- •Executive Summary
- •Box K1.1. Why is innovation important?
- •Box K1.2. Incremental and radical innovation
- •Figure 1.1. Driving forces of innovation
- •Table 1.1. Innovation style at different stages of the firm
- •Table 1.2. Closed innovation versus open innovation principles
- •Table 1.3. The benefits of collaboration
- •Figure 1.2. Structure of the national innovation system
- •Box K1.3. Public-private partnerships for innovation
- •Table 1.4. Options for improving the functioning of an innovation system
- •Box K1.4. The public sector role as coordinator
- •Box K1.5. Innovation Agencies and Innovation Councils
- •Executive Summary
- •A. The importance of framework conditions
- •Box K2.1. Entrepreneurship as a driver of innovation
- •B. Local and regional dimensions
- •Box K2.2. Are local factors still relevant?
- •Box K2.3. Codified and tacit knowledge
- •C. The role of the business environment
- •Box C2.3. Good practices in company formation
- •Table 2.3. Basic principles in the organization and delivery of business services
- •Box K2.4. What is R&D and why it matters?
- •Table 2.4. Principles of designing tax incentives for R&D in firms
- •Figure 2.2. Eligibility of UK companies for R&D tax incentives
- •Table 2.5. Direct funding and tax incentives for R&D
- •Figure 2.3. Funding requirements lifecycle
- •Table 2.6. Taxonomy of types of support for early-stage companies
- •Executive Summary
- •A. Identifying industry-science linkages and the forms of public support
- •Figure 3.1. How the public and private sector can join forces in support of innovation
- •Table 3.1. Different categories and forms of industry-science relations
- •B. Supporting industry-science linkages at different stages of the innovation process
- •Table 3.2. Industry-science relations (ISR) and the institutional setting in public science
- •Table 3.3. Responsible Partnership Guidelines for Collaborative Research
- •Table 3.4. The types of technology that lead to spin-outs or established firm licenses
- •Executive Summary
- •A. Innovation support institutions and firms’ innovation activities
- •Table 4.1. Types of innovation support institutions
- •B. Business incubators
- •Box K4.1. What is a business incubator?
- •Box K4.2. Pre-incubation
- •Table 4.2. Performance evaluation: definition of key evaluation issues
- •Table 4.3. Performance evaluation: Definition of key performance evaluation indicators
- •C. Science and technology parks
- •Box K4.4. Different definitions of science parks
- •Table 4.5. Four science park models: Main features
- •Table 4.6. Profile of a typical North American university research park
- •D. Innovation clusters
- •Box K4.5. The main features of innovation clusters
- •Table 4.7. An illustrative framework for cluster monitoring, benchmarking and evaluation
76 Policy Options and Practical Instruments
___________________________________________________________________________
•The park may be a not-for-profit or for-profit entity owned wholly or partially by a university or a university related entity. Alternatively, the park may be owned by a non-university entity but have a contractual or other formal relationship with a university, including joint or cooperative ventures between a privately developed research park and a university.
•Typically, science and technology parks serve the post-incubator phase of company development or provide a launch pad for companies that are "spun out" from a university or company.
•Science and technology parks are important agents in industry-science linkages. Thanks to their nature, they can facilitate both the establishment of business relationships fostering the diffusion of innovation and the formation of partnership relationships with industry.
•An innovation cluster is a system of close links between firms and their suppliers and clients, and knowledge institutions, resulting in the generation of innovation. The cluster includes companies that both cooperate and compete among themselves. The links between firms are both vertical, through buying and selling chains, and horizontal, through having complementary products and services, and use similar specialized inputs, technologies or institutions, and other linkages.
•Most of the linkages that shape a cluster involve social relationships or networks that produce benefits for the firms involved. Clusters become even more visible and attractive if they have strong linkages with related clusters in other regions and countries.
•Clusters are based on relationships among firms. The relationships can be built on common or complementary products, production processes, core technologies, natural resource requirements, skill requirements, and/or distribution channels.
•Cluster initiatives are organized efforts to increase the growth and competitiveness of clusters within a region, involving cluster firms, the government and/or the research community.
A. Innovation support institutions and firms’ innovation activities
The role of innovation support institutions
•Innovation support institutions are public, or private, or public-private institutions that provide support to start-up innovating entrepreneurs in commercializing their innovation and bringing it to the market.
Enhancing the Innovative Performance of Firms |
77 |
___________________________________________________________________________
•Some institutions provide public financial and/or in-kind support to start-up ventures. However, this support is of one-off nature: at a certain point of time firms are expected to “grow up” and take care of themselves; those that fail to achieve financial viability within the established time limits will exit the market.
•All innovation support institutions provide (commercial or free) business services (such as couching, consulting, managerial or administrative services) to innovating entrepreneurs.
•Another important role of these institutions is in facilitating linkages between the potential key stakeholders of a project. They help in connectivity and networking both within the institution but also with the outside environment.
The system of innovation support institutions is very broad and may include various bodies
(see also Box 4.1.):26
•Awareness raising and public information institutions;
•Information brokerage institutions (technology forums, fairs, networking institutions, etc.);
•Management training and consulting centres, including centres for entrepreneurship
•Innovation intermediaries (technology transfer offices, information centres at universities, etc.);
•Couching centres and consulting offices;
•Business incubators and pre-incubators;
•Science parks and technological parks; and
•Innovation clusters.
26 Innovation support institutions also include different public and private funding agencies providing early stage financing to innovative firms. For policy options regarding these institutions see ECE/CECI/7.
78 Policy Options and Practical Instruments
___________________________________________________________________________
Box C4.1. Innovation support institutions in Poland
The institutional infrastructure supporting innovation in Poland includes universities, the Polish Academy of Sciences, other research and development units, supporting public bodies such as the Polish Agency for Enterprise Development, the Industry Development Agency, the FIRE Innovation Centre, and a network of innovation support institutions. The number of such institutions has been growing steadily in recent years (see Chart below)
Chart. Number of innovation support centres in Poland, 1990-2007
In mid-2007, there were 694 innovation support centres in Poland:
•326 training and consulting centres
•87 technology-transfer and information centres
•49 pre-incubators
•84 local and regional guarantee funds
•64 credit funds
•6 seed capital funds
•47 entrepreneurship incubators
•16 technology incubators
•15 technology parks
•13 cluster initiatives.
This chapter provides some policy options for raising the efficiency of some of these innovation support institutions, namely those that are in the later chain aimed at supporting the bringing of innovations to the market. Three main types of innovation support institutions are discussed below: business incubators, science and technology parks and innovation clusters. While these institutions have many things in common, there are also distinct differences among them (Table 4.1). In reality, however, institutions often incorporate mixed features (e.g. incubators can have features of science or technology parks and vice versa).
Enhancing the Innovative Performance of Firms |
79 |
___________________________________________________________________________
Table 4.1. Types of innovation support institutions
Type of institution |
|
|
|
|
Main features |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
• A focus on growth-oriented start-up firms |
|
||||||||||
|
• A process |
to |
help |
firms |
establish |
and |
grow |
|||||
|
|
successfully |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
• Providing |
a |
range |
of |
services |
including |
||||||
|
|
communications, office equipment and a business |
||||||||||
Business incubators |
|
development programme tailored to the needs of |
||||||||||
|
the market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
• |
Often involving common buildings, at least as a |
||||||||||
|
|
hub for broader activities |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
• |
Varied models suited to local conditions, ranging |
||||||||||
|
|
from highly intensive services for a small number |
||||||||||
|
|
of firms to less intensive services for a larger |
||||||||||
|
|
number of firms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
• Linked with educational or research institutions |
|||||||||||
|
• Provides |
infrastructure |
and |
support |
services for |
|||||||
|
|
businesses, particularly real estate and office space |
||||||||||
|
• Performs a technology transfer function |
|
||||||||||
Science and technology parks |
• |
Accommodates also large and established |
||||||||||
|
|
businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
• Sometimes |
involves |
business incubation of new |
|||||||||
|
|
companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
• |
May focus upon a particular industry, or be more |
||||||||||
|
|
general in nature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
• |
Geographic concentration – spatial proximity of |
||||||||||
|
|
businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
• |
Specialization around a core activity to which all |
||||||||||
|
|
actors relate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
• |
Multiple actors, including firms, public |
||||||||||
|
|
authorities, academia, members of the financial |
||||||||||
Innovation clusters |
|
sector and collaborative institutions |
|
|
||||||||
• |
Competition and cooperation between the actors |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
• Critical |
mass |
to achieve |
the |
necessary |
inner |
||||||
|
|
dynamics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
• The cluster life cycle with a long term perspective |
|||||||||||
|
• |
Innovation, with firms in the cluster involved in |
||||||||||
|
|
technological, |
commercial |
or |
organizational |
|||||||
|
|
change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Incubator Toolkit, iDISC - the infoDev Incubator Support Center (http://www.idisc.net/en/ToolkitPrint.aspx).