Культура и национальное самосознание Европы. Практикум на английском языке
.pdfTask 4. What is national identity according to Anthony Smith? Task 5. What is A. Smith’s idea of European unity?
Task 6. What is A. Smith’s idea of European identity?
Task 7.Account for reasons for the revival of nationalism in the globalization era, which A.Smith points out in his article.
Task 8. Why is the landscape an essential vehicle and mould for nation-building? Give examples of the symbolic status of the landscape.
Task 9. Why are legal and political rights essential in the Western model of a nation?
Task 10. Read two definitions of nations. Which one do you agree with? Give arguments to support your point of view.
1)«Ethnic distinctiveness remains a core of the nation. That means shared ancestry myths, common historical memories, unique cultural markers, and a sense of difference. The past (history) is of great importance. (Anthony D. Smith)
2)Nations are entirely modern and are socially constructed. The past is largely irrelevant. (Ernest Gellner)
Task 11. Explain the definition by B.Anderson: «”Nation” is an imagined political community».
Vocabulary to learn
1.1.Academic Vocabulary
1.an account
2. approach |
e.g. theoretical approaches to… |
3.causes and consequences (of smth.)
4.to describe
5. impact on |
e.g. the impacts of immigration |
|
6. to examine |
on national identity |
|
e.g. We’ll also explore the role of |
||
7. to explore |
||
|
landscape, memory and |
|
8. to consider |
historical heritage. |
|
e.g. How does national identity |
||
9. relate to smth. |
||
|
relate to similar concepts like |
|
10. related to smth. |
“nation,” race,etc.? |
|
|
11
11.research fields
12.to undergo
13.to stem from
14.according to
15.kinds of
16.to be composed of smth.
17.consequently, therefore
18.features of smth.
19.dimension, multidimensional
20.to argue that
21.to maintain that
22.to imply
23.view
24.to differentiate
25.profound
26.essential
27.to emphasize
28.emphasis on
29.to spring up
30.attitude towards
1.2.Topical Vocabulary
31.contemporary
32.cultural and national awareness
33.European „enlargement
e.g. Europe and the EU are undergoing the most significant changes…
e.g. The concepts of identity and national identity originally stem from the social sciences.
e.g. There are different kinds of collective identity.
e.g. The self is composed of multiple identities
e.g. Legal equality among the members of that community implies exclusion of outsiders from those rights and duties.
e.g. gulf between the concepts of the state and the nation
e.g. The philosophers emphasize these particular features
e.g. a different model of the nation sprang up
12
34. to shape |
e.g. the way in which the past |
|
has shaped the landscape |
35.to re-shape
36.to challenge, challenge, challenging
37. diversity |
e.g. cultural diversity of Europe |
38. to share |
e.g. all who share a historic |
|
culture and homeland and |
|
common myths |
39.rights and duties
40.possess
41.landscape
42.represent
43.achievements
44. to link, a link |
e.g. to link transportation |
|
networks and US national |
|
identity |
45.to gain independence
46.rural
47.urban
48.to be made up of
49.peasants
50.anthem
51.the ordinary, the everyday
52.community
53.status
54. source of |
e.g. the richest source of |
|
55. roots of |
historical material |
|
e.g. the emergence of |
||
56. to emerge; emergence |
||
(noun) |
independent Finland; the |
|
|
emergence of market towns |
|
57. to reveal |
e.g. The landscape reveals the |
|
|
impact on the land of foreign |
|
|
cultures and civilizations. |
|
58. to enable |
e.g. Landscape enables people to |
|
|
create a link with their past. |
|
59. to generate |
e.g. to generate a sense of |
|
60. a sense of belonging |
belonging |
|
|
||
|
13 |
61. the Norwegians |
|
|
62. the Swiss |
|
|
63. the Austrians |
|
|
64. the Scottish |
|
|
65. the Alps |
|
|
66. Asia |
|
|
67. legal equality |
|
|
68. civil and legal rights |
|
|
69. code of laws |
e.g. Citizenship implies |
|
70. to exclude, exclusion |
||
|
exclusion of outsiders from those |
|
|
rights and duties. |
|
71. to obey |
e.g. to obey the laws |
|
72. majority |
e.g. the vast majority of |
|
73. border, boundary |
contemporary states |
|
e.g. state’s boundaries coincide |
||
74. to coincide |
||
|
with the nation’s ones |
|
75. to bind |
e. g. to bind the population |
|
|
together |
76.descent
77.descendants (of immigrants)
78. native |
e.g. native culture |
79. claim, to claim |
|
Recommended Reading
Basic
1.Smith, A. D., National Identity. London: Penguin 1991.
2.Smith, Anthony D. Nationalism and modernism: a critical survey of recent theories of nations and nationalism, London; New York: Routledge 1998.
3.Smith Anthony D. National Identity and the Idea of European Unity International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944). Vol. 68, No. 1 (Jan., 1992), pp. 55–76.
4.Guibernau, M. Anthony D. Smith on nations and national identity: a critical assessment //Nations and Nationalism, 10 (1/2), 2004, p.p.125–141.
14
5.Coakley, John. Nationalism, Ethnicity and the State Making and Breaking, Dublin: Nations University College 2012.
6.Delanty, G., Kumar, K. The SAGE Handbook of Nations and Nationalism. SAGE Publications Ltd 2006.
7.Grosby, Steven, Leoussi, Athena S. ed. Nationalism and Ethnosymbolism: History, culture and ethnicity in the formation of nations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2007.
Additional
1.When is the nation? : Towards an understanding of theories of nationalism. Ed. Atsuko Ichijo and Gordana Uzelac. London; New York: Routledge 2005.
2.Young, Mitchell, Zuelow, Eric and Sturm Andreas, ed. Nationalism in a global era: The persistence of nations. London; New York: Routledge. 2007.
Internet resources
www.cer.org.uk – An official website of the centre for European reform (CER). CER is an independent, private not-for-profit organization. It positions itself as a think-tank devoted to making the European Union work better and strengthening its role in the world. The CER is pro-European but not uncritical. They regard European integration as largely beneficial but recognize that in many respects the Union does not work well. The CER aims to promote an open, outward-looking and effective European Union. Through meetings, seminars and conferences CER brings together people from the worlds of politics and business, as well as other opinion-formers. The conclusions of their research and seminars are reflected in their publications, which can be used for the preparation for question 5 of the seminar.
PRACTICAL # 2. Multiculturalism in Europe
Objective: to develop the ability to apply knowledge gained from Humanities, Social Studies and Economics in carrying out expert and analytical work on ethnic and racial issues.
Organizational structure of the class: group discussion
15
Topics for discussion
1.Multiculturalism as a new paradigm of ethnic development.
2.Multiculturalism in academic discourse.
3.Multiculturalism in different national contexts.
4.Revision of history from Multiculturalists’ perspective.
Learning strategies
The practical is devoted to multiculturalism – a phenomenon of the second half of the XX-th century. This is extremely complicated and multi-dimensional issue, that’s why two classes are planned to examine it. Multiculturalism relates to communities containing multiple cultures. The term is used in two broad ways, either descriptively or normatively. As a descriptive term, it usually refers to the simple fact of cultural diversity: it is generally applied to the demographic make-up of a specific place, sometime at the organizational level, e.g. schools, businesses, neighbourhoods, cities, or nations. As a normative term, it refers to ideologies or policies that promote this diversity or its institutionalization. In this sense, multiculturalism is a society “at ease with the rich tapestry of human life and the desire amongst people to express their own identity in the manner they see fit.”
The first practical is focused on multiculturalism as a political theory and ideology. Since there is a host of different and sometimes controversial definitions for multiculturalism, students should bear in mind that multiculturalism is more a discourse rather than a theory in a traditional sense of the word. It refers to a mode of communication across ethnic or religious divisions. The underlying principle of multiculturalism is of not only tolerating but also respecting different religions and cultures and encouraging them to coexist harmoniously.
The preparation for question #1 should be started with the examination of the reasons for the quest of a new paradigm of ethnic development in the 1960–1970-s. Analyze multiculturalism in comparison with the concepts of assimilationism. Compare multicuturalist metaphors of "salad bowl" or "cultural mosaic" with assimilationist metaphor of "melting pot". Think over the question: why did the ideology of nationalism with its central idea of a nation-state based on the principle of unity (of descent, culture, language, and often of religion) and homogeneous society – undergo crises and gave way to multiculturalism?
16
Question #2. Given the fact that the issue is highly disputable, analyze the arguments of critics of multiculturalism. Deep insights into the matter are provided by articles from the recommended reading list, particularly those of Triandafyllidou, A., Modood, T. and Meer, N.; Werbner, P. and Claval, P.
Question #3. Western nation-states, which had achieved a de facto single national identity during the 18th and/or 19th centuries, has been practicing multiculturalism as official policy since the 1970s. Find out the reasons for the change from assimilationism policies to multiculturalism. Although the reasons vary from country to country, try to find out the common ones. Pay attention to the fact that many of the great cities of the Western world are increasingly made of a mosaic of cultures. Use recent demographic statistics to explore this aspect. Then focus on two main different strategies which have developed through different government policies and strategies. The first focuses on interaction and communication between different cultures. Interactions of cultures provide opportunities for the cultural differences to communicate and interact to create multiculturalism. (Such approaches are also often known as interculturalism.) The second centers on diversity and cultural uniqueness. Cultural isolation can protect the uniqueness of the local culture of a nation and also contribute to global cultural diversity. A common aspect of many policies following the second approach is that they avoid presenting any specific ethnic, religious, or cultural community values as central.
Question #4 is of particular interest for History students. Here they are supposed to do some historiographical country-based research. The aim is to analyze the ways scholars from European countries rewrite their nation’s history from multiculturalists’ perspective.
Assignments for control and development of competences
1.Give definitions to the following terms: “cultural diversity”, "cultural mosaic”, “demographic make-up”, “assimilationism”, “nationstate”.
2.Summarize the main features of multiculturalism as a cultural paradigm of ethnic development.
3.List the arguments of the opponents of multiculturalism.
4.Give examples of multiculturalist interpretation of national history of a European country.
17
5.Compare multicuturalist metaphors of "salad bowl" or "cultural mosaic" with assimilationist metaphor of "melting pot".
6.Test tasks
Task 1. Explain multiculturalism as a new paradigm of ethnic development.
Task 2. Give account of multiculturalism in academic discourse. Task 4. What is “cultural diversity”?"
Task 5. What is "cultural mosaic”? Task 6. What is “assimilationism”? Task 7. What is a“nation-state”?
Task 8. Why did the ideology of nationalism with its central idea of a nation-state gave way to multiculturalism?
Task 9. What are arguments of the opponents of multiculturalism? 6. Complete an essay on one of the topics:
1. Revision of history from Multiculturalists’ perspective.
2. Multiculturalist interpretation of a national history of a European country.
Requirements for submission of an essay:
An essay has clearly stated objectives and is planned carefully. The structure of the paper work has all the necessary elements. They are the following: 1. Introduction (Objectives of the essay, analysis of primary sources and research works of scholars). 2. Main part (a statement, supportive arguments “for” and “against”, the author’s personal point of view). 3. Conclusion. An excellent essay has clear statements and several supporting arguments presented in a logically coherent order. Conclusions logically follow arguments. The essay must be written according to the requirements: the paper should not exceed 4-5 pages. It should be typed in a readable font such as 12or 14-point Times Roman or Arial. Cover sheet or title page should include the following information: name, class number, instructor’s name, date and the title of the essay. The paper must include footnotes either on each page or at the end of the main text.
|
Vocabulary to learn |
1. to abandon |
e.g. to abandon multiculturalism |
2. an advocate |
e.g. an advocate |
3. advocacy for |
of multiculturalism |
|
|
|
18 |
4.assimilation
5.cultural diversity
6.cultural uniqueness
7.to contribute to
8.controversial
9.to coexist
10.country-based research
11.demographic make-up
12.to denounce
13.political dimensions of smth.
14.disputable (issue)
15.the discursive attack on smth.
16.to endorse
17.evidence-based
18.to give way to
19.homogeneous (society)
20.interaction
21.implementing policies
22.marginalized (identity, ethnicity)
23.multiculturalism, multiculturalist, multicultural
24.to overestimate
25.policy-making, policy-maker
26.a post-multicultural alternative
27.to take on (a political task)
28.quest
e.g. to denounce multiculturalism
e.g. to give way to multiculturalism
e.g. interactions of cultures
e.g. to overestimate the political power of smth.
e.g. the quest for a new paradigm
Recommended Reading
Basic
1.Triandafyllidou, Anna; Modood, Tariq and Meer, Nasar. Eds., European Multiculturalisms: Cultural, Religious and Ethnic Challenges. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011.
2.Modood, Tariq & Meer, Nasar. Rejoinder: Assessing the Divergences on our Readings of Interculturalism and Multiculturalism //
19
Journal of Intercultural Studies Vol. 33, No. 2, April 2012, pp. 233–
244.<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2012.649531>.
3.Werbner, Pnina Multiculturalism from Above and Below:
Analysing a Political Discourse // Journal of Intercultural Studies Vol. 33, No. 2, April 2012, pp. 197–209.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/- 07256868.2012.649527.
4. Wieviorka, Michel. Multiculturalism: A Concept to be Redefined and Certainly Not Replaced by the Extremely Vague Term of Interculturalism // Journal of Intercultural Studies Vol. 33, No. 2,
April |
2012, |
pp. |
225–231. |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/- |
07256868.2012.649530. |
|
|
||
1.Boneta, Lluís and Négrierb, Emmanuel. The end(s) of national cultures? Cultural policy in the face of diversity // International Journal of Cultural Policy Vol. 17, No. 5, November 2011, 574–589. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2010.550681>.
2.Claval, Paul. Multiculturalism and dynamics of modern civilization. < http://archive.unu.edu/dialogue/papers/claval-s2.pdf >.
Additional
1. Levey, Geoffrey Brahm. Interculturalism vs. Multiculturalism: A Distinction without a Difference? // Journal of Intercultural Studies Vol. 33, No. 2, April 2012, pp. 217–224. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/- 07256868.2012.649529>.
2.End it, don’t mend it // The Economist, April, 5, 2003.
3.Wilson, Neate. Unwelcome remainders, welcome reminders.
(ethnicity within national identity) (Theory, Culture and Criticism) MELUS; 6/22/1994; <http://www.highbeam.com>.
4. Modood, Tariq. Multiculturalism. A civic idea. Cambridge: Polity 2007.
Internet resources
www.cer.org.uk – An official website of the centre for European reform (CER). CER is an independent, private not-for-profit organization. It positions itself as a think-tank devoted to making the European Union work better and strengthening its role in the world. The CER is pro-European but not uncritical. They regard European integration as largely beneficial but recognize that in many respects the Union does not work well. The CER aims to promote an open, outward-looking and effective European Union. Through meetings, seminars and conferences CER brings together people from the worlds
20
