
- •Передмова
- •Unit 1 politics. Political science Defining Politics
- •Different Views of Politics
- •Bismarck thought that politics was an academic subject.
- •Politics as the Art of Government
- •What Is Politics?
- •Unit 2 study of politics Approaches to the Study of Politics
- •Traditional Scholarship
- •Social Science and Politics
- •Radical and Postmodernist Criticism
- •Concepts, Models and Theories
- •Unit 3 types of state Politics without the State: Tribal Societies
- •Feudalism
- •States without Nations: Kingdoms
- •States without Nations: Empires
- •Politics between States. Globalization
- •Unit 4 human nature and politics Relationship between Human Nature and Politics
- •Is the State Necessary?
- •Why Should I Obey the State?
- •The Nature of Authority
- •Rights: Natural, Human, Legal
- •Inalienable Rights
- •What are Human Rights?
- •Does Democracy Need the News?
- •Constitutions
- •Uk Constitution
- •Unit 5 political system of the united kingdom and the usa British Constitution
- •Political Party System
- •Major Parties in the uk
- •The Labour Party.
- •8 Draw a similar chart for Ukrainian political parties. Place the parties on the spectrum, match the names of Ukrainian political parties to ideologies. Parliamentary Electoral System
- •The House of Lords
- •The House of Commons
- •Composition of the Government
- •Political System of the United States of America
- •The United States Senate
- •Elections
- •Presidential Elections
- •Primary Elections Explained
- •Unit 6 political systems and regimes Traditional Systems of Classification
- •Regimes of the Modern World
- •Liberal Democracy
- •Economics and Government
- •Areas of Government. Social and Economic Policies
- •Ideology
- •Ideology and Policy
- •Political Spectrum. Role of Government
- •The Old Right: Monarchism
- •Problems with Monarchy
- •The Radical Right: Nazism and Fascism
- •Marxism
- •Leninism and Stalinism
- •Radicalism
- •Radical Theism: Catholic, Protestant and Islamic
- •Ecology as Political Radicalism
- •Feminism as Political Radicalism
- •Liberalism
- •Conservatism. Thatcherism and Neo-Conservatism
- •Defining Democracy
- •Бібліографія
- •Bealey f. The Blackwell Dictionary of Political Science: a User's Guide to Its Terms / Frank Bealey. – London: Wiley-Blackwell, 1999. – 396 p.
- •How Do Human Rights Affect Our Life?
- •Impact Cards
- •Human Rights and Responsibilities
- •Relations between Leninism and Stalinism
Rights: Natural, Human, Legal
‘Rights’ are associated with individuals. A right is not only an authority to act that an individual has but an authority all individuals have in the same situation, or individuals in a specific legal system have.
The doctrine that all men possessed ‘natural’ rights appeared in the seventeenth century as part of the debate on the limitations on the power of the British Crown. Hobbes and Locke also took part in that debate. In the eighteenth century the potential of these ideas was realized in the American and French revolutions. Such ideas were associated with deism – a rational reformulation of Christian ideas – which stressed that the Creator gave not only natural laws which governed the motions of the planets and all other natural objects, but also moral laws governing human relationships. Man had been given the power to discover all these laws by reason. The American Declaration of Independence proclaimed inalienable and God-given rights to the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. These were elaborated in the French Declaration of the Rights of Man.
The concept of human rights as expressed in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) developed the idea of good of individuals to the good of race or nation. Such natural, human or universal rights that are largely a moral claim for equal and just treatment should be distinguished from legal rights that are enforced in the courts of a specific legal system. These can be subdivided into the rights given by legislation and rights that are guaranteed by a constitution.
1 Give Ukrainian equivalents for the following words and expressions.
Limitation, deism, reason, inalienable.
2 Translate words and word combinations from Ukrainian into English and use them in your own sentences.
Особа, проголошувати, правова система.
3 Complete the sentences.
A right is not only ...
Such natural ...
Man had been given ...
The American Declaration ...
‘Rights’ are ...
4 Comprehension questions.
What are rights?
How were rights seen in the 18th century?
What rights are proclaimed in the American Declaration of Independence?
What concept of human rights is expressed in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
5 Say if the following statements are true according to the text.
A right is a person’s right to act.
Rights do not include authority.
The concept of ‘natural’ rights appeared in the seventeenth century.
Inalienable rights include the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights developed the idea of natural, human or universal rights.
Inalienable Rights
Inalienable Rights
Tomas Jefferson set forth a fundamental principle upon which democratic government is founded. Governments in a democracy do not grant the fundamental freedoms enumerated by Jefferson; governments are created to protect those freedoms that every individual possesses by virtue of his or her existence.
In their formulation by the Enlightenment philosophers of the 17th and 18th centuries, inalienable rights are God-given natural rights. These rights are destroyed when civil society is created, and neither society nor government can remove or “alienate” them.
Inalienable rights include freedom of speech and expression, freedom of religion and conscience, freedom of assembly and the right to equal protection. Since they exist independently of government, these rights cannot be legislated away, nor are they subject to the momentary whim of an electoral majority. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution for example, does not give freedom of religion or of the press to the people; it prohibits the Congress from passing any law interfering with freedom of speech, religion and peaceful assembly. A historian, Leonard Levy, has said, “Individuals may be free when their government is not”.
Speech
Freedom of speech and expression is the lifeblood of any democracy. To debate and vote, to assemble and protest, to worship, to ensure all these people rely upon the unrestricted flow of speech and information. Citizens of a democracy live with the conviction that through the open exchange of ideas and opinions, truth will eventually win out over falsehood, the values of others will be better understood, areas of compromise more clearly defined, and the path of progress opened. The greater the volume of such exchanges, the better.
The corollary to freedom of speech is the right of the people to assemble and peacefully demand that the government hears their grievances. Without this right to gather and be heard, freedom of speech would be devalued. For this reason, freedom of speech is considered closely linked to, if not inseparable from, the right to gather, protest and demand change. Democratic governments can legitimately regulate the time and place of political rallies and marches to maintain the peace, but they cannot use that authority to suppress protest or to prevent dissident groups from making their voices heard.
Freedom and Faith
Freedom of religion, or more broadly freedom of conscience means that no person should be require to profess any religion or other belief against his or her desires. Additionally, no one should be punished or penalized in any way because he or she chooses one religion over another or, indeed, opts for no religion at all. The democratic state recognizes that a person’s religious faith is a profoundly personal matter.
Citizenship: Rights and Responsibilities
Democracies rest upon the principle that government exists to serve the people; the people do not exist to serve the government. In other words, the people are citizens of the democratic state, not its subjects. While the state protects the rights of its citizens, in return, the citizens give the state their loyalty. But rights, like individuals, do not function in isolation. Rights are not the private possession of individuals, but exist only insofar as they are recognized by other citizens of the society. The electorate, as the American philosopher Sidney Hook expressed it, is “the ultimate custodian of its own Freedom”. From this perspective, democratic government, which is elected by and accountable to its citizens, is not the antagonist of individual rights, but their protector. It is to enhance their rights that citizens in a democracy undertake their civic obligations and responsibilities.
The essence of democratic action is the active, freely chosen participation of its citizens in the public life of their community and nation. Without this broad, sustaining participation, democracy will begin to wither and become the preserve of a small, select number of groups and organizations.
Democracy, Diane Ravitch writes, “it’s a process, a way of living and working together. It is evolutionary, not static. It requires cooperation, compromise and tolerance among all citizens. Making it work is hard, nor easy. Freedom means responsibility, not freedom from responsibility”.
Democracy embodies ideals of freedom and self-expression, but it is also clear-eyed about human nature. It does not demand that citizens be universally virtuous, only that they will be responsible. As American theologian Reinhold Neibuhr said: “Man’s capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man’s inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary”.
1 Give Ukrainian equivalents for the following words and expressions.
Fundamental, Enlightenment, inalienable right, conscience, to legislate away, whim, Amendment, lifeblood, conviction, falsehood, grievance, insofar, custodian, to wither, theologian.
2 Translate words and word combinations from Ukrainian into English and use them in your own sentences.
Надавати, громадянське суспільство, забороняти, приймати закон, наслідок, дисидент, свобода совісті, доброчесний.
3 Complete the sentences.
Rights are not ...
Governments in a democracy ...
The First Amendment ...
Democratic governments can ...
Democracy embodies ...
Freedom of religion ...
These rights are destroyed ...
Citizens of a democracy ...
Without this right ...
The essence of democratic action ...
4 Comprehension questions.
What fundamental principle is democratic government founded upon?
Can you give examples of inalienable rights?
What is the essence of democratic action?
What does freedom of speech mean?
Does democratic state recognize parson’s religious faith?
Are people subjects of the state?
What does freedom of religion mean?
How do rights function?
How is government elected?
What is the essence of democratic action?
When will democracy wither?
What does democracy embody?
Does government grant fundamental freedoms?
What do philosophers of Enlightenment think about rights?
What do inalienable rights include?
Can natural rights be alienated?
What does the 1st Amendment say?
What is the lifeblood of democracy?
Do you agree that freedom means responsibility, not freedom from responsibility?
Can government use its authority to suppress dissident groups?
What are the principles of democracy?
Project Work. Study the text below. Complete the assignment on human rights after the text. (You may need to use additional resources like books on human rights and Internet).