
- •Air sampling and industrial hygiene engineering. Martha j. Boss & Dennis w. Day
- •4.1 Definitions
- •4.2 Example—outline of bulk sampling qa/qc procedure
- •4.3 Example—outline of the niosh 7400 qa procedure
- •4.3.1 Precision: Laboratory Uses a Precision of 0.45
- •4.3.2 Precision: Laboratory Uses a Precision sr that is Better Than 0.45
- •4.3.3 Records to Be Kept in a qa/qc System
- •4.3.4 Field Monitoring Procedures—Air Sample
- •4.3.5 Calibration
- •4.4 Sampling and analytical errors
- •95% Confident That the Employer Is in Compliance
- •95% Confident That the Employer Is not in Compliance
- •4.5 Sampling methods
- •4.5.1 Full-Period, Continuous Single Sampling
- •4.5.2 Full-Period, Consecutive Sampling
- •4.5.3 Grab Sampling
- •4.6 Calculations
- •4.6.1 Calculation Method for a Full-Period, Continuous Single Sample
- •4.6.2 Sample Calculation for a Full-Period, Continuous Single Sample
- •4.6.3 Calculation Method for a Full-Period Consecutive Sampling
- •4.7 Grab sampling
- •4.8 Saes—exposure to chemical mixtures
- •5.1 Baseline risk assessment
- •5.2 Conceptual site model
- •5.2.1 Source Areas
- •5.2.2 Possible Receptors
- •5.3 Chemicals of potential concern
- •5.4 Human health blra criteria
- •5.5 Toxicity assessment
- •5.6 Toxicological profiles
- •5.7 Uncertainties related to toxicity information
- •5.8 Potentially exposed populations
- •5.8.1 Exposure Pathways
- •5.8.2 Sources
- •5.9 Environmental fate and transport of copCs
- •5.10 Exposure points and exposure routes
- •5.11 Complete exposure pathways evaluated
- •5.12 Ecological risk assessment
- •5.13 Data evaluation and data gaps
- •5.14 Uncertainties
- •5.14.1 Uncertainties Related to Toxicity Information
- •5.14.2 Uncertainties in the Exposure Assessment
- •5.15 Risk characterization
- •5.16 Headspace monitoring—volatiles
- •5.18 Industrial monitoring—process safety management
- •5.19 Bulk samples
- •6.1 Fungi, molds, and risk
- •6.1.1 What Is the Difference between Molds, Fungi, and Yeasts?
- •6.1.2 How Would I Become Exposed to Fungi That Would Create a Health Effect?
- •6.1.3 What Types of Molds Are Commonly Found Indoors?
- •6.1.4 Are Mold Counts Helpful?
- •6.1.5 What Can Happen with Mold-Caused Health Disorders?
- •6.2 Biological agents and fungi types
- •6.2.1 Alternaria
- •6.3 Aspergillus
- •6.4 Penicillium
- •6.5 Fungi and disease
- •6.6 Fungi control
- •6.6.1 Ubiquitous Fungi
- •6.6.2 Infection
- •6.6.3 Immediate Worker Protection
- •6.6.4 Decontamination
- •6.6.5 Fungi and voCs
- •6.6.6 Controlling Fungi
- •6.7 Abatement
- •Indoor Air Quality and Environments
- •7.1 Ventilation design guide
- •7.2 Example design conditions guidance
- •7.2.1 Outside Design Conditions
- •7.2.2 Inside Design Conditions
- •7.3 Mechanical room layout requirements
- •7.4 Electrical equipment/panel coordination
- •7.5 General piping requirements
- •7.6 Roof-mounted equipment
- •7.7 Vibration isolation/equipment pads
- •7.8 Instrumentation
- •7.9 Redundancy
- •7.10 Exterior heat distribution system
- •7.10.1 Determination of Existing Heat Distribution Systems
- •7.10.2 Selection of Heat Distribution Systems
- •7.10.2.1 Ag Systems
- •7.10.2.2 Cst Systems
- •7.10.2.3 Buried Conduit (preapproved type)
- •7.10.2.4 Buried Conduit (not preapproved type)
- •7.11 Thermal insulation of mechanical systems
- •7.12 Plumbing system
- •7.12.1 Piping Run
- •7.13 Compressed air system
- •7.13.1 Compressor Selection and Analysis
- •7.13.2 Compressor Capacity
- •7.13.3 Compressor Location and Foundations
- •7.13.4 Makeup Air
- •7.13.5 Compressed Air Outlets
- •7.13.6 Refrigerated Dryer
- •7.14 Air supply and distribution system
- •7.14.1 Basic Design Principles
- •7.14.2 Temperature Settings
- •7.14.3 Air-Conditioning Loads
- •7.14.4 Infiltration
- •7.14.5 Outdoor Air Intakes
- •7.14.6 Filtration
- •7.14.7 Economizer Cycle
- •7.15 Ductwork design
- •7.15.3 Evaporative Cooling
- •7.16 Ventilation and exhaust systems
- •7.16.1 Supply and Exhaust Fans
- •7.17 Testing, adjusting, and balancing of hvac systems
- •7.18 Ventilation adequacy
- •7.19 Laboratory fume hood performance criteria
- •7.20 Flow hoods
- •7.21 Thermoanemometers
- •7.22 Other velometers
Air sampling and industrial hygiene engineering. Martha j. Boss & Dennis w. Day
CHAPTER 4
Statistical Analysis and Relevance
This chapter contains theoretical and real-world discussions about statistical analysis. It gives special emphasis to situations where knowledge of statistical relevance is a prerequisite for sampling adequacy. It also illustrates the difference between log-normal and normal distribution and parametric monitoring data.
4.1 Definitions
In statistical analysis and relevance, certain standard definitions are used. The following standard definitions and examples illustrate the basic concepts.
• Accuracy: Agreement of the measured value (i.e., empirical value) and the "true value" (i.e., accepted reference value) of the sample given valid sampling tech niques, proper sample preparation, and reliable and accurate instrumentation . and/or other procedures.
Accuracy is often estimated by adding (or "spiking") known amounts of the target parameters. For asbestos quality assurance (QA) sampling, accuracy is evaluated by comparing analyses of duplicate samples that have been evaluated in proficiency in analytical testing (PAT) round robins (for air samples) or NIST National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) proficiency testing (for bulk and transmission electron microscopy [ТЕМ]).
Accuracy is a measure of the bias of the method and may be expressed as the difference between two values, a ratio, or the percentage difference.
Analysis: Combination of sample preparation and evaluation.
Audit: Systematic determination of the function or activity quality.
Bias: Systemic error either inherent in the method or caused by measurement sys tem artifacts or idiosyncrasies.
Blind sample: Presented to the laboratory as indistinguishable from field sam ples (syn: performance audit samples). All field blanks are to be presented to the laboratory as blind samples for asbestos air samples.
Calibration: Comparative procedure in which singular measurements are evalu ated against an accepted group of measurements. The evaluation may be against a primary, intermediate, or secondary standard.
Calibration curve: Range over which measurement can take place (syn: standard curve, multipoint calibration).
Calibration standard: Instruments or other measurement techniques used to evaluate the measurement system. Ideally, these standards do not directly incor porate or use the target parameters to be measured.
Chain-of-custody: Defined sample custody procedures that must be followed to document the transition from field collection to subsequent transfer sites (com mon carriers, laboratories, storage facilities, etc.).
Check standard: Used to verify that the initial standard or calibration curve remains in effect. It ideally incorporates standard materials (syn: daily standard, calibration check or standard, reference standard, control standard, single point response factor, single point drift check).
Comparability: Confidence with which one set of empirical data can be com pared to another.
Completeness: Amount of valid data obtained from a measurement system compared to the amount expected.
Data quality: Totality of data parameters that identify ability to satisfy or repre sent a given condition; includes accuracy, precision, representativeness, and com parability.
Data reduction: Using standard curves to interpret raw data.
Data validation: Review process that compares a body of data against a set of cri teria to provide data adequacy assurance given the data's intended use; includes data editing, screening, checking, auditing, verification, certification, and review.
Detection limit: Minimum target parameter quantity that can be identified, i.e., distinguished from background or "zero" signal.
Double-blind sample: When neither the composition nor identification of the sample is known to the analyst.
Duplicate sample (field or laboratory): Sample divided into two portions, with both portions carried through the sample preparation process at the same time. For asbestos air samples, field duplicates are air samples collected at the same time as the compliance air samples, and lab duplicates are portions of one filter that are fixed and analyzed separately.
Environmentally related measurements: Field or laboratory investigations that generate data involving chemical, physical, or biological parameters characteris tic of the environment.
Field blanks: Generated at the time of sampling, field blanks provide a check on contamination, starting with the sampling process and proceeding through the full analysis scheme. For asbestos fiber concentration sampling, field blanks are filter cassettes transported to the site and exposed to ambient conditions. The filter caps are removed from the filter cassettes; however, a vacuum air pump is not used to pull air across the filter cassettes. Thus, the cassettes are exposed to the environ mental airstream of the surrounding environment outside the asbestos control area.
Good laboratory practices: Performing a basic laboratory operation or activity so as not to influence data generation quality.
Instrument blank: Used to obtain information on instrument aberration absence/presence. The measurement instrument is presented with materials normally within the instrument and cycled through the measurement sequence. The resulting signal is then defined as the baseline instrument signal level.
Internal standard: A nontarget parameter added to samples just prior to measure ment to monitor variation in sample introduction and stability and to normalize
data for quantitation purposes. Internal standards are not usually used in bulk (phase light microscopy [PLM]) or phase contrast microscopy (PCM); however, these standards may be applicable to ТЕМ protocol.
Laboratory blank: Prepared in the laboratory after receipt of samples from the field. These blanks are prepared using a material assumed not to contain the target parameter. Lab blanks for asbestos sampling are filter membranes obtained from filter cassettes that have been retained in the laboratory without removal of the filter cassette caps. The lab blank is a check on all the chemicals and reagents used in the method as well as the influence of the general laboratory environment (syn: analytical blank, system blank, method blank, process blank). Measurement: Creating quantitative data from a prepared sample. Method check sample: Prepared in the laboratory by spiking a clean reference matrix with known quantities of the target parameters. For asbestos air-sampling analysis, method check samples are previously prepared filters evaluated by separate analysts within the same laboratory. These duplicate analyses are defined in the National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) 7400 method as quality assurance, and the acceptable statistical parameters are outlined therein. Method detection limit: Minimum quantity that a method (i.e., both sample preparation and target parameter measurement steps) can be expected to distinguish from background or "zero" signal. This limit takes into account losses during preparation and measurement and instrument sensitivity that may contribute to qualification or quantification of results. This limit does not apply to physical parameters (i.e., density, temperature).
Performance evaluation (PE) sample: Sample with known "true" values that is presented to the laboratory as a "performance evaluation sample." These samples are biased by the analyst's knowledge of the intent of the sample. For asbestos air-sampling analysis, "true" value samples may be defined as the PAT samples with their inclusive statistical ranges.
Precision: Measure of the reproducibility of a set of results obtained under similar conditions. Precision is determined by multiplicate analysis of samples, duplicates, replicates, or splits. Standard deviation is used as a measure of precision. Procedure: Systematic instructions and operations for using a method of sampling or measurement.
Proficiency sample: Samples for which known composition values are available for accuracy comparisons. The composition values may be qualitative, quantitative, or statistical ranges of acceptable qualitative/quantitative results. Quality assurance: An orderly assemblage of management policies, objectives, principles, and general procedures by which a laboratory outlines the methods used to produce quality data. QA is an intralaboratory function. Note: The NIOSH 7400 method defines QA in terms of both intralaboratory and interlabo-ratory methods and/or sequencing. However, for the purposes of specified QA/quality control (QC) documents, inter laboratory methods are defined as QC. Quality control: Routine application of procedures used to develop prescribed performance standards in the monitoring and measurement of standards. QC is an interlaboratory function.
QC samples: Analyzed concurrently with field samples to insure that analytical systems are operating properly, i.e., in control. These samples provide an estimate of the precision and accuracy of the sampling and analysis system. QC samples for asbestos sampling are sent between laboratories for interlaboratory comparisons of methodology and analytical proficiency.
Quality of method: Degree to which the method functions free of systemic error, bias, and random error.
Quantitation limits: Maximum and minimum levels or quantities of a reliably quantified target parameter. These limits are bounded by the standard curve lim its and are generally related to standard curve data.
Reagent blank: Used to identify contamination sources. These blanks incorpo rate specific reagents during sample preparation to identify lab blank contami nate sources (syn: dilution blank).
Recovery/percent recovery: Generally used to report accuracy based on the measurement of target parameters, comparison of these concentrations, and cor relating these measurements to the predicted amounts. Recovery in asbestos air sampling is the statistical percentage differential observed during accuracy eval uation (i.e., percentage difference in fiber concentrations).
Replicate samples (field or laboratory): A sample is divided into two portions and is processed as two completely separate and nonparallel samples, i.e., pre pared and analyzed at different times or by different people. Field replicates in asbestos air sampling are defined as filters that are obtained from two separate filter cassettes drawn separately or from a y-juncture. These are then transported, fixed, and analyzed separately. Lab replicates are taken from a singular filter, which is sectioned, fixed, and analyzed separately.
Representativeness: Degree to which data accurately and precisely represent a parameter variation characteristic at a sampling point and portray an environ mental condition.
Sample custody: Verification and documentation procedure for the transfer of samples from the field to the laboratory, within the laboratory, and to the final storage or disposal destination.
Sample Operation Procedure (SOP): Procedure adopted for repetitive use when performing a specific measurement or sampling operation.
Sample preparation: Transformation of the sample into appropriate forms for transfer and/or measurement.
Sampling: Removal of a process stream representative portion or a portion of a larger quantity of material for subsequent evaluation.
Sensitivity: An instrument's detection limit given the minimum quantity of a tar get parameter that can be consistently identified, i.e., distinguished from back ground or "zero" signal by the instrument; ideally established using the materials that are used for standardization.
Split samples (field or laboratory): A sample, divided into aliquots, that is sent to a different laboratory for preparation and measurement. These split samples may be replicates or duplicates that are then defined as splits when sent to another laboratory for QC analysis. For asbestos air samples this shipment involves either the shipping of capped filter cassettes (field split) or the shipping of fixed slides (lab split).
Standard materials: Materials, such as mixtures «of the target parameters at known concentration and purity, used to carry out standardizations. For asbestos air sampling these materials may be PAT samples.
Standardization: Establishing a quantitative relationship between known target parameters input and instrument readout.
Target parameters: Entity for which qualitative or quantitative information is desired.
• Trip blanks: Essentially field blanks that do not have the caps removed. These blanks provide insight into the contamination generated as a result of the shipping process. These blanks are generally not required for asbestos sample shipment.