- •1. The subject of tg. Analytical character of english
- •2. The history of theoretical grammar development
- •3. Parts of speech. Different classifications
- •4. Functional parts of speech
- •5. Noun, its categories
- •6. Adjective. The category of degrees of comparison
- •7. Rronoun, its categories
- •8. Verb, classifications
- •9. Verb, the categories of tense and time-correlation
- •10. Verb, the categories of voice and aspect
- •12. Arguable questions of english morphology
- •13. The theory of phrase
- •14. Transformational generative grammar
- •15. Syntactic relations in a phrase, sentence, text
- •16. Sentence in transformational generative grammar
- •17. Simple sentence. Structural approach
- •18. Sentence in semantics
- •19. Sentence in pragmatics
- •20. Actual division of the sentence
- •21. Composite sentence: compound and complex sentences
- •22. Text grammar
10. Verb, the categories of voice and aspect
1. The catof VOICE (vc) expr the relations btw the subj & the obj of the action:
He invited his friends (doer) – He was invited by his friends (object)
2. Opp-n of active (weak) & passive (strong) vc. In coll speech, the role of the p-ve aux-ry may be performed by ‘get/become’. The freq-cy of usg of PVc in Eng is far greater than in Rus (‘cause the number of Vs capable of forming the Pvs is greater).
3. Debated: are there other vcs in Eng? 3 vcs may be suggested:
1)thereflexive (he dressed himself)2)reciprocal (they kissed e.o.) 3)middle(door opened
4.The catof ASPECT shows the manner in which the act-n is either performed or repr-ted
2 const-ts: common (cm; weak) & continuous (ct; strong) aspects.
Ct – an action as a process developing at a certain moment or a limited period of time.
Cm – just names the action.
5. Some linguists: no aspective mng in the cm form, ct – just one of the tense forms.
6. Usually ct not used with Vs denoting abstract rel-ns, sense perception, emotions. But
there’re numerous examples of such usage: the V changes its mng to denote either
an activity (I’m thinking of him) or the temporary char-r of the state (He’s being..)
7. Curme – 4 aspects:
1) durative (action as continuing – He’s eating)
2) point-action (calls attention to 1 point):
a) the ingressive type (begin/start + inf, get,grow,turn,become+pred adj, part-le
N or a prep-l phrase: He often gets sick)
b) the effective type (the final point: The two friends fell out)
3) terminative (action as a whole – He handed me a book. I overlooked a mistake)
4) iterative (indefinitely prolonged succession – He pooh-poohs at everything)
11. VERB, THE CATEGORY OF MOOD + OTHER TYPES OF EXPR MOD-TY
1. Mood (md) shows the degree of reality or possibility of an action. The verbal cat of md
serves to expr the speaker’s attitude towards the factuality of a state-of-affs as real
or hypothetical.
In ModEng this cat is decaying.The forms of the unreal md in many cases repl=modals
2. 2 groups of mds are dist-shed: real/fact mds & the unreal/non-fact/oblique mds.
3. a) The indic – the only real md in Eng; represents an action as a real fact. The forms =
the tense-aspect forms of the V. 2 non-fact mds:
b) The imper – advice, request, recommendation, order and so on. Stelling – the gram
idiom. One form only, without any suffix or ending.
c) The subj – an action as unreal (I wish I had known it).
4. Another app-ch – md: 3 const-ts (ind, subj I, subj II). They form a binary opp-n.mark
5. Prof. Smirnitsky – 6 mds:
1) indic (He came there) 2) imper (Read the letter!)
3) subj I (be/go for all prsns: I suggest that he go there. If it be so)
4) subj II ( were for all prsns, forms PS & PPS: I wish I were.. If I knew/had known)
5) suppositional(anal-l forms should/would + infin: Should u meet.., I sug that he sh
6) conditional(anforms sh/wd+inf in the main clause:what wd u do if y were asked?)
6. Other ways of indicating the reality or possibility of an action:
1. Lexico-syntactic means (comb-n of modal Vs may/might/can/could/sh/wd with the inf
If anything should happen I can take care of myself)
2. Lexical means (mod wds maybe, perhaps, possibly, probably;other wds (Ns, adjs, Vs)
of modal semantics: It’s time we were moving)
3. Syntactic types of sces or subordinate clauses (imper-ve; clauses intr-d by conjs as if/
as though, conditional, etc: Take it easy! She really looks as though she isn’t..
4. Diff com-ns of the above means.
5. Intonation, prosody.
