Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Kompendium_1-5_doc.doc
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.05.2025
Размер:
700.93 Кб
Скачать

Unit 1 Leadership

Text 1

1. Work in 3 groups; each group reads text A, B or C.

2. In your group discuss the following:

- the topic of the text

- points covered

- facts vs attitude

- text genre (research paper, journal article, textbook)

- target audience

- the author’s position, attitude

3. Summarise the results of your discussion and report them to the class.

4. Now scan the other two texts quickly. Was everything mentioned in the summary?

A. Leadership roles

Leaders have three essential roles. They have to:

  1. Define the task - they have to make it quite clear what the group is expected to do.

  2. Achieve the task - that is why the group exists. Leaders ensure that the group's purpose is fulfilled. If it is not, the result is frustration, disharmony, criticism and, eventually perhaps, disintegration of the group.

  3. Maintain effective relationships - between themselves and the members of the group, and between the people within the group. These relationships are effective if they contribute to achieving the task. They can be divided into those concerned with the team and its morale and sense of common purpose, and those concerned with individuals and how they are motivated.

J.Adair (1) suggested some time ago that these demands are best expressed as areas of need which leaders are there to satisfy. These are: (1) task needs - to get job done, (2) individual needs to harmonize the needs of the individual with these of the task and the group and (3) group needs - to build and maintain team spirit.

B. Leadership and Management Styles

Leaders and managers may adopt different approaches when dealing with their staff. The approach a leader or manager adopts is called his or her management style. The following are examples of contrasting styles:

Charismatic/non-charismatic. Charismatic leaders rely on their personality, their inspirational qualities and their 'aura'. They are visionary leaders who are achievement orientated, calculated risk takers and good communicators. Non-charismatic leaders rely mainly on their know-how (authority goes to the person who knows), their quiet confidence and their cool, analytical approach to dealing with problems.

Autocratic/democratic. Autocratic leaders impose their decisions, using their position to force people to do as they are told. Democratic leaders encourage people to participate and involve themselves in decision taking.

Enabler/Controller. Enablers inspire people with their vision of the future and empower them to accomplish team goals. Controllers manipulate people to obtain their compliance.

Transactional/transformational. Transactional leaders trade money, jobs and security for compliance. Transformational leaders motivate people to strive for higher-level goals.

C. Situational Leadership

The situation in which leaders and their teams function will influence the approaches that leaders adopt. There is no such thing as an ideal leadership style. It all depends. The factors affecting the degree to which a style is appropriate will be the type of orgaanization, the nature of the task, the characteristics of the group and, importantly, the personality of the leader.

A task-orientated approach (autocratic, controlling, transactional) may be best in emergency or crisis situations or when the leader has power, formal backing and a relatively well-structured task. In these circumstances the group is more ready to be directed and told what to do. In less well-structured or ambiguous situations, where results depend on the group working well together with a common sense of purpose, leaders who are more concerned with maintaining good relationships (democratic, enablers, transformational) are more likely to obtain good results.

However, commentators such as Charles Handy (2) are concerned that intelligent organizations have to be run by persuasion and consent. He suggests that the heroic leader of the past 'knew all, could do all and could solve every problem'. Now, the post-heroic leader who 'asks how every problem can be solved in a way that devel­ops other people's capacity to handle it' has come to the fore.

From: Armstrong M., Stephens T. A Handbook of Management and Leadership: a Guide to Managing for Results. Bell&Bain, 2005. P.13-15.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]