
- •Вінницький державний педагогічний університет імені михайла коцюбинського
- •“Теоретична граматика англійської мови”
- •Пояснювальна записка
- •What is language (Definitions)
- •Objectives of Linguistics
- •Human language peculiarities
- •3.2 Communicative versus informative
- •3.3 Unique properties of the human language
- •Study questions
- •What is language (Definitions)
- •The Longman Dictionary defines it as:
- •Objectives of Linguistics
- •3.1. Human language peculiarities
- •Communicative versus informative
- •Unique properties of the human language
- •Displacement
- •Arbitrariness
- •Productivity
- •Cultural transmission
- •Discreteness
- •Duality
- •Other properties
- •Study questions
- •Competence and performance
- •1. The scope of grammar
- •2. Types of grammar
- •3. Grammatical analysis
- •4. Methods of linguistic analysis
- •4.1 Oppositional analysis
- •4.2. Distributional analysis
- •4.3 Ic analysis
- •4.4 Transformational analysis
- •The notion of grammatical opposition
- •2. Transposition of grammatical forms
- •3.Polysemy, homonymy and synonymy in grammar
- •Polysemy
- •Homonymy
- •3.3 Synonymy
- •I came I did come
- •1. General Characteristics of the Word and Word Structure
- •Morphemes and Morphs: Boundaries between Morphemes and Morphs
- •3.Word as a Linguistic Unit
- •4.Lexical and Grammatical Words
- •5.Words and Lexemes
- •E.G. Consider the pairs
- •Study questions and tasks
- •Basic assumptions of external linguistic analysis
- •1. The domains of grammatical studies
- •2. Basic assumptions of the external analysis
- •2.1 Communicative and expressive functions
- •2.2 Linguistic signs: types and properties
- •2.3 Sign systems
- •Index Icon Symbol
- •3. Communicative context
- •4. Language and Thought
- •1. System and Structure
- •Identify predication lines to divide the sentence into constituent parts.
- •Make a scheme to show the relations between sentence parts.
- •Define the constituents of each sentence.
- •1. Provide extended answers to the following questions:
- •2. Explain the following statement:
- •3. Match the parts of the statements to characterize the linguistic notions under consideration
- •Seminar 4
- •The language-particular level and the general level.
- •Grammaticalisation.
- •Prototypical and non-prototypical grammatical categories.
- •2. Grammaticalisation
- •3. Prototypical and non-prototypical grammatical categories
- •Contents Lecture Materials
5.Words and Lexemes
Syntax deals with combinations of words, as far as morphology studies the form of words. The term 'word', however, is used in a variety of senses, so that it will be helpful to begin with some clarification. Consider the sentences This tooth needs attention and These teeth need attention. Are tooth and teeth instances of the same word or of different words? In one sense they are clearly different: they differ in pronunciation, spelling, meaning and in their grammatical behaviour. In another sense, however, they are manifestations of a single element, and indeed they are traditionally said to be 'forms of the same word.
We thus have two distinct concepts here, the second more abstract than the first: so the word is often used in the less abstract sense and then it’s necessary to introduce the term lexeme for the more abstract one. If we say that tooth and teeth are different words, but forms of the same lexeme. Words will be represented in ordinary italics, lexemes in bold italics: tooth is the singular form of the lexeme tooth, while teeth is its plural form.
More precisely, we will say that tooth and teeth are different inflectional forms of tooth, and will speak of "singular and 'plural' here as inflectional properties.
Similarly with verbs: sang and sung, for example, are respectively the past tense and past participle forms of the lexeme sing. The set of inflectional forms of a lexeme constitutes an inflectional paradigm: the paradigm for tooth contains the two forms tooth and teeth, while that for sing contains sang, sung, sing and various others as the verb inflection is a good deal more complex than noun inflection.
The distinction we have drawn between word and lexeme makes our concept of word more precise, but there remains one further point to be clarified.
E.G. Consider the pairs
[The window was] clean and [I'll] clean [the window]
[She drew some cash from the] bank [by the post office]
and [She lay on the] bank [of the river]
The two cleans are forms of different lexemes: the first is a form of the adjective clean, which has cleaner and cleanest as its other forms, whereas the second is a form of the verb clean, which has cleaned, cleans, etc., as its other forms. The difference between the two banks is lexical rather than grammatical: they are different lexical items - i.e. different items of the vocabulary. I will distinguish between the term word used without qualification and lexicogrammatical word in such a way that the former does not presuppose any lexical or grammatical analysis while the latter does. Given this terminology, the two cleans or the two banks will be instances of the same word but of different lexicogrammatical words. We have more occasion to talk simply of words than of lexicogrammatical words.
The structure of the entire word may be represented by means ol either a sel <rf labeled brackets or a tree diagram, (Brackets and trees are also used to represent the structures of sentences).
The two types. of notation are for the most part interchangeable
N
V
V
Adj
N
De nation al ize ation
CF
[[[hospital]N ize]V ed]V
Both ways indicate the details of the morphological structure of the word.