8. Interaction and counteraction.

Perhaps, a question for many readers, will seem urgent whether the existing crisis civilization would do a sharp counteraction whether it will try to suppress our attempt to create a new one? Prerequisites for a counteraction are at least that great variety of tough and contradictory "laws" put restrictions and prohibitions on many actions which can be required for creation of hitech settlement (a techno village). But here, it is necessary to remember that the existing system isn't complete, it consists of those contradictions which led it to a crisis. Also it is necessary to transfer any attempts to create counteraction of our activities to these internal contradictions. Let's tell, the car which doesn't move isn't generally a subject to "jurisdiction" of road traffic police, but also regular police can't break into it and capture the people who are inside, if they don't constitute direct "danger" – for example, don't shoot around. And, police officers are guided by only two reasons: own safety, and an opportunity to receive some benefit; something else can introduce only the order of their administration which is guided by the same reasons itself. Thus, without being of interest from the point of material requisitions, without participating in violence and in political merrymakings, we can originally keep ourselves from unhealthy attention of "authorities".

Also, the question of interaction with various social movements proclaiming also aspiration to reconstruction of the existing civilization and creation a new one, based on other principles is interesting, regarding the person and his welfare as of paramount importance. It's, for example, the Zeitgeist movement and the Venus Project. Undoubtedly, such movements are positive tendencies, attracting the people inclined to reasonable thinking - but it is necessary to understand that until participants of these movements didn't realize motivation, didn't fully waken The Reason, the priority of the personality over society isn't approved — the cooperation with them, generally can consist in informing them on the Way of Reason and their invitation to a cooperation in this project.

9. This is only beginning!

If one tried to find the adequate term characterizing the main idea offering an exit from the system crisis of human civilization by dismantle of such an atavism, as society, by individual development and awakening of The Reason for each certain person, then the author offered the term "Way of Reason", with some analogy of "the Way of the Warrior", including many parallels in practicians of a thought and action though the Reason excludes wars and conflicts between people therefore this new determination is required.

If we look for the term for a philosophical basis of the Way of Reason, then the author, about two decades ago, offered the name "Progressive Individualism". This term is developed, being based on determinations and prerequisites of traditional philosophy.

And, one more important note. Just as initiators of The Zeitgeist movement: the Movie and the Project Venus emphasize a dissimilarity of their ideas with the ideas of Marxism (though, upon, coincidence is considerably observed), the author considers it necessary to emphasize basic distinction of Progressive Individualism ideology and so-called "sociopathy".

In modern official "psychology" they often operate with the term "sociopathy", trying any attempt of an individual "to deny society" classify as a pathology, halfway to psychiatric clinic.

It can lead to attempts of certain people and groups to brand ideology of progressive individualism as "sociopathy ideology", and to hang a label of a "sociopath" both on the author, as well as on any solidary.

Therefore, I would like to focus attention on basic distinction of sociopathy and progressive individualism now.

Sociopathy, as a rule, is characterized by the following list of "symptoms":

1. "heartless indifference to feelings of others";

2. "rough and resistant line item of irresponsibility and neglect social rules and obligations";

3. "inability to support relations in the absence of difficulties in their formation";

4. "extremely low capability to maintain frustration, and also a low threshold of the category of aggression, including violence;

5. "inability to have sense of guilt and to derive benefit from life experience, especially punishments";

6. "the expressed tendency to charge people around or to push plausible explanations for the behavior leading the subject to the conflict with society".

So, on points.

1. Specified, undoubtedly, is abnormal for a Homo Sapiens, it can't be therefore peculiar adherents of the Way of Reason.

2. "Social rules and obligations", in a considerable part, are far-fetched conventions and restrictions; only when it is about life and wellbeing of other people, a Homo Sapiens acts so that not to damage them (an exception is the situation when life or wellbeing of people, de facto Reasonable is contrasted with the benefits of the twilight thinking, but it is the complex problem of choice requiring the maximum responsibility in decision making, for the twilight conceiving are too the people, potentially Reasonable), in other cases it is possible and is necessary to reject or bypass all far-fetched rules and the social bans.

3. Also, it not typical for a Homo Sapiens. Moderately desires and need, Homo Sapiens is capable to cooperation and other types of relations with similar to him, and also makes all efforts to establishment of contact with the education purpose to the twilight conceiving.

4. The aspiration to emotional stability, lack of any aggression to whom or something, can be most successfully satisfied thanks to the Way of Reason. As violations of emotional balance and flash of aggression are incompatible with continuous objective sensibleness and actions, such behavior for a Homo Sapiens – is excluded.

5. Sense of guilt and punishment are also, atavisms of a social civilization, they are implemented and applied for the purpose of control over masses and the people who weren't beyond reactive thinking. Those two determinations are most actively used, respectively, by religious structures and police systems, and also in many other life situations. Homo Sapiens can't make any action, intentionally, to the detriment of life or wellbeing of similar ones, therefore, he can't be "guilty" or "punished". Mistakes, are necessary to be analyzed and to correct the causes and consequences. As for the "life experience", its presence at one line with sociogenis atavisms ("punishment" is allocated as a subcategory of life experience; to some extent so it also is, alas, but it shan't be in a reasonable civilization), convicts the term author's attitude towards a human being as to an animal with the reactive thinking based on reflexes whom stimulations or inhibits from any actions - training, i.e. development of conditioned reflexes by means of encouragement or "punishment".

6. This feature is known also as "indulgationing". Homo Sapiens can and shall overcome social prohibitions and restrictions, and, if necessary - can and shall avoid aggressive actions to his address and damage from the twilight conceiving beings, for this purpose it is possible and sometimes necessary to use, in the maximum measure of the understanding, with proper care - their own sociogenic stamps and restrictions. But it isn't an indulgationing.

Speaking in brief, a Homo Sapiens can and shall neglect society as it іsn't a specific person or the personality, but only a parasitic "egregor"; but can't neglect the specific person and work to the detriment of him.

In conclusion, I will add: sociopathy is one of the typical and almost inevitable manifestations of twilight consciousness which is very often created in today's society struck with a crisis.

So, we have just fluently analysed the crisis of human civilization, and came to a conclusion that the exit from it will provide only the Way of Reason. The present essay is only the beginning setting the fundamental principles for understanding, but for specific changes in an way of existence of human race a lot more will be required, both theoretical researches, and practical developments. Therefore, the essay "Human To Human" will be continued with a cycle of articles "Way of Reason" written in different years and under the different circumstances sometimes blocking or it is a little from other line item opening the same questions which are raised here, or is disaggregated opening any applied area; but also these articles, certainly, don't contain exhaustive decisions for all tasks which we should solve on the way to a new civilization of mankind.

For continuation of contacts and communication, in Internet network it was registered and nachalno the interactive resource with the blog and a forum is arranged, all materials which are in this book are placed in the same place: http://wayofthereason.my1.ru. Besides, there is a bank account which purpose — fund raising, at present, on distribution of information on the Way of Reason, further, is possible — and for practical actions according to it: No. 4149605050672401 Account No., Privatbank, Ukraine.

Meet you on the Way of Reason!

Veleslav Vran aka Voron_Shinigami

03.02.2012, Korsun.

Addendums.

To chapter 2.

Laws of the nature for a reasonable being. To chapter II of the essay "Human to Human: The Way Of The Reason".

The law of the nature is a principle or a rule according to which, a being, a kind or phenomenon continue to exist and/or develop according to the purpose and the place in the nature, the world and the Universe. Laws of the nature for living beings - heredity and reproduction, variability and adaptation to environment conditions, selection of viable forms in fight for existence.

For The Reason these laws a bit differ, as the Reason on global the role is equivalent to all other Universe, and its existence, according to the concept of transhumanity, isn't exclusively tied to a form of a live organism, proteinaceous bodies or something else.

Laws of the nature (they are natural, unwritten laws) for a being - the Reason carrier, allowing it to live and keep the essence as reasonable, along with similar, are as follows:

1. Law of desire. You want - you do, you don't want - you don't do. Nobody also can force anybody to anything, and nobody does anything on coercion.

2. Law of equal freedom. Freedom of everyone is boundless in the Universe, but comes to an end where freedom of another, not to the detriment of any begins.

3. Law of reversal. Concerning similar to rely as you wish that similar to you be relied concerning you.