
- •Air sampling and industrial hygiene engineering. Martha j. Boss & Dennis w. Day
- •4.1 Definitions
- •4.2 Example—outline of bulk sampling qa/qc procedure
- •4.3 Example—outline of the niosh 7400 qa procedure
- •4.3.1 Precision: Laboratory Uses a Precision of 0.45
- •4.3.2 Precision: Laboratory Uses a Precision sr that is Better Than 0.45
- •4.3.3 Records to Be Kept in a qa/qc System
- •4.3.4 Field Monitoring Procedures—Air Sample
- •4.3.5 Calibration
- •4.4 Sampling and analytical errors
- •95% Confident That the Employer Is in Compliance
- •95% Confident That the Employer Is not in Compliance
- •4.5 Sampling methods
- •4.5.1 Full-Period, Continuous Single Sampling
- •4.5.2 Full-Period, Consecutive Sampling
- •4.5.3 Grab Sampling
- •4.6 Calculations
- •4.6.1 Calculation Method for a Full-Period, Continuous Single Sample
- •4.6.2 Sample Calculation for a Full-Period, Continuous Single Sample
- •4.6.3 Calculation Method for a Full-Period Consecutive Sampling
- •4.7 Grab sampling
- •4.8 Saes—exposure to chemical mixtures
- •5.1 Baseline risk assessment
- •5.2 Conceptual site model
- •5.2.1 Source Areas
- •5.2.2 Possible Receptors
- •5.3 Chemicals of potential concern
- •5.4 Human health blra criteria
- •5.5 Toxicity assessment
- •5.6 Toxicological profiles
- •5.7 Uncertainties related to toxicity information
- •5.8 Potentially exposed populations
- •5.8.1 Exposure Pathways
- •5.8.2 Sources
- •5.9 Environmental fate and transport of copCs
- •5.10 Exposure points and exposure routes
- •5.11 Complete exposure pathways evaluated
- •5.12 Ecological risk assessment
- •5.13 Data evaluation and data gaps
- •5.14 Uncertainties
- •5.14.1 Uncertainties Related to Toxicity Information
- •5.14.2 Uncertainties in the Exposure Assessment
- •5.15 Risk characterization
- •5.16 Headspace monitoring—volatiles
- •5.18 Industrial monitoring—process safety management
- •5.19 Bulk samples
- •6.1 Fungi, molds, and risk
- •6.1.1 What Is the Difference between Molds, Fungi, and Yeasts?
- •6.1.2 How Would I Become Exposed to Fungi That Would Create a Health Effect?
- •6.1.3 What Types of Molds Are Commonly Found Indoors?
- •6.1.4 Are Mold Counts Helpful?
- •6.1.5 What Can Happen with Mold-Caused Health Disorders?
- •6.2 Biological agents and fungi types
- •6.2.1 Alternaria
- •6.3 Aspergillus
- •6.4 Penicillium
- •6.5 Fungi and disease
- •6.6 Fungi control
- •6.6.1 Ubiquitous Fungi
- •6.6.2 Infection
- •6.6.3 Immediate Worker Protection
- •6.6.4 Decontamination
- •6.6.5 Fungi and voCs
- •6.6.6 Controlling Fungi
- •6.7 Abatement
- •Indoor Air Quality and Environments
- •7.1 Ventilation design guide
- •7.2 Example design conditions guidance
- •7.2.1 Outside Design Conditions
- •7.2.2 Inside Design Conditions
- •7.3 Mechanical room layout requirements
- •7.4 Electrical equipment/panel coordination
- •7.5 General piping requirements
- •7.6 Roof-mounted equipment
- •7.7 Vibration isolation/equipment pads
- •7.8 Instrumentation
- •7.9 Redundancy
- •7.10 Exterior heat distribution system
- •7.10.1 Determination of Existing Heat Distribution Systems
- •7.10.2 Selection of Heat Distribution Systems
- •7.10.2.1 Ag Systems
- •7.10.2.2 Cst Systems
- •7.10.2.3 Buried Conduit (preapproved type)
- •7.10.2.4 Buried Conduit (not preapproved type)
- •7.11 Thermal insulation of mechanical systems
- •7.12 Plumbing system
- •7.12.1 Piping Run
- •7.13 Compressed air system
- •7.13.1 Compressor Selection and Analysis
- •7.13.2 Compressor Capacity
- •7.13.3 Compressor Location and Foundations
- •7.13.4 Makeup Air
- •7.13.5 Compressed Air Outlets
- •7.13.6 Refrigerated Dryer
- •7.14 Air supply and distribution system
- •7.14.1 Basic Design Principles
- •7.14.2 Temperature Settings
- •7.14.3 Air-Conditioning Loads
- •7.14.4 Infiltration
- •7.14.5 Outdoor Air Intakes
- •7.14.6 Filtration
- •7.14.7 Economizer Cycle
- •7.15 Ductwork design
- •7.15.3 Evaporative Cooling
- •7.16 Ventilation and exhaust systems
- •7.16.1 Supply and Exhaust Fans
- •7.17 Testing, adjusting, and balancing of hvac systems
- •7.18 Ventilation adequacy
- •7.19 Laboratory fume hood performance criteria
- •7.20 Flow hoods
- •7.21 Thermoanemometers
- •7.22 Other velometers
5.13 Data evaluation and data gaps
Existing data for concentrations of contaminants in the medium of concern—surface soil, subsurface soil, groundwater, and air—are evaluated. This evaluation will determine if data are adequate to estimate exposure point concentrations and to evaluate contaminant migration and toxicity. Existing data will also be evaluated to determine if data are of adequate quality for use in a risk assessment according to the methods specified in the U.S. EPA guidance, Data Usability in Risk Assessments.
If additional environmental data are necessary to complete the BLRA, an SAP is developed. In addition to chemical data, collection of water quality data (i.e., hardness) may be specified in the SAP because the toxicity and mobility of metals in surface water is hardness dependent.
At this time an evaluation of existing data indicates that on-site groundwater data are available. Current groundwater data and new empirical data are evaluated for background and down-gradient information. The arithmetic means and 95% UCLs of the mean are calculated for COPCs. For the groundwater pathways a well survey is conducted within 1 mile of the site to verify the locations and uses of all wells.
If recontouring of the soil surface has occurred to direct storm water runoff toward collection points, additional surface soil samples (0-2 in.) may be necessary for the analysis of COPCs in the soil ingestion and air pathways.
Data collection points are designed to identify hot spots and to calculate average concentrations over the entire site and in the areas of concern. Soil pH must also be measured because soil pH influences metals transport.
Surface water data for up-gradient and down-gradient points and sample collection points for this data are identified. No surface water or sediment data from on-site
drainages, or drainage pathways from the site, may be available to provide information on the extent of contaminant migration. Sediment data from the surface water pathway provide information on whether the rivers or standing bodies of water subject to runoff are another source of contamination to other surface waters. Collect surface water and sediment samples from these areas.
The level of generation of dust at the site is required information. This information may be collected via real-time particulate measurements and/or by collecting samples for laboratory analysis. The level of dust generation is assumed to vary significantly with time and climatic data. The collection of dust generation data is planned carefully so that dust generation is neither underestimated or overestimated.
5.14 Uncertainties
Uncertainties may relate to several factors, such as toxicity information or exposure assessments.
5.14.1 Uncertainties Related to Toxicity Information
The Rffls for COPCs are a major source of uncertainty in a BLRA. A chronic RfD is an estimate of the daily exposure unlikely to present an appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime. Uncertainty factors are applied to selected exposure levels identified in animal or human studies to derive the RfD. To avoid overestimating the RfD, identified exposure levels are divided by these uncertainty factors. An uncertainty factor of 10 is used to account for variations in human sensitivity when using data from valid human studies involving long-term exposure of average, healthy subjects. When extrapolating from observations of toxicity in animals to predicted toxicity in humans, additional uncertainty factors of 10 are applied.
Uncertainties are also present when identifying whether a compound is a likely human carcinogen and at what level of exposure an increased risk of cancer may exist. Uncertainties in quantifying the exposure levels that may result in elevated carcinogenic risk for specific compounds are corrected for by using the 95% UCL of the slope relating exposure to the probability of developing cancer. The actual slope may be greater, but is unlikely to be greater.
The lack of an RfD and a cancer SF for lead will introduce uncertainty into the BLRA if lead is a COPC.