
- •Foreword
- •Preface the purpose of this book
- •Intended audience
- •Book organization
- •About b2t training
- •Chapter 1: Possess a Clear Understanding of Business Analysis overview
- •What is business analysis?
- •Business Analysis vs. Software Development
- •The Role of the Business Analyst
- •Business Analyst Traits
- •History of Business Analysis
- •Where Do Business Analysts Come From?
- •From it
- •Case in Point
- •From Business
- •Case in Point
- •Where Do Business Analysts Report?
- •Who makes a great business analyst?
- •Case in Point
- •Business Analyst Suitability (- відповідність) Questionnaire
- •Suitability Questionnaire
- •Answers
- •Business Analyst Career Progression
- •Key business analysis terms/concepts
- •What Is a Requirement?
- •Iiba Business Analysis Body of Knowledge® (babok®) definition of requirement:
- •Core Requirements Components
- •Why Document Requirements?
- •Why Do Requirements Need to Be Detailed?
- •High-Level Requirements Are Interpreted Differently
- •Many Analysts Only Use Text to Document Requirements
- •Complex Business Rules Must Be Found
- •Requirements Must Be Translated
- •Case in Point
- •What Is a Project?
- •What Is a Product?
- •What Is a Solution?
- •Case in Point
- •What Is a Deliverable?
- •System vs. Software
- •It Depends
- •Business analysis certification
- •Iiba babok®
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
- •Chapter 2: Know Your Audience overview
- •Establish trust with your stakeholders
- •With whom does the business analyst work?
- •Executive or Project Sponsor
- •Case in Point: Giving the Sponsor Bad News
- •Project Manager
- •Why Does a Project Need a Project Manager and a Business Analyst?
- •Project Manager and Business Analyst Skills Comparison
- •Tips for Those Performing Both Roles
- •Other Business Analysis Professionals
- •Subject Matter Experts and Users
- •Getting to Know Your Subject Matter Experts
- •A Manager Who Does Not Understand His or Her Employees’ Work
- •When the Expert Is Not Really an Expert
- •When the Expert Is Truly an Expert
- •The Expert Who Is Reluctant to Talk
- •The Expert Who Is Angry about Previous Project Failures
- •The Expert Who Hates His or Her Job
- •Quality Assurance Analyst
- •When “qa” Is a Bad Word in Your Organization
- •Usability Professional
- •It Architect
- •Case in Point
- •It Developer
- •Case in Point
- •The Developer Who Is Very Creative
- •The Developer Who Codes Exactly to Specs
- •The Developer’s Industry Knowledge
- •Data Administrator/Architect/Analyst
- •Database Designer/Administrator
- •Stakeholder Analysis
- •Balancing stakeholder needs
- •Case in Point
- •Understanding the Political Environment
- •Working with dispersed teams
- •Physical Distance
- •Time Zone Differences
- •Nationality/Cultural Differences
- •Language Differences
- •Using Team Collaboration Tools
- •Using a Shared Presentation
- •Sharing a Document
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
- •Chapter 3: Know Your Project
- •Why has the organization decided to fund this project?
- •Business Case Development
- •Case in Point
- •Project Initiated Because of a Problem
- •Case in Point
- •Project Initiated to Eliminate Costs (Jobs)
- •Project Initiated by Outside Regulation
- •Project Initiated by an Opportunity
- •Projects for Marketing or Advertising
- •Case in Point
- •Projects to Align Business Processes
- •Strategic planning
- •Portfolio and Program Management
- •How Does Your Project Relate to Others?
- •Enterprise Architecture
- •Business Architecture
- •The Organizational Chart
- •Locations
- •Swot (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats)
- •Products
- •Information Architecture
- •Application Architecture
- •Technology Architecture
- •Case in Point
- •Security Architecture
- •Communicating Strategic Plans
- •Project Identification
- •Project initiation
- •Naming the Project
- •Initiation
- •Approach or Methodology
- •Statement of Purpose
- •Objectives
- •Problems/Opportunities
- •Stakeholders
- •Business Risks
- •Items Out of Scope
- •Assumptions
- •Scope of the Business Area
- •Scoping the Analysis Area Using a Context-Level Data Flow Diagram
- •Area of Study
- •High-Level Business Processes
- •Scoping the Analysis Area Using a Use Case Diagram
- •Project Initiation Summary Revisit Scope Frequently
- •Scope Creep
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
- •Chapter 4: Know Your Business Environment overview
- •Case in Point
- •How does a business analyst learn about the enterprise?
- •Read the Company’s Marketing Materials
- •Read the Company’s Financial Reports
- •Review the Corporate Strategic Plan
- •Seeing things from the business perspective
- •Case in Point
- •Prioritizing Requests
- •Case in Point
- •How a business analyst learns the business: elicitation techniques
- •Review Existing Documentation
- •Case in Point
- •Observation
- •Case in Point
- •Case in Point
- •Interviews
- •Surveys and Questionnaires
- •Facilitated Sessions
- •Why Use a Facilitated Session?
- •Challenges for the Business Analyst as the Facilitator
- •Focus Groups
- •Competitive Analysis
- •Interface Analysis
- •Learn the current (as is) system
- •Case in Point
- •What is a business process?
- •Essential Analysis
- •Perfect Technology
- •No Storage Limitations or Constraints
- •Case in Point
- •Completely Error-Free Processing
- •Case in Point
- •No Performance Limitations
- •Technology Is Available at No Cost
- •Case in Point
- •Summary of Perfect Technology
- •Essential Business Processes
- •Case in Point
- •What Is the Difference between a Process and a Use Case?
- •Describing a Process
- •Seeing Things from the Top and from the Bottom
- •Implementation Planning
- •Training
- •Rollout Plan
- •Schedule
- •Metrics
- •Procedures/Organizational Changes
- •Summary of tips for learning your business
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
- •Chapter 5: Know Your Technical Environment overview
- •Case in Point
- •Why does a business analyst need to understand the technical environment?
- •Understand Technology, But Don’t Talk Like a Technologist
- •Case in Point
- •What does a business analyst need to know about technology?
- •Software Development/Programming Terminology
- •Does a Business Analyst Need to Know How to Develop Software?
- •Software Development Methodologies
- •Methodology/Software Development Life Cycle
- •Waterfall
- •Planning Phase
- •Analysis Phase
- •Design Phase
- •Construction Phase
- •Testing Phase
- •Information Engineering
- •Joint Application Development/Design
- •Rapid Application Development
- •Iterative/Incremental Development Approaches
- •Object-Oriented Analysis and Design
- •Rational Unified Process
- •Agile Development Approaches
- •An Organization’s Formal Methodology
- •Why Don’t Most Methodologies Detail the Business Analysis Approach?
- •An Organization’s Informal Standards
- •Technical Architecture
- •Operating Systems
- •Case in Point
- •Computer Networking
- •Data Management
- •Relational Database
- •Structured Query Language
- •Software Usability/Human Interface Design
- •Software Testing
- •Case in Point
- •Software Testing Phases
- •Unit Testing
- •Integration Testing
- •System Testing
- •Regression Testing
- •Case in Point
- •User Acceptance Testing
- •Post-Implementation User Assessment
- •Working with it Communicating with Developers
- •When to Get it Involved in a Project
- •It Corporate Culture
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
- •Chapter 6: Know Your Analysis Techniques overview
- •Case in Point
- •Categorizing and presenting requirements Collecting and Managing Requirements
- •What Is a Requirement?
- •Categorizing Requirements
- •Case in Point
- •Why Categorize Requirements?
- •Developing a System for Organizing Requirements
- •Iiba babok Categories
- •A Recommended Categorization System
- •Business Requirements
- •Functional Requirements
- •Technical Requirements
- •Core requirements components
- •Overview of Core Requirements Components Data (Entities and Attributes)
- •Processes (Use Cases)
- •External Agents (Actors)
- •Business Rules
- •Case in Point
- •Core Requirements Component: Entities (Data)
- •Core Requirements Component: Attributes (Data)
- •Attribute Uniqueness
- •Mandatory or Optional
- •Attribute Repetitions
- •Core Requirements Component: Processes (Use Cases)
- •Core Requirements Component: External Agents (Actors)
- •Internal vs. External
- •Core Requirements Component: Business Rules
- •Finding Business Rules
- •Analysis techniques and presentation formats
- •Glossary
- •Workflow Diagrams
- •Why Use Workflow Diagrams?
- •Entity Relationship Diagramming
- •Why Build a Logical Data Model?
- •Business Process Modeling with the Decomposition Diagram
- •Why Build a Decomposition Diagram?
- •Use Case Diagram
- •Use Case Descriptions
- •Why Use Use Cases?
- •Case in Point
- •Prototypes/Simulations
- •Why Use Prototypes/Simulations?
- •Other Techniques Event Modeling
- •Entity State Transition/uml State Machine Diagrams
- •Object Modeling/Class Modeling
- •User Stories
- •Traceability Matrices
- •Gap Analysis
- •Data Flow Diagramming
- •Choosing the Appropriate Techniques
- •Using Text to Present Requirements
- •Using Graphics to Present Requirements
- •Using a Combination of Text and Graphics
- •Choosing an Approach
- •Case in Point
- •Business Analyst Preferences
- •Case in Point
- •Subject Matter Expert Preferences
- •Case in Point
- •Developer Preferences
- •Project Manager Preferences
- •Standards
- •Case in Point
- •As is vs. To be analysis
- •Packaging requirements How Formally Should Requirements Be Documented?
- •What Is a Requirements Package?
- •Case in Point
- •Request for Proposal Requirements Package
- •Characteristics of Excellent Requirements
- •Getting Sign-Off
- •Requirements Tools, Repositories, and Management
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
- •Chapter 7: Increase Your Value overview
- •Build your foundation Skill: Get Started
- •Skill: Think Analytically
- •Skill: Note Taking
- •Technique: Brainstorming
- •Skill: Work with Complex Details
- •Case in Point
- •How Much Detail? Just Enough!
- •Case in Point
- •Time management Skill: Understand the Nature of Project Work
- •Skill: Work on the Most Important Work First (Prioritize)
- •Case in Point
- •Technique: Understand the 80-20 Rule
- •Technique: Timeboxing
- •Build your relationships and communication skills Skill: Build Strong Relationships
- •Skill: Ask the Right Questions
- •Case in Point
- •Skill: Listen Actively
- •Barriers to Listening
- •Listening for Requirements
- •Skill: Write Effectively
- •Case in Point
- •Skill: Make Excellent Presentations
- •Skill: Facilitate and Build Consensus
- •Skill: Conduct Effective Meetings
- •Prepare for the Meeting/Select Appropriate Attendees
- •Meeting Agenda
- •Conducting the Meeting
- •Tips for Conducting Successful Meetings
- •Follow-Up/Meeting Minutes
- •Skill: Conduct Requirements Reviews
- •How to Conduct a Review
- •Step 1. Decide on the Purpose of the Review
- •Step 2. Schedule Time with Participants
- •Steps 3 and 4. Distribute Review Materials and Have Participants Review Materials Prior to the Session
- •Case in Point
- •Step 5. Conduct the Review Session
- •Steps 6 and 7. Record Review Notes and Update Material
- •Step 8. Conduct a Second Review If Necessary
- •Typical Requirements Feedback Corrections
- •Missing Requirements
- •Unclear Sentences
- •Scope Creep
- •Keep learning new analysis techniques Technique: Avoid Analysis Paralysis!
- •Technique: Root Cause Analysis
- •The Five Whys
- •Case in Point
- •Skill: Intelligent Disobedience
- •Continually improve your skills
- •Skill: Make Recommendations for Solutions
- •Understand the Problem
- •Imagine Possible Solutions
- •Case in Point
- •Evaluate Solutions to Select the Best
- •Skill: Be Able to Accept Constructive Criticism
- •Case in Point
- •Skill: Recognize and Act on Your Weaknesses
- •Technique: Lessons Learned
- •Business analysis planning
- •Technique: Map the Project
- •Examples of Mapped Projects
- •Skill: Plan Your Work
- •Technique: Assess Business Impact
- •Case in Point
- •Factors That Determine Business Impact
- •Case in Point
- •Technique: Conduct Stakeholder Analysis
- •Technique: Plan Your Communications
- •Skill: Choose Appropriate Requirements Deliverables
- •Skill: Develop a Business Analysis Task List
- •Skill: Estimate Your Time
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Conducting a survey or questionnaire can be useful when the sources of information are in different locations or the number of participants answering a given question is large. Surveys and questionnaires may be administered to internal or external stakeholders.
Surveys and questionnaires allow the BA to ask exactly the same questions over a large group of stakeholders, removing any subjective interviewing bias. They may be conducted formally or informally. Formal surveys are usually designed and conducted by a market research firm or department. The BA will work closely with researchers to develop the questions and possible answers.
Informal surveys can be used to confirm the analyst’s understanding of a process, assess the impact of a change, or generate solution ideas. Informal surveys are used for a small number of people and require less preparation than more formal surveys. They also may be used for brainstorming ideas or getting an initial feel for the needs of the stakeholders.
Content and distribution are factors that require considerable planning if the BA expects a high rate of return and useful results. The layout of the form or screen sent to the participants must be clear and very easy to use. Participants must be told why they have been asked to participate and how valuable their responses will be.
The shorter the survey, the more likely participants are to respond. The questions should clearly relate to the survey objective and be focused on at most two subject areas.
Another way to increase the number of responses is to offer an incentive. An employee incentive may be as simple as: “You will be entered in a drawing to win a free lunch in the cafeteria.” An incentive for an external customer might involve the opportunity to win a free product or service.
Typically, closed-ended questions (i.e., yes or no, multiple choice) are used to allow answers to be tabulated and reported quickly. They must be carefully worded to minimize ambiguity. Be aware that you are forcing the participant to choose an answer. Closed-ended questions are limiting and can lead stakeholders to an answer with which they do not truly agree. Most analysts “test” the questions on a few stakeholders before sending out the survey. A useful resource for designing surveys is An Introduction to Survey Research, Polling, and Data Analysis (Weisberg et al., 1996).
Facilitated Sessions
A business analysis professional who needs to learn information from several stakeholders should consider conducting a formal requirements gathering session. This session is designed to bring together people from different areas of the business to focus on one particular process or topic. They work together to build a shared corporate understanding of the process and may also work to develop ideas for problem solving solutions. These sessions were developed by IBM and were originally called Joint Application Design™ (Wood and Silver, 1995). The technique was developed around an impartial, trained facilitator who conducted each session with specific rules and leadership skills.
Webster’s New World College Dictionary defines the word facilitate as to make easy or easier. This is a very nice way of explaining why facilitation sessions are often considered during project initiation and requirements gathering. To make requirements elicitation easy or easier is a goal toward which all teams strive. A facilitator is one who is a planner, designer, helper, instrument, or agent.
Facilitated sessions are not meetings. They are very structured, planned, working sessions where every participant is carefully chosen and has a critical role to play. Planning and preparing for a facilitation session is a significant task that if not done well results in a poorly run session and a huge waste of time for the participants.
Knowing when to conduct a facilitated session is very important. These sessions can be costly in terms of the number of participants and the time required. They should be scheduled and conducted only when there are more than two viewpoints that must be represented. Every business analysis professional must be familiar with the steps required to conduct a session successfully. Ideally, a new BA will be able to observe several sessions before conducting one of his or her own.
Facilitated sessions are an excellent technique for project initiation activities. The newly formed project team of business and technical stakeholders can come together to clarify understanding of the reason for and objectives of the project. In addition, the team can help to develop the scope or boundaries of the project. Bringing together project participants at the beginning of the project creates team enthusiasm and synergy. Everyone feels a part of the planning and decision making. They agree to “buy into” the project goals and will be advocates for change in their departments. These initial project kickoff sessions are even more valuable when the project sponsor starts the session by telling the group the reason for initiating the project and explaining its important business value to the organization.
Facilitated sessions are also useful for detailed requirements gathering and elicitation. A particular business process or set of business rules may be the focus of the session, with participants providing content for and review of requirements diagrams or models. These sessions can also be structured as brainstorming sessions where participants generate ideas for process improvements or new software designs.
Facilitated information gathering sessions are led by a facilitator who is usually supported by a recorder and a timekeeper. The session is carefully planned by this facilitation team. Topics on the agenda, participants, meeting location, and length of sessions are all carefully considered and documented.
Facilitated sessions are a great way for BAs to gather business requirements and help their business teams understand and articulate needs. Using facilitated sessions to gather and analyze requirements is a key task of many BAs.
It is important to recognize that a BA acting as a facilitator on his or her own project is not independent or completely objective, as traditional professional facilitators are. The BA brings his or her business area knowledge, understanding of technological options, and understanding of the organizational environment to the session, making him or her not only the facilitator but also a valuable member of the group.