Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
1145549_7DB6B_bilety_po_teoreticheskoi_fonetike...docx
Скачиваний:
12
Добавлен:
01.05.2025
Размер:
133.82 Кб
Скачать

11. The London school of linguistics and its contribution to the development of the phoneme theory.

The London school of linguistics is headed by Daniel Jones.

“A phoneme is a family of sounds in a given language which are related in character and are used in such a way that no one member ever occurs in a word in the same phonetic context as any other member.”

“A phoneme may be described roughly as a family of sounds consisting of an important sound of the language together with other related sounds which take its place in particular sound-sequences or under particular conditions of length or stress.” (Ex. The family of sounds [t] is represented by the following members, used in different phonetic contexts: slightly rounded (tool), post-alveolar (try), labialised (twice), dental (at the), lateral (little) nasal (kitten) etc).

Later Jones expounded his new theory which may be called atomistic. He broke up the phoneme into atoms and considered different features of phoneme as independent phenomena. He distinguished phones (different qualities of the same phoneme), crones (different degrees of length), tones (different pitch variations of the phoneme in tone languages), strones (different degrees of stress). Phones are combined into phonemes that are distinctive in a language (for instance, voiced and voiceless phonemes in English). Chrones are combined into chronemes (long and short chronemes in English). In the same way tones are combined into tonemes in tone languages (even and rising tonemes in oriental languages), strones are combined into stronemes (primary and weak stronemes).

But the atomistic conception of the phoneme is not very convincing. The separate features of a phoneme should not be treated as independent phenomena. Length or tone have no importance without other sound features. They exist only in phonemes and all these characteristic features taken together make up a phoneme which is linguistically distinctive. Length by itself is an abstraction, a long phoneme is a linguistic reality and must be distinguished from a short phoneme.

According to Jones the problem of phonemes is connected with philosophy, so that a linguist can not cope with it. It is also impossible to give an adequate definition of the phoneme.

12. The American school of linguistics and its contribution to the development of the phoneme theory.

The American school of linguistics is called descriptive, as under the influence of de Saussure’s ideas. American descriptivism is based on behaviourism. According to the ideas of behaviourism, speech is a special form of behaviour, and the process of communication is a chain of stimuli and reactions, so language may be compared to any system of codes, such as the Morse code or traffic signs, which coordinates the human behaviour and serves as a connector between the interlocutors’ nervous systems (a heard word is a stimulus, a spoken word is a reaction to it).

One of the representatives of the American school of linguistics is Leonard Bloomfield who developed the theory of four main levels of the language:

1) phonemic;

2) morphemic;

3) lexical;

4) syntactic.

The units of these levels are phonemes, morphemes, words and sentences. The elements of each level can be combined with the elements of the same level. Thus phonemes can be combined with phonemes, morphemes can be combined with morphemes etc. But such combinations produce the units of the next level. Bloomfield believed that the description of a language should begin with the simplest phonemic level.

Bloomfield defined the phoneme as a minimum unit (bunch or bundle) of distinctive features.

Another representative of the American school of linguistics is William Twaddel who is rather contradictory in his views, as on one hand, he defines a phoneme as an abstractional fiction, but at the same time he introduces the term “microphoneme”, which is equivalent to Bloomfield’s distinctive feature, and the term “macrophoneme” which is defined as the sum total of microphonemes and this is equivalent to Bloomfield’s phoneme.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]