear margins.
41.6.3.1 Antrostomy, Inferior Turbinectomy
andMedial Maxillectomy
Initially, an uncinectomy is performed to identify the natural maxillary ostium and enlarged up to the posterior maxillary sinus wall. Posteriorly located lesions can be accessed using mega-antrostomy. Tumours with lateral extension require medial maxillectomy including these steps (Fig.41.7.):
• Medialisation of the inferior turbinate and crushing with
Tilley forceps (or artery clip) up to posterior end.
• Resection of the inferior turbinate along the crushed area
using turbinectomy scissors.
• Scalpel or Colorado needle is used to perform mucosal
incision.
• Bone is cut along mucosal incisions using sharp chisel or
osteotome.
• Lacrimal duct is sharply cut with scissors.
• Once the medial wall is removed, tumour can be easily
removed. Anterior wall extension might require an angled
scope for better visualisation.
• If more exposure is required, the anterior wall of maxil-
lary sinus is drilled down.
Tumours extending beyond middle meatus require ante­rior and posterior ethmoidectomy and sphenoidotomy. Tumour clearance and level of extension can be assessed with frozen biopsies. If necessary, middle turbinate and superior turbinate can be removed to achieve clearance of anterior skull base region.
ab
Lateral nasal w
resection line of IT
41 Endoscopic Resection ofNasal andParanasal Sinus Neoplasms
https://t.me/med1917
423
Fig. 41.6 T1 lesion localised within maxillary sinus (a) and T2 lesion extending beyond maxillary sinus into middle meatus (b)
Fig. 41.7 Illustration of
medial maxillectomy, mucosal and bony incisions
all
Maxillary antrum
Mucosal incision
MT
IT
“Crush” and
Nasal floor
424
SPA a. &
SPA a. &
Infraorbital n.
& a.
https://t.me/med1917
41.6.4 Lesions Invading Posterior Wall ofMaxillary Sinus, Floor or Medial Wall ofOrbit, Pterygoid Fossa, Ethmoid Sinuses (T3) (Fig.41.8)
Approaches to lesions invading oor or medial wall of orbit, pterygoid fossa, ethmoid sinuses include the following:
• Transmaxillary access to pterygopalatine fossa
• Resection of lamina papyracea +/ periorbita
• Ethmoidectomy
41.6.4.1 Transmaxillary Access
toPterygopalatine Fossa (Fig.41.9)
Access to pterygopalatine fossa is usually preceded by large antrostomy and medial maxillectomy; therefore, the poste­rior wall is widely exposed. The next step is to elevate mucosa from the posterior maxillary sinus wall. Prior to bone removal, the sphenopalatine artery is ligated/cauterised with bipolar forceps. Kerrison punch (3mm, 45°) is used to remove the bony wall of the posterior maxillary sinus and expose the anterior face of PPF.
The anterior compartment contains fat and blood vessels, but the posterior compartment contains neural structures. The maxillary artery is in the lateral and inferior portion of the PPF along the anterior margin of the lateral pterygoid muscle. Neurovascular structures and fat are covered with the fascia. In most of cases, we do not have to enter these soft tissues but only mobilise them laterally, which allows suf-
P. Surda et al.
Fig. 41.8 Maxillary T3 lesion extending into middle meatus and invading medial and inferior wall of orbit
foramen
MT
Maxillary
sinus
PNS
Fig. 41.9 Transpterygoid approach, mucosal dissection line (left), contents of pterygopalatine fossa (right). MT middle turbinate; PNS postnasal space; SPA sphenopalatine artery; PP ganglion pterygopala-
foramen
Vidian n.
MT
Maxillary
PNS
tine ganglion; IMA internal maxillary artery; GDP n. greater descend­ing palatine nerve; PPF pterygopalatine fossa
sinus
PP ganglion
GDP n.
IMA
PPF
41 Endoscopic Resection ofNasal andParanasal Sinus Neoplasms
https://t.me/med1917
425
cient access to posterior wall of PPF. To do so, SPA and Vidian bundle must be cauterised as these structures prevent the mobilisation.
When exposing PPF contents, crucial is to leave the peri­osteum intact. This way further dissection will be avascular, and PPF contents are protected. Complete removal of poste­rior wall allows access laterally to the infratemporal fossa.
41.6.4.2 Management ofOrbital Invasion
Tumours invading the medial or inferior orbital walls are often well dened and can be successfully removed leaving periorbita intact. Management of medial wall invasion includes removal of bulla ethmoidalis followed by removal of invaded lamina papyracea but leaving periorbita.
In cases of resectable tumours with extension into extra­conal space, it is difcult to identify the lateral margin and normal tissue planes using direct transnasal route through the tumour. Therefore, we adopted the combined transorbital and transnasal approach [27]. This technique allows:
• Early identication of the lateral extent and clear demar-
cation of uninvolved tissue planes at the orbital
interface.
• AEA and PEA can be identied and cauterised to reduce
the vascularity of the mass prior to resection.
• Transorbital placement of the customisable protective
Silastic® sheet between orbital contents and tumour
ensures that tissue plane is not lost once approaching the
tumour transnasally. It also allows a clear protective bar-
rier of the orbital contents from the transnasal endoscopic
approach.
Tumours that involve medial wall, retrocaruncular approach is indicated. When orbital oor is also invaded, we recommend combination of transconjunctival and retroca­runcular approach with lateral canthotomy extension.
41.6.4.3 Retrocaruncular Approach (Medial
Orbital Corridor)
1. Upper and lower eyelids are retracted in their medial por-
tion with traction sutures.
2. Caruncle is retracted medially with atraumatic ne
forceps.
3. Incision is placed immediately lateral to the caruncle
through the conjunctiva of the plica semilunaris.
4. Fibrous layer is dissected until Horner’s muscle is
encountered and followed medially to the posterior lacri­mal crest.
5. Globe is gently retracted laterally.
6. Orbital periosteum is incised and elevated at level of
orbital rim.
7. AEA and PEA are identied and discontinued.
8. Silastic® implant cut into U-shaped sheet can be inserted as a preventive measure to protect the orbital contents during the transnasal part.
41.6.4.4 Transconjunctival Approach (Inferior
Orbital Corridor) andLateral Canthotomy (Lateral Orbital Corridor) (Fig.41.10)
1. Procedure is initiated with lateral canthotomy.
2. A pointed scissor is inserted horizontally into the outer lid angle laterally so that the instrument contacts the underly­ing bone of the lateral orbital rim (approximately 7–10mm).
3. Lateral palpebral ssure is cut horizontally including the skin, the orbicularis oculi muscle and the conjunctiva.
4. Conjunctival incision is placed from laterally to medially in the depth of the fornix.
5. Lower lid is retracted downwards, and periorbita is incised parallel but just posterior to the infraorbital rim.
6. Periosteum is then incised and elevated. Subperiosteal dissection follows, and medial orbital wall is identied.
Once the lateral margin of the tumour is identied, we
continue with transnasal approach and removal of the tumour.
41.6.4.5 Transnasal Approach (Removal
oftheTumour)
1. If accessible, a sphenopalatine artery ligation is per­formed with bipolar cauterisation
2. Tumour debulking is performed until Silastic® implant is easily identied within the nasal cavity, demarcating to the surgeon the lateral limit of dissection while prevent­ing orbital fat prolapse.
41.6.4.6 Closure andReconstruction
Silastic® implant can be removed endonasally or transor­bitally depending on the size of lamina papyracea defect.
Minimal bony resection such as isolated orbital wall (lat­eral or medial) or small orbital oor defects do not require any kind of reconstruction. Subtotal resection of medial orbital wall with visible fat prolapse can be repaired using slightly oversized perforated PDS sheet. Fat prolapsing into perforations ensures that sheet will not dislodge. If the fat was resected, there is a risk of muscle entrapment; hence, non-perforated sheet should be used.
Larger defects of the orbital oor can be repaired using a thick fascial sling tightly secured to the margins of the bony defect or customised titanium/medpore plate depending on whether radiotherapy is planned. With subtotal or total oor defects (>75% surface area, orbital oor and 1 or more walls), rigid reconstruction is advisable. Furthermore, it is important to reconstruct extensive orbital defects primarily because established secondary defects are difcult to repair.
426
ucture
https://t.me/med1917
P. Surda et al.
Retracted orbital fat
Inferior
orbital
fissure
Infraorbital
canal
Fig. 41.10 Transconjunctival approach (inferior orbital corridor) and lateral canthotomy (lateral orbital corridor), endoscopic view of the orbital oor containing fracture (bottom)
In our experience, customised titanium/medpore plate is used. Plate is attached to the inferior orbital rim with screws. Mesh must be sitting on the posterior ledge in the posterior third of the orbita to avoid enophthalmos.
apex, inltration of the cavernous sinus and encasement of the internal carotid artery. In cases of invasion of soft tissues of the check or palate, endoscopic assisted or pure open approach is indicated. Non-oncologic approaches of surgical
Orbital floor fr
debulking of the tumour may be performed either for pallia­tion or, occasionally, adjuvant proton beam radiotherapy.
41.6.5 Tumour Invades Any oftheFollowing: Anterior Orbital Contents, Skin ofCheek, Infratemporal Fossa, Pterygoid Plates, Cribriform Plate, Sphenoid or Frontal Sinuses (T4a) Orbital Apex, Dura, Brain, Middle Cranial Fossa, Cranial Nerves Other Than Maxillary Nerve
A purely endoscopic approach with curative intent is contra­indicated in cases of extensive involvement of the orbital
41.6.5.1 Endoscopic Approaches toAnterior Skull Base (Cribriform Fossa, Frontal Sinus)
Firstly, we must identify the stalk of the tumour, which is followed by central debulking using microdebrider to achieve better mobilisation. During this phase, it is crucial to leave the margins intact.
Before we commence resection of the tumour, a wide sur­gical eld must be created allowing good manoeuvrability and visualisation. This usually includes the following:
41 Endoscopic Resection ofNasal andParanasal Sinus Neoplasms
https://t.me/med1917
427
• Posterior septotomy, resection of rostrum sphenoidale allowing visualisation of important landmarks: opticoca­rotid recess and planum sphenoidale
• Haemostasis by sphenopalatine artery cauterisation
• Maximal ventrocranial exposure usually requires Draf III frontal sinotomy (outside in technique) allowing visuali­sation anterior border of anterior skull base
Subsequently, centripetal resection of tumour is per-
formed. Tumour is mobilised from lateral margins towards the centre of anterior skull base.
Tumour that is inltrating lamina papyracea is resected
together with invaded bone leaving periorbita. All efforts should made to remove anterior tumour in one monobloc. Margins are sent for frozen sections to conrm complete clearance.
41.6.5.2 Resection ofAnterior Skull Base (Bony
Structures, Dural Involvement, Brain Parenchyma)
This module can be further built upon with endoscopic resection of anterior skull base. First step involves coagula­tion of anterior and posterior ethmoidal artery, which is fol­lowed by removal of invaded skull base using diamond drill. The crista galli can be carefully removed using scissors with blunt tip. Adherence of dura to the orbital roof may signify invasion. Dural resection extends from posterior frontal region to optic chiasm (if needed). Laterally, it is crucial to leave few millimetres wide rim of dura that will facilitate reconstruction.
Falx cerebri can be clipped to prevent bleeding from sinus
sagittalis. Arachnoidea that lies above the tumour is sepa­rated from brain parenchyma, and bulbus olfactorius is resected if indicated. Residual tumour containing bone of anterior skull base, dura mater and bulbus olfactorius is removed in toto transnasally. Dural edges are sent for frozen sections to ensure completeness of resection.
3. Reconstruction is supported with small pieces of fat placed between bone of anterior skull base and second layer.
4. The third layer is either fascia lata or mucoperiostal/ mucoperichondrial ap (nasoseptal ap), which has mainly supportive role.
5. Small pieces of absorbable dressing are placed over the reconstruction.
First and second layer of fascia lata can be stitched together. Stitch has a square shape of the size of dural defect. This way, reconstruction is more robust, and fascia lata is less likely to dislodge.
Post-Operative Care in Large Dural Reconstruction
1. Bed rest for 5 days; horizontal position with increased
upper body by 30°.
2. Regular neurological monitoring.
3. Do not lift objects that are heavier than 3kg for 3weeks.
Avoid any activity where you hold your breath and push, for example, weightlifting, lifting or moving heavy objects or straining during bowel movements for the rst 3weeks.
4. Open mouth sneezing to avoid increase of intracranial
pressure.
5. General rule is not to touch the nose for 2 weeks to the
prevent cerebrospinal uid (CSF) leak.
6. After 2weeks, patient will start to regularly ush the nose
with saline douches as instructed.
7. Patient can start to gently blow your nose after 2weeks.
8. Patients usually return to the work between the fourth to
sixth weeks after surgery with increasing work hours. We will specify when you can go back to work.
9. There are no specic restrictions to sexual activity.
41.6.5.4 Approach toParapharyngeal Space
andInfratemporal Fossa (Fig.41.11)
Initial steps of this approach include these modules:
41.6.5.3 Dural Reconstruction
Reconstruction is performed endonasally in multilayer fash­ion, preferably using autologous material. We recommend fascia lata. When adjuvant radiotherapy is planned, cartilage must be avoided due to the risk of necrosis.
Multilayer Technique
1. Fascia lata is used as rst intracranial and intradural layer and should be at least 30% larger than defect. Anterior portion can be split, which makes positioning around falx cerebri easier.
2. Second layer of fascia lata is placed intracranially but extradurally; in between anterior skull base rim and dura mater.
• Nasoseptal ap harvest
• Posterior septotomy
• Sphenopalatine artery ligation and division
• Medial maxillectomy and inferior turbinectomy
• Removal of posterior maxillary sinus wall
For larger resections, contralateral nasoseptal ap is har­vested at the beginning. During the dissection, it can be stored in the sphenoid sinus and at the end used for recon­struction of the defect.
For purposes of planning, positions of vidian canal and foramen rotundum are excellent landmarks to determine area of dissection depending on tumour location (Fig.41.12) [29].