Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 196 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
94 Мб
Скачать
276
https://t.me/med1917
c
Fig. 29.5 (continued)
A. P. Fagin et al.
Fig. 29.6 Osteotomies complete; maxilla downfractured with digital pressure
that an inferior maxillectomy with preservation of the infra­orbital rim and orbital oor would provide adequate onco­logic margins. (If superior extension of the tumour requires a total maxillectomy, refer to Chap. 42.)
The osteotomy is then performed. The anaesthesia team is informed that this part of the procedure carries the highest risk for intraoperative blood loss, which can be limited with hypotensive anaesthesia if it is medically safe to do so. A reciprocating saw is used to complete each side sequentially, with a horizontal cut extending from the pterygomaxillary junction anteriorly across the zygomaticomaxillary buttress to end medially through the lateral nasal wall. The lateral nasal wall osteotomy can be conrmed using single-sided guarded nasal osteotomes. The nasal septum is transected with maxillectomy scissors if septal resection is desired, or it is separated from the maxilla with a curved, double-ball nasal septal osteotome if the septum can be preserved.
gomaxillary junction; care is taken to angle the osteotome downwards (inferiorly), with a nger placed intraorally behind the maxillary tuberosity. The osteotomy is then car­ried out until the osteotome is felt on the intraoral nger. Digital pressure is then placed on the anterior maxilla in an inferior direction to complete the downfracture in a con­trolled fashion (Fig.29.6). The greater palatine arteries can then be located at the posterior lateral aspect of the superior side of the downfractured maxilla and can be safely ligated with surgical clips. Once haemorrhage is controlled, atten­tion is turned to the posterior aspect of the resection speci­men. Cautery is used to carry the dissection posteriorly in the planned resection marking along the posterior aspect of the maxilla. This dissection is carried across the posterior aspect of the hard palate and connected with the contralateral side to free the remaining attachments.
Next, a curved osteotome is rmly placed into the ptery-
29 Inferior Maxillectomy andResection ofTumour oftheUpper Alveolus
https://t.me/med1917
277
The inferior maxillectomy specimen is then delivered (Fig.29.7). The resection bed is inspected for haemostasis, which is obtained with cautery, surgical clips, and suture ligation where appropriate. In the authors’ experience, a tracheostomy is rarely necessary unless the reconstructive technique is particularly bulky.
a
To aid in airway patency, prior to any reconstruction, nasal trumpets to create an nasopharyngeal airway can easily be placed and secured to the nasal septum without risking damage to reconstructive aps (Fig.29.8). At the same time, it is convenient to place a nasogastric feeding tube.
b
Fig. 29.7 (a) Resection bed after removal of inferior maxillectomy specimen. (b) Superior view of inferior maxillectomy specimen. (c) Inferior view of inferior maxillectomy specimen
278
https://t.me/med1917
c
Fig. 29.7 (continued)
A. P. Fagin et al.
Fig. 29.8 Bilateral nasal trumpets placed prior to any reconstruction, to assist in airway patency postoperatively and help avoid tracheostomy
29.4.1 Reconstructive Options
Though the focus of this chapter is not on maxillary recon­struction, this section briey reviews some reconstructive options. The goal of reconstruction is re-creation of anatomic boundaries between the oral cavity, maxillary sinus, and
nasal cavity, and restoration of masticatory function. For small resections of the maxillary alveolus, primary closure with local advancement of tissue is possible, although care should be taken not to obliterate the maxillary vestibule if the patient has a maxillary denture. Transposition of the buccal fat pad can often assist in creating a layered closure for small
29 Inferior Maxillectomy andResection ofTumour oftheUpper Alveolus
https://t.me/med1917
279
communications between the maxillary sinus and oral cavity. For larger defects, local aps (such as the facial artery myo­mucosal ap) can help provide a layered closure. For even larger defects (such as the one created in this case), obtura­tors historically were the only option to restore anatomic separation, but the advent of microvascular free tissue trans­fer has created many more options. For soft tissue, a radial forearm ap works well, owing to its relative lack of bulk (Fig.29.9).
When more extensive dental rehabilitation is planned, a bone ap is required to support eventual dental implant pros­theses. The bula is the workhorse for bony reconstruction
Fig. 29.9 Radial forearm ap inset to restore separation between the maxillary sinus, nasal cavity, and oral cavity
of the jaws, although bony transfer with a radial forearm, scapula, or deep circumex iliac artery bone ap is possible. The amount of bone available with a radial forearm bone ap is relatively small, however, and there is also the real risk of fracture of the radius, which sometimes can occur several weeks after the procedure, even if a bone plate has been placed on the radius.
Figures 29.10 and 29.11 show a case of mucoepidermoid carcinoma treated by bilateral inferior maxillectomy and reconstructed with an osteocutaneous bula graft followed by restoration with an implant-supported prosthesis to com­pletely restore both masticatory and cosmetic function.
280
https://t.me/med1917
A. P. Fagin et al.
Fig. 29.10 (a) Preoperative image of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of a minor salivary gland. (b) Inferior maxillectomy specimen. (c) Osteocutaneous bular graft with plates xated, ready for implantation into the resection bed. (d) Postoperative orthopantomogram
a
b
c
d
29 Inferior Maxillectomy andResection ofTumour oftheUpper Alveolus
https://t.me/med1917
abc
d
281
Fig. 29.11 (a and b) Frontal and prole clinical photos with immediate prosthesis in place, demonstrating the restoration of lip support and cosmetic smile. (c) Orthopantomogram with six implants in bula in
29.5 Postoperative Care
Postoperative care is based on the extent of resection, recon­struction, and any medical comorbidities. Small resections can often be performed under day-case anaesthesia. Sinus precautions are of course important for all patients in whom the reconstruction includes the maxillary sinus, to limit pres­sure changes across it that could impede healing. The authors do not routinely recommend postoperative antibiotics unless a microvascular free tissue transfer is used for reconstruc­tion. In the case of smaller resections, the patient can often resume an oral soft diet, but for larger resections and espe­cially for those with free ap reconstruction, nasogastric feeding for 5–7days is recommended. Finally, the authors do not routinely use postoperative steroids.
29.6 Results andConclusions
When oncologically appropriate margins can be achieved without resecting the infraorbital rim or zygoma, a tran­soral approach to an inferior maxillectomy is a well-toler-
preparation for implant- supported prosthesis. (d) Intraoral photo of immediate implant-supported prosthesis
ated procedure that spares the need for facial incisions in the classic Weber-Fergusson approach. Tumours of the maxilla have historically been difcult to clinically observe in the preoperative setting, but the advent of CT and, where appropriate, MRI has provided improved visualization for preoperative planning, often allowing for a more conserva­tive maxillectomy. Even with modern imaging, however, it is not always possible to denitively determine an appro­priate surgical plan preoperatively. Intraoperative endo­scopic evaluation of the sinus and intraoperative pathological evaluation can help the surgeon perform the minimum resection required to maintain oncologically acceptable margins. Reconstructive options aim to restore the anatomical separation between the oral cavity, nasal cavity, and maxillary sinus, as well as preserving mastica­tory function and phonation. The advent of microvascular free tissue transfer (with or without bony transfer) has revo­lutionized a reconstructive surgeon’s ability to restore form and function to patients undergoing this procedure. Finally, consideration should be given to the neck, particularly for patients with maxillary alveolus carcinomas, which have a high risk of micrometastasis. In the authors’ series of max-
282
https://t.me/med1917
A. P. Fagin et al.
illary alveolus carcinomas, 15% of patients developed neck metastasis within 18months of the original primary tumour surgery [7].
References
1. Pogrel MA. Inferior hemi-maxillectomy for treatment of palatal tumors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;46:85–7.
2. Öhngren LG.Malignant tumors of the maxilla-ethmoid region. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1933;13:1.
3. Brown JS, Shaw RJ. Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface: introducing a new classication. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:1001–8.
4. Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M.Prosthodontic guide­lines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classication sys­tem of defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:352–63.
5. Brown JS, Rogers SN, McNally DN, Boyle M.A modied clas­sication for the maxillectomy defect. Head Neck. 2000;22:17–26.
6. Davison SP, Sherris DA, Meland NB.An algorithm for maxillec­tomy defect reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:215–9.
7. Mourouzis C, Pratt C, Brennan PA.Squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary gingiva, alveolus, and hard palate: is there a need for elec­tive neck dissection? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48:345–8.
Part XI
https://t.me/med1917
Surgery of the Mandible
Perioral Marginal Mandibulectomy
https://t.me/med1917
JoshuaE.Lubek
30
30.1 Introduction
Oral cavity cancers involving the mandibular gingiva can become a signicant dilemma for the ablative surgeon with respect to the correct amount of mandibular bone required for surgical resection and achievement of appropriate surgi­cal margin. Marginal mandibulectomy is dened as the par­tial resection of the mandible. It is generally reserved for cases in which a gingival cancer has involved only the alveo­lar bone adjacent the teeth or the cortical bone has not been violated by tumour inltration. Marginal mandibulectomy can be performed both in the sagittal plane or the horizontal plane (rim resection). Although both techniques have been described the sagittal resection is fraught with more compli­cations, removes the ability to wear a removable dental pros­thesis, the inability to place dental implants without signicant bone grafting and signicantly weakens the man­dibular bone increasing the risk of mandibular fracture.
Furthermore, if the cortical bone is violated, then a sagittal resection will likely result in a positive oncologic margin (Fig.30.1a–c).
The purpose of the marginal mandibulectomy is to avoid
the morbidity of a segmental resection while maintaining proper oncologic principles and disease control. To this extent the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC 8th edition) has modied its denition of bone invasion involv­ing the alveolar dental segment. The cortical bone surround­ing the teeth is thin with little marrow, and thus, involvement of this bone occurs early and does not upstage the tumour to true marrow invasion. True pathologic bone invasion (pT4) requires involvement of the marrow bone below the apices of the teeth (Fig.30.2).
This chapter will focus on the technique of performing
the marginal rim mandibulectomy, indications, and post­operative care.
J. E. Lubek (*) Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Head & Neck Surgical Oncology/Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA e-mail: jlubek@umaryland.edu
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 R. Simo et al. (eds.), Atlas of Head and Neck Surgery, Springer Surgery Atlas Series,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36593-5_30
285
286
ab
https://t.me/med1917
J. E. Lubek
Free gingival
margin
Attached
gingiva
Anterior oral
vestibule
c
Sublingual
Condylar process
Coronoid process
Submandibular
fossa
fossa
Free gingival
margin
Attached
gingiva
Anterior oral
vestibule
Mandibular foramen
Alveolar process
Mental
foramen
Mental
protuberance
(chin)
Body
Ramus
Fig. 30.1 (a) Sagittal rim mandibulectomy. (b) Horizontal marginal rim mandibulectomy. (c) Horizontal rim marginal mandibulectomy