Full Asset Report

50,000
321
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 (x 1,000)
Dollars
Figure 8.2
2.2.3Applications
Asset |
Replacement Cost Percentage of Total 345 |
$50,000. |
100.0% |
2
Figure 7.3
This information about replacement costs is presented below as a barchart.

50,000 345 










5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
40 |
45 |
50 (x 1,000) |
Dollars
Figure 8.3
2.2.4Communications Hardware
Asset |
Replacement Cost |
Percentage of Total |
|
$50,000. |
100.0% |
Figure 7.4
This information about replacement costs is presented below as a barchart.
50,000
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
40 |
45 |
50 (x 1,000) |
Dollars
Figure 8.4
2.2.5Communications Software
Asset |
Replacement Cost |
Percentage of Total |
EWQ |
$25,000. |
100.0% |
Full Asset Report
Figure 7.5
This information about replacement costs is presented below as a barchart.

25,000 EWQ 










25 |
50 |
75 |
100 |
125 |
150 |
175 |
200 |
225 |
250 (x 100) |
Dollars
Figure 8.5
2.2.6Databases
Asset |
Replacement Cost |
Percentage of Total |
456 |
$7,500. |
100.0% |
Figure 7.6
This information about replacement costs is presented below as a barchart.
3

7,500
456
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 (x 1,000) |
Dollars
Figure 8.6
2.2.7Documentation
Asset |
Replacement Cost |
Percentage of Total |
OI |
$10,000. |
100.0% |
Figure 7.7
This information about replacement costs is presented below as a barchart.

10,000 OI 










1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 (x 1,000) |
Dollars
Full Asset Report
Figure 8.7
2.2.8Hardware
Asset |
Replacement Cost |
Percentage of Total |
HARD |
$25,000. |
100.0% |
Figure 7.8
This information about replacement costs is presented below as a barchart.

25,000 HARD 










25 |
50 |
75 |
100 |
125 |
150 |
175 |
200 |
225 |
250 (x 100) |
Dollars
Figure 8.8
2.2.9Office Equipment
Asset |
Replacement Cost |
Percentage of Total |
QWE |
$7,500. |
60.0% |
QWE |
$5,000. |
40.0% |
Figure 7.9
This information about replacement costs is presented below as a barchart.
4

7,500
QWE
5,000
QWE
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 (x 1,000) |
Dollars
Figure 8.9
The percentage of the total replacement cost for this category that is contributed by each asset is indicated in the following diagram.
Full Asset Report
QWE (40.0%)
QWE (60.0%)
Figure 9.9
2.2.10Personnel
Asset |
Replacement Cost |
Percentage of Total |
PERS |
$2,000. |
100.0% |
Figure 7.10
This information about replacement costs is presented below as a barchart.

2,000 PERS 








25 |
50 |
75 |
100 |
125 |
150 |
175 |
200 (x 10) |
Dollars
Figure 8.10
2.2.11System Software
Asset |
Replacement Cost |
Percentage of Total |
HELPMEPLEASE |
$7,500. |
100.0% |
Figure 7.11 |
|
|
This information about replacement costs is presented below as a barchart.
5

7,500 ELPM EPLEASE 







1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 (x 1,000) |
Dollars
Full Asset Report
Figure 8.11
2.2.12Utilities
Asset |
Replacement Cost |
Percentage of Total |
42 |
$0. |
0.0% |
42 |
$0. |
0.0% |
Figure 7.12
Full Threat Report |
1 |
3.2 INCIDENTS INVOLVING EACH THREAT
Each Incident is defined as triple of the form <threat, loss category, asset category> . By doing things this way it is possible to separate the various forms of loss that a given threat may cause to the enterprise as the result of acting on the same asset category.
The sections below look at each threat and indicate the various incidents that were associated with it in the analysis. For each incident, a table is presented (FIGURES 13.1, 13.2, ...) indicating its SLE and ALE (where the ALE is generated by multiplying the SLE for the incident by the AFE of the threat). The overall ALE for a threat is the sum of the ALEs for each of the associated incidents. This is shown as the total of the third column. The percentage of this total represented by the ALE for each incident is indicated in the fourth column.
Also shown for each threat is a barchart that provides a visual presentation of the relative magnitudes of the ALE for each incident. These are shown as FIGURES 14.1, 14.2, ....
Piecharts are then also provided that indicate the percentage of each threat ALE that is accounted for by each incident that is used in its calculation.
3.2.1Blackmail - AFE: 0.05
The various incident classes associated with this threat are shown in the following table:
Incident Class |
SLE |
ALE |
% of total ALE |
Direct Loss, Personnel |
$20. |
$1. |
0.0% |
Figure 13.1 |
|
|
|
20
Direct, Personnel
2 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
14 |
16 |
18 |
20 |
Dollars
Figure
16.1Blackmail - SLE's
3.2.2Budget Loss - AFE: 0.50
The various incident classes associated with this threat are shown in the following table:
Incident Class |
SLE |
ALE |
% of total ALE |
Disclosure, Databases |
$25,000. |
$12,500. |
100.0% |
Figure 13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosure, Databases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 12 (x 1,000) |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 14.2 |
|
Budget Loss - ALE's |
|||||||
Full Threat Report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Disclosure, Databases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
25 |
50 |
75 100 125 150 175 200 |
225 250 (x 100) |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 16.2 |
Budget Loss - SLE's |
|||||||
3.2.3Cold/Frost/Snow - AFE: 5.00
The various incident classes associated with this threat are shown in the following table:
Incident Class |
SLE |
ALE |
% of total ALE |
Disclosure, Databases |
$12,500. |
$62,500. |
100.0% |
Figure 13.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Disclosure, Databases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
5 |
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 |
55 60 (x 1,000) |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 14.3 |
Cold/Frost/Snow - ALE's |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Disclosure, Databases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 12 (x 1,000) |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 16.3 |
Cold/Frost/Snow - SLE's |
||||||||||
3.2.4Data Destruction - AFE: 20.00
The various incident classes associated with this threat are shown in the following table:
Incident Class |
SLE |
ALE |
% of total ALE |
Disclosure, Databases |
$250,000. |
$5,000,000. |
98.9% |
Direct Loss, Databases |
$2,751. |
$55,027. |
1.1% |
Figure 13.4

5,000,000 Disclosure, Databases 










5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
40 |
45 |
50 (x 100,000) |
Dollars
Full Threat Report |
3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Direct, Databases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 |
55 (x 1,000) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollars
Figure 14.4 Data Destruction - ALE's
Direct, Databases (1.1%)
Disclosure, Databases (98.9%)
Figure 15.4 Data Destruction - ALE's
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosure, Databases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
50 |
|
75 |
|
100 |
125 |
150 |
175 |
200 |
225 |
|
250 (x 1,000) |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,751 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Direct, Databases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
25 |
50 |
75 |
100 |
125 |
150 |
175 |
200 |
225 |
250 |
|
275 (x 10) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 16.4 |
Data Destruction - SLE's |
|||||||||||||||||
3.2.5 Data Disclosure - AFE: 3.00
Full Threat Report |
4 |
The various incident classes associated with this threat are shown in the following table:
Incident Class |
SLE |
ALE |
% of total ALE |
Disclosure, Databases |
$1,938. |
$5,813. |
100.0% |
Figure 13.5 |
|
|
|

5,813 Disclosure, Databases 











5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
40 |
45 |
50 |
55 (x 100) |
Dollars
Figure 14.5 Data Disclosure - ALE's

1,938
Disclosure, Databases
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 (x 10)
Dollars
Figure 16.5 Data Disclosure - SLE's
3.2.6Data Integrity Loss - AFE: 3.00
The various incident classes associated with this threat are shown in the following table:
Incident Class |
|
SLE |
ALE |
% of total ALE |
|
Direct Loss, Accounts Receivable |
|
$5,526. |
$16,576. |
27.8% |
|
Direct Loss, Applications |
|
$5,507. |
$16,523. |
27.7% |
|
Disclosure, Personnel |
|
$4,500. |
$13,500. |
22.7% |
|
Direct Loss, Communications Software |
$2,723. |
$8,171. |
13.7% |
|
|
Direct Loss, System Software |
|
$817. |
$2,451. |
4.1% |
|
Direct Loss, Databases |
|
$640. |
$1,921. |
3.2% |
|
Direct Loss, Accounts Payable |
|
$147. |
$443. |
0.7% |
Disclosure, |
Databases |
$0. |
$0. |
0.0% |
|
|
Figure 13.6
Direct, Accts Rec
Direct, Applicatns
Disclosure, Personnel
Direct, Comms S/W
Direct, System S/W
Direct, Databases
|
|
|
|
|
16,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
16,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,921 |
25 |
50 |
75 |
100 |
125 |
150 (x 100) |
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
