- •It is recommended for publishing as a study aid by the Editorial Board of Tomsk Polytechnic University
- •Соntents
- •Introduction
- •1. History of knowledge development about biosphere chemical composition and scale of its transformations
- •Global emission of chemical elements (thous.T/year) (according to V.V. Yermakov, 2003)
- •2. Key approachers to classification of chemical elements
- •Fig. 1 Classification of elements in human organism in terms of abundance and use (Underwood e., 1962)
- •Vital elements in composition of organisms (according to а. Lenindger)
- •Content of some elements in plants, animal and human organisms, mg/kg
- •Concentration of cations in marine water and organisms liquids of some mammals and birds, mg/kg (Bgatov а.V., 1999, with recalculations of Ignatova т.N., 2009)
- •Biogenetic classification of elements
- •3. Factors and processes element composition formation of living matter
- •4. Regional aspects of biogeochemistry
- •4.1. Conditions of the Natural Environment Components According to Ecological-Geochemical Monitoring and Population Health Data (Tomsk Region)
- •Geochemical specific characteristics in districts of Tomsk region to maximum element concentration in pathologically changed thyroid glands (relative to regional monitoring)
- •Different diseases of separate thyroid gland pathology types in districts of Tomsk region per 1000 persons (during 5 years)
- •4.2. Element composition of human organs and tissues
- •Contemporary estimation of the environmental pathology (wt. %) and trace elements (mg/kg) in a human body (From Ulf Lindh, 2005 with changes)
- •Comparative estimation of element analysis results obtained by inaa method with published data of domestic and international standards
- •4.3. Biogeochemistry of uranium and thorium
- •Thorium content in the plants of the Large Vasyugan marsh, mg/kg (dm) (“Geochemistry…”, 2002)
- •4.4. Rare earth element in human organs and tissues
- •4.5. Element content in children hair samples
- •Comparative analysis of evaluation level of the chemical element concentration in human hair (mg/kg, dry weight)
- •Comparative data of children hair composition (mg/kg, dry weight) from different regions of Russia, Belorussia and Kazakhstan
- •Geochemical specification of population hair in Tomsk oblast and other regions (n – number of samples)
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Geochemistry of living organisms
- •Published in author’s version
- •Printed in the tpu Publishing House in full accordance with the quality of the given make up page
Comparative data of children hair composition (mg/kg, dry weight) from different regions of Russia, Belorussia and Kazakhstan
Element |
Russia |
Stolin, Belorussia (n=3) |
Pavlodar, Kazakhstan (n=120) |
||||
Tomsk oblast (n=538) |
Cheljabinsk oblast (n=44) |
Irkutsk oblast (n=36) |
|||||
Na |
603 ± 25 |
558 ± 44 |
547 ± 84 |
133 ± 33 |
223 ± 17 |
||
Ca |
2626 ± 99 |
2339 ± 209 |
2031 ± 253 |
1403 ± 90 |
1403 ± 90 |
||
Sc |
0,05 ± 0,004 |
0,007 ± 0,001* |
0,008 ± 0,002* |
0,005 ± 0,002 |
0,007 ± 0,0004 |
||
Cr |
4,7 ± 0,4 |
0,3 ± 0,07* |
3,8 ± 1,1 |
0,5 ± 0,07 |
0,5 ± 0,07* |
||
Fe |
522 ± 49 |
42 ± 8* |
181,5 ± 71* |
< 50 |
45 ± 3,7* |
||
Co |
0,26 ± 0,02 |
0,03 ± 0,005* |
0,004 ± 0,002 |
0,07 ± 0,01 |
0,07 ± 0,01 |
||
Zn |
182 ± 3,5 |
362 ± 26 |
227 ± 10 |
181 ± 21 |
207 ± 8 |
||
As |
0,7 ± 0,03* |
n.а |
< 2 |
< 1 |
< 0,8 |
||
Se |
0,87 ± 0,15 |
0,18 ± 0,02* |
1,04 ± 0,08 |
0,8 ± 0,03 |
0,8 ± 0,03 |
||
Br |
12,6 ± 1,7 |
2,7 ± 0,2 |
9,6 ± 1,4 |
3,7 ± 1,3 |
6,5 ± 0,6 |
||
Rb |
1,9 ± 0,4* |
n.а |
1,1± 0,08* |
<1 |
<3 |
||
Sr |
14,3 ± 0,7* |
n.а |
6,4 ± 2,3* |
<15 |
<15 |
||
Ag |
0,47 ± 0,6 |
n.а |
0,2 ± 0,05* |
0,18 ± 0,08 |
0,3 ± 0,03 |
||
Sb |
0,12 ± 0,07 |
0,1 ± 0,01 |
0,06 ± 0,02* |
< 0,03 |
0,07 ± 0,01* |
||
Cs |
0,08 ± 0,004* |
n.а |
< 0,03 |
<0,1 |
<0,05 |
||
Ba |
15,4 ± 0,67* |
n.а |
0,001 ± 0,0001 |
< 5 |
<10 |
||
La |
0,27 ± 0,01 |
0,18 ± 0,01 |
0,09 ± 0,02 |
0,005 ± 0,002 |
0,05 ± 0,006 |
||
Ce |
0,4 ± 0,03 |
0,1 ± 0,006* |
0,12 ± 0,02 |
0,19 ± 0,14 |
<0,08 |
||
Sm |
0,1 ± 0,01 |
0,08 ± 0,005 |
0,007 ± 0,003* |
< 0,002 |
0,02 ± 0,003* |
||
Eu |
0,02± 0,001* |
n.а |
< 0,002 |
0,005 ± 0,002* |
< 0,03 |
||
Tb |
0,01 ± 0,0004* |
n.а |
< 0,007 |
< 0,01 |
0,01 ± 0,0003 |
||
Yb |
0,05 ± 0,01* |
n.а |
< 0,01 |
< 0,03 |
0,03 ± 0,0005* |
||
Lu |
0,008±0,0005* |
0,01 ± 0,0005* |
0,002 ± 0,0003* |
< 0,001 |
0,002 ± 0,0001* |
||
Hf |
0,06 ± 0,004 |
0,03 ± 0,005 |
0,03 ± 0,006 |
< 0,009 |
0,02 ± 0,002* |
||
Ta |
0,04 ± 0,001* |
n.а |
< 0,01 |
< 0,03 |
< 0,03 |
||
Au |
0,06 ± 0,01 |
0,02 ± 0,003 |
0,03 ± 0,01 |
0,02 ± 0,02 |
0,11 ± 0,03 |
||
Hg |
3,25 ± 0,4 |
0,37 ± 0,07 |
2,5 ± 0,7 |
1,6 ± 0,2 |
0,4 ± 0,04 |
||
Th |
0,07 ± 0,01 |
0,06 ± 0,01* |
0,016 ± 0,003 |
0,01 ± 0,001 |
0,02 ± 0,001 |
||
U |
0,17 ± 0,01 |
0,14 ± 0,01* |
0,25 ± 0,03 |
0,02 ± 0,01 |
0,33 ± 0,07 |
||
Notes: n – number of samples; * - average calculation based on samples, where 50% of the values are less than determination range; n.а. – not analyzed.
Table 4.
