
- •Air sampling and industrial hygiene engineering. Martha j. Boss & Dennis w. Day
- •4.1 Definitions
- •4.2 Example—outline of bulk sampling qa/qc procedure
- •4.3 Example—outline of the niosh 7400 qa procedure
- •4.3.1 Precision: Laboratory Uses a Precision of 0.45
- •4.3.2 Precision: Laboratory Uses a Precision sr that is Better Than 0.45
- •4.3.3 Records to Be Kept in a qa/qc System
- •4.3.4 Field Monitoring Procedures—Air Sample
- •4.3.5 Calibration
- •4.4 Sampling and analytical errors
- •95% Confident That the Employer Is in Compliance
- •95% Confident That the Employer Is not in Compliance
- •4.5 Sampling methods
- •4.5.1 Full-Period, Continuous Single Sampling
- •4.5.2 Full-Period, Consecutive Sampling
- •4.5.3 Grab Sampling
- •4.6 Calculations
- •4.6.1 Calculation Method for a Full-Period, Continuous Single Sample
- •4.6.2 Sample Calculation for a Full-Period, Continuous Single Sample
- •4.6.3 Calculation Method for a Full-Period Consecutive Sampling
- •4.7 Grab sampling
- •4.8 Saes—exposure to chemical mixtures
- •5.1 Baseline risk assessment
- •5.2 Conceptual site model
- •5.2.1 Source Areas
- •5.2.2 Possible Receptors
- •5.3 Chemicals of potential concern
- •5.4 Human health blra criteria
- •5.5 Toxicity assessment
- •5.6 Toxicological profiles
- •5.7 Uncertainties related to toxicity information
- •5.8 Potentially exposed populations
- •5.8.1 Exposure Pathways
- •5.8.2 Sources
- •5.9 Environmental fate and transport of copCs
- •5.10 Exposure points and exposure routes
- •5.11 Complete exposure pathways evaluated
- •5.12 Ecological risk assessment
- •5.13 Data evaluation and data gaps
- •5.14 Uncertainties
- •5.14.1 Uncertainties Related to Toxicity Information
- •5.14.2 Uncertainties in the Exposure Assessment
- •5.15 Risk characterization
- •5.16 Headspace monitoring—volatiles
- •5.18 Industrial monitoring—process safety management
- •5.19 Bulk samples
- •6.1 Fungi, molds, and risk
- •6.1.1 What Is the Difference between Molds, Fungi, and Yeasts?
- •6.1.2 How Would I Become Exposed to Fungi That Would Create a Health Effect?
- •6.1.3 What Types of Molds Are Commonly Found Indoors?
- •6.1.4 Are Mold Counts Helpful?
- •6.1.5 What Can Happen with Mold-Caused Health Disorders?
- •6.2 Biological agents and fungi types
- •6.2.1 Alternaria
- •6.3 Aspergillus
- •6.4 Penicillium
- •6.5 Fungi and disease
- •6.6 Fungi control
- •6.6.1 Ubiquitous Fungi
- •6.6.2 Infection
- •6.6.3 Immediate Worker Protection
- •6.6.4 Decontamination
- •6.6.5 Fungi and voCs
- •6.6.6 Controlling Fungi
- •6.7 Abatement
- •Indoor Air Quality and Environments
- •7.1 Ventilation design guide
- •7.2 Example design conditions guidance
- •7.2.1 Outside Design Conditions
- •7.2.2 Inside Design Conditions
- •7.3 Mechanical room layout requirements
- •7.4 Electrical equipment/panel coordination
- •7.5 General piping requirements
- •7.6 Roof-mounted equipment
- •7.7 Vibration isolation/equipment pads
- •7.8 Instrumentation
- •7.9 Redundancy
- •7.10 Exterior heat distribution system
- •7.10.1 Determination of Existing Heat Distribution Systems
- •7.10.2 Selection of Heat Distribution Systems
- •7.10.2.1 Ag Systems
- •7.10.2.2 Cst Systems
- •7.10.2.3 Buried Conduit (preapproved type)
- •7.10.2.4 Buried Conduit (not preapproved type)
- •7.11 Thermal insulation of mechanical systems
- •7.12 Plumbing system
- •7.12.1 Piping Run
- •7.13 Compressed air system
- •7.13.1 Compressor Selection and Analysis
- •7.13.2 Compressor Capacity
- •7.13.3 Compressor Location and Foundations
- •7.13.4 Makeup Air
- •7.13.5 Compressed Air Outlets
- •7.13.6 Refrigerated Dryer
- •7.14 Air supply and distribution system
- •7.14.1 Basic Design Principles
- •7.14.2 Temperature Settings
- •7.14.3 Air-Conditioning Loads
- •7.14.4 Infiltration
- •7.14.5 Outdoor Air Intakes
- •7.14.6 Filtration
- •7.14.7 Economizer Cycle
- •7.15 Ductwork design
- •7.15.3 Evaporative Cooling
- •7.16 Ventilation and exhaust systems
- •7.16.1 Supply and Exhaust Fans
- •7.17 Testing, adjusting, and balancing of hvac systems
- •7.18 Ventilation adequacy
- •7.19 Laboratory fume hood performance criteria
- •7.20 Flow hoods
- •7.21 Thermoanemometers
- •7.22 Other velometers
4.6.1 Calculation Method for a Full-Period, Continuous Single Sample
Obtain the full-period sampling result (value X), the PEL, and the SAE. The SAE can be obtained from the OSHA Chemical Information Manual. Divide X by the PEL to determine Y, the standardized concentration, that is, Y = X/PEL.
Compute the UCL (95%) as follows: UCL(95%) = Y + SAE
Compute the LCL (95%) as follows: LCL(95%) = Y - SAE
Classify the exposure according to the following classification system:
If the UCL :£ 1.0, a violation does not exist.
If the LCL < 1.0 and the UCL > 1, classify as possible overexposure.
If the LCL > 1.0, a violation exists.
4.6.2 Sample Calculation for a Full-Period, Continuous Single Sample
A single fiberglass filter and personal pump were used to sample for carbaryl for a 7-h period. The industrial hygienist was able to document that the exposure during the remaining unsampled 0.5 h of the 8-h shift would equal the exposure measured during the 7-h period. The laboratory reported 6.07 mg/m3. The SAE for this method is 0.23. The PEL is 5.0 mg/m3.
Step 1. Calculate the standardized concentration. Y = 6.07/5.0 = 1.21
Step 2. Calculate confidence limits.
LCL = 1.21 - 0.23 = 0.98
Since the LCL does not exceed 1.0, noncompliance is not established. The UCL is
then calculated: UCL = 1.21 + 0.23 = 1.44
Step 3. Classify the exposure.
Since the LCL < 1.0 and the UCL > 1.0, classify as possible overexposure.
4.6.3 Calculation Method for a Full-Period Consecutive Sampling
The use of multiple consecutive samples will result in slightly lower SAEs than the use of one continuous sample because the inherent errors tend to partially cancel each other. The mathematical calculations, however, are somewhat more complicated. If preferred, the industrial hygienist may first determine if compliance or noncompliance can be established using the calculation method noted for a full-period, continuous, single-sample measurement. If results fall into the "possible overexposure" region using this method, a more exact calculation should be performed as follows.
Compile X(l), X(2). . . , Х(и), and the n consecutive concentrations on one workshift.
Compile their time durations, T(l), T(2),. . . , T(n).
Compile the SAE.
Compute the TWA exposure.
Divide the TWA exposure by the PEL to find Y, the standardized average (TWA/PEL).
Compute the UCL (95%) as follows: UCL (95%) = Y + SAE (Equation E).
Compute the LCL (95%) as follows: LCL (95%) = Y - SAE (Equation F).
Classify the exposure according to the following classification system:
If the UCL < 1.0, a violation does not exist.
If the LCL < 1.0, and the UCL > 1, classify as possible overexposure.
If the LCL > 1.0, a violation exists.
When the LCL < 1.0 and the UCL > 1.0, the results are in the "possible overexposure" region, and the industrial hygienist must analyze the data using the more exact calculation for full-period consecutive sampling, as follows:
Y - SAE(T12X12 + T2%2. . . + Т„2Хп2)1'2 РЕЦТ + T2 + Т„)
4.6.4 Sample Calculation for Full-Period Consecutive Sampling
Two consecutive samples were taken for carbaryl instead of one continuous sample, and the following results were obtained:
Sample А В
S
ampling
rate (L/min) 2.0 2.0
Time (min) 240.0 210.0
Volume (L) 480.0 420.0 Weight (mg) 3.005 2.457 Concentration (mg/m3) 6.26 5.85
The SAE for carbaryl is 0.23.
Step 1. Calculate the UCL and the LCL from the sampling and analytical results: TWA = (6.26 mg/m3 X 240 min + (5.85 mg/m3) X 210 min 450 min = 6.07 mg/m3 Y = 6.07 mg/m3/PEL = 6.07/5.0 = 1.21 Assuming a continuous sample: LCL = 1.21 - 0.23 = 0.98
UCL = 1.21 + 0.23 = 1.44
Step 2. Since the LCL < 1.0 and the UCL > 1.0, the results are in the possible over-exposure region, and the industrial hygienist must analyze the data using a more exact calculation for full-period consecutive sampling. If the LCL > 1.0, a violation is established.