
- •Contents
- •Introduction
- •1 Overview of Low Level Light Therapy
- •1.1 Brief History
- •1.2 Evidence for effectiveness of lllt
- •2 Mechanisms of low level light therapy
- •2.1 Cellular Chromophores and First Law of Photobiology
- •2.2 Action Spectrum and Tissue Optics
- •2.3 Mitochondrial Respiration and atp
- •2.4 Cytochrome c oxidase and nitric oxide release
- •2.5 No signaling
- •2.6 Downstream cellular response
- •2.7 Downstream tissue response
- •3. Laser Therapy
- •3.1 Intravascular Laser Therapy
- •3.2 Laser Acupuncture and Trigger Points
- •3.3 Lllt for Hair Regrowth
- •Conclusion
- •References
Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus International Sakharov Environmental University |
|
Faculty of Environmental Medicine
Department of Foreign Languages
The possibility of using Low Level Light Therapy at the present stage
Done:
Master Course Student: Nadezhda Antonova
_______________ 2013
Scientific adviser MD, Professor Anatoly Batyan ___________________ 2013 |
Department of foreign languages Chair, Associate professor, PhD Elena Malashenko ___________________ 2013 |
Minsk 2013
Contents
Y
Introduction 3
1 Overview of Low Level Light Therapy 4
1.1 Brief History 4
1.2 Evidence for effectiveness of LLLT 4
2 MECHANISMS OF LOW LEVEL LIGHT THERAPY 5
2.1 Cellular Chromophores and First Law of Photobiology 5
2.2 Action Spectrum and Tissue Optics 6
2.3 Mitochondrial Respiration and ATP 6
2.4 Cytochrome c oxidase and nitric oxide release 7
2.5 NO signaling 8
2.6 Downstream cellular response 8
2.7 Downstream tissue response 9
3. Laser Therapy 10
3.1 Intravascular Laser Therapy 10
3.2 Laser Acupuncture and Trigger Points 11
3.3 LLLT for Hair Regrowth 12
Conclusion 13
References 14
Introduction
Soon after the discovery of lasers in the 1960s it was realized that laser therapy had the potential to improve wound healing and reduce pain, inflammation and swelling. In recent years the field sometimes known as photobiomodulation has broadened to include light-emitting diodes and other light sources, and the range of wavelengths used now includes many in the red and near infrared [1]. The term "low level laser therapy" or LLLT has become widely recognized and implies the existence of the biphasic dose response or the Arndt-Schulz curve.
This review will cover the mechanisms of action of LLLT at a cellular and at a tissular level and will show the evidence for effectiveness and principles of laser therapy that are employed in clinical practice.
Thus the serious life-threatening diseases such as stroke, heart attack, spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury may soon be amenable to LLLT therapy [13].
1 Overview of Low Level Light Therapy
1.1 Brief History
Low level laser therapy (LLLT) is the application of light (usually a low power laser or LED in the range of 1mW - 500mW) to a pathology to promote tissue regeneration, reduce inflammation and relieve pain. The light is typically of narrow spectral width in the red or near infrared (NIR) spectrum (600nm - 1000nm), with a power density (irradiance) between 1mw-5W/cm2. It is typically applied to the injury for a minute or so, a few times a week for several weeks. Unlike other medical laser procedures, LLLT is not an ablative or thermal mechanism, but rather a photochemical effect comparable to photosynthesis in plants whereby the light is absorbed and exerts a chemical change [6].
The phenomenon was first published by Endre Mester at Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary in 1967 a few years after the first working laser was invented (Mester et al. 1967). Mester conducted an experiment to test if laser radiation might cause cancer in mice. He shaved the hair off their backs, divided them into two groups and irradiated one group with a low powered ruby laser (694-nm). The treatment group did not get cancer and to his surprise, the hair grew back more quickly than the untreated group. He called this "Laser Biostimulation" [10].
1.2 Evidence for effectiveness of lllt
Since 1967 over 100 phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials (RCTs) have been published and supported by over 1,000 laboratory studies investigating the primary mechanisms and the cascade of secondary effects that contribute to a range of local tissue and systemic effects.
RCTs with positive outcomes have been published on pathologies as diverse as osteoarthritis, tendonopathies, wounds, back pain, neck pain, muscle fatigue, peripheral nerve injuries and strokes [3,4]; nevertheless results have not always been positive. This failure in certain circumstances can be attributed to several factors including dosimetry (inadequate or too much energy delivered, inadequate or too much irradiance, inappropriate pulse structure, irradiation of insufficient area of the pathology), inappropriate anatomical treatment location and concurrent patient medication (such as steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories which can inhibit healing) [2].