
- •Foreword
- •Preface the purpose of this book
- •Intended audience
- •Book organization
- •About b2t training
- •Chapter 1: Possess a Clear Understanding of Business Analysis overview
- •What is business analysis?
- •Business Analysis vs. Software Development
- •The Role of the Business Analyst
- •Business Analyst Traits
- •History of Business Analysis
- •Where Do Business Analysts Come From?
- •From it
- •Case in Point
- •From Business
- •Case in Point
- •Where Do Business Analysts Report?
- •Who makes a great business analyst?
- •Case in Point
- •Business Analyst Suitability (- відповідність) Questionnaire
- •Suitability Questionnaire
- •Answers
- •Business Analyst Career Progression
- •Key business analysis terms/concepts
- •What Is a Requirement?
- •Iiba Business Analysis Body of Knowledge® (babok®) definition of requirement:
- •Core Requirements Components
- •Why Document Requirements?
- •Why Do Requirements Need to Be Detailed?
- •High-Level Requirements Are Interpreted Differently
- •Many Analysts Only Use Text to Document Requirements
- •Complex Business Rules Must Be Found
- •Requirements Must Be Translated
- •Case in Point
- •What Is a Project?
- •What Is a Product?
- •What Is a Solution?
- •Case in Point
- •What Is a Deliverable?
- •System vs. Software
- •It Depends
- •Business analysis certification
- •Iiba babok®
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
- •Chapter 2: Know Your Audience overview
- •Establish trust with your stakeholders
- •With whom does the business analyst work?
- •Executive or Project Sponsor
- •Case in Point: Giving the Sponsor Bad News
- •Project Manager
- •Why Does a Project Need a Project Manager and a Business Analyst?
- •Project Manager and Business Analyst Skills Comparison
- •Tips for Those Performing Both Roles
- •Other Business Analysis Professionals
- •Subject Matter Experts and Users
- •Getting to Know Your Subject Matter Experts
- •A Manager Who Does Not Understand His or Her Employees’ Work
- •When the Expert Is Not Really an Expert
- •When the Expert Is Truly an Expert
- •The Expert Who Is Reluctant to Talk
- •The Expert Who Is Angry about Previous Project Failures
- •The Expert Who Hates His or Her Job
- •Quality Assurance Analyst
- •When “qa” Is a Bad Word in Your Organization
- •Usability Professional
- •It Architect
- •Case in Point
- •It Developer
- •Case in Point
- •The Developer Who Is Very Creative
- •The Developer Who Codes Exactly to Specs
- •The Developer’s Industry Knowledge
- •Data Administrator/Architect/Analyst
- •Database Designer/Administrator
- •Stakeholder Analysis
- •Balancing stakeholder needs
- •Case in Point
- •Understanding the Political Environment
- •Working with dispersed teams
- •Physical Distance
- •Time Zone Differences
- •Nationality/Cultural Differences
- •Language Differences
- •Using Team Collaboration Tools
- •Using a Shared Presentation
- •Sharing a Document
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
- •Chapter 3: Know Your Project
- •Why has the organization decided to fund this project?
- •Business Case Development
- •Case in Point
- •Project Initiated Because of a Problem
- •Case in Point
- •Project Initiated to Eliminate Costs (Jobs)
- •Project Initiated by Outside Regulation
- •Project Initiated by an Opportunity
- •Projects for Marketing or Advertising
- •Case in Point
- •Projects to Align Business Processes
- •Strategic planning
- •Portfolio and Program Management
- •How Does Your Project Relate to Others?
- •Enterprise Architecture
- •Business Architecture
- •The Organizational Chart
- •Locations
- •Swot (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats)
- •Products
- •Information Architecture
- •Application Architecture
- •Technology Architecture
- •Case in Point
- •Security Architecture
- •Communicating Strategic Plans
- •Project Identification
- •Project initiation
- •Naming the Project
- •Initiation
- •Approach or Methodology
- •Statement of Purpose
- •Objectives
- •Problems/Opportunities
- •Stakeholders
- •Business Risks
- •Items Out of Scope
- •Assumptions
- •Scope of the Business Area
- •Scoping the Analysis Area Using a Context-Level Data Flow Diagram
- •Area of Study
- •High-Level Business Processes
- •Scoping the Analysis Area Using a Use Case Diagram
- •Project Initiation Summary Revisit Scope Frequently
- •Scope Creep
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
- •Chapter 4: Know Your Business Environment overview
- •Case in Point
- •How does a business analyst learn about the enterprise?
- •Read the Company’s Marketing Materials
- •Read the Company’s Financial Reports
- •Review the Corporate Strategic Plan
- •Seeing things from the business perspective
- •Case in Point
- •Prioritizing Requests
- •Case in Point
- •How a business analyst learns the business: elicitation techniques
- •Review Existing Documentation
- •Case in Point
- •Observation
- •Case in Point
- •Case in Point
- •Interviews
- •Surveys and Questionnaires
- •Facilitated Sessions
- •Why Use a Facilitated Session?
- •Challenges for the Business Analyst as the Facilitator
- •Focus Groups
- •Competitive Analysis
- •Interface Analysis
- •Learn the current (as is) system
- •Case in Point
- •What is a business process?
- •Essential Analysis
- •Perfect Technology
- •No Storage Limitations or Constraints
- •Case in Point
- •Completely Error-Free Processing
- •Case in Point
- •No Performance Limitations
- •Technology Is Available at No Cost
- •Case in Point
- •Summary of Perfect Technology
- •Essential Business Processes
- •Case in Point
- •What Is the Difference between a Process and a Use Case?
- •Describing a Process
- •Seeing Things from the Top and from the Bottom
- •Implementation Planning
- •Training
- •Rollout Plan
- •Schedule
- •Metrics
- •Procedures/Organizational Changes
- •Summary of tips for learning your business
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
- •Chapter 5: Know Your Technical Environment overview
- •Case in Point
- •Why does a business analyst need to understand the technical environment?
- •Understand Technology, But Don’t Talk Like a Technologist
- •Case in Point
- •What does a business analyst need to know about technology?
- •Software Development/Programming Terminology
- •Does a Business Analyst Need to Know How to Develop Software?
- •Software Development Methodologies
- •Methodology/Software Development Life Cycle
- •Waterfall
- •Planning Phase
- •Analysis Phase
- •Design Phase
- •Construction Phase
- •Testing Phase
- •Information Engineering
- •Joint Application Development/Design
- •Rapid Application Development
- •Iterative/Incremental Development Approaches
- •Object-Oriented Analysis and Design
- •Rational Unified Process
- •Agile Development Approaches
- •An Organization’s Formal Methodology
- •Why Don’t Most Methodologies Detail the Business Analysis Approach?
- •An Organization’s Informal Standards
- •Technical Architecture
- •Operating Systems
- •Case in Point
- •Computer Networking
- •Data Management
- •Relational Database
- •Structured Query Language
- •Software Usability/Human Interface Design
- •Software Testing
- •Case in Point
- •Software Testing Phases
- •Unit Testing
- •Integration Testing
- •System Testing
- •Regression Testing
- •Case in Point
- •User Acceptance Testing
- •Post-Implementation User Assessment
- •Working with it Communicating with Developers
- •When to Get it Involved in a Project
- •It Corporate Culture
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
- •Chapter 6: Know Your Analysis Techniques overview
- •Case in Point
- •Categorizing and presenting requirements Collecting and Managing Requirements
- •What Is a Requirement?
- •Categorizing Requirements
- •Case in Point
- •Why Categorize Requirements?
- •Developing a System for Organizing Requirements
- •Iiba babok Categories
- •A Recommended Categorization System
- •Business Requirements
- •Functional Requirements
- •Technical Requirements
- •Core requirements components
- •Overview of Core Requirements Components Data (Entities and Attributes)
- •Processes (Use Cases)
- •External Agents (Actors)
- •Business Rules
- •Case in Point
- •Core Requirements Component: Entities (Data)
- •Core Requirements Component: Attributes (Data)
- •Attribute Uniqueness
- •Mandatory or Optional
- •Attribute Repetitions
- •Core Requirements Component: Processes (Use Cases)
- •Core Requirements Component: External Agents (Actors)
- •Internal vs. External
- •Core Requirements Component: Business Rules
- •Finding Business Rules
- •Analysis techniques and presentation formats
- •Glossary
- •Workflow Diagrams
- •Why Use Workflow Diagrams?
- •Entity Relationship Diagramming
- •Why Build a Logical Data Model?
- •Business Process Modeling with the Decomposition Diagram
- •Why Build a Decomposition Diagram?
- •Use Case Diagram
- •Use Case Descriptions
- •Why Use Use Cases?
- •Case in Point
- •Prototypes/Simulations
- •Why Use Prototypes/Simulations?
- •Other Techniques Event Modeling
- •Entity State Transition/uml State Machine Diagrams
- •Object Modeling/Class Modeling
- •User Stories
- •Traceability Matrices
- •Gap Analysis
- •Data Flow Diagramming
- •Choosing the Appropriate Techniques
- •Using Text to Present Requirements
- •Using Graphics to Present Requirements
- •Using a Combination of Text and Graphics
- •Choosing an Approach
- •Case in Point
- •Business Analyst Preferences
- •Case in Point
- •Subject Matter Expert Preferences
- •Case in Point
- •Developer Preferences
- •Project Manager Preferences
- •Standards
- •Case in Point
- •As is vs. To be analysis
- •Packaging requirements How Formally Should Requirements Be Documented?
- •What Is a Requirements Package?
- •Case in Point
- •Request for Proposal Requirements Package
- •Characteristics of Excellent Requirements
- •Getting Sign-Off
- •Requirements Tools, Repositories, and Management
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
- •Chapter 7: Increase Your Value overview
- •Build your foundation Skill: Get Started
- •Skill: Think Analytically
- •Skill: Note Taking
- •Technique: Brainstorming
- •Skill: Work with Complex Details
- •Case in Point
- •How Much Detail? Just Enough!
- •Case in Point
- •Time management Skill: Understand the Nature of Project Work
- •Skill: Work on the Most Important Work First (Prioritize)
- •Case in Point
- •Technique: Understand the 80-20 Rule
- •Technique: Timeboxing
- •Build your relationships and communication skills Skill: Build Strong Relationships
- •Skill: Ask the Right Questions
- •Case in Point
- •Skill: Listen Actively
- •Barriers to Listening
- •Listening for Requirements
- •Skill: Write Effectively
- •Case in Point
- •Skill: Make Excellent Presentations
- •Skill: Facilitate and Build Consensus
- •Skill: Conduct Effective Meetings
- •Prepare for the Meeting/Select Appropriate Attendees
- •Meeting Agenda
- •Conducting the Meeting
- •Tips for Conducting Successful Meetings
- •Follow-Up/Meeting Minutes
- •Skill: Conduct Requirements Reviews
- •How to Conduct a Review
- •Step 1. Decide on the Purpose of the Review
- •Step 2. Schedule Time with Participants
- •Steps 3 and 4. Distribute Review Materials and Have Participants Review Materials Prior to the Session
- •Case in Point
- •Step 5. Conduct the Review Session
- •Steps 6 and 7. Record Review Notes and Update Material
- •Step 8. Conduct a Second Review If Necessary
- •Typical Requirements Feedback Corrections
- •Missing Requirements
- •Unclear Sentences
- •Scope Creep
- •Keep learning new analysis techniques Technique: Avoid Analysis Paralysis!
- •Technique: Root Cause Analysis
- •The Five Whys
- •Case in Point
- •Skill: Intelligent Disobedience
- •Continually improve your skills
- •Skill: Make Recommendations for Solutions
- •Understand the Problem
- •Imagine Possible Solutions
- •Case in Point
- •Evaluate Solutions to Select the Best
- •Skill: Be Able to Accept Constructive Criticism
- •Case in Point
- •Skill: Recognize and Act on Your Weaknesses
- •Technique: Lessons Learned
- •Business analysis planning
- •Technique: Map the Project
- •Examples of Mapped Projects
- •Skill: Plan Your Work
- •Technique: Assess Business Impact
- •Case in Point
- •Factors That Determine Business Impact
- •Case in Point
- •Technique: Conduct Stakeholder Analysis
- •Technique: Plan Your Communications
- •Skill: Choose Appropriate Requirements Deliverables
- •Skill: Develop a Business Analysis Task List
- •Skill: Estimate Your Time
- •Summary of key points
- •Bibliography
Case in Point: Giving the Sponsor Bad News
A few years ago, I consulted with an organization as a PM/BA to manage the implementation of a vendor-supplied software package. The IT director explained to me that the package had already been selected, the contract had already been negotiated and signed, and they needed me to coordinate and oversee the implementation of and training for the new software. It sounded pretty straightforward to me. As any good PM does, I immediately set about building my work breakdown structure, identifying and learning about the tasks that would be necessary for a successful and smooth implementation.
Since I had worked on package implementations before, there were many tasks that I could assume would be necessary. But a good analyst never assumes anything, so I began introducing myself to stakeholders and asking if my assumptions were correct. One of the first people with whom I spoke was the network administrator, Jeff. I wanted him to help me determine how big an impact this new software would have on the network and estimate how long it would take to install and set up individual access.
His first sentence was a huge clue to me that this was not going to be as easy as I hoped: “What new software?” Apparently the selection committee had not included the network administrator when choosing this package. He quickly asked me a few technical questions about the package and its network abilities and requirements. In less than 10 minutes, he concluded that this particular software package would not run on the company’s network. Period—end of discussion—not compatible.
I would be lying if I didn’t admit that one of my first thoughts was “Well, there goes my consulting contract!” I asked Jeff a few more questions about how we might make this package work and if he could think of any options. Setting up a brand new network for the users and working with the software on stand-alone machines were the only options that we could come up with. Neither could be supported by the current IT staff.
I had to report to the director and the business people that the package selected was not the right choice for the company. Being the bearer of bad news sometimes falls to the PM/BA. In this case, I was telling them that the person who had headed up the selection committee had not done his job well and that we had no plan for implementing the software which had just been purchased. The managers and business subject matter experts were very disappointed and upset. The selection committee had spent several months making this recommendation and the software functionality was desperately needed. Now we would have to start all over with package evaluations. No one wanted to tell the sponsor. I offered to meet with him. (Being an outside consultant, my only risk was losing my contract.)
I am often amazed at the reverence with which we treat our corporate executives. They are human beings just like the rest of us. They have good days and bad like everyone else. They just tend to look at things from a higher perspective and often make decisions faster than other employees. Once we had decided that I would tell the sponsor, Ben, everyone came into my office telling me everything that they knew about him. “Ben is a great guy; he just gets angry sometimes.” “Ben is very quiet; he may not say anything to you.” “When are you going to see Ben? Are you nervous?”
The climax of the story is really anti-climatic. Ben was a very nice, soft-spoken man who enjoyed golf and had two children. His office was nicely furnished with a few golf pictures. Since I play golf, I felt comfortable asking him where and how often he played. I really believe that in most interactions with people, a brief conversation about something other than work relaxes the situation and puts things in perspective. It allows people to let their defenses down and be open to the conversation.
Ben invited me to sit down, which usually indicates that the stakeholder is ready to get into the business conversation. I told him about the software/network problem. I gave him a brief, clear statement of the problem. He sat silently, thoughtfully for a few minutes, and I waited patiently for the news to be processed. His next question, as expected, was “Is there anything we can do?” I told him about the possibility of a separate network or stand-alone machines but admitted that they were not really good ideas. He shook his head in agreement and simply said, “Well, we’ve got to break the contract, get our money back, and find another package.” And then I was excused. This was an excellent sponsor—he accepted the reality of the situation and was able to quickly go to the next logical step. My contract was extended to include selection of another package, contract negotiations support, and implementation.
|
|
When communicating with sponsors, brevity is the key. Be brief and to the point. Stay at a high level, supplying details only when necessary to make a point. Be concise, clear, and respectful of their time. They want to know what the bottom line is.
If you feel intimidated by your sponsor, you may not be able to ask good questions and get the information that you need to be successful. Take opportunities to talk with executives whenever you can. You will discover that they are people just like the rest of us. Put yourself in the sponsor’s position and tailor the communications appropriately.