- •If you think ignoring something or trying to discourage it will make it somehow not happen, you are not paying attention to either history or the world around you.
- •It is during these brain growth spurts that matrix 'shifts' occur. Intelligence does go through clear developmental stages, stages that should parallel the physical growth of the brain.
- •It is the 'alien abduction' scenario I mentioned above.
- •It is vitally important to remember this in n-hacking.
- •Information should however be a priority, and should be provided to all persons registered. A monthly newsletter would be a good idea.
- •I'll give you a real life example, an experience my colleague had as a child:
- •Instead, we currently have a social majority of 'average' human beings, living in a simulation full of weak sentiments based on attachment behavior.
- •I say 'a' path, because there are quite likely several. Matrix theory is the one I have chosen to go down.
- •7. View (Perception & programming your mind)
- •In everything we do in neurohacking, there is always a physiological change, and a psychological counterpart. Since we do the two together they work twice as well and we take half the time.
- •If your mains supply is unreliable, stock up on batteries. If it's non-existent, get a generator and start wiring up.
- •In a very real sense, bonding is the essence of comp. When we learn a thing we form bonds, in between parts of our brain, new physical synapses, new receptors, new bits of mind.
- •If you could turn on this feeling whenever you like, about anybody or anything you like, and you could choose to be in love with whomever you pleased, would you do it?
- •Indoctrination
- •1. Blocks and Filters
- •3. Knowledge as awareness
- •If our group is right, then all the other groups must be wrong...So we have these collectives of people, all stuck in various matrices, arguing over which matrix it's best to be stuck in.
- •4. Firewalls, Keys and Codes
- •Input for the 'new' brain focuses on intellect and creativity, ideas and logic are likely to form the most useful input here, which is stored in semantic memory.
- •13. Plugins (Biofeedback and similar techniques)
- •If you care about someone, this should be your aim. To help them set themselves free.
- •In summary, sensory motor input hits the old brain, is sent to the midbrain, encoded in symbol; object and episode, complete with emotional weighting, and sent to the frontal cortex.
- •It must be obvious that two things are very important in this system: making sure the images are associated with the correct translations, and recognizing when events deviate from expected patterns.
- •In the same directory, find and open or create a folder called 'Wizard'. Enter the following data:
- •Interview with the Victim
- •If you're depressed and you have no dream recall at all, take a look at your sleep cycle and be nice to it.
- •Valerian, especially if used with St. John's Wort, can be very effective in depression and especially insomnia.
- •Xxxxxxxxxneeds morexxxxxxxxxxxx
In a very real sense, bonding is the essence of comp. When we learn a thing we form bonds, in between parts of our brain, new physical synapses, new receptors, new bits of mind.
Physical bonding is essential for the survival of biology. It is a physical attunement to and awareness of the state of another person's physiology; their needs and moods, their sensory-motor state.R10 Physically bonded people find their body rhythms synchronize, including hormone cycles. Pheromones are partly responsible for this, but the existence of a sufficient number of receptors to detect them is just as vital.
Physical bonding can happen both without conscious awareness and even (and this may astonish you) without conscious feelings. All that is needed is close physical proximity for a long enough time, preferably with pleasant physical interaction and good mental interaction. Physical bonding, even between parent and baby, is not love. Lots of creatures can physically bond. (Perhaps you believe that all creatures can love, too, but regardless of that, the two are not the same thing.) Physical bonding does not even respect species' boundaries.
The process of bonding is exactly the same between two adults as it is between an adult and a child. Sexual attraction need not be present at all for bonding to take place, and sex certainly need not be a part of love, although love will enhance sexual attraction if it is present.
A bonding of intelligence in a relationship or interaction is synergy. Synergy is not possible without interaction. It is a mental state that uses a precise set of hormones and networks to achieve its goal. Synergy is, at some stage, an important drive for intelligence, as important as sexuality is for biology's sake.
There are different kinds of bonding, as I've said. One of the most important is physical bonding, unfortunately it is also now one of the most rare. The degree to which this has damaged intelligence is incalculable. In our entire genetic past (i.e. before medical intervention) babies who were not in contact and bonded with another human being almost all of the time, were not likely to survive. Currently babies are isolated from physical contact almost entirely, in playpens and prams and high chairs and cribs, with blankets and toys and pacifiers and bottles instead of real live humans, which is what they really need to stop feeling anxious.
Instead of bonding, these children form attachments, to the things they spend most of their time with. So we get the children who scream blue murder if teddy gets lost, or cannot sleep without a particular blanket, or sulk all night if they can't watch their favorite TV show. At age seven, when they should be bonding to their environment in a deep intuitive awareness of the world and its natural rules and scientific laws, instead they become attached to society and its rules and laws. And at puberty, when they should be bonding to a partner, instead they attach to a person they are attracted to and call it 'love', which is a terrible joke.
Love
This section is not about sex. Just thought we'd clear that up from the start. Love is a genuine emotion. We rarely see it these days, though, much like honor. (Honor used to mean, 'full of honesty', i.e., integrity.) Most human relationships now are based on attachment and fear of loss.
To experience love, a human must be able to bond. Two hormones are necessary to start the process off; one for girls and one for boys...girls use oxytocin for bonding, boys use vasopressin. One depends on estrogen for its production, the other, testosterone.
There are genetic aspects to our capacity for love. Some animals form long pair bonds with their mates, as human beings do.R27 Others have only the equivalent of 'one-night-stands'. The promoter upstream of the oxytocin- and vasopressin-receptor genes affects the difference in behavior. The insertion of an extra section of DNA text (only about 460 letters long), into the promoter makes an animal more likely to bond with its mate. Having this doesn't guarantee that you will fall in love; it just makes it easier for you to do so. Lots of other factors can interfere with that.
Being stuck in a matrix makes it very difficult to experience love as a pure neurochemical state (all of our moods are dependent on our chemistry, as anyone will know who has ever noticed what amazing things alcohol can do to an audience). Genuine love has its own unique chemistry, just like genuine fear or genuine sorrow.
And the fact is, we can 'turn off' our ability to feel love, (not just the feeling, but the ability to feel it), just like any other emotion, or sentiment, eventually. Many things, behavior being one can control the expression of genetic factors, and ultimately our ability to feel things depends on the expression of those gene transcription factors.
We can also turn it on. But...
The love potion paradox
Thought experiment: If you could find a 'love potion', i.e., some medication or technique that would make one person feel like they were in love, by reproducing the exact same chemical state, and you could only use one dose, whom would you give it to? Would you take it yourself? Would you give it to your partner (with informed consent, obviously)?
What would be your angle? Would you treat it as though it were something that was going to make somebody feel really good for a while, like a long-lasting drug, or would you believe that the state of mind generated by the potion was real love and would be experienced as such?
The paradox of the love potion is this: If you believe that 'love' is a mystical state that cannot be faked with a bunch of chemicals, a 'love potion' can never work for you; whatever happens you will remain convinced it wasn't 'real'. If you think such a potion can produce 'love', then the state itself is no more than a bunch of chemicals and means nothing. People 'love' you because of a bunch of chemicals, not because of your worth...so what would be the point of ever using such a potion? It isn't real!