Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Антоновой Н. реферат по англ в магистратуре.docx
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.05.2025
Размер:
700.76 Кб
Скачать

Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus

International Sakharov Environmental University

Faculty of Environmental Medicine

Department of Foreign Languages

The possibility of using Low Level Light Therapy at the present stage

Done:

Master Course Student: Nadezhda Antonova

_______________ 2013

Scientific adviser

MD, Professor

Anatoly Batyan

___________________ 2013

Department of foreign languages Chair, Associate professor, PhD

Elena Malashenko

___________________ 2013

Minsk 2013

Contents

Y

Introduction 3

1 Overview of Low Level Light Therapy 4

1.1 Brief History 4

1.2 Evidence for effectiveness of LLLT 4

2 MECHANISMS OF LOW LEVEL LIGHT THERAPY 5

2.1 Cellular Chromophores and First Law of Photobiology 5

2.2 Action Spectrum and Tissue Optics 6

2.3 Mitochondrial Respiration and ATP 6

2.4 Cytochrome c oxidase and nitric oxide release 7

2.5 NO signaling 8

2.6 Downstream cellular response 8

2.7 Downstream tissue response 9

3. Laser Therapy 10

3.1 Intravascular Laser Therapy 10

3.2 Laser Acupuncture and Trigger Points 11

3.3 LLLT for Hair Regrowth 12

Conclusion 13

References 14

Introduction

Soon after the discovery of lasers in the 1960s it was realized that laser therapy had the potential to improve wound healing and reduce pain, inflammation and swelling. In recent years the field sometimes known as photobiomodulation has broadened to include light-emitting diodes and other light sources, and the range of wavelengths used now includes many in the red and near infrared [1]. The term "low level laser therapy" or LLLT has become widely recognized and implies the existence of the biphasic dose response or the Arndt-Schulz curve.

This review will cover the mechanisms of action of LLLT at a cellular and at a tissular level and will show the evidence for effectiveness and principles of laser therapy that are employed in clinical practice.

Thus the serious life-threatening diseases such as stroke, heart attack, spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury may soon be amenable to LLLT therapy [13].

1 Overview of Low Level Light Therapy

1.1 Brief History

Low level laser therapy (LLLT) is the application of light (usually a low power laser or LED in the range of 1mW - 500mW) to a pathology to promote tissue regeneration, reduce inflammation and relieve pain. The light is typically of narrow spectral width in the red or near infrared (NIR) spectrum (600nm - 1000nm), with a power density (irradiance) between 1mw-5W/cm2. It is typically applied to the injury for a minute or so, a few times a week for several weeks. Unlike other medical laser pro­cedures, LLLT is not an ablative or thermal mechanism, but rather a pho­tochemical effect comparable to photosynthesis in plants whereby the light is absorbed and exerts a chemical change [6].

The phenomenon was first published by Endre Mester at Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary in 1967 a few years after the first working laser was invented (Mester et al. 1967). Mester conducted an experiment to test if laser radiation might cause cancer in mice. He shaved the hair off their backs, divided them into two groups and irradiated one group with a low powered ruby laser (694-nm). The treatment group did not get cancer and to his surprise, the hair grew back more quickly than the untreated group. He called this "Laser Biostimulation" [10].

1.2 Evidence for effectiveness of lllt

Since 1967 over 100 phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials (RCTs) have been published and supported by over 1,000 laboratory studies investigating the primary mechanisms and the cascade of secondary effects that contribute to a range of local tissue and systemic effects.

RCTs with positive outcomes have been published on pathologies as diverse as osteoarthritis, tendonopathies, wounds, back pain, neck pain, muscle fatigue, peripheral nerve injuries and strokes [3,4]; nevertheless results have not always been positive. This failure in certain circumstances can be attributed to several factors including dosimetry (inadequate or too much energy delivered, inadequate or too much irradiance, inap­propriate pulse structure, irradiation of insufficient area of the patholo­gy), inappropriate anatomical treatment location and concurrent patient medication (such as steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories which can inhibit healing) [2].