
- •989 Market Street, San Francisco, ca 94103-1741
- •Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
- •Part three: higher education blended learning models and perspectives 151
- •XXXIV Preface and Acknowledgments
- •34 The Handbook of Blended Learning
- •38 The Handbook of Blended Learning
- •Table 3.1. Blended learning train-the-trainer detailed agenda.
- •On designing interaction experiences for the next generation of blended learning
- •44 The Handbook of Blended Learning
- •Interaction as Experience
- •In Support of Interaction Strategies for the Future of Blended Learning
- •Corporate blended learning models and perspectives
- •Blending learning for business impact
- •Ibm's Case for Learning Success
- •66 The Handbook of Blended Learning
- •Guided Navigation
- •Figure 6.3. Specific learning elements.
- •Table 6.1. Learning elements.
- •Figure 6.6. Specific knowledge services.
- •Figure 7.3. Microsoft skills assessment tool for organizations.
- •Transformation of sales skills through knowledge management and blended learning
- •Figure 8.2. EsSba transformations in selling strategies.
- •116 The Handbook of Blended Learning
- •Figure 9.1. Cisco networking academy organizational hierarchy.
- •41(8), 19. Wonacott, m. E. (2002). Blending face-to-face and distance learning methods in adult and career-technical
- •Table 10.1. Types of benefits identified in oracle's leadership training.
- •It also appeared to me that other people in the course weren't having as
- •Part three
- •Improve retention rates and student outcomes systemwide.
- •New zealand examples of blended learning
- •176 The Handbook of Blended Learning
- •In addition to providing support to instructors through the multiple training opportunities listed above, some specific tools have been developed to support lecturers' needs:
- •Of glamorgan.
- •188 The Handbook of Blended Learning
- •192 The Handbook of Blended Learning
- •View.Asp?PressId::::75#top.
- •Blended learning enters the mainstream
- •Impact on Faculty and Students
- •200 The Handbook of Blended Learning
- •Integrated field experiences in online teacher education
- •A Natural Blend?
- •1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Fiscal Year (July 1-June 30)
- •Integrated Field Experiences in Online Teacher Education 217
- •In f. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator's handbook. Building a knowledge base for the preparation of
- •Blended learning at the university of phoenix
- •School b.S. M.S. M.B.A. Ph.D. Psy.D.
- •Visits_040524.Html. Osguthorpe, r. Т., & Graham, c. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and
FIGURE 13.1. CONTINUUM OF
E-LEARNING AT THE UNIVERSITYOf glamorgan.
this term. As a result, research findings could be misleading due to confusion arising out of ambiguous terminology.
At the University of Glamorgan, we have adopted a continuum of e-learning that indicates the blend as the use of online medium increases from basic information and communication technology (IGT) use to intensive ICT use (see Figure 13.1).
At the basic ICT use end of the continuum is the blend of current practices plus a basic use of ICT, for example PowerPoint and Word documents. At the e-enhanced stage, current practice is supplemented with access to some online resources provided through the VLE (Blackboard) such as announcements and lecture notes on the Web. The next stage is e-focused, where the instructor might use discussion boards, online assessment tests, and interactive learning materials alongside some face-to-face delivery. The end of the continuum is the e-intensive stage, where modules or complete awards are delivered and moderated online but still may contain some face-to-face elements such as inductions.
The next section offers more specifics about how E-College Wales is using blended learning.
Local Designs
Wales is a country where a quarter of those of working age are not in paid employment. Such high levels of inactivity have led to locally concentrated areas of unskilled people and destructive cycles of low expectations, disaffection, and
187
E-College Wales, a Case Study of Blended Learning
social exclusion. A large section of Wales has been designated as an Objective One area by the European Union (EU); wtth ^**^П>*»*£е ble for extra funding to stimulate economic growth. Thus m 2000 the University of Glamorgan, in collaboration wtth it. partnership of further education colleges in Wales, successfully bid to the European Sooju Fund^ for funding to develop entrepreneurial programs online across the Objective OneTreasgof Wales,"resulting in the E-College Wales (ECW) project. ECW is one of Europe's largest and most innovative online learning projects offering an honors degree in enterprise, a master's degree in professional development available in both Welsh and English, a foundation degree m business administration, courses related to finance for nonfinancial managers, and an e-moderaticn course for developing teaching skills in an online environment. ECW was launched in 2000 and now has over eight hundred learners onhne. All courses have been popular and attracted many students who would not have enrolled in face-to-face programs at the university. The master s m professional development and the e-moderation courses are growing most rapidly indicating that professional and training courses attract online learners. On the degree in enterprise, many learners dropped out at the end of the first year, stating that they did not want a degree but rather training in specific business areas (for example, how to write a business plan, marketing, and financial know-how). Our plans are to introduce smaller chunks of learning and training for these
small business owners.
The learner target group is diverse; we knew at the outset that many potential online learners would be unlikely to pay for any new opportunity and would have few or no formal educational qualifications. Thus, as a result of EU funding, the courses and programs, mentioned previously, were offered free, and student. were loaned personal computers. We knew that motivation and retention wou d be two of the most crucial issues in delivering successful e-learnmg programs to these learners. The learner target group is made up of those least likely to participate in open and distance learning without motivation, incentive, and intensive local support. In UK. universities, in particular those with a widening access policy, retaining students is problematic. Student motivation and satisfacUon-with the online program are frequently given as reasons that a large number of students drop out (Alexander, 2001; Bonk, 2003).
Although we recognized that motivating, engaging, and retaining individuals would be the key to success in the implementation of e-learmng, our retention rate in the first year was low (50 percent). The students provided many reasons why they withdrew including personal issues, such as increased pressure of work, lack of time, illness, and lack of IT skills. There were also a number of course-specific reasons given for withdrawal, and these included technical problems, wrong course selection, and too much course work. Student responses to the