
- •National Aviation University engineering mechanics of liquid and gas
- •Laboratory work 1 determination of reynolds’ critical number Brief theoretical information
- •Work Procedure
- •Laboratory work 2
- •Determination of resistance coefficient
- •And pressure losses along a pipe line
- •Brief theoretical information
- •Work procedure
- •Laboratory work 3 determination of local resistances coefficients Brief theoretical information
- •Work procedure
- •Laboratory work 4 determination of discharge coefficients of liquid flow through orifices and mouthpieces Brief theoretical information
- •1. Discharge coefficients of liquid flow through an orifice in a thin wall.
- •Work procedure
- •2. Discharge coefficients of liquid flow through cylindrical nozzles
- •Work procedure
- •Laboratory work 5
- •Ventury flow meter as an example of engineering application of bernulli ‘s equiation Brief theoretical information
- •Work procedure
- •Laboratory work 6 centrifugal pump testing Brief theoretical information
- •Work procedure
- •Appendix 1
- •Appendix 2
- •Appendix 3
- •Appendix 4
- •Appendix 5
Work procedure
1. Fill in reservoir 1 with water. (Fig. 3.2).
2. Open faucet 4 approximately on 1/4 till 1/5 turnover and set up the minimum water rate.
3. After the water level in piezometers is set measure the piezometer heights for following resistances: gradual enlargement, gradual contraction, sudden enlargement, and sudden contraction.
4. By means of calibrated tank 6 measure the volume of water W and time T for its filing.
5. Calculate the rate Q and speed values Vav .
6.
Calculate the values
with formulas 3.4 or 3.5, choosing
in
each
case
larger value of a speed for particular local resistance.
7. Determine the coefficients by formulas 3.6 or 3.7, following item 6.
8. Close faucet 4, open faucet 5 on 1/4 till 1/5 turnover and set minimum water rate.
9. Repeat the procedures of items 3-5 for faucet local resistance.
10.Taking into account the inlet and outlet diameter of conduit calculate the difference of piezometers readings, find the particular local resistance at entrance and coefficient by formula 3.2.
11. The results of measurements and calculations put down into table3.2.
12. Make conclusions.
Table 3.2
Type of local resistsance |
Smooth increasing |
Smooth decreasing |
Sudden increasing |
Sudden decreasing |
Faucet |
Measured volume W,cm3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Time for tank filling T,s |
|
|
|
|
|
Flow rate Q,cm3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average speed Vav,cm/s |
|
|
|
|
|
Local head losses hl,cm |
|
|
|
|
|
Coefficient
of local resistance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory work 4 determination of discharge coefficients of liquid flow through orifices and mouthpieces Brief theoretical information
Liquid flow through orifices and mouthpieces is frequently considered in engineering field .It is typical for liquids that during discharge potential energy of liquid in reservoir transforms in kinetic energy with more or less losses. This phenomenon occurs very often in aircraft engineering. Liquid flow of different jets is also referred to as discharge through orifices or nozzles. Liquid flow through holes and nozzles requires determination of flowing speed and flow rate.
1. Discharge coefficients of liquid flow through an orifice in a thin wall.
An orifice in a thin wall is the hole where there are no energy losses in liquid flow due to viscous friction. Liquid flows towards the centre of the orifice due to inertia forces and simultaneously is carried by the stream along axis 0-0 (Fig. 4.1, 4.2).
Fig. 4.1. Flow through round orifices: a – in a thin wall, b - sharp edged hole
Fig. 4.2. Scheme of experimental system
Degree
of fluid contraction is determined by the contraction
coefficient
,
which equals relation of stream cross-section area
to the area of the hole
,
.
The contraction coefficient essentially depends on the nature of contraction, which can be full or partial, complete and incomplete.
An incomplete contraction implies influence of the sides when the distance between orifice and sides is less then 3d. Contraction is partial if the directing side is near the orifice. The more discharge speed the greater the loss of pressure head H will be.
Bernoulli’s equation for liquid flow from its free surface in the reservoir (section 1-1 in Fig. 4.2) to the contracted cross-section (section 2-2), where it takes cylindrical shape, for even distribution of flow speeds is
,
where (V2 =VA) is actual discharge speed, is resistance coefficient.
In case under consideration p1 = p2 = pat, and V1 0, so
or (4.1)
,
where
is speed
coefficient
considering loss of pressure.
For
ideal liquid
,
in this case
= 0,
=
1.
Consequently, for the ideal liquid theoretical speed is equal to :
This formula is called Torichelli’s formula. So, coefficient is the relation of the real liquid discharge speed to the ideal liquid speed. It should be considered that distribution of speeds in the flow section is even only in the central part of the section.
The coefficient can be determined experimentally. Equations of motion are the following:
X = VA t (4.2)
and
,
(4.3)
where t - time; X, Y - co-ordinates of a particle (Fig. 4.2).
After combining 4.2 and 4.3 the equation of a particle motion stands for:
.
(4.4)
Putting
to the
formula (4.4), one shall get:
.
(4.5)
Liquid flow rate in the contracted section equals the product of actual discharge speed and actual flow cross-section area:
.
Putting
one
follows:
,
(4.6)
where
is the flow
rate coefficient,
QT
is the
theoretical flow rate of liquid.
Consequently, coefficient is relation of the actual flow rate to the theoretical flow rate, which implies flow contraction and resistance losses.
Coefficients
depend
on the basic
criterion of hydrodynamic similarity, the Re-number. Graphic
dependence of coefficients
and
on
Reynolds’ number for round orifices is shown in Fig. 4.3.
Fig. 4.3. Graphic of dependence , on the Reynolds’ number for round orifices in a thin wall
For
liquids with low viscosity (water, benzene,
kerosene and others) discharge usually corresponds with large
Reynolds’ number that’s why discharge coefficient is being
changed within small limits; through calculations their average
values are usually of such size:
=
0,63;
=
0,97;
=
0,61;
=
0,065.
Discharge coefficients can be estimated experimentally as it is shown in Fig4.2.