
- •Tapescripts
- •Introduction
- •Aviation English
- •Part I English in Aviation communication
- •Dreams take flight
- •Concorde - end of an era?
- •Deal could revive supersonic flights
- •Airbus 350 cleared for take-off
- •International aviation and space shows
- •The flight crew
- •The Flight Deck
- •Reducing fuel burn on the md-11
- •Sukhoi Superjet 100
- •Air Traffic Control
- •Air traffic controllers
- •Controller-pilot data link communication
- •Free flight
- •Recommendations for air traffic controllers
- •At the Airport
- •A modern airport
- •A Variety of Airport jobs
- •Controlling the planes
- •Airport transport and vehicle
- •Truck collapse leads to delay
- •Welcome aboard
- •Recommendations for pilots
- •Cabin staff
- •Services on board singapore Airlines launches Connexion-based live tv
- •Onboard cellphone
- •Bad passenger behaviour
- •Plane diverted after passenger attacks crew
- •1. First Aid
- •Medical care in air
- •Doctor’s recommendations
- •Potential health risks for pilots
- •Aerodrome forecasts
- •Flying forecast
- •Meteorological hazards
- •Volcanic ash
- •Wind shear and turbulence alerts at Hong Kong International Airport
- •Bird strike hazard
- •Border collies prove effective in controlling wildlife at airports
- •Cabin safety
- •Flight hazards
- •The effect of fatigue on performance and safety
- •Decision-making and Team performance
- •Emergency landing
- •European inspection programme targets aircraft during airport turnarounds
- •Turnaround
- •Aircraft security. The threat of terrorism
- •Hijackers escape
- •Security alert
- •Collision course
- •The runway collision at Paris Charles de Gaulle airport
- •Kegworth crash
- •Flying fur
- •Steps to eliminate runway incursions
- •Recommendations for pilots and controllers
- •The taxi phase should be treated as a critical phase of flight
- •General phraseology and guidance in the uk
- •Recommendations for Pilots:
- •How to be a safe pilot
- •What communication skills mean
- •Plane's mayday call missed due to pilot's poor English
- •Effective Communication
- •Recommendations for pilots and controllers
- •Linguistic problems of aviation english
- •Confusingly related words
- •Part II. English for everyday communication
- •A pilot by passengers’ eyes
- •Flight attendants
Border collies prove effective in controlling wildlife at airports
Using of collie dogs is a relatively new method of reducing populations of birds and other wildlife that may be hazardous to aircraft operations at airports.
The Border collie dogs can be found on the airfield itself, patrolling and keeping birds and other wildlife at a safe distance.
Several years ago, the only dogs found at airports across the world were those employed as customs and police agents, assisting airport officers in detecting bombs, contraband, weapons and other illegal or dangerous items.
Today Border collies serve as an effective means of wildlife control in airport environments. Airports attract large numbers of birds and deer. Many wildlife dispersal methods seek to imitate predators but become ineffective as the birds or deer habituate to the stimulus.
Border collies, however, are true predators and prevent habituation. Border collies may be less effective against smaller bird species, such as swallows and dunlins, and they do not prevent gulls and other birds from overflying the airport or raptors from hunting on the airport.
The Border collie dogs are more effective against big birds. The dogs can prevent pairs of cranes from nesting or roosting; waterfowl and wading birds are flushed by dogs in open areas.
Results of the wildlife control programme at Dover airport, which introduced Border collies, demonstrated that an essential percentage of large birds were excluded from the air base and the surrounding farmlands. So the number of bird strikes to aircraft dropped.
Border collies require daily work and exercise. Qualified dogs are expensive. But they are very effective, that’s why they should be considered as one method of control to be used in combination with other wildlife control procedures.
Unit 8. Hazardous conditions in flight. Threat and error management
42 Exercise 1.
Cabin safety
Threat categories
Applying the threat and error management (TEM) model to cabin operations, threats can be classified in five broad categories, as described below.
The first of these categories, operational threats, includes elements such as adverse weather. Turbulence, for instance, is a threat to cabin safety that may result in injuries to passengers or cabin crew if the cabin and galley are not properly secured or if passengers are not seated in a timely manner. Among other operational threats affecting cabin crew are time constraints, unfamiliar cabins or galley configurations, flight diversions and abnormal operational events such as rejected take-offs.
Another category, flight deck threats, concerns events originating on the flight deck, or more specifically errors made by the flight crew. In high-workload situations, for example, pilots may omit to inform the cabin crew of anticipated turbulence.
Crew support threats include errors made by maintenance personnel, ground crew or dispatch personnel. Faulty equipment that has not been repaired, errors in passenger load paperwork, or omissions about cabin abnormalities in the defect logbook, can all produce situations that require cabin crew threat management.
Aircraft threats involve malfunctions that can compromise cabin safety. Equipment malfunctions or abnormalities, such as an overheating oven, are typical of the threats in this category. Communication system problems, such as the failure of the public address system or interphone, can diminish cabin safety.
Passenger threats: Safety can also be endangered by passengers who are violent, abusive or intoxicated, or who disregard instructions from the cabin crew. Passengers may attempt to smoke in the lavatories or try unlawfully to enter the flight deck. These situations pose threats to safety that require management by the cabin crew. Passenger threats not only have the potential to reduce safety, but may cause distractions that result in cabin crew errors.
43 Exercise 2.