Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Копия Копия 5 ОБЩИЙ ВАРИАНТ, 4 курс+_стр (26.08.2016).doc
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.07.2025
Размер:
5.7 Mб
Скачать

Portfolio preparation

SELF – ASSESSMENT

1 International Standards of Assessment: c2 (Proficiency), lsp

Communication is assessed according to the following criteria.

Grammar

20p

Vocabulary

20p

Discourse management 20p

Pronunciation

10p

Interactive communication

15p

Global achievement scale

15p

Total score

100 p

Writing is assessed according to the following criteria.

Content

20p

Range

20p

Accuracy

20p

Appropriacy of register and format

10p

Organization and cohesion

15p

Target reader 15p

Total score

100 p

2 According to the requirements of the course, students’ achievements are evaluated by the following Assessment grid (LSP)

Attendance

100 p.

Class work

100 p.

Current Assessment (CA)

100 p.

Self-Regulated Student’s Work Under the Teacher’s Guidance (SRSWTG) 100 p.

Student’s Independent Work (SIW)

100 p.

Module

100 p.

Final Control

100 p.

Total

Score

100 p.

Evaluation Rubrics

Task

Below standard

Standard

Above standard

Outstand-

ing

1

2

3

4

Survey

disorganised and difficult to follow; little data, few conclusions; intrusive errors of vocabulary and grammar.

clearly written, logically organised, including a representative range of facts and some conclusions; grammatical and lexical mistakes do not impede overall intelligibility.

Carefully planned and checked text, including introduction; a good range of data, and conclusions; logically linked and accurate in terms of grammar and lexis; good range of vocabulary displayed.

engaging, original and well organised text, consisting of introduction, data (extensive) and conclusion. Few errors of grammar and vocabulary, consistent and appropriate style; illustrative diagrams or charts might also be included.

Report

report is confused and/or short and/or difficult to follow, poorly researched and/or minimally exemplified; intrusive errors of vocabulary and grammar and/or large chunks copied directly from websites.

report is basic but sufficient to present main arguments: divided into clear sections and generally easy to follow; research is not exhaustive but sufficient and mainly original, grammar and lexical mistakes do not impede overall intelligibility.

Report is thorough and clearly laid out, with arguments convincingly made on the basis of well searched data: research has gone beyond the most obvious resources and there is ample evidence of original thinking and writing; high level of accuracy and a broad lexical range.

report is exceptionally well argued, demonstrating original, often committed thinking based on thorough research, expressing a range of points of view but reaching clearly articulated and accurately expressed conclusions.

Presentation

presentation simply read aloud; not easy to follow; poorly illustrated; and/or under rehearsed; work not well distributed between group members, little collaboration.

presentation organised into stages; clearly illustrated and sufficiently detailed to give a general idea; evidence of rehearsal and sufficient group collaboration, even if workload not evenly distributed; some reading aloud, but some impoverished ‘telling’.

well-organised presentation, with clear and detailed rationale, showing evidence of thorough research and rehearsal; attractively illustrated; work well coordinated and evenly distributed; some reading aloud, but some impoverished ‘telling’.

presentation painstakingly researched but presented in an engaging even entertaining way; technically impressive, well resourced; even distribution of work, each contribution harmoniously linked to make a coherent whole: report delivered with notes but not read aloud; questions handled effectively and spontaneously.