Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Методичка по лексикологии.doc
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.03.2025
Размер:
250.37 Кб
Скачать

4. Development of new meanings Causes:

1) Historical/ extra-linguistic - changes in a nation's social life, culture, knowledge, technology, arts. New objects, concepts, phenomena must be named.

2) Linguistic - influence of other words, mostly synonyms

Semantic Process (transference):

1) Transference based on resemblance (similarity) - metaphor. A new meaning is a result of associating 2 objects due to their outward similarity.

2) Transference based on contiguity - metonymy. It is based on psychological links b/w different objects and phenomena: common situations, a part and a whole, cause and effect, common function, material and object made of it.

Results

  1. Broadening (generalization) -narrowing (specialization)

  2. Degeneration (degradation) -elevation of a referent.

16

17

Polysemy as a Means of Secondary Nomination

1. The nature of polysemy

Both language and vocabulary reflect reality in the way peculiar to human language alone. The main task of the latter is to draw the notional picture of the world in lexical meanings. Within language there have developed the phenomena which reveal the intrinsic characteristics of language units and disclose the basic principles of their structure. Among such 1-ge categories we find polysemy (P), i.e. the ability of a word to have several related meanings at a time.

In terms of the theory of signs it means that 1 and the same plane of expression corresponds to a number of planes of content.

A peculiar relationship b/w separate meanings within word structures specifies P as a purely 1-ge category, another means of secondary nomination.

2. A lexico-semantic variant (lsv), its notion

Members of a word structure related in their meanings are called LSVs (Pr. Smirnitsky's term): signs which are identical

18

in all features but their lexical meanings. The extent of their semantic difference is confined to variation only, the idea of variation suggests the presence of a certain common component of meaning (invariant part) in all LSVs of a word.

Linguistic analysis shows that the invariant part of meanings may be presented as:

1. The whole content of the basic direct LSV;

2. part of the basic meaning in either the centre of the other or on their periphery;

  1. a certain common part of meaning contained by all LSVs of the same polysemantic word;

  2. The common semantic part may be latent or implied.

3. Types of relations b/w LSVs

The interconnection b/w the members of the polysemantic structure falls into 3 types: 1. Subordination reveals the hierarchical arrangement of a number of units which are dependent due to the semantic component on the basic direct nominative LSV as derived and figurative. It expresses itself in 2 types:

19

- Irradiation when all the units depend on the basic one, Concatenation which means the chain coexistence of meanings, the dependence of each on the preceeding one.

  1. Coordination means the semantic equalityof the units, their relative autonomy and independence of each other.

  2. Mixed type which is characterized by the presence of both S and С

Among the notional classes P is most typical of the verb. The adjective ranks the second, the noun is least of all polysemantic. 4. Types of LSVs

  1. the way of naming - direct/ figurative

  2. the dependence of one on the other - basic/ derived

3. etymologically - primary/ secondary, modern/ archaic

4. abstract/ concrete 5.logical/ emotional 6.general/particular 7.frequent/ rare

8.neutral/ stylistically marked 9.common/ dialectal

Types of Modern English Homonymy 1. The definition of homonyms-Homonyms (homos '4he same" and onoma "name") are words which are identical in sound and spelling, or, at least, in one of these aspects, but different in their meaning.

As for their stylistic function they are accidental creations, and therefore purposeless. In the process of communication they lead sometimes to confusion and misunderstanding and are one of the most important sources of popular humour. From the point of view of their morphological structure they are mostly one-morpheme words.

2. The origin of homonyms: phonetic changes, borrowings, word-building (conversion, shortening, sound-imitation), split polysemy.

3. Classification of homonyms The most widely accepted

classification is that recognizing homonyms proper, homophones and homographs.

According to their part of speech belonging Professor A. I. Smirnitsky classified homonyms into two large classes: I. full homonyms, II. partial homonyms (simple

20

21

lexico-grammatical partial homonyms, complex lexico-grammatical partial

homonyms, partial lexical homonyms).

Problems of English Synonyms and Antonyms