Group discussion (group leader)

Leader

Problem

Date

EFFECTIVINESS

RATING

COMMETNS

Introduction of participants

1 2 3 4 5

Introduction of the problem

1 2 3 4 5

Knowledge of topic

1 2 3 4 5

Ability to manage organizational plan

1 2 3 4 5

Ability to encourage participation

1 2 3 4 5

Ability o handle conflicts

1 2 3 4 5

Transition between steps

1 2 3 4 5

Graceful conclusion

1 2 3 4 5

Thanks conveyed to participants

1 2 3 4 5

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

RATING KEY

1 = poor 2 = Fair 3 = acceptable 4 = good 5 = excellent

Participants

Problem

Date

GROUP DYNAMICS

RAING

COMMENTS

Participants freely expressed their opinions

1 2 3 4 5

The group stayed on topic

1 2 3 4 5

All members participated equally

1 2 3 4 5

CONTENT

RATING

COMMETNS

The problem was clearly identified

1 2 3 4 5

The existence of the problem was proven

1 2 3 4 5

The causes of the problem were explained

1 2 3 4 5

Possible future effects of the problem were presented

1 2 3 4 5

Possible solutions were proposed

1 2 3 4 5

The best solutions were chosen

1 2 3 4 5

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

RATING KEY

1 = poor 2 = Fair 3 = acceptable 4 = good 5 = excellent

Debate topic

Affirmative

(Speaker A: name)

Negative

(Speaker B: name)

SPEAKER A

DELIVERY

SPEAKER B

1 2 3 4 5

Eye contact

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Volume of voice

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Rate of speech

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Pronunciation/intonation

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Enthusiasm

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Posture

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Adherence to time limit

1 2 3 4 5

CONTENT

1 2 3 4 5

Definition/explanation of proposition

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Proof that problem exists

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Refutation/rebuttal

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Supporting evidence

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Effectiveness of reasoning

1 2 3 4 5

COMMENTS

(speaker A)

COMMENTS

(speaker B)

I am persuaded to vote for Speaker A or B

REASOSN FOR DECISION

Grade: Speaker A

Grade: Speaker B

RATING KEY

1 = poor 2 = Fair 3 = acceptable 4 = good 5 = excellent