Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Sb95667

.pdf
Скачиваний:
4
Добавлен:
13.02.2021
Размер:
444.21 Кб
Скачать

dium in the presence of laser pumping wave(ω2), but in the absence of Stokes

wave(ω1 = ω2 − ωυ), this anti-Stokes wave will be attenuated.

However, there exists one more polarization component with the frequency

ω2:

Pϖ 3

(z) ~ E

2

E

2

E

* exp i(

2

−ϖ

1

)t .

(3.16)

nl

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

It does not contain E3 and

can

 

be

treated

as

the upper side

frequency

2 + (ω2 − ω1)] in the spectrum of oscillations of dielectric permittivity with the modulation by combination of frequencies ω2 and ω2 − ω1. This component is responsible for emission of radiation with the frequency ω3. If one adds to (3.16) the spatial dependence of polarization, he will get:

Pϖ 3

(z) ~ E

2

E

E*exp[i(2k

2

k

1

)r].

(3.17)

nl

 

 

2 1

 

 

 

The field E3exp(ik3r) corresponds to this term, and

 

 

 

 

 

k 3 = 2k 2 k1 .

 

 

 

 

(3.18)

The anti-Stokes wave can be emitted only in directions, which correspond to requirements (3.18) – see Fig.3.4. Since | ki| = ωini/c, the antiStokes component can be emitted only along the conical surface, whose axis coincides with the pumping laser beam, while the angle between this surface and axis is equal to β. The real ge-

ometry and situation is yet more complicated. There are observed also the higher order Stokes and anti-Stokes components, and also the corresponding directions of propagation are modified with respect to (3.18) due to other nonlinear effects like self-focusing (see further).

Fig. 3.4. The diagram for explanation of the anti-Stokes radiation propagation direction

31

Fig. 3.5. Experiment of SRS excitation

In the Fig.3.5 is shown the scheme of one of the first experiments on SRS observation. Pumping laser radiation was focused into the SRS-active medium. The output radiation was collimated by the lens and was sent to the prism spectrograph. One could have seen on the screen the residual pumping radiation, the intense first Stokes component and weaker first anti-Stokes and second Stokes components.

3.3. Stimulated Brillouin scattering

The spontaneous scattering of light on the thermal acoustic waves was first predicted by L.Mandelstam in 1918, but was not published. It was rediscovered by Brilloin in 1922 and now is known as Brillouin scattering (in Russian – Mandel- stam-Brillouin scattering). Its stimulated analogue (SBS), where the acoustic wave is amplified by intense light action, was demonstrated in 1964.

The first experiment on SBS demonstration is shown in the Fig.3.6. The Q- switched giant pulse from ruby laser with the frequency ω2 was focused into the quartz crystal. The acoustical wave with the frequency ωs in the range of several GHz (the so called hypersonic wave) was excited in the crystal, scattering the light with the frequency ω2−ωs. The Fabrys-Perot interferometers made it possible to register both the primary and scattered wave, which have had a very small (in optical measure) spectral shift. Both acoustical and scattered waves were propagating in definite directions and were observed when the laser radiation power have exceeded the definite threshold level.

Spontaneous Brillouin scattering originates from the so called noise hypersonic waves. Hypersound has the frequency in the range 108-109 Hz and the wave-

32

length in the micrometer range. On this scale the matter is subjected to everexisting temperature and pressure fluctuations, which cause the said noise hypersound, scattering the incident light. If the incident light intensity is sufficiently high, it can amplify the hypersonic waves via the so called electrostriction mechanism, stimulated by interference of incident and spontaneously scattered light. Under definite geometry this amplification gets the exponential growth, transforming the spontaneous scattering process into stimulated one. Its nature and features have much in common with SRS effect.

Fig. 3.6. First experiment on SBS observation

Let us consider the elementary volume of matter, which is subjected by the electric field of the light wave dx dy dz. Let some point inside this volume shifts from its equilibrium position in u(x, t), producing the single dimension deformation ∂u/∂x. Let us introduce phenomenological constant γ, which characterizes the variation of dielectric permittivity due to deformation:

δε = −γ(ux). (3.19) In the presence of deformation the density of stored energy is changed in – 1/2 γ (∂u/∂x)E2. Variation of stored energy due to deformation produces the excess

pressure

 

p = −1 2 γE 2 .

(3.20)

The unit volume is subjected to an electrostriction force, acting along the ax-

is x:

 

 

 

 

 

 

F = −

p =

γ

 

E2 ,

(3.20a)

 

 

 

x 2 ∂x

 

 

33

 

and the oscillation u(x, t) obeys the equation

 

 

 

− η

u + T

2u +

γ

 

E2 = ρ

2u

,

(3.21)

 

 

t2

 

t

x2 2 ∂x

 

 

Here η is the attenuation constant, accounting for the acoustical losses; Т is the volume elasticity module of the medium; ρ is the medium density; T = (1/ρ) (dρ/dp). Let us assume that both electric fields and the acoustic wave are the plane waves, propagating in the arbitrary directions:

E1(r,t) = 1 2E1(r1) exp[i(ϖ1t k1r)]+ c.c.;

 

E2 (r,t) = 1 2E2 (r2 ) exp[i(ϖ 2t k2r)]+ c.c.;

(3.22)

u(r,t) = 1 2us (rs ) exp[i(ϖst ksr)]+ c.c.,

 

Here r1, r2, rs are the distances along the propagation directions k1, k2, ks, where ri

= (kiTri)/ki. let us

differentiate

the last

equation

 

of

(3.22) in assumption that

2u

 

 

 

u

 

2u , and we shall get:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s << k

 

 

s , k

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

r 2

 

 

s

 

rs

 

s

s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2u

 

 

1

 

 

 

u

2u

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

 

= −

 

k 2u

+ 2ik

 

s

 

s

exp([i

s

t k

s

r)]+ c.c.).

(3.22а)

 

 

2

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

r

 

 

 

s s

s r

r

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let us now replace in (3.21) x by rs, and we shall get:

 

(iηϖ

 

+ ρϖ 2 )u

 

 

 

 

u

 

exp[i

 

t k r )]+ c.c. =

 

 

T k 2u

+ 2ik

 

s

 

 

 

 

r

 

 

 

s

 

 

s s

 

s s

s

 

 

s

s s

 

 

γ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

 

 

(3.23)

 

= −

 

{E (r )E*(r ) exp[i((ϖ

2

−ϖ

1

)t (k k )r)]+ c.c.}.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

1

1

 

 

 

2

 

1

 

 

4 ∂rs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From (3.23) results that ωs = ω2 − ω1, ks = k2 k1, and the right side of (3.23) is transformed into

γ

 

(E E*) − ik E E* exp[i

t k

r)] + c.c.,

(3.24)

4

 

r

2 1

s 2 1

 

s

s

 

 

 

 

s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and the wave equation (3.23) now looks like

2ik v2

us (rs ) + k 2v2

− ϖ2

+

iηϖs

u (r ) = −

iγks

E (r )E*(r )

, (3.25)

 

 

s s

rs

 

s s

s

 

 

 

s s

2 2 1 1

 

 

r

 

where vs is the velocity of acoustic waves propagation ( vs2 = T / r ).

34

The equation (3.25) is valid under the condition

(E2E1*)<< ksE2E1* .

rs

The equation for the electromagnetic waves looks like the wave equation:

Ñ2E (r,t) = με

2

E (r,t) + με

2

(P )

,

(3.26)

 

 

i

t

2

i

t2

nl i

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here (Pnl)i is the component of the nonlinear polarization, which is exciting the field Ei(r, t). With the use of first equality from (3.22), we obtain:

Ñ2Ei (r,t) = - 1 [k12E1(r1)+ 2ik1ÑE1(r1)2E1(r1)]exp[i(ϖ1t -k1r)]+ c.c. (3.27) 2

Let us combine (3.27) and (3.26) (i = 1), neglect the term Ñ2E1(r1) and, recalling that k1 ÑE1(r1) = k1 (dE1/dr1), and thus obtain the equation:

k

dE1(r1)

exp[i(ϖ t - k r)]+ c.c. = iμ

2

(P

)

.

(3.28)

 

 

1

1

1

t 2

nl

i

 

 

 

r1

 

 

 

 

 

The nonlinear polarization in (3.28) is the additional polarization, induced by the acoustical wave, i.e. (Pnl)i = (de)E, or, with account for (3.19)

(P

)

i

= δε E = -γE(r, t) u(r, t) .

(3.29)

nl

 

rs

 

 

 

 

 

According to (3.22) the product E (du/drs) contains the terms, which oscillate with the frequencies (w1 ± ws) and (w2 ± ws). However, only those of them, for which (w2 ws) = w1, can perform as the synchronous sources, so one can rewrite the equation (3.28) as follows

 

dE1

 

it k r)

 

im ¶2

 

 

 

i

 

t k

 

r)

 

 

 

k1

 

e

1 1

=

 

 

 

 

 

 

- gE2e

 

 

 

2

 

2

 

´

 

 

 

dr1

 

4 t2

 

 

 

 

 

 

rs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

or, with account for (3.24)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

dE

 

 

iv2gm

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

u*

 

 

 

 

k

 

1

=

 

1

E

 

ik u +

 

 

s

 

 

 

 

1

 

dr

 

4

 

2

 

 

 

s s

 

 

r

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

For |dus/drs| << |ksus| the wave equation transforms to

dE

 

v2gmk

s

 

 

*

 

aE

1

=

1

E u

 

-

1 ,

 

 

 

 

dr

 

4k

2

s

 

2

1

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

[ * −it k r) ]

us e s s ,

(3.30)

35

Here was added the dissipative term – ( αE1/2) so as to account for the losses in the medium at the frequency ω1, which were earlier neglected. The equation for the wave with ω2 = ω1 + ωs is written out similarly

dE

 

ϖ2γμk

αE

 

2

=

2 s

E u*

2

,

(3.31)

 

 

 

dr2

 

 

1 s

2

 

 

 

4k2

 

 

The relationships (3.25), (3.30) and (3.31) comprise the closed system of equations for amplitudes of acoustical us(rs) and electromagnetic E1(r1) and E2(r2) fields. The intense field with the frequency ω2 induces simultaneous generation of the electromagnetic wave with the frequency ω1 and of the acoustic wave with the frequency ωs = ω2 − ω1. The analysis is simpler if the generated waves are much less intense than the laser radiation. Then we can suppose that E2(r2) = const and consider only (3.25) and (3.30). let us also assume that in (3.25) ωs = ksvs, i.e. we shall apply for the acoustic wave the same dispersion law, which is valid for the case of free propagation in the medium without losses. Then

us = −

η

u

γ

 

E

E*

,

(3.32)

vs

v

 

rs

s

2

 

2 1

 

 

 

 

 

s

 

 

 

 

and the equation (3.30) can be rewritten as

 

 

 

 

 

 

dE*

αE*

γk k

E*u .

 

1

= −

1

1 s

(3.33)

 

dr

2

2 s

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

Two variables (r1 and rs) in equations (3.32) and (3.33) can be replaced by one coordinate ξ along the bisector of the angle between k1 and ks (see Fig.3.7). So one can use rs = r1 = ξ cos θ= q, and thus convert (3.32) and (3.33) to

Fig. 3.7. Transformation of coordi-

nate system

us = −

 

η

u

γ

 

 

E

E*;

 

 

v

 

 

q

vs

s

 

2

 

2 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

 

. (3.34)

 

dE*

 

αE*

 

γk k

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

= −

1

 

1 s

E*u .

 

 

 

 

 

dq

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

 

2 s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

These equations describe the increase or decrease of the acoustic displacement us and of the electric field E1 along any of two propagation directions, corresponding to q.

36

Let us suppose that the growth is exponential:

 

 

 

 

u

s

(q) = u0egq ;

E*

(q) = (E0 )*egq .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3.35)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

 

 

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let us combine (3.35) with (3.34) and solve the algebraic equation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

(a

 

+ a) +

1

 

(a

 

+ a)2

 

 

 

 

k1k sg

2

 

E2

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

g = -

 

 

 

- 4 a

 

a -

 

 

 

 

 

,

(3.36)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

s

 

 

4

 

 

s

 

 

 

 

s

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8re1vs

 

 

 

 

 

Here as = – h/rvs is the acoustic attenuation constant. The amplification gain g grows up with the increase of acoustic frequency ws. Since ws << w2, then w2 » w1 and the for the isotropic medium k 2 k1 . The vector relationship (3.24) is the same as for the Bragg scattering, and thus,

 

ks

 

=

 

2k 2

 

sin θ ,

(3.37)

 

 

 

 

The amplification is maximal for the backward scattering (q = p/2): ks = 2k 2

(Fig. 3.8), ands the frequency of the acoustic wave is

(ϖs )max = 2ϖ2νs n2 c ,

(3.38)

For g > 0 the noise acoustic waves, propagating along ks, and the light waves, propagating along k1 and having the frequency w1 will be amplified simultaneously in accordance with (3.35). So the power of the waves, propagating in the said directions, will grow up. The condition of amplification for SBS is fulfilled when:

2

³

8Tε1αsα

 

| E2 |

 

.

(3.39)

 

 

 

g2k k

 

 

 

1 s

 

If one emphasizes the acoustic and optical attenuation constants in terms of attenuation lengths Ls = 2/as and L1 = 2/a, (i.e. the distances at which under usual conditions the field amplitude is reduced in е times), the relationship for the threshold pumping will look like

 

2

 

16cTe2n2n

 

I

 

>

 

0 1 2

,

(3.40)

 

 

 

 

 

 

g2k k L L

 

 

 

 

 

1 s 1 s

 

a

b

 

 

Fig. 3.8. Correspondence between vectors

k2, k1 and ks for SBS in isotropic medium: a

– for the arbitrary angle θ; b – for the backward scattering (θ ≈ π/2)

37

Let us calculate as an example the parameters of SBS for quartz. Here

Т = 5 · 1010 N/m2 is the typical value of elasticity module for the solid state bod-

ies,

 

γ ≈ ε ~ 10–11

F/m is

the

typical

value of the electrostriction coefficient,

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

λ

 

≈ λ = 1 μm, L

1

= 1 m, ω ≈ 2ω (v n/c) ≈ 12π · 109 s–1 for v

s

= 3 · 103 m/s,

2

 

 

1

 

 

 

s

2

s

 

k

L

1

= (2πL /λ ) = 2π · 106, L

s

= 10–3

m –the typical values for quartz and sap-

1

 

 

1

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

phire. So the threshold power can be evaluated as Iпор ≈ 1011 W/cm2.

3.4. Nonlinear effects, accompanying the stimulated scattering

We have said already that SRS and SBS effects arouse only if the radiation

intensity exceeds some threshold. However, often the measured value of threshold is lower than the expected one. The difference between theory and experiment can be rather large; in some liquids these values differ in one hundred and more times. The reason the self-focusing effect. Due to this effect the beam diameter in the medium is gradually reducing and finally the beam is collapsing to “focal point”. In this point the power density of the laser radiation can be very high and can lead to material damage. In particular, this effect is very important in the high power pulsed solid-state lasers, because it can lead to active element damage. Let us discuss this effect in more details.

We have already mentioned that for dielectric permittivity is valid either

ε = ε 0 + γ 1E or ε = ε0 + γ2 E 2 , hence the refraction index n ~ ε will also de-

pend upon Е, and thus upon the light intensity I ~ E 2 . In general case one can

represent the refraction index as n = n

 

+ n , where

n =

 

 

E(t)

 

2

 

 

 

0

f

 

 

. Usually

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

this value is positive, and thus in the beam center, where I is larger than in periphery region, the value of n is also larger. In other words the Gaussian beam with high I will produce in the medium the region, whose properties are similar to the positive lens, providing self-focusing of the laser beam. This effect is known as the large scale self-focusing. In some media n < 0. In this case the nonlinear lens is negative, and the beam self-defocusing occurs.

The large-scale self-focusing competes with diffraction broadening of the beam, so the beam either will collapse after collection in one point, or will create the narrow channel, where the diffraction and self-focusing will be mutually compensated. Such compensation can take place after the beam collapse.

38

The multi-mode beams are usually self-focused into several channels, known as filaments. Similar filamentation of the beam occurs in the case of the so called small-scale self-focusing. It is caused by the growth of perturbations of the beam wavefront in the field of high-power light wave. This effect is especially often observed in the active (amplifying) medium. In this case the primary smooth (plane or Gauss) wavefront of the amplified beam, propagating through the active medium, is gradually breaking into several segments, and each of these segments subjects the self-focusing and filamentation. The small-scale self-focusing of laser radiation in the active medium is one of the main negative effects, which endanger the high-power solid-state lasers. Its prevention requires special measures.

Self-focusing requires high intensity of radiation, and thus it is realized usually in the pulsed mode. In this case one has also to take into account the variation of the laser pulse parameters during its propagation through the nonlinear medium. Let us consider the pulse propagation through the Kerr medium where

n = n0 + n2 E (t ) 2 . It is rather obvious that the pulse propagation through the me-

dium and field intensity growth will be accompanied by the growth of optical power of the nonlinear lens. The forward front of the laser pulse will pass through the non-perturbed medium and will not be subjected to self-focusing. The following parts of the pulse will feel the stronger and stronger influence of this effect. So the transverse section of the pulse will change with its propagation through the medium (see Fig.3.9). The backward part of the pulse will be narrowed due to selffocusing, while its forward part will expand due to diffraction

Fig. 3.9. Dynamics of self-focusing perturbations

Fig. 3.10. Self-sharpening

of the pulse.

Spectral content of laser pulse in this case is also subjected to very large modification. It is caused by phase self-modulation effect, whose nature is as follows. The phase of the wave is equal to:

39

 

ω0

+ n2

 

E(t)

 

2

 

 

ω0

 

,

 

 

0t kz) = ω0t

n0

 

 

z

= ω0t

 

n0z + ϕ(t)

 

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here

ϕ(t) = − ω

C n

2

z

 

E(t)

 

2 , i.e. the phase of wave is self-modulated in accor-

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

dance

with

ϕ(t) ,

 

 

 

and the frequency ω0 gets the addition

ω(t) = ∂( ϕ) = −

ω0 n z

 

E(t)

 

2

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t

C

2

 

 

 

 

t

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is illustrated by the Fig.3.10. The upper curve corresponds to the giant (Q- switched) pulse, and the bottom – to its frequency. In the pulse beginning its frequency ω = ω0 + ω is less than ω0 , then it grows nearly linearly, and at the pulse end ω > ω 0 . It means that the pulse, propagating through the nonlinear medium, accumulates the nearly linear frequency modulation. If we will now send such a pulse into the so called disperse line, which has the abnormal dispersion of the refraction index (it means that n falls with ω), the backward part of the pulse will have the group velocity which will be higher than that of the forward part of the pulse. In other words the backward part will move faster and the pulse will be self-sharpening, and its total duration will be reduced (compressed). The maximal rate of compression of the pulse with duration τ0 down to τmin is determined by the formula

S = ττ0 2k n2Il ,

min ∂ω2

Here l is the medium length, and I is the intensity in the pulse maximum. Abnormal dispersion can be realized in the metal vapor nearby the absorption line, in special devices, comprised by two diffraction gratings, or in special single-mode optical fiber. In the latter case the low value of nonlinearity (n2 = 3.2 · 10–13 cm2 kW–1 ) is compensated by the possibility to organize propagation of the radiation with width of 5-10 μm along hundreds of meters. The so called pulse compressor, comprised by combination of diffraction gratings and such single-mode fiber, makes it possible to obtain S ≈ 100. So one can compress the pulses, produced by Q-switched lasers or by lasers with mode synchronization, down to durations in ten range of ~ 10 −14 − 10 −15 с, i.e. of just few cycles of optical electromagnetic wave. Such femtosecond laser are now actively developed.

40

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]