Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Методичка по лексикологии.doc
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.03.2025
Размер:
250.37 Кб
Скачать

1. The definition of synonyms

Synonyms are different words with similar or identical meanings. Their function in speech is to reveal different aspects, shades and variations of the same phenomenon. They add precision to each detail of description and may colour the whole text. A carefully chosen word from a group of synonyms is a great asset not only on the printed page but also in a speaker's utterance. It was Mark Twain who said that the difference between the right word and just the right word is the difference between the lightning and the lightning-bug.

2. Criteria of synonymy: we are still not certain which words should correctly be considered as synonyms. Linguists distinguish: conceptual criterion, semantic criterion, definitional analysis, the criterion of interchangeability.

3.Types of synonyms

The only existing classification system for synonyms established „ by Academician V. V. Vinogradov divides them into three types: ideographic, stylistic and absolute. However, some aspects of his classification system are open to question.

A more modern and a more effective approach to the classification of synonyms may be based on the definition describing synonyms as words differing in connotations. It seems convenient to classify connotations by which synonyms differ rather than synonyms themselves, ( See the lecture on Lexical Meaning)

4. The dominant synonym.

Euphemisms.

The dominant synonym is a "central" word of a synonymic group whose meaning is equal to the denotation common to all the synonymic group and which is characterized by: high frequency of usage, broad combinability, broad general meaning, lack of connotations.

Euphemisms are words instinctively avoided by people because they are considered indecent, indelicate, rude, too direct or

22

23

impolite. The "offensive" referents, for which these words stand for are described in a round­about way, by using substitutes due to social conventions.

Superstitious taboos gave rise to euphemisms based on a deeply-rooted subconscious fear. They have their roots in the distant past of mankind when people believed that there was a supernatural link between a name and the object or creature it represented. Therefore, all the words denoting evil spirits, dangerous animals, or the powers of nature were taboo.

Euphemisms are probably the oldest type of synonyms.

5. Antonymy Antonyms can be defined as 2 or more words of the same language belonging to the same part of speech and to the same semantic field, identical in style and nearly identical in distribution, associated and often used together so that their denotative meanings render contradictory or contrary notions.

Antonymy is not evenly distributed among the categories of parts of speech. Most antonyms are adjectives. Verbs take second place, then come nouns and adverbs.

The important question of criteria received a new treatment in V.N. Komissarov's work. According to him, 2 words shall be considered A if they are regularly contrasted in actual speech, i.e. if the contrast in their meanings is proved by definite types of contextual co-occurrence.

Another important criterion suggested by him is the possibility of substitution and identical lexical valence. Classification:

l)Contradictory/ contrary;

2)Gradable / complementary;

3)According to the morphological

approach absolute (root)/ derivational.

Phraseology 1. Phraseological units as word

groups with transferred meanings.

In the system of vocabulary besides words as single items we find units represented by word combinations traditionally called phraseological units (Academician V.V. Vinogradov's term). There are some other terms denoting more or less the

24

25

same linguistic phenomenon: idioms, set-expressions, set-phrases, fixed word-groups, collocations.

They are included in the vocabulary stock as they convey the integrated indivisible meaning of a whole and are reproduced ready-made. There are two major criteria for distinguishing between ph.u. and free word-groups: semantic, structural. The latter finds expression in a number of restrictions (restriction in substitution, restriction in introducing any additional components into the structure and grammatical invariability.