- •Theoretical Grammar of Modern English for the juniors
- •I. The Theme: Introduction to Word-Structure.
- •Seminar 1
- •I. The issues to be discussed:
- •II. Practical Task:
- •Issues for individual tasks
- •IV. Glossaries to be learned and used during the activity:
- •References:
- •Theoretical Grammar of Modern English
- •Seminar 2
- •II. Practical Tasks:
- •II. Issues for individual tasks:
- •The Table
- •Morpheme
- •(Nb! Read up Block m.Y. Attentively!) Topics for the reports:
- •II. Glossary to be learned and used during the activity:
- •Absolute Must
- •Ilyish b.A. “The Structure of Modern English” Leningrad, 1971 p.P.21-26
- •Further Reading
- •III .R.V. Reznik, t.S. Sorokina , t.A. Kazaritskaya
II. Practical Tasks:
1. Represent the relationship between morphemes, allomorphs and morphs using a diagram.
Commissioned, prepared, sprawled
Stresses , watches, steps, eyes, horses, rocks
2. Make the syllabic and morphemic segments of the following underlined words (lexemes) and prove the difference.
Swimming costume, looked sympathetically
Good nourishment, nuclear disarmament
(It is important to avoid confusing morphemes with syllables.)
3. Point out haplology in the following underlined words
Students’ books
Horses’ dealers
There was a confused tramping of horses’ feet outside.
Both girls’ dresses were worn out.
4. Make a ‘Tree Diagram’ of the following words
a) unrestfulness b) unforgettable
c) illegitimatize (also –ise) (vt)
5. Analyze the following words according to the traditional
approach (Block M. Y.)
e.g. immediately, shameful, unconditioned,
playground, women’s washing, remembered
Exercise: 1.
a) Make a list of ten words containing the suffix ‘ic, as in ‘magnetic’ and ‘allergic’.
b) What word- classes do the bases to which- ic is added belong?
c) What is the word- class of the resulting word?
d) Is-ic an flectional or derivational suffix? What is in your evidence?
Exercise: 2. Study the examples below and, with help of a dictionary,
answer the questions below.
Monoism Unique
Monologue Unilateral
Monolingual Unitary
Monolith Unify
Monogamy Unipolar
Monogenesis Unicellular
Monochrome Unidirectional
a) What is the meaning of the morphemes ‘mono’ and ‘uni’?
b) What bases can these morphemes be attached to normally?
List as many relevant factors that play a role in the selection of these prefixes as you can think of.
c) What is the word- class of ‘mono’ and ‘uni’ according to the data above and why?
d) What is the word- class of the words formed by attaching ‘mono-’ and ‘uni-’?
Exercise: 3.
Compounding is a very important way of adding to the word stock of English. Sometimes it is bare roots that are combined in compounds, and sometimes an input base contains an affixed form as in hairdresser.
[hair] n [dress] v [-er] n > [hairdresser] n
[kind] a [heart] n [-ed] a [kindhearted] a
NB! In greater detail address F. Katamba and J.Stomhan “Morphology” ch.13 pp.:315-316. Read up the cited pages and fulfill the following tasks.
Exercise: 4.
Examine the underlined words. What is the syntactic and semantic relationship between the two words that make up each compound?
a) The boy sat struggling with a knife and a piece of whitewood.
b) The woman put her saucepan on the hob.
c) The spur of the officer caught in tree-root and a sharp-edged tree-base.
d) It was his duty to return with the beer-pot and the bottle.
e) The house was hunted by so much by-gone.
f) She ran out, and saw a long brown snake on the flower-bed.
g) Town-bread, everything seemed to her splendid.
h) He was a tall, well-built man in the prime of life.
Exercise: 5.
Present hierarchical structure of the words below through a ‘Tree Diagram’.
Understatement, telltale, attendance, awake, babyhood, baby moon, headless, beautiful.
Exercise: 6.
Present the hierarchical structure of the words below through ‘Labeled Bracketing’.
Upbringing, unwitnessed, yearlong, wrapper, notwithstanding, comfortable, tuque, malfunction.
Modal answer: unwitnessed.
Un-wit-ness-ed. can be represented with ‘Labeled
Bracketing’:
[A[V[V un-[n wit] ]-ed]
Now answer the question: Do you any difference between the two techniques (ways) of morpheme analysis If so, support your argument with well-formed examples?
