- •Grammar in Use
- •The Verb
- •Present Continuous
- •Present Simple (Indefinite) and Present Continuous
- •Unit 3 Present Perfect
- •Unit 4 Present Perfect Continuous
- •Future Perfect
- •Exercises:
- •Exercises:
- •Types of Passive Constructions
- •Chapter II modal verbs unit 10
- •Can/could
- •Unit 11
- •2) Possibility due to circumstances,
- •Can and may compared
- •2) Prohibition,
- •3) Emphatic advice
- •Must and may compared
- •Unit 12
- •5. Как мне быть? что мне делать?
- •6. Что со мной будет?
- •Unit 13
- •Ought to
- •6. Откуда я знаю?
- •8. До чего дошло дело!
- •Unit 14
- •Will and would
- •Chapter III forms expressing unreality unit 15
- •Unreality in Object Clauses
- •Unit 16
- •Unreality in Appositive and Predicative Clauses
- •Exercises:
- •Unit 17
- •Unit 18
- •Chapter IV
- •Verbals (non-finite forms of the verb) unit 19
- •Infinitive and ing-form
- •Verbals as subject
- •Infinitive as Subject
- •Infinitive and ing-form as Subject Compared
- •Unit 21
- •Verbals as predicative
- •Infinitive as Predicative
- •Infinitive and ing-form as Predicative Compared
- •Unit 22
- •Verbals as predicate
- •Infinitive as Predicate
- •Unit 23
- •Verbals as part of a compound verbal predicate
- •Infinitive as Part of a Compound Verbal Predicate
- •Unit 24
- •Verbals as a second action accompanying the action of the predicate verb
- •Infinitive as a Second Action
- •Unit 25
- •Verbals as object
- •Infinitive as Object
- •Infinitive and ing-form as Object Compared
- •Verbals as subjective predicative (complex subject)
- •Infinitive and ing-form as Subjective Predicative (Complex Subject)
- •Unit 27
- •Verbals as objective predicative (complex object)
- •Infinitive and ing-form as Objective Predicative (Complex Object)
- •Unit 28
- •Verbals as adverbial modifier
- •Infinitive as Adverbial Modifier
- •Unit 29
- •Verbals as attribute
- •Infinitive as Attribute
- •Infinitive and ing-form as Attribute Compared
- •Unit 30
- •Verbals as parenthesis
- •Infinitive as Parenthesis
- •Infinitive and ing-form as Parenthesis Compared
- •References
Unreality in Appositive and Predicative Clauses
In appositive clauses usually introduced by conjunction that, as a rule, Indicative Mood is found. The rules of sequence of tenses must be observed:
He is under the impression that I am hiding something from him.
should*+Infinitive is used in appositive clauses after nouns expressing order, suggestion, wish, agreement and decision, such as agreement, decision, demand, desire, order, proposal, recommendation, request, requirement, suggestion, understanding, wish, etc. The rules of sequence of tenses are not observed:
He told me of his desire that all should be happy.
There was no likelihood that anyone should be there.
In predicative clauses generally Indicative Mood is used. The rules of sequence of tenses are observed:
The question is how we are going to find the means to do it.
The fact was that I hardly knew what to say.
The trouble is that he didn't find him in.
When the subject of the principal clause is the noun aim, arrangement, desire, condition, decision, idea, plan, proposal, suggestion, wish, etc, should*+Infinitive is used in subordinate clause and the rules of sequence of tenses are not observed:
My suggestion is that we should go and see what we can do.
His desire was that life should fall in with his own plans.
Unreality in Adverbial Clauses of Purpose
An adverbial modifier of purpose is usually expressed by an infinitive. It may be preceded by in order or so as:
He went up to his room to change.
I kept drinking coffee in order to stay awake.
You'd better wait outside so as to be at hand if I want you.
More often so as is used with negative infinitive:
She sat still so as not to disturb the dog.
A clause of purpose introduced by conj. so that is found when the subject of this clause is not the same as the subject of the principal clause. The predicate is expressed by may or can + Infinitive and rules of sequence of tenses are observed:
Leave the door open so that the light may show you the way.
He opened the door a little so that he could hear what the women were saying.
If the verb in clause of purpose is negative should* + Infinitive is used:
I turned so that he should not see my face.
Sometimes conj. lest (чтобы не) is used in such clauses, in this case should* + Infinitive is used and the rules of sequence of tenses are not observed:
He withdrew his eyes lest she should read them.
Unreality in Adverbial Clauses of Comparison
In clauses of comparison with conj. as if or as though Past Indefinite (or were) or Past Perfect is used:
He asked me the question as if the answer were really important to him.
They passed her in silence as though she did not exist.
Note: in present-day English the form were is replaced by was in singular:
He behaves as if he was the boss here.
Past Perfect (-Continuous) shows that the action of subordinate clause precedes the action of the principal clause:
Bob gazed at him as though he had not heard.
If the action of the subordinate clause follows the action of the principal clause would*+Infinitive is used and rules of sequence of tenses are not observed:
She began to weep as though her heart would break.
Note: compare clause of comparison in Russian and in English:
|
She looked at me as if she did not recognise me. |
|
He spoke of the film as if he had seen it. |
