
- •Main Morphological Notions of Theoretical Grammar
- •1. General notions
- •2. General principles of grammatical analysis
- •3. Morphology and syntax as 2 parts of linguistic description
- •4. The notions of grammatical meaning
- •5. Types of grammar
- •The Structure of Morphemes
- •1. The definition of a morpheme
- •2. Word-form derivation
- •3. The notion of oppositions
- •Parts of Speech
- •1. Classification of word classes
- •The Noun
- •1. The noun (general characteristic)
- •2. Grammatical category of number
- •3. Grammatical category of case
- •4. Grammatical category of gender
- •Determiners
- •1. The definition of the article
- •2. Functions of articles
- •3. The category of determinedness and indeterminedness
- •Adjectives
- •1. The definition of the adjective
- •2. Classes of adjectives
- •3. The degrees of comparison
- •Irregular forms of comparison
- •4. Substantivization of adjectives
- •5. Adjectivization of nouns
- •6. The problem of statives
- •1. The verb. Problems of classification
- •The Verb. The Category of Aspect and Tense
- •The Verb. The Category of Phase (order, correlation)
- •The Verb. The Category of Voice
- •1. The definition of the voice
- •The Verb. The Category of Mood
- •The Verbals
- •Pronoun
- •1. Semantic characteristics of pronouns
- •2. Morphological characteristics of pronouns
- •3. Syntactic characteristics of pronouns
- •5. New approach to pronouns
- •Preposition
- •The Conjunctions. Semantics of Conjunctions
- •Numerals
- •Syntaxes
Pronoun
1. Semantic characteristics of pronouns
2. Morphological characteristics of pronouns
3. Syntactic characteristics of pronouns
4. The category of case
5. New approach to pronouns
1. Semantic characteristics of pronouns
The meaning of the pronoun as a separate part of speech is difficult to define. In fact, some pronouns share essential peculiarities of nouns (she), while others have much in common with adjectives (her). Like nouns and adjectives, pronouns denote things and properties of things, but they do not name them as nouns and adjectives do. The pronoun is a part of speech which points to things and their properties without naming them. Pronouns, according to Vinogradov and Smirnitsky, have a very general relative meaning which varies depending on the situation. For instance, the personal pronoun 'I' may indicate a woman, a man, a child and even an animal or a thing in fairy tales. Taken in isolation, the pronoun is practically devoid of any meaning whatsoever.
Noun and adjectives are quite different in this respect. Thus, the indication of an object by means of the noun 'table' does not depend on the speaker or situation. The estimation of properties is, certainly, more subjective, but still nobody will call a square table round or an ugly man - handsome.
Jespersen thinks that if we took the relative character of meaning as the basis for singling out pronouns into a separate part of speech, we should refer such words as 'today, yesterday, tomorrow, right, left, father, mother, John' to pronouns, too, because they also change their meaning in accordance with the situation.
There is a grain of truth in it, since, for example, no concrete day exists which is always called 'yesterday'. Nevertheless, according to Smirnitsky, we are not justified in including the words 'yesterday, today, tomorrow' and the like into the class of pronouns, for they indicate time in the way substantives do. Thus, using the word 'yesterday' we mean a definite period of time, a day, not a second, a minute, an hour, a week or a year. Such generalization is to be found only in pronouns proper.
2. Morphological characteristics of pronouns
Structure
Pronouns fall under simple (we) and compound (ourselves). Derivative pronouns do not occur in the English language. Many linguists recognize the existence of phrase pronouns (each other, one another).
If, however, we accept the view that it is only words that are classified into parts of speech, we shall have to exclude the combinations 'each other' and 'one another' from the class of pronouns and study them in syntax.
It is impossible to speak of a pronominal system of inflections since pronouns constitute a heterogeneous (разнородный) group.
The category of gender
The pronouns lack the grammatical category of gender. Personal, possessive and reflexive pronouns express sex distinction lexically,
E.g. he – she, his – her (hers), himself – herself,
He told me all about it.
She felt sorry for a poor woman behind the door.
She didn’t move her hand.
He put out his hand to take hers.
The category of number
The grammatical category of number is found in reflexive pronouns, in the demonstrative pronouns ‘this, that’ and in the defining pronoun ‘other’, ‘myself – ourselves’, ‘yourself – ourselves’, ‘himself, herself’, ‘itself – themselves’, ‘this – these’, ‘that – those’, ‘other – others’,
E.g. And then I dressed myself and came away to find you.
Well, I hope you’ll both enjoy yourselves.
What would he do with himself?
When she washed herself, the cat washed itself.
They blamed themselves for this unlucky marriage.
I look awful in this blue dress.
I loved that movie.
Those nights were long.
You are not fair to the others.
The category of case
The defining pronouns ‘everybody, everyone, other’, the negative pronouns ‘nobody, no one’ and the indefinite pronouns and the indefinite pronouns ‘somebody, someone, anybody, anyone, one’ have the Common and the Genitive case just like nouns.
E.g. … you know almost everybody.
Nobody was spending any money.
Everybody’s business is nobody’s business.
Anybody can see it.
It’s anybody’s right.
Only one with a constitution of iron could have hold himself down, as Martin did.
I know exactly what it feels like to be held down on one’s back.
Personal pronouns, the interrogative and relative ‘who’ draw a distinction between the Nominative and the Objective Cases.
Personal pronouns: Interrogative/Relative pronouns
I – me you – you who – whom
he – him they – their
she – her
it – it
we – us
There is a tendency in Modern English to use of the Nominative case of personal pronounce only in the function of the subject that is followed immediately by the predicate-verb,
E.g. You don’t understand.
The Objective case is used everywhere else,
E.g. We’re mad, you and me…
You are the only person who has ever seen Ran. – Me?
They’d tell me themselves. – Not them.
It wasn’t me.
Obviously no one can do it but him.
Jack was three or four years older than me.
You are as conventional as them all.
In the interrogative pronoun ‘who’ the Objective case form ‘whom’ tends to be replaced by the Nominative case form ‘who’, especially if the question ends with a preposition,
E.g. Who could she trust?
Who can he take after?
In the relative pronoun ‘who’ the expansion of the Nominative case also takes place,
E.g. You know who I mean, don’t you?
… that is my older sister who you didn’t meet.
However, the tendency to oust the Objective case form is not so strong with the relative ‘who’ as with the interrogative ‘who’ evidently because the relative ‘who’ is not followed immediately by the verb,
e.g. I asked whom Mark had married.
Then there was Kirsten Lindstrom, whom you probably met.
When the relative ‘who’ is followed immediately by the verb, it is used in the Nominative case,
E.g. His father was here, and so everything was all right. His father whom he loved and who was happy and strong, and his only promise of safety.