
- •Unit 1 Sanitation Microbiology.
- •I. Reading and Speaking Practice Section
- •Guess the meaning of the following international words:
- •Learn the names of pathogen representatives in English with their Russian equivalents:
- •3. Summarize the text by listing:
- •6. The answers to the following questions are the summary of the text. Answer these questions and give the summary of the text.
- •7. Does this text give you sufficient information about sanitation microbiology?
- •Text b Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease Virus ‘ May Have Caused Cambodia Child Deaths’
- •8. Look through the text to find out who this text is intended for:
- •9. Concentrate on discovering the author’s main idea. Select the statement which best expresses the author’s main idea.
- •3) The World Health Organisation (who) helps to investigate the case to Cambodian Health Ministry .
- •11. Make a review of the article (Use essential vocabulary from Appendix 2 on p. )
- •12. Make a report about the epidemiological situation in Cambodia as if you were a member of the The World Health Organisation (who) (use the information from the article) Text c
- •It Is Interesting To Know
- •II. Vocabulary Section
- •16. Составьте словосочетания, используя слова из левой и правой колонок.
- •19. Переведите с русского на английский язык.
- •III. Group Discussion Find the information about the outbreaks of zoonotic diseases in the world and prepare a short talk. Use:
8. Look through the text to find out who this text is intended for:
a) general reader;
b) students in veterinary;
c) professionals.
9. Concentrate on discovering the author’s main idea. Select the statement which best expresses the author’s main idea.
1) Pig pathogen can be transmitted to humans.
2) Epidemiological information must be considered alongside the laboratory results.
3) The World Health Organisation (who) helps to investigate the case to Cambodian Health Ministry .
10. Re-arrange the sentences in a logical order and write a summary of the article:
1. The EV-71 has been known to generally cause severe complications among some patients.
2. Fifty-nine cases had been identified
3. In all, 52 had died but samples were not available in the majority of cases.
4. They had high fevers and signs of encephalitic or respiratory symptoms.
5. Children under seven years of age, most of whom had died within 24 hours of being admitted to hospital in Phnom Penh or the northern town of Siem Reap.
11. Make a review of the article (Use essential vocabulary from Appendix 2 on p. )
12. Make a report about the epidemiological situation in Cambodia as if you were a member of the The World Health Organisation (who) (use the information from the article) Text c
Write a letter to your friend in which tells him/ her what interesting things you’ve learnt from this text (see Appendix on p. )
It Is Interesting To Know
Anton van Leeuwenhoek was a man born before his time. Although not the first to discover the microscope or to use magnifying lens, he was the first to see and describe bacteria. We know that he was a "cloth merchant" living in Delft, Holland, and that he used magnifying lens to view the quality of the weave of the merchandise he purchased. He traveled to England in 1668 to view English cloth and there he saw drawings of magnifications of cloth much greater than any of the current lens available in Holland would do. He returned to Holland and took up lens grinding. Being meticulous, he developed his lens grinding to an art and in the process tested them by seeing how much detail he could observe with a given lens. One can guess that he chanced to look at a sample of pond water or other source rich in microbes and was amazed to see distinct, uniquely shaped organisms going. He made numerous microscopes from silver and gold and viewed everything he could including the scum on his teeth. His best lens could magnify ~300-500 fold which allowed him to see microscopic algae and protozoa and larger bacteria. He clearly had excellent eyesight because he accurately drew pictures of microbes that were at the limit of the magnification of his lens. He used only single lens and not the compound lens of the true microscopes we employ today; which makes his observations all the more amazing. He wrote of his observations to the Royal Society of London in 1676 and included numerous drawings. He astonished everyone by claiming that many of the tiny things he saw with his lens were alive because he saw them swimming purposefully about. This caused no end of shock and wonderment and numerous people hurried to Delft to see if this Dutchman was "in his cups" or if he was really onto something new and wonderful. A few minutes with one of his numerous microscopes was all it took to convert his visitors to enthusiastic believers in the existence of these tiny beasties living all around them. His discovery was the equivalent of our finding life on Mars today.