
- •Philosophy exam
- •Define the difference between philosophy and common sence
- •Define the difference between philosophy and humanities/science
- •Define the difference between philosophy and ideology
- •4. What are the three general branches of phylosophy/what are the basic philosophycal questions?
- •5. Explain the meaning and significanse of “the arche question”
- •6. The being and becoming dilemma in early Greek philosophy
- •7. Explain Zeno’s paradoxes
- •8. Is total flux chaotic? Explainthe nature of change in the system of Heraclitus
- •9. Difine dialectic
- •10. Virtue in Greek philosophy. Explain the meaning of knowledge in Socrate’s ethics
- •11. Explain the ‘’Euthyfro dilemma”
- •12. Plato’s theory of ideas: ideas and sensual objects – differences and similarities
- •13. Plato’s theory of ideas: the conception of participation
- •14. Plato’s theory of ideas: the allegory of the cave
- •15. Plato’s theory of ideas: the ideal state
- •16. Aristotle: syllogisms
- •17. Hylomorphism: substance and its components
- •18. Aristotle: the four causes: what is the sence of final cause?
- •19. Aristotle: the theory of virtue (Golden Mean)
- •20. Aristotle: what does it mean to be a political animal?
- •21. The existence of God: ontological argument as formulated by St. Anselm
- •22. The existence of God: ontological argument as formulated by Descartes (deceitful demon and “Matrix”)
- •23. The existence of God: Pascal’s wager
- •24. Theodicy: how to explain suffering and injustice?
- •25. Descartes: the Cartesian method – its main assumptions and functions
- •26. Descartes: cogito and the mind/body problem
- •27. The theory of substance: monism and monistic theories
- •28. The theory of substance: pluralism and pluralistic theories
- •29. What is the ultimate source of our knowledge? Nativism vs.Empiricism
- •30. Locke’s tabula rasa and the critique of nativism
- •31. Locke: primary and secondary qualities
- •32. Berkeley: “esse est percipi” and phenomenalism
- •33. Hume: ideas and perceptions
- •34. Hume: the critique of necessary connection between cause and effect
- •35. Kant: a priory/ a posteriory and analytic/synthetic judgements
- •36. Kant: forms of sensible intuition and “the second Copernican revolution”
- •37. Kant: is metaphysics a science?
- •38. Kant ethics: categorical imperative
15. Plato’s theory of ideas: the ideal state
In his theory of ideas, Plato sought to resolve a dichotomy that vexed the Greek mind, the opposition between Change and Being.
He said that the world we experience, the world of change, the world of sense experience and impressions is only an imperfect outcropping, a shadow of the pristine, unchanging, universal World of forms, that is World of Ideas.
That world, not this, is the real world. In it are conatined the ideal forms of everything. The world of Ideas is eternal, the world of sensual objects is temporary and illusory.
16. Aristotle: syllogisms
Aristotle’s logic was founded on the syllogism , in which, given two premises a certain conclusion necessarily follows, for instance:
“All trees are made of wood, an oak is a tree, all oaks are made of wood (A is B, C is A, C is B)..
17. Hylomorphism: substance and its components
In general, then, matter is closely connected to potential or power; the potential or power to become some particular sort of thing.
Only by giving it form can it be made actual (i.e., made into an actual object of a particular kind).
This portion of Aristotle's metaphysics is called hylomorphism, because it is the claim that all objects are a combination of matter (hulê6) and form (morphê)
Aristotle believed that his hylomorphic theory answered the problem of change posed by Parmenides.
Parmenides believed change to be impossible because it implies that something passes into nothing, and something else passes out of nothing. Since the "nothing" was thought not to exist, Parmenides concluded that all change is impossible.
Aristotle's reply is that the basic matter remains the same underneath all change. Only new forms are put in the place of old forms. For example, a block of stone becomes a statue of Pericles because the block-form is removed and replaced with a Pericles-form by the sculptor.
18. Aristotle: the four causes: what is the sence of final cause?
The idea of potentiality is connected to Aristotle’s theory of the four causes of things.
Every substance can be described by four causes:
1. material (matter),
2. formal (form),
3.efficient (action)
4 final.
The efficient cause of something is the motion that brings it to its final cause – what it was intended to be.
Tracing efficient cause back to its source Aristotle concluded that the chain of causes cannot go back ad ifinitum (infinitely, endlessly) therefore there must be a Prime Mover, an “uncaused cause” that is pure form and wholly actualised, namely God.
19. Aristotle: the theory of virtue (Golden Mean)
But how can we be sure what is best for us that is, was is virtuous?
the answer to this is one of Aristotle’s brightest ideas and it is known as the famous principle of the Golden Mean;
virtue, informed by reason lies in the middle between two extremes that is two opposite vices, one of excess and the other of deficiency.
For example: what does it mean to be brave, what is courage as a virtue – it lies right in the middle between cowardice and recklessness: being a coward is not enough, being a reckless person, showing too much courage is not only unnecessary but also too much (and usually stupid).
Gentleness lies right in the middle between submission and quick temper (hastiness).