- •Передмова
- •Unit 1 politics. Political science Defining Politics
- •Different Views of Politics
- •Bismarck thought that politics was an academic subject.
- •Politics as the Art of Government
- •What Is Politics?
- •Unit 2 study of politics Approaches to the Study of Politics
- •Traditional Scholarship
- •Social Science and Politics
- •Radical and Postmodernist Criticism
- •Concepts, Models and Theories
- •Unit 3 types of state Politics without the State: Tribal Societies
- •Feudalism
- •States without Nations: Kingdoms
- •States without Nations: Empires
- •Politics between States. Globalization
- •Unit 4 human nature and politics Relationship between Human Nature and Politics
- •Is the State Necessary?
- •Why Should I Obey the State?
- •The Nature of Authority
- •Rights: Natural, Human, Legal
- •Inalienable Rights
- •What are Human Rights?
- •Does Democracy Need the News?
- •Constitutions
- •Uk Constitution
- •Unit 5 political system of the united kingdom and the usa British Constitution
- •Political Party System
- •Major Parties in the uk
- •The Labour Party.
- •8 Draw a similar chart for Ukrainian political parties. Place the parties on the spectrum, match the names of Ukrainian political parties to ideologies. Parliamentary Electoral System
- •The House of Lords
- •The House of Commons
- •Composition of the Government
- •Political System of the United States of America
- •The United States Senate
- •Elections
- •Presidential Elections
- •Primary Elections Explained
- •Unit 6 political systems and regimes Traditional Systems of Classification
- •Regimes of the Modern World
- •Liberal Democracy
- •Economics and Government
- •Areas of Government. Social and Economic Policies
- •Ideology
- •Ideology and Policy
- •Political Spectrum. Role of Government
- •The Old Right: Monarchism
- •Problems with Monarchy
- •The Radical Right: Nazism and Fascism
- •Marxism
- •Leninism and Stalinism
- •Radicalism
- •Radical Theism: Catholic, Protestant and Islamic
- •Ecology as Political Radicalism
- •Feminism as Political Radicalism
- •Liberalism
- •Conservatism. Thatcherism and Neo-Conservatism
- •Defining Democracy
- •Бібліографія
- •Bealey f. The Blackwell Dictionary of Political Science: a User's Guide to Its Terms / Frank Bealey. – London: Wiley-Blackwell, 1999. – 396 p.
- •How Do Human Rights Affect Our Life?
- •Impact Cards
- •Human Rights and Responsibilities
- •Relations between Leninism and Stalinism
Constitutions
The rock upon which a democratic government rests is its constitution – the formal statement of its fundamental obligations, limitations, procedures and institutions. The constitution of the country is the supreme law of the land, and all citizens, prime ministers to peasants alike, are subject to its provisions. At a minimum, the constitution, which is usually codified in a single written document, establishes the authority of the national government, provides guarantees for fundamental human rights and sets forth the government’s basic operating procedures.
Despite their enduring, monumental qualities, constitutions must be capable of change and adaptation if they are to be more than admirable fossils. The world’s oldest written constitution, that of the United States, consists of seven brief articles and 26 amendments. This written document, however, is only the foundation for a vast structure of judicial decisions, presidential actions and traditional practices that has been erected over the past 200 years – and kept the U.S. Constitution alive and relevant.
This pattern of constitutional evolution takes place in every democracy. In general, there are two schools of thought about the process of amending, or changing, a nation’s constitution. One is to adopt a difficult procedure, requiring many steps and large majorities. As a result, the constitution is changed infrequently, and then only for compelling reasons that receive substantial public support. This is the model of the United States, whose Constitution is a brief statement of the general principles, powers and limits of government, together with a more specific listing of duties, procedures and, in the Bill of Rights, the fundamental rights of individual citizens.
A much simpler method of amendment, which many nations use, is to provide that any amendment may be adopted by approval of the legislature and passed by the voters at the next election. Constitutions able to be changed in this fashion can be quite lengthy, with specific provision that differ little from the general body of legislation.
No constitution like Americas, written in the 18th century, could have survived unchanged into the late 20th century. Similarly, no constitution in force today will survive into the next century without the capacity for change – while still holding fast to principles of individual rights, due process and government through the consent of the governed.
1 Give Ukrainian equivalents for the following words and expressions.
Constitution, limitation, supreme law, peasant, to set forth, capable, infrequently, amendment, lengthy, capacity.
2 Translate words and word combinations from Ukrainian into English and use them in your own sentences.
Демократичний уряд, гарантія, поправка, більшість, законодавча влада.
3 Complete the sentences.
This is the model ...
The constitution ...
No constitution ...
This written document ...
As a result ...
4 Comprehension questions.
What is constitution?
What should a constitution provide?
What is the oldest constitution in the world?
How can constitutions be amended?
How can constitution remain relevant for a long time?
5 Say if the following statements are true according to the text.
Constitution is important for any type of government.
Constitution is the supreme law of the country.
Constitution of the USA is a very long document.
Constitution cannot evolve.
Constitution can be changed infrequently.
The Bill of Rights gives specific listing of duties and procedures.
Every constitution in force today will survive into the next century without change.
