Список використаних джерел

1. Adams В. Mate selection in the Unated States: A theoretical summarization. In W. Butt, R. Hill, I. Nye, I. Reis (Eds.). Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 1. P. 259-267). New York: Free Press. 1979.

2. Amato P., Johnson D., Booth A., Rogers S. 2003. Continuity and Change in Marital Quality Between 1980 and 2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65:1-22.

3. Audrey Vanden Heuvel. In a class of our own? An international comparison of family values // Family matters no. 29 (August), 1991. – pp. 20-21. (https://aifs.gov.au/publications/family-matters/issue-29/class-our-own – 14.11.2014).

4. Centers R. Sexual attractions and love: An instrumental theory. Springfield, IL: Chas, С. Tomas.1975.

5. Georgas, J. (2003). Family: Variations and changes across cultures. In W. J. Lonner, D. L. Dinnel, S. A. Hayes, & D. N. Sattler (Eds.), Online Readings in Psychology and Culture (Unit 13, Chapter 3), (http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~culture/index-cc.htm – 19.12.2014), Center for Cross-Cultural Research, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington USA.

6. Joseph Price (2006). Does a spouse slow you down? Marriage and graduate student outcomes [Electronic version]. Retrieved [15.10.2015], from Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations site: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/workingpapers/147/.

7. Korenman S., Neumark D. 1991. “Does Marriage Really Make Men More Productive? The Journal of Human Resources, 36: 282-307.

8. Krista Anders. Stress and family relationships among college students // 39-th annual Western Pennsylvania undergraduate psychology conference // New Wilmington, PA, 2011. (http://www.drspeg.com/research/2011/stressfamily.pdf – 10.10.2015).

9. Lewis R., Spanier G. The rising about the quality and stability off marriage // Contemporary theories about the family. – Vol. 2. Eds. W. Burr. – N.Y., 1971.

10. Melville K. Marriage and the family. N.Y., 1977. Murstein B. Stimulus-value-role: a theory of marital choice // Journ. of marriage and the family. 1970. Vol. 32.

11. Norval D. Glenn. What’s happening to American marriage? // Marriage and family, 96 (97). Article 20 // Ed. By Kathleen R. Gilbert. – 22 ed. – Guilford: Dushking Publishing Group, Brown & Benchmark, 1996. – 240 p. – pp. 104-106.

12. Nye I., Berardo F. The family: its structure and interaction. N.Y., 1973. Леш /. L. Family systems in America. N.Y., 1976.

13. Ogadimma Chukwubueze, Arisukwu. Cohabitation among university of Ibadan undergraduate students // Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. – Vol. 3, No.5, 2013. – pp. 185-192. [Electronic version]. Retrieved [03.12.2015], from International knowledge sharing platform site http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/view/5252.

14. Pepper Schwartz. Peer marriage. What does it take to create a truly egalitarian relationship? // Marriage and family, 96 (97). Article 21 // Ed. By Kathleen R. Gilbert. – 22 ed. – Guilford: Dusking Publishing Group, Brown & Benchmark, 1996. – 240 p. – pp. 107-111.

15. Pollet T.V., Nettle D. (2009). Birth order and adult family relationships: Firstborns have better sibling relationships than laterborns. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 1029-1046.

16. Popenoe D. (1988). Disturbing the next-Family changes and decline in modern societies. – New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

17. Schwartz S.J., Zamboanga B.L., Ravert R.D., Kim, S.Y. (2009). Perceived parental relationships and health-risk behaviors in college attending emerging adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 727-741.

18. Toman W. Family constellation. 3th ed. – New York; Springer, 1976.

19. Walerian Slomka. The hierarchy of human values // George F. McLean, John Kromcowski. Urbanization and values. (Cultural heritage and contemporary change. Series I. Culture and Values. Vol. 5.) – Washington, 1991. – 380 p. – Chapter XXII. – pp. 353-359. (The council for research in values and philosophy).

20. Williams K., Umberson D. 2004. Marital Status, Marital Transitions, and Health: A Gendered Life Course Perspective. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45:81-98.

21. Winch R. Mate selection: A study of complementary needs. New York: Harper&Row, 1954.

22. Yazedjian A., Toews M.L., Navarro A. (2009). Exploring parental factors, adjustment, and academic achievement among white and his panic college students. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 458-467.