- •Lexicology
- •1. Lexicology as a science
- •2. Problems of Lexicology Modern English Lexicology studies the problems of:
- •Practical Importance
- •3. Semasiology
- •1. Word meaning.
- •2. Types of meaning.
- •3. Meaning and motivation.
- •Motivation
- •The structure of lexical meaning. Polysemy
- •Semantic structure
- •Patterns of meaning derivation
- •Other sematic relations of words
- •Homonymy
- •Synonyms
- •Antonyms
- •English vocabulary as a system and semantic rules
- •9. Types of semantic relations.
- •Inclusion. Hyponymic structures.
- •10. Semantic classification of words. Synonymy.
- •Classification:
- •11. Lexical and Terminological Sets, Lexico-Semantic Groups and Semantic fields.
- •12. Antonymy. Classification of antonyms.
- •14. Morphemes. Classification of morphemes. Types of meaning in morphemes. Types of word-segmentability.
- •Types of meaning in morphemes Word-formation
- •1. Various types and ways of forming words
- •2 Principal types of word-formation
- •1) Vowel - interchange (ablaut)
- •2) Consonant – interchange
- •2. Affixation
- •Suffixation.
- •Classification:
- •1) Neutral
- •2) With a certain stylistic value:
- •Prefixation
- •Classification:
- •Social Variation of the English Language
- •Gender Issues
1) Neutral
-able (agreeable), -er (writer), -ing (meeting);
2) With a certain stylistic value:
-oid (asteroid), -tron (cyclotron).
These suffixes occur usually in terms and are bookish.
Prefixation
Prefixation is the formation of words with the help of prefixes.
Prefixes are derivational morphemes affixed before the derivational base.
Prefixes modify the lexical meaning of the base. They seldom shift words from one part of speech into another and therefore both of the source word and its prefixed derivative mostly belong to the same part of speech.
to write – to rewrite
Classification:
I. According to the lexico-grammatical character of the base prefixes are usually added to:
1) deverbal prefixes (those added to the verbal base);
re- (rewrite); over- (overdo); out- (outstay)
2) denominal prefixes (those added to the nominal base);
un- (unbutton), de- (detrain), ex- (ex-president)
3) deadjectival prefixes (those added to the adjectival base)
en- (eneasy); bi- (biannual).
II. According to the class of words they preferably form:
1) verb-forming
en-/em- (embed, enclose); be- (befriend); de- (dethrone).
2) noun-forming
non- (non-smoker); sub- (sub-committee); ex- (ex-husband).
3) adjective-forming
un- (unfair); il- (illiterate); ir- (irregular).
4) adverb-forming:
un- (unfortunately); up- (uphill).
!!! The majority of prefixes function in more than one part of speech.
III. Semantically:
1) monosemantic
“ex-“ has only one meaning – “former” – ex-boxer.
2) polysemantic
“dis-“ has 4 meanings:
- “not” (disadvantage);
- “reversal or absence of an action or state” (diseconomy, disaffirm);
- “removal of” (to disbranch);
- “completeness of intensification of an unpleasant action” (disgruntled).
IV. According to their generalizing denotational meaning:
1) negative
un- (ungrateful);
non- (nonpolitical)
in- (incorrect)
dis- (disloyal)
a- (amoral)
2) pejorative
mis- (mispronounce)
mal- (maltreat)
pseudo- (pseudo-scientific)
3) prefixes of time and order
fore- (foretell)
pre- (pre-war)
post- (post-war)
ex- (ex-president)
4) prefix of repetition
re- (rebuilt, rewrite)
5) locative prefixes
super- (superstructure)
sub- (subway)
inter- (inter-continental)
trans- (transatlantic)
V. According to their stylistic reference:
1) neutral
over- (oversee)
under- (underestimate)
un- (unknown)
2) with quite a definite stylistic value
pseudo- (pseudo-classical)
super- (superstructure)
ultra- (ultraviolet)
uni- (unilateral)
bi- (bifocal).
These prefixes are of a literary-bookish character.
Social Variation of the English Language
Social language variation deals with different identities a person acquires participating in social structure. Hence social language variation provides an answer to the questions “Who are you?” and “What are you?” People belong to different social groups and perform different social roles. A person might be identified as “a women”, “a parent”, “a doctor”, “a political activist” or in many other ways. Any of these identities can have consequences for the kind of language people use. Indeed, it is usually language – much more than clothing, furnishing, or other externals – which is the chief signal of both permanent and transparent aspects of a person’s social identity.
Certain aspects of social variation seem to be of particular linguistic consequence. Age, sex, and socioeconomic class have been repeatedly shown to be of importance when it comes to explaining the way sounds, grammatical constructions, and vocabulary vary. Adopting a social role invariably involves a choice of appropriate linguistic forms.
