Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
ПАЙМАКОВА Е.А..doc
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.07.2025
Размер:
701.95 Кб
Скачать

7 Translate from Russian into English:

  1. Как считают обозреватели, многочисленные интегративные тенденции подразумевают радикальные изменения в мировой политике со значительными последствиями.

  2. Глобализация – это процесс сближения стран в различных сферах, образования взаимозависимых связей между народами.

  3. В то же время планету сотрясают такие события, как распространение вооружения, возрождение этнических конфликтов, ухудшение окружающей среды.

  4. Хотя трудно определить, когда завершается один период и начинается другой, считается, что основные поворотные пункты в мировой политике происходят в конце широкомасштабных войн, которые разрушают предыдущий порядок.

  5. Несмотря на радикальные изменения в мировой политике, особенно после двух мировых войн и окончания Холодной войны, многое остается без изменений.

  6. В конце 20-го века некоторые страны либо мирно, либо насильственно распались на отдельные политические единицы, стремясь получить национальную автономию.

  7. Хотя трудно предсказать, привнесет ли 21-й век совершенно новую международную систему, ясно, что именно взаимодействие постоянного и изменчивого будет определять будущие отношения между основными акторами.

8 Questions for discussions:

  1. Integrative and disintegrative trends in contemporary world politics.

  2. The criteria of a new international system.

  3. The interaction of constancy and change in the world politics.

Unit 2 the emergence of the modern state system

As a network of relationships among independent political units, the state system was born with the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, which ended the Thirty Years’ War in Europe. Thereafter, European rulers refused to recognize the authority of the Roman Catholic church, replacing the previous system of papal governance with geographically and politically separate states that recognized no authority above them. The newly independent states were all given the same legal rights: territory under their sole control, the freedom to conduct foreign relations and negotiate treaties with other states, and the authority to establish whatever form of government they chose. The concept of state sovereignty – that no one is above the state — captures these legal rights.

The Westphalian system still colors every dimension of world politics, and provides the terminology used to describe the primary units in international affairs. Although the term "nation-state" is often confusingly used interchangeably with "state" and "nation," technically the three are different. A state is a legal entity that enjoys a permanent population, a well-defined territory, and a government capable of exercising sovereignty. A nation is a collection of people who, on the basis of ethnic, linguistic, or cultural affinity, perceive themselves to be members of the same group. Thus the term nation-state implies a convergence between territorial states and the psychological identification of people within them. However, in employing this familiar terminology, we should exercise caution because this condition is relatively rare; there are few independent states comprised of a single nationality. Most states are populated by many nations, and some nations are not states. These "nonstate nations" are ethnic groups, such as Native American tribes in the United States, Sikhs in India, or Basques in Spain, composed of people without sovereign power over the territory in which they live.

When we speak generically about foreign policy and the decision-making processes that produce it, we mean the goals that officials representing states seek abroad, the values that underlie those goals, and the means or instruments used to pursue them. To begin our inquiry into how states make foreign policy choices, we first consider the setting for their choices and the circumstances outside national borders that make such choices necessary.