
- •Introduction
- •Module 1. Classical Pragmatics
- •1. Basic Assumptions of Linguopragmatics
- •Issues Discussed:
- •Definition
- •Structural Ambiguity
- •Origins
- •Areas of Interest
- •Referential Uses of Language
- •Related Fields
- •Criticisms of Pragmatics
- •References
- •2. Speech Act
- •Issues Discussed:
- •J. L. Austin’s Taxonomy of Speech Acts
- •Speech Act and Language Development
- •Earlier Treatments of Speech Acts
- •Historical Critics of Speech Act Theory
- •References
- •3. Illocutionary Act
- •Issues Discussed:
- •Definition
- •Further examples:
- •Approaches to Defining "Illocutionary Act"
- •J. R. Searle’s Taxonomy of Illocutionary Speech Acts
- •Illocutionary Force
- •Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices
- •Illocutionary Negations
- •References
- •4. Indirect Speech Acts
- •Issues Discussed:
- •Definition
- •J. R. Searle's Theory of "Indirect Speech Acts"
- •Analysis Using Searle's Theory
- •References
- •5. Felicity Conditions
- •Issues Discussed:
- •Definition
- •Preparatory Conditions
- •Conditions for Execution
- •Sincerity Conditions
- •Felicity Conditions for Declarations
- •Felicity Conditions for Requests
- •Felicity Conditions for Warnings
- •References
- •6. K. Bach, r. Harnish and The Unified Theory
- •Issues Discussed:
- •K. Bach and r. Harnish on the Locutionary Acts
- •K. Bach and r. Harnish on the j. R. Searle’s Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts
- •Communicative Acts versus Conventional Acts
- •The Speech Act Schema
- •References
- •Module 2. Contemporary Pragmatics
- •7. Contemporary Pragmatic Theory and Two Models of Linguistic Communication
- •Issues Discussed:
- •Contemporary Pragmatic Theory
- •Two Models of Linguistic Communication
- •References
- •8. D. Sperber, d. Wilson and Relevance Theory
- •Issues Discussed:
- •Basic Assumptions of Relevance Theory
- •The Principles of Relevance
- •Implicated Premises and Conclusions
- •References
- •9. Levinson's Theory of Utterance-Type-Meaning
- •References
- •10. Literalists, Minimalists, Contextualists and Others
- •References
- •Module 1. Classical Pragmatics Seminar 1. Referential Uses of Language
- •Issues Discussed:
- •Definition of Sign
- •Dyadic Signs
- •Triadic Signs
- •Molino and Nattiez's diagram:
- •Modern Theories of Sign
- •Indexicality
- •Pragmatics and Indexicality
- •Ch. S. Peirce's Trichotomy of Signs
- •Referential Indexicality
- •Indexical Presupposition and Performativity
- •References
- •Tasks and Questions
- •Seminar 2. Non-Referential Uses of Language
- •Issues Discussed:
- •First, Second, and Higher Orders of
- •Sex/Gender Indices
- •Affect Indices
- •Deference Indices
- •T/V Deference Entitlement
- •Affinal Taboo Index
- •Hypercorrection as a Social Class Index
- •Multiple Indices in Social Identity Indexicality
- •Oinoglossia (‘Wine Talk’)
- •References
- •Tasks and Questions
- •Seminar 3. Performative Utterance
- •Issues Discussed:
- •Origin of the Term
- •J. L. Austin's Definition
- •Categories of Performatives
- •The “Hereby” Test
- •Distinguishing Performatives from Other Utterances
- •Are Performatives Truth-Evaluable?
- •E. Sedgwick's Account of Performatives
- •Some Examples (Mainly of Explicit Performative Utterances)
- •References
- •Tasks and Questions
- •Seminar 4. H. P. Grice and Theory of Conversation
- •Issues Discussed:
- •H. P. Grice’s Definition of Conversational Implicature
- •H. P. Grice’s Cooperative Principle and Conversational Maxims
- •Conversational Implicature and Its Characteristics
- •Conversational Implicature versus Conventional Implicature
- •Particularized and Generalized Conversational Implicatures
- •Other Types of Conversational Implicature
- •Implicature versus Entailment
- •H. P. Grice’s Theory of Meaning and Communicative Intentions
- •References
- •Tasks and Questions
- •Module 2. Contemporary Pragmatics Seminar 5. Near-Side Classical Pragmatics
- •Issues Discussed:
- •Indexicality
- •D. Kaplan on Indexicals and Demonstratives
- •Pragmatic Puzzles of Referentialism
- •R. Stalnaker on Context and Content
- •Presupposition, Common Ground and Context
- •Propositional Concepts
- •References
- •Tasks and Questions
- •Seminar 6. Politeness Theory
- •Issues Discussed:
- •Politeness and Its Types
- •Techniques to Show Politeness
- •Linguistic Devices to Show Politeness
- •P. Brown and s. Levinson’s Politeness Theory
- •Positive and Negative Face
- •Face-Threatening Acts
- •Negative Face Threatening Acts
- •Positive Face Threatening Acts
- •Politeness Strategies
- •Bald On-record
- •Positive Politeness
- •Negative Politeness
- •Choice of Strategy
- •Payoffs Associated with each Strategy
- •Sociological Variables
- •Social distance between parties (symmetric relation).
- •The absolute ranking of the threat of the fta.
- •Criticism of the Politeness Theory
- •G. Leech’s Politeness Maxims
- •The Tact Maxim
- •The Generosity Maxim
- •The Approbation Maxim
- •The Modesty Maxim
- •The Agreement Maxim
- •The Sympathy Maxim
- •References
- •Tasks and Questions
- •Seminar 7. Deixis
- •Issues Discussed:
- •Definition
- •Types of Deixis Traditional Categories
- •Other Categories
- •Discourse
- •Anaphoric Reference
- •Deictic Center
- •Usages of Deixis
- •Deixis and Indexicality
- •Tasks and Questions
- •Questions for Module Control 1
- •Questions for Module Control 2
- •References
- •Some Definitions of Pragmatics (versus Semantics)
- •Glossary
Historical Critics of Speech Act Theory
‘Speech Act Theory’ is a line of linguistic discourse developed by J. L. Austin in “How to Do Things with Words”, a compilation of a series of speeches that he made in 1955. These were published posthumously and further refined by J. R. Searle. Critical theorists in other areas of critical theory use speech act theory as a way of approaching aspects of their own discourse. It is used mainly in the fields of linguistics and philosophy, meaning that, in speaking, a person is doing so through a particular set of pre-set conventions. The basics of the theory centre on the idea that words, when placed together, do not always have a fixed meaning. Austin’s work has had many critics; David Gorman explains that many people have used his work without fully understanding its criticisms, and Austin’s main arguments have had only one notable follow up work, that by Searle in 1969 [9, p. 109]. Speech-act theory is a continuing discourse, still written about and criticised in hundreds of articles and books. Edward MacKinnon states that “the various conceptual systems we have indicated are only intelligible as extensions of an ordinary language framework” [10, p. 235], meaning that, as its basis, the theory must first have an already working or ‘ordinary’ set of rules that are indisputable and reliable.
References
Alston W. P. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning / William P. Alston. – Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2000.
Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words / John Langshaw Austin. – 2nd ed. – Cambridge (MA) : Harvard University Press, 2005.
Austin J. L. Performative Utterances / John Langshaw Austin // Philosophical Papers / [J. O. Urmson, G. J. Warnock (eds.)]. – Oxford : Clarendon, 1961.
Brock J. An Introduction to Peirce’s Theory of Speech Acts / Jarrett Brock // Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. – 1981. – vol. 17. – P. 319-326.
Bühler K. Die Axiomatik der Sprachwissenschaften / Karl Bühler // Kant-Studien. – 1933. – vol. 38.
Bühler K. Sprachteorie / Karl Bühler. – Jena : Fischer, 1934.
Doerge F. Ch. Illocutionary Acts – Austin’s Account and What Searle Made of It / Friedrich Christoph Doerge. – Tuebingen, 2006.
Dore J. Holophrases, Speech Acts and Language Universals / John Dore // Journal of Child Language. – 1975. – vol. 2. – P. 21-40.
Gorman D. The Use and Abuse of Speech-Act-Theory in Criticism / David Gorman // Poetics Today. – 1999. – vol. 20. – P. 93-119.
MacKinnon Ed. Language, Speech, and Speech-Acts / Edward MacKinnon // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. – 1973. – vol. 34 (2). – P. 224-238.
Mulligan K. Promising and Other Social Acts – Their Constituents and Structure / K. Mulligan // Speech Act and Sachverhalt : Reinach and the Foundations of Realist Phenomenology / K. Mulligan. – Nijhoff, Dordrecht / Boston / Lankaster, 1987.
Reid Th. Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind / Thomas Reid. – Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 1969.
Schuhmann K. Elements of Speech Act Theory in the Work of Thomas Reid / Karl Schuhmann, Barry Smith // History of Philosophy Quarterly. – 1990. – vol. 7. – P. 47-66.
Searle J. R. Indirect Speech Acts / John R. Searle // Pragmatics : A Reader / [S. Davis (ed.)]. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1991. – P. 265-277.
Smith B. Towards a History of Speech Act Theory / Barry Smith // Speech Acts, Meanings, and Intentions : Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle / Barry Smith. – Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter, 1990. – P. 29-61.