Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
MEO_n.docx
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.05.2025
Размер:
2.15 Mб
Скачать

1. Open the brackets using the Subjunctive II Present:

47

1. I wish the WTO system (to resolve) our dispute peacefully and

constructively.

2. We’d rather countries (to renegotiate) the rules and (to stop)

declaring war on each other.

3. It’s time the two member-states (to establish) the closer

economic ties.

4. It is as though countries (to have) faith in the WTO.

5. If there (to be) no multilateral regime such as the WTO’s system

would poor and rich countries be equal in the international

sphere?

2. Compose sentences with the phrases below using the Subjunctive

II Present and the Present Conditional. Mind the voice (active,

passive):

E.g.

a) to turn to the WTO to settle trade disputes;

b) to reduce a lot of international trade tension. –

If countries could not turn to the WTO to settle their trade disputes, a

lot of international trade tension would not be reduced.

1. a) to have an equal right;

b) to impose one’s will on trading partners.

2. a) to form alliance and to pool resources;

b) to resist unwanted pressure.

3. a) to apply the rules to all members of the WTO;

b) to end up with different conditions for trading.

4. Freer trade cuts the cost of living

We are all consumers. The prices we pay for our food and clothing, our

necessities and luxuries, and everything else in between, are affected

by trade policies.

Protectionism is expensive: it raises prices. The WTO’s global system

lowers trade barriers through negotiation and applies the principle of

non-discrimination. The result is reduced costs of production (because

imports used in production are cheaper) and reduced prices of finished

goods and services, and ultimately a lower cost of living.

48

There are plenty of studies showing just what the impacts of

protectionism and of freer trade are. These are just a few figures:

Food is cheaper

When you protect your agriculture, the cost of your food goes up – by

an estimated $1,500 per year for a family of four in the European

Union (1997); by the equivalent of a 51% tax on food in Japan (1995);

by $3 billion per year added to US consumers’ grocery bills just to

support sugar in one year (1988).

Negotiating agricultural trade reform is a complex undertaking.

Governments are still debating the roles agricultural policies play in a

range of issues from food security to environmental protection.

But WTO members are now reducing the subsidies and the trade

barriers that are the worst offenders. And in 2000, new talks started on

continuing the reform in agriculture. These have now been

incorporated into a broader work programme, the Doha Development

Agenda, launched at the fourth WTO Ministerial Conference in Doha,

Qatar, in November 2001.

Clothes are cheaper

Import restrictions and high customs duties combined to raise US

textiles and clothing prices by 58% in the late 1980s.

UK consumers pay an estimated £500 million more per year for their

clothing because of these restrictions. For Canadians the bill is around

C$780 million. For Australians it would be A$300 annually per

average family if Australian customs duties had not been reduced in the

late 1980s and early 1990s.

The textiles and clothing trade is going through a major reform – under

the WTO. The programme includes eliminating restrictions on

quantities of imports.

If customs duties were also to be eliminated, economists calculate the

result could be a gain to the world of around $23 billion, including

$12.3 billion for the US, $0.8 billion for Canada, $2.2 billion for the

EU and around $8 billion for developing countries.

49

The same goes for other

goods …

When the US limited

Japanese car imports in the

early 1980s, car prices rose

by 41% between 1981 and

1984 – nearly double the

average for all consumer

products. The objective was

to save American jobs, but

the higher prices were an

important reason why one

million fewer new cars

were sold, leading to more

According to one calculation, consumers and

governments in rich countries pay $350 billion

per year supporting agriculture – enough to

job losses.

If Australia had kept its tariffs at 1998 levels, Australian customers

would pay on average A$2,900 more per car today. In 1995, aluminium

users in the EU paid an extra $472 million due to tariff barriers.

One of the objectives of the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) is

another round of cuts in tariffs on industrial products, i.e. manufactured

and mining products. Some economists, Robert Stern, Alan Deardorff

and Drusilla Brown, predict that cutting these by one third would raise

developing countries’ income by around $52 billion.

and services

Liberalization in telephone services is making phone calls cheaper – in

the 1990s by 4% per year in developing countries and 2% per year in

industrial countries, taking inflation into account.

In China, competition from a second mobile phone company was at

least part of the reason for a 30% cut in the price of a call. In Ghana the

cut was 50%.

The group of economists led by Robert Stern estimates that lowering

services barriers by one third under the Doha Development Agenda

would raise developing countries’ incomes by around $60 billion.

50

And so it goes on. The system now entrusted to the WTO has been in

place for over 50 years.

In that time there have been eight major rounds of trade negotiations.

Trade barriers around the world are lower than they have ever been in

modern trading history. They continue to fall, and we are all benefiting.

TASKS

Task 1. Transcribe:

Necessity, luxury, ultimately, grocery, textile, issue, subsidy,

ministerial, annually, major, tariff, Qatar, Doha.

Task 2. Define the following terms:

consumer

subsidy

agenda

liberalization

inflation

Task 3. Give a synonym from the text:

to put to practical use

strong influence

venture

to start off or set in motion

aim or purpose

to calculate roughly

to put into the care or protection of someone

to receive good

Task 4. Translate using the text:

1.

2.

3.

конкуренция

прожиточный минимум

снижать торговые барьеры путем переговоров

4.

конечный результат

это снижение

стоимости

прожиточного минимума

51

5. сложной задачей являются переговоры по реформированию

торговли в сельском хозяйстве

6. ограничения на ввоз

7. высокие таможенные пошлины

8. снять ограничения на количество ввозимых товаров

9. высокие цены на машины стали причиной сокращения

рабочих мест в автоиндустрии

10. снижение тарифов на промышленные товары увеличит

доходы развивающихся стран на 52 млрд. долларов

Task 5. Insert prepositions:

The WTO lowers trade barriers ... negotiation.

New talks started ... continuing the reform ... agriculture.

These talks have now been incorporated ... a broader work

programme.

Import restrictions raised US textile prices ... 58% ... the late

1980s.

UK consumers pay £500 million more ... year ... their clothing ...

... these restrictions.

Clothing trade is going ... a major reform.

If Australia had kept its tariffs ... 1998 levels, customers would

pay ... average A$2,900 more ... car today.

One ... the objectives ... the DDA is another round ... cuts ...

tariffs ... industrial products.

The system now entrusted ... the WTO has been ... place ... over

50 years.

Task 6. Answer the questions:

1. Does lowering of trade barriers have an impact on the cost of

living?

2. Is it sensible of a country to protect its agriculture by introducing

import restrictions and high customs duties?

3. What is being done to promote the agricultural trade reform?

4. What is the essence of the reform in textile and clothing trade?

5. What would happen if customs duties were eliminated?

6. What was the outcome of the US limiting Japanese car imports in

the early 1980s?

52

7. What factors help to make phone calls cheaper?

8. What can help to raise developing countries' incomes?

9. Has the WTO been successful in lowering trade barriers around

the world?

Task 7. Monologue with active vocabulary: Tell us how you went

shopping.

Word-building

Here's a list of most common prefixes in the English language.

Study their meanings and look through the examples:

co- (= with)

cooperate

contra- (= against)

contradict

de- (= remove)

deregulate

(=the reverse of)

inattention

inter- (= between)

international

ir- (= not)

irregular

pre- (= before)

predict

re- (= again)

rewrite, relive

sub- (= under)

submarine

dis- (= not)

mis- (= badly / wrongly) trans- (= across)

disappear

il- (= not)

illegal

im- (= not)

immaterial

in -(=inside)

inpatient

misinform

non- (= opposite)

non-profit

out- (= more than)

outperform

over- (= too much)

oversleep

transatlantic

un- (=opposite)

unfasten

under- (= not

enough)

underpaid

53

Nouns-forming suffixes

-er / -or (a person

optician

happiness

who V-s/ smth. used

-ice (condition/ state/ -ship (state of being N)

for V-ing)

teacher / rubber

-ant/ -ent

assistant

quality)

justice

-ment (act/ result of

action)

improvement

leadership

-ence / -ance (action/

result of V)

permanence

-al (action/result)

denial

-cy (function/ state/

-ism (name of system quality of being A)

or belief)

-ate (group of people realism

with certain duties /

job, rank or degree) -ist (the person who

lunacy

-age (action/ result of V/

collection of N)

electorate/

candidate

believes in the

system)

marriage / baggage

-ery/ -ary/ -ory

realist

-ity (state/ quality of

being A)

(action/ place of V-

ing)

bribery / bakery

-ian (having a

specific skill)

-ion (action/state/

result)

confusion

-ness (state/ quality of

being A)

similarity

-ty (state/quality)

clarity

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]