
- •Matters at law and other matters английский язык для юристов учебник
- •Ответственный редактор:
- •Рецензенты:
- •Предисловие
- •Содержание
- •Unit 1. Law and society
- •History of law
- •It is the spirit and not the form of law that keeps justice alive.
- •Common Law and Civil Law
- •Animals as defendants
- •Kinds of Law
- •Unit 2. Violence
- •Crimes against humanity
- •Terrorism
- •Определение международного терроризма и методики борьбы с ним
- •Политика сша в области борьбы с международным терроризмом
- •Description
- •If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local fbi office or the nearest american embassy or consulate.
- •Caution
- •If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local fbi office or the nearest u.S. Embassy or consulate.
- •Description
- •Caution
- •If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local fbi office or the nearest american embassy or consulate.
- •(C) Разыскивается
- •(D) Помощь следствию
- •Unit 3. Human rights
- •The european convention on human rights
- •Domestic violence
- •Society prepares the crime; the criminal commits it.
- •Justice not excuses
- •Whoever profits by the crime is guilty of it.
- •Unit 4. Crime detection
- •C rime Detection
- •From the history of fingerprinting…
- •Fingerprint evidence is used to solve a British murder case
- •Genetic fingerprinting
- •Dna evidence as evidence in criminal trials in England and Wales
- •The sentence of this court is...
- •Capital Punishment: Inevitability of Error
- •These are all little known facts about the system dealing with inmates, prisons and the law in the usa
- •Medvedev to head Russian anti-corruption council
- •If poverty is the mother of crimes, want of sense is the father.
- •Organized crime constitutes nothing less than a guerilla war against society.
- •I’m proud of the fact that I never invented weapons to kill.
- •Avoiding e-mail Fraud
- •Формирование прав потребителей. Донохью против Стивенсона
- •The causes of crime
- •The causes of crime Part II
- •The causes of crime Part III
- •The causes of crime Part IV
- •Unit 5. Juvenile delinquency
- •From the history of juvenile delinquency. Causes of delinquency
- •Сравнительный анализ законодательства об аресте в уголовном процессе сша и России
- •The juvenile justice system. Treatment of juvenile delinquents
- •Unit 1. Central features of the british law system
- •British Constitution
- •M agna Carta
- •History of the “Great Charter”
- •The Bill of Rights
- •From the History of the Bill of Rights
- •Habeas Corpus
- •C onstitutional Conventions in Britain
- •Key principles of British Constitution
- •The Supremacy of Parliament
- •The rule of law
- •Sources of english law
- •How Judicial Precedent Works
- •Parts of the judgment
- •The hierarchy of the courts
- •The Court Structure of Her Majesty's Courts Service (hmcs)
- •Unit 2. U.S. Courts
- •The judicial system of the usa
- •The us Constitution
- •Historical influences
- •Influences on the Bill of Rights
- •Unit 3. The jury
- •From the Juror’s Handbook (New York Court System)
- •Introduction
- •Common questions of jurors
- •Is it true that sometimes jurors are not allowed to go home until after the trial is over? Is this common?
- •Is possible to report for jury service but not sit on a jury?
- •Famous American Trials The o. J. Simpson Trial 1995
- •Selection of the Jury
- •Unit 4. Family law
- •Family Law
- •P arent and Child
- •Surrogacy
- •Adoption
- •Protection of children from abuse, exploitation, neglect and trafficking
- •Children’s rights
- •If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
- •Money often costs too much.
- •Consequences of child marriage
- •Unit 6. Police and the public
- •The Police in Britain t he definition of policing
- •Origins of policing
- •The world's first modern police force 1829
- •The police and the public
- •T he Stefan Kizsko case
- •The organization of the police force
- •Facts from the history of prisons
- •Improvements
- •Из интервью с главным государственным санитарным врачом Федеральной службы исполнения наказаний (фсин) России Владимиром Просиным (2009г.)
- •Law: the child’s detention
- •What does the law say?
- •Legal articles quotations
- •Information in language understood
- •What does the law say?
- •Inadmissible under article 6(3)(a) and (b)
- •Conclusion
- •Law and relevant articles quotations
- •Law and relevant articles quotations
- •Inhuman or degrading treatment
- •Facts. Handcuffed in public
- •Law and relevant articles quotations
- •Legal documents universal declaration of human rights
- •Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic,
- •21 February 1992, by the un Commission on Human Rights, reprinted
- •In Report of the Working Group on the Rights of Persons Belonging to
- •Article 1
- •Article 2
- •Article 3
- •Article 4
- •Short history of us civil procedure
- •The legal profession
- •Legal education
- •U.S. Courts
- •Virginia’s Judicial System
- •Virginia’s Judicial System (continued)
- •American law in the twentieth century
- •Criminal justice
- •The death penalty
- •Legal profession and legal ethics
- •Legal education
- •History of islamic law
- •History of islamic law qur’anic legislation
- •Legal practice in the first century of islam
- •Legal practice in medieval islam
- •Religious law and social progress in contemporary islam
Unit 3. The jury
TASK 1. Study the text below, making sure you fully comprehend it. Where appropriate, consult English-Russian dictionaries and/or other reference & source books on law.
Jury
J
ury
is a body of people who are chosen to decide the truth of factual
evidence in an action or legal proceeding and, on instruction of the
court, to apply the law to the facts. Such a body is called a petit
jury or trial jury. Traditionally, a trial jury consists of 12
people, often with one or two alternates.
From the History of Jury
The exact origin of the jury system is not known; various writers have attributed it to different European peoples who at an early period developed different methods of trial. It seems probable that the jury in England was derived directly from the Norman institution of recognition by sworn inquest, whereby 12 knights were chosen to serve as recognitors.
As early as the 12th century, it had become customary for suitors in certain cases affecting the title to real estate to apply to the King's Court for the summoning of recognitors to ascertain, either from their own knowledge or on inquiry from others, the truth of the matter at issue; the verdict of the court, if unanimous, was accepted as conclusive. It was natural that other questions of fact arising in the King's Court should be disposed of in a similar manner, and the gradual transformation of the recognitors into the jury followed as a matter of course. Originally, the jury members were not only judges of fact, but were also witnesses who were selected because of their knowledge of the customs and the people of the locality, and possibly of the suitors themselves. In the early 15th century, however, the judges of the courts of common law restricted the jury to the performance of its function as a judge of fact based on the evidence submitted in an action. This is the single function of the jury in modern practice.
Selection of a Jury in the US
In the US the selection of a jury starts when a large group of citizens is called to appear for jury duty at each term of court. They are selected according to constitutional provisions. Each state has its own qualifications for those who may serve on a jury. In general, all jurors must be US citizens, local residents, of approved integrity, and of reasonable intelligence. The group of jurors called at any one time is known as a panel. Both the state and federal courts have independent lists of jurors that are made up under the direction of officials known as commissioners of jurors. Jurors are paid, as provided by statute, for time spent serving on jury duty.
|
|
|
Functions of a Jury
After a satisfactory jury has been drawn, the jury is sworn, and the trial proceeds. In general, during the progress of a trial, all questions of law are determined by the court and questions of fact by the jury.
After all the evidence has been presented, the two counsels, first for the defendant and then for the plaintiff or prosecution, “sum up,” that is, each addresses the jury, reviewing the evidence in the case and commenting on it in a manner favorable to that counsel's side of the case. The judge then makes a charge to the jury. The charge is a statement of the rules of law applicable to the evidence in that particular case. It is given in order to aid the jury in rendering a correct verdict. The jury then retires from the courtroom to begin deliberations. These deliberations continue until an agreement as to the verdict is reached, or until the presiding judge deems that the jury cannot reach an agreement. The latter case is known as a hung jury. In the event that no agreement is reached, a new trial may be called. All members of a jury must agree on a verdict, which in a civil trial may be “for the plaintiff” or “for the defendant,” and in a criminal trial “guilty” or “not guilty.” (In some states, however, the verdict in a civil trial need not be unanimous.) In a civil trial the jury is then empowered to set the amount of any damages. The verdict of a jury is decisive and cannot be disturbed unless rendered contrary to law or against the weight of evidence. In such a case the verdict may be set aside, either by the presiding judge or later on appeal.
TASK 2. Find the appropriate definitions:
ascertain |
отвод (присяжным, свидетелю), давать отвод |
alternate juror |
устанавливать; определять; выяснять; удостоверять |
summon |
коллегия присяжных равного с подсудимым социального статуса |
recognitor |
1) созывать 2) вызывать |
challenge |
заместитель присяжного |
jury of peers (jury of one's peers) |
1) присяжный 2) лицо, дающее обязательство в суде |
inquest |
истец |
suitors
|
расследование, дознание, следствие |
panel |
единодушный, единогласный |
unanimous |
список присяжных заседателей |
hung jury |
явиться для заседания суда присяжных |
to disturb the verdict |
изолировать |
deliberation |
коллегия присяжных, не пришедших к единому мнению |
sequester
|
поставить вопрос о пересмотре вердикта |
report of jury service
|
совещание, обсуждение |
TASK 3. Answer the following questions:
1) What is a jury?
2) What is known about the origin of a jury?
3) What was the procedure of affecting the title to real estate in XII century?
4) Who was a predecessor of a juror?
5) How the performance of jury’s function was changed in the early 15th century?
6) What do you know about the selection of a jury in the US?
7) How does a jury work?
TASK 4. True or false (correct if the statement is false)?
1. Petit jury is a jury of 12 persons empanelled to determine the facts of a case and decide the issue pursuant to the direction of the court on points of law.
2. The jury derived from Norman institution of recognition by sworn witnesses.
3. In the early 15th century the jury members were not only judges of fact, but also witnesses or possibly the suitors themselves.
4. Panel is a list of persons summoned for jury service.
5. Jurors are not paid for time spent serving on jury duty.
6. Only the judge has the right to challenge a juror in case of his bias or self-interest.
7. All questions of law are determined by the jury.
8. After all the evidence has been presented the judge “sums up,” reviewing the evidence in the case in order to aid the jury in rendering a correct verdict.
9. Hung jury is a trial jury duly selected to make a decision in a criminal case regarding a defendant's guilt or innocence, but who are unable to reach a verdict due to a complete division in opinion.
10. The verdict of a jury is decisive and cannot be disturbed.
TASK 5. Study the text below, making sure you fully comprehend it. Where appropriate, consult English-Russian dictionaries and/or other reference & source books on law.