Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
1145549_7DB6B_bilety_po_teoreticheskoi_fonetike...docx
Скачиваний:
4
Добавлен:
01.05.2025
Размер:
133.82 Кб
Скачать

6. Main trends in the phoneme theory

Most linguists have looked upon the phoneme as one of the basic language units. In general, views of the phoneme fall into five main classes:

The mentalistic or psychological view regards the phoneme as an ideal mental image, or a target at which the speaker aims. Actually pronounced speech sounds are imperfect realizations of these images partly because an ideal repetition of a sound is next to impossible and partly because of the influence exerted by neighboring sounds. This theory was originated by the Russian linguist J.A. Baudouin de Courtenay.

The functional view regards the phoneme as the minimal sound unit by which meanings may be differentiated. According to this conception, in every sound only a certain number of the articulatory features are involved in the differentiation of meanings. Such features are called distinctive. Non-distinctive features are not taken into account, because they do not differentiate meanings.

The abstract view is a stronger form of the functional approach. It regards phonemes as essentially independent of the acoustic and physiological properties associated with them.

The psychological, functional and abstract views of the phoneme can be qualified as idealistic, since all of them look upon the phoneme as an abstract conception existing in the mind but not in the reality that is in human.

The physical view regards the phoneme as a group of articulatory similar sounds without taking into consideration its functional and abstract aspects, though it is impossible to assign sounds to the same phoneme without their substitution in the same phonetic context and regardless the change in meaning.

The populational view regards the phoneme as a unit of:

an idiolect – individual speech of members of the same language community (K. Pike);

a dialect – a distinct form of a language distinguished from other forms by differences in pronunciation, grammar and vocabulary (L. Bloomfield);

a multidialect – the concrete language as a whole (H. Smith);

a supralect – a standard form of a language by which the dialects and idiolects may be compared (J. Perry).

7. The Kazan school of linguistics and its contribution to the development of the phoneme theory.

The Kazan school of linguistics was founded by I.A. Baudouin de Courtenay, the originator of the phoneme theory. His work may be subdivided into two periods:

  1. the morphological approach;

During the first stage of the development of his phoneme theory Baudouin de Courtenay was interested in the entity of the morpheme. He perceived that the same morpheme was not always represented by the same combination of sounds.

Baudouin de Courtenay introduced a new term homogenes to define the sounds that make up a morpheme and distinguished two kinds of homogenes:

1) divergent – variants of the same sound arising from the phonetic laws functioning in the language at the present time. They represent phonetic alternations (ex. гриб [п]– грибы [б]);

2) correlates – sounds that are different in character and the different qualities of which can no be explained by the existing phonetic laws of the language, as they represent historical phoneme alternations (ex. скакать [к] – скачу [ч]).

Baudouin de Courtenay was the first linguist who demanded accurate distinction between synchronic and diachronic approach to phonetic investigation. The phoneme in his understanding is something that produces alternation.

During the second stage of his phoneme theory Baudouin de Courtenay searched for a unit which would not be bound by the limits of a morpheme. Now he asserts that a speech sound is a fictious unit, an invention of the scientists. So the phoneme is a complex perception of the articulatory movements and of the muscular sensations connected with them together with the resulting acoustic impressions, all of which react on mind simultaneously.

In general Baudouin de Courtenay’s views upon the phoneme lack consistency. His ideas have not become widely spread, because most of his works were written either in Russian or in Polish, and few Western European scholars were acquainted with one or the other language. His phoneme theory became known chiefly through the works of his pupil L.V. Shcherba.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]